CachexiaPRIMsNCT05899205
Patient Recorded Indexing Measurements
An observational study of Cachexia and Cancer, run by Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht at 2 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: One of the greatest challenges in the field of cancer treatment is cachexia, a multifactorial syndrome characterized by substantial loss of body weight (muscle and fat mass), leading to progressive functional impairment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cachexia, Cancer, Weight, Body
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2021to 1 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults, requiring neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or curative-intent surgery for cancer
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18
- Diagnosed with cancer
- Planned for curative-intent surgery or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Who cannot join
- ASA-classification V,
- severe liver cirrhosis Child grade C,
- end stage renal disease requiring dialysis,
- severe heart disease New York Heart Association class IV,
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring (home)oxygen therapy,
- Patients must be "mobile". They may not be bedridden or in a wheelchair.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Netherlands2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Maastricht University Medical Center+
Maastricht, 6200MD
Nicole Hildebrand, M.D., nicole.hildebrand@mumc.nl
- Recruiting
Zuyderland Medical Center
Sittard, 6162 BG
M Sosef, M.D., PhD, +31884597777, s.rensen@maastrichtuniversity.nl
About this study
Rationale: One of the greatest challenges in the field of cancer treatment is cachexia, a multifactorial syndrome characterized by substantial loss of body weight (muscle and fat mass), leading to progressive functional impairment. Cancer cachexia significantly impairs quality of life and survival as well as treatment outcome. Despite its considerable relevance for the prognosis of cancer patients, the diagnosis of cachexia is problematic. The current consensus definition of cancer cachexia is based on weight loss over the last six months. In practice, this is assessed by subjective reporting by the patient, which is subject to error and bias. Novel technologies enable accurate, standardized, and objective assessment of body weight and physical activity by newly diagnosed cancer patients in the home situation. Because of the increasing implementation of neo-adjuvant treatment strategies that offer an extended time-window for the collection of these data, there is a great opportunity to use this information in risk analyses by treating physicians, optimization of pre-habilitation programs, and in the shared-decision making process with the patient.
Objective: The central aim of the 'Patient-Recorded Indexing MeasurementS' (PRIMS) study is to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of cachexia in patients with cancer. This aim will be achieved by focusing on two objectives. The primary objectives are to compare self-reported and objectively measured pre-treatment weight change. The secondary objectives are to define host phenotypes and to investigate longitudinal associations between body weight and physical activity patterns.
Read more
Study design: Explorative pilot study
Study population: Patients ≥18 years old undergoing curative-intent chemotherapy or surgery for cancer. Patients will be included in two referral centers specialized in treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, colorectal, and ovarian cancer.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is body weight change over time. Objectively measured body weight will be compared to subjectively reported body weight change. Their respective association with treatment-related adverse events and survival will be investigated. Survival will be calculated from date of start of treatment until death. Chemotherapy related adverse event will be recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Postoperative adverse events will be scored according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Secondary endpoints: The secondary endpoints will be the association between other cachexia-related parameters that are investigated in the study and adverse events / survival. Other parameters include physical activity over time, using accelerometry, baseline physical assessment, anthropometric measurements, body composition, and laboratory results. Besides this, other endpoints that will be assessed are disease-free survival (calculated from the first day of treatment until first recurrence) and response to chemotherapy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
Read the detailed description
Patients undergoing curative-intent chemotherapy or surgery for cancer will be included. All types of cancer might be included. To date, the two participating centers are referral hospitals focused on the care of hepatobiliary, pancreatic, upper-GI, colorectal, and ovarian cancer.
Upon informed consent, patients will undergo extensive pre-treatment screening. The screening consists of physical assessment and anthropometric measurements. The physical assessment consists of a modified steep-ramp test, 30-second chair stand test, handgrip strength, timed-up-and-go-test, and 2-minute walk test. For anthropometric measurements the study personnel will measure current BMI (kg/m^2), waist circumference (cm), upper arm circumference (cm), triceps skinfold (mm), and wrist circumference (cm). Upper arm muscle and fat area (cm^2) will be calculated based on triceps skinfold and upper arm circumference.
All measurements will be performed by a trained physiotherapist or nurse practitioner, if available. The study team will also be trained to perform measurements.
Moreover, body composition will be measured at baseline and after treatment. Body composition will be assessed at the level of the third lumbar level (L3) where both processi transversi are visible. Body composition analysis will be performed using an automated segmentation algorithm (MosaMatic (TM) ). The assessed areas are skeletal muscle, visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue. For each area indices (cm^2/m^2) corrected for body length and radiation attenuation (HU) will be measured.
Laboratory results include, but are not limited to, C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L), lymphocyte count, albumin (g/L), HbA1c, haemoglobin, CRP, TNF-α, interleukin-6, blood lipids, and additional parameters related to inflammation
Then, patients receive a weight scale for daily at-home measurements of body weight and an accelerometer for assessing physical activity. Body weight data will be collected using an electronic weight scale with integrated memory SD cards for automated autonomous storage of data (CE licensed). Physical activity will be monitored through a research grade wrist-worn accelerometer that records movement in three axes as well as body position (sedentary versus standing position). Data on frequency, intensity, and duration of activity will be collected. Activity can be summarized into light, moderate and (very) vigorous activity. Additionally, data on sedentary behavior will be collected.
Monitoring plan for patients treated with chemotherapy:
T0 Start of monitoring: When patients first present at the outpatient clinic, they will receive extensive physical analysis as described above. Additionally, the investigators will collect one blood sample. Patients will receive equipment (weight scale and accelerometer) for at home monitoring. The patient will start using the weight scale daily and wear the accelerometer continuously after screening.
T1: Start of chemotherapy: During chemotherapy, the body weight and physical activity measurements will continue. Patients will use the scale once daily and the accelerometer continuously.
T2: End of chemotherapy: The monitoring will continue until two weeks after chemotherapy.
T3: End of monitoring ( usually 2-3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy). A routine CT-scan to assess the effect of the chemotherapy will be performed. Patients will hand in all equipment to the researcher during regular follow-up.
Body composition measurement on the diagnostic CT-scan will be repeated, as described above.
Monitoring plan for patients treated with surgery:
T0 start of monitoring: When patients first present at the outpatient clinic, they will receive extensive physical analysis as described above. Additionally, the investigators will collect one blood sample. Patients will receive equipment (weight scale and accelerometer) for at home monitoring. The patient will start using the weight scale daily and wear the accelerometer continuously.
T1: Hospital admission:
At the day of admission, the patient will not bring the weight scale and accelerometer to the hospital. Monitoring will be paused for the length of hospital stay for primary surgery.
T2: Discharge from hospital:
At the day of discharge after primary surgery, length of stay at the hospital will be recorded. The patient will be reminded to restart monitoring and use the weight scale daily and wear the accelerometer continuously.
T3: End of monitoring:
During the regular follow-up visit 2-3 weeks after discharge, monitoring will end. Patients will hand in all equipment to the researcher during the regular follow-up visit. Over the course of the oncological follow-up, a routine CT-scan will be performed. Body composition analysis at the L3-level will be repeated as described above.
Outcome measurements:
Outcome measurements are presented in their order of registry.
The first outcome measurement is treatment-related adverse events. During chemotherapy adverse events will be recorded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria version 5.0 (www.eortc.be/services/doc/ctc/). For each adverse event the respective number of cycle, type of adverse event, and grade thereof will be recorded. Moreover, for chemotherapy delay, reason for delay, and dose reduction (including %of dose reduction of the respective drug) will be recorded.
Adverse events after surgery will be recording using the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 30 days after surgery. For each complication, the Clavien-Dindo grade will be recorded. Major complications are defined as ≥III.
Averse events will be recorded by a trained physician.
Treatment response after treatment will be graded based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) after chemotherapy. RECIST-criteria will be scored as 'complete response' , 'partial response', 'stable disease', and 'progressive disease'. The criteria will be scored by the radiologist according to international criteria.
Moreover, pathological outcomes will be recorded for solid tumor using the TNM-classification. This includes the extent of the tumor (T), extent of spread to lymph nodes (N), number of resected lymph nodes and number of positive lymph nodes, metastatic disease (M), resection margin (R), perineural invasion, and vascular invasion. The pathological analysis will be performed according to national guidelines.
Survival and disease-free survival will also be recorded. The follow-up will continue up to five years after the last treatment.
Survival will be calculated from the first day of treatment until death. If available, reason of death will also be recorded.
Disease-free survival is defined from the first day of treatment until first sign of recurrence.
Sample size calculation The sample size calculation was based on the primary objective, which is to assess the agreement of cancer cachexia diagnosis based on self-reported weight loss versus objectively measured weight loss. Assuming a null hypothesis intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.75, based on previously published literature, and an expected ICC of 0.65, with a significance level of 0.05 and statistical power of 90%, 270 subjects will be required. With an expected dropout rate of 10%, the total sample size is 300.
Data analysis plan Data analysis will be performed using R in the latest version available at the time of analysis (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
A short data analysis plan is presented here. For the primary objectives of the study, namely, to detect the agreement of cancer cachexia diagnosis based on self-reported weight versus objectively measured body weight and their respective association with treatment-related adverse events and treatment outcomes, the subjective self-reported weight change over the last six months and objective body weight data before treatment from the digital body weight scale will be used. The association between predictive variables and the occurrence of adverse events will be investigated through univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Predictive parameters include baseline measurements, body composition measurements, and physical activity. Moreover, the correlation between self-reported pre-treatment weight changes versus objectively measured weight changes will be evaluated.
Dissemination policy Research results, negative or positive, will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals. A writing committee, assigned by the principal investigators, will prepare the manuscripts. Co-authorship is reserved for all who contributed constructively to the study at the discretion of the principal investigators.
- Conditions
- Cachexia, Cancer, Weight, Body
- Keywords
- Cancer cachexia, Physical activity, Body weight, Body composition, Functional mobility, Pre-treatment assessment
- Medical subject headings
- Cachexia, Neoplasms, Body Weight, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Periampullary and pancreatic cancer | Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for periampullary or pancreatic cancer. | |
| Upper-GI Cancer | Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for esophageal or gastric cancer | |
| Lower-GI Cancer | Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for colorectal cancer or colorectal liver metastases | |
| Hepatic cancer | Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic or perihilar cholangiocarcinoma | |
| Gynecological cancer | Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Body weight
At home measurement with memory integrated weight scale
Measured: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks
Number of treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Chemotoxicity according to Common Toxicity Criteria v5.0
Measured: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks
Postoperative complications
Postoperative complications rated according to Clavien-Dindo classification
Measured: 30 days postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (10)
Functional mobility/muscle strength
Timed up and go test (in sec)
Measured: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Functional mobility
2 minute walking test (in m)
Measured: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Change in body composition (adipose tissue surface and muscular tissue surface)
Automated segmentation of body composition on the L3 level of abdominal CT-scans
Measured: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks
Treatment outcome
Treatment outcome will be evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Measured: after completion of chemotherapy, 5-14 weeks after start of treatment
Physical activity
Accelerometry data on three axes
Measured: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks
Muscle strength
Grip strength analysis (in kg)
Measured: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Aerobic capacity
Steep ramp test (in W)
Measured: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Nutritional status
Weight loss before diagnosis
Measured: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Overall survival
Overall and recurrence free survival
Measured: Up to 5 years after completion
Recurrence free survival
Recurrence free survival
Measured: Up to 5 years after completion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2023
- Study start1 Jun 2021
- Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (42)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CachexiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Maastricht University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nicole Hildebrand, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
- Investigators
- Steven Olde Damink, PhD, MSc., M.D., Principal investigator, Maastricht University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05899205
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL65402.068.18
- Acronym
- PRIMs
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Perry GS, Byers TE, Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Williamson DF. The validity of self-reports of past body weights by U.S. adults. Epidemiology. 1995 Jan;6(1):61-6. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199501000-00012.
PubMed 7888448Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
PubMed 21296615Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M, Guttridge DC, Fearon KCH. Cancer-associated cachexia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Jan 18;4:17105. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.105.
PubMed 29345251van Dijk DPJ, Krill M, Farshidfar F, Li T, Rensen SS, Olde Damink SWM, Dixon E, Sutherland FR, Ball CG, Mazurak VC, Baracos VE, Bathe OF. Host phenotype is associated with reduced survival independent of tumour biology in patients with colorectal liver metastases. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Feb;10(1):123-130. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12358. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PubMed 30378742van Dijk DPJ, Bakers FCH, Sanduleanu S, Vaes RDW, Rensen SS, Dejong CHC, Beets-Tan RGH, Olde Damink SWM. Myosteatosis predicts survival after surgery for periampullary cancer: a novel method using MRI. HPB (Oxford). 2018 Aug;20(8):715-720. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.378. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
PubMed 29519644van Dijk DP, Bakens MJ, Coolsen MM, Rensen SS, van Dam RM, Bours MJ, Weijenberg MP, Dejong CH, Olde Damink SW. Low skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and visceral adiposity are associated with overall survival and surgical site infections in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017 Apr;8(2):317-326. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12155. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
PubMed 27897432Wallengren O, Lundholm K, Bosaeus I. Diagnostic criteria of cancer cachexia: relation to quality of life, exercise capacity and survival in unselected palliative care patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1569-77. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1697-z. Epub 2013 Jan 13.
PubMed 23314651Ross PJ, Ashley S, Norton A, Priest K, Waters JS, Eisen T, Smith IE, O'Brien ME. Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers? Br J Cancer. 2004 May 17;90(10):1905-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601781.
PubMed 15138470Cawley J, Maclean JC, Hammer M, Wintfeld N. Reporting error in weight and its implications for bias in economic models. Econ Hum Biol. 2015 Dec;19:27-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
PubMed 26256130Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007 Jul;8(4):307-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00347.x.
PubMed 17578381Peddle-McIntyre CJ, Cavalheri V, Boyle T, McVeigh JA, Jeffery E, Lynch BM, Vallance JK. A Review of Accelerometer-based Activity Monitoring in Cancer Survivorship Research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Sep;50(9):1790-1801. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001644.
PubMed 29683922Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
PubMed 19097774Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PubMed 15273542Fearon K, Arends J, Baracos V. Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;10(2):90-9. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.209. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
PubMed 23207794Sikkens EC, Cahen DL, de Wit J, Looman CW, van Eijck C, Bruno MJ. A prospective assessment of the natural course of the exocrine pancreatic function in patients with a pancreatic head tumor. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 May-Jun;48(5):e43-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31829f56e7.
PubMed 24717227
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patient Recorded Indexing Measurements
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05899205
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRIMs / NL65402.068.18
- Conditions
- Cachexia, Cancer, Weight, Body
- Keywords
- Cancer cachexia, Physical activity, Body weight, Body composition, Functional mobility, Pre-treatment assessment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Ziekenhuis MaastrichtUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Maastricht University
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: One of the greatest challenges in the field of cancer treatment is cachexia, a multifactorial syndrome characterized by substantial loss of body weight (muscle and fat mass), leading to progressive functional impairment. Cancer cachexia significantly impairs quality of life and survival as well as treatment outcome. Despite its considerable relevance for the prognosis of cancer patients, the diagnosis of cachexia is problematic. The current consensus definition of cancer cachexia is based on weight loss over the last six months. In practice, this is assessed by subjective reporting by the patient, which is subject to error and bias. Novel technologies enable accurate, standardized, and objective assessment of body weight and physical activity by newly diagnosed cancer patients in the home situation. Because of the increasing implementation of neo-adjuvant treatment strategies that offer an extended time-window for the collection of these data, there is a great opportunity to use this information in risk analyses by treating physicians, optimization of pre-habilitation programs, and in the shared-decision making process with the patient.
Objective: The central aim of the 'Patient-Recorded Indexing MeasurementS' (PRIMS) study is to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of cachexia in patients with cancer. This aim will be achieved by focusing on two objectives. The primary objectives are to compare self-reported and objectively measured pre-treatment weight change. The secondary objectives are to define host phenotypes and to investigate longitudinal associations between body weight and physical activity patterns.
Study design: Explorative pilot study
Study population: Patients ≥18 years old undergoing curative-intent chemotherapy or surgery for cancer. Patients will be included in two referral centers specialized in treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, colorectal, and ovarian cancer.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is body weight change over time. Objectively measured body weight will be compared to subjectively reported body weight change. Their respective association with treatment-related adverse events and survival will be investigated. Survival will be calculated from date of start of treatment until death. Chemotherapy related adverse event will be recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Postoperative adverse events will be scored according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Secondary endpoints: The secondary endpoints will be the association between other cachexia-related parameters that are investigated in the study and adverse events / survival. Other parameters include physical activity over time, using accelerometry, baseline physical assessment, anthropometric measurements, body composition, and laboratory results. Besides this, other endpoints that will be assessed are disease-free survival (calculated from the first day of treatment until first recurrence) and response to chemotherapy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
Detailed description
Patients undergoing curative-intent chemotherapy or surgery for cancer will be included. All types of cancer might be included. To date, the two participating centers are referral hospitals focused on the care of hepatobiliary, pancreatic, upper-GI, colorectal, and ovarian cancer.
Upon informed consent, patients will undergo extensive pre-treatment screening. The screening consists of physical assessment and anthropometric measurements. The physical assessment consists of a modified steep-ramp test, 30-second chair stand test, handgrip strength, timed-up-and-go-test, and 2-minute walk test. For anthropometric measurements the study personnel will measure current BMI (kg/m^2), waist circumference (cm), upper arm circumference (cm), triceps skinfold (mm), and wrist circumference (cm). Upper arm muscle and fat area (cm^2) will be calculated based on triceps skinfold and upper arm circumference.
All measurements will be performed by a trained physiotherapist or nurse practitioner, if available. The study team will also be trained to perform measurements.
Moreover, body composition will be measured at baseline and after treatment. Body composition will be assessed at the level of the third lumbar level (L3) where both processi transversi are visible. Body composition analysis will be performed using an automated segmentation algorithm (MosaMatic (TM) ). The assessed areas are skeletal muscle, visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue. For each area indices (cm^2/m^2) corrected for body length and radiation attenuation (HU) will be measured.
Laboratory results include, but are not limited to, C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L), lymphocyte count, albumin (g/L), HbA1c, haemoglobin, CRP, TNF-α, interleukin-6, blood lipids, and additional parameters related to inflammation
Then, patients receive a weight scale for daily at-home measurements of body weight and an accelerometer for assessing physical activity. Body weight data will be collected using an electronic weight scale with integrated memory SD cards for automated autonomous storage of data (CE licensed). Physical activity will be monitored through a research grade wrist-worn accelerometer that records movement in three axes as well as body position (sedentary versus standing position). Data on frequency, intensity, and duration of activity will be collected. Activity can be summarized into light, moderate and (very) vigorous activity. Additionally, data on sedentary behavior will be collected.
Monitoring plan for patients treated with chemotherapy:
T0 Start of monitoring: When patients first present at the outpatient clinic, they will receive extensive physical analysis as described above. Additionally, the investigators will collect one blood sample. Patients will receive equipment (weight scale and accelerometer) for at home monitoring. The patient will start using the weight scale daily and wear the accelerometer continuously after screening.
T1: Start of chemotherapy: During chemotherapy, the body weight and physical activity measurements will continue. Patients will use the scale once daily and the accelerometer continuously.
T2: End of chemotherapy: The monitoring will continue until two weeks after chemotherapy.
T3: End of monitoring ( usually 2-3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy). A routine CT-scan to assess the effect of the chemotherapy will be performed. Patients will hand in all equipment to the researcher during regular follow-up.
Body composition measurement on the diagnostic CT-scan will be repeated, as described above.
Monitoring plan for patients treated with surgery:
T0 start of monitoring: When patients first present at the outpatient clinic, they will receive extensive physical analysis as described above. Additionally, the investigators will collect one blood sample. Patients will receive equipment (weight scale and accelerometer) for at home monitoring. The patient will start using the weight scale daily and wear the accelerometer continuously.
T1: Hospital admission:
At the day of admission, the patient will not bring the weight scale and accelerometer to the hospital. Monitoring will be paused for the length of hospital stay for primary surgery.
T2: Discharge from hospital:
At the day of discharge after primary surgery, length of stay at the hospital will be recorded. The patient will be reminded to restart monitoring and use the weight scale daily and wear the accelerometer continuously.
T3: End of monitoring:
During the regular follow-up visit 2-3 weeks after discharge, monitoring will end. Patients will hand in all equipment to the researcher during the regular follow-up visit. Over the course of the oncological follow-up, a routine CT-scan will be performed. Body composition analysis at the L3-level will be repeated as described above.
Outcome measurements:
Outcome measurements are presented in their order of registry.
The first outcome measurement is treatment-related adverse events. During chemotherapy adverse events will be recorded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria version 5.0 (www.eortc.be/services/doc/ctc/). For each adverse event the respective number of cycle, type of adverse event, and grade thereof will be recorded. Moreover, for chemotherapy delay, reason for delay, and dose reduction (including %of dose reduction of the respective drug) will be recorded.
Adverse events after surgery will be recording using the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 30 days after surgery. For each complication, the Clavien-Dindo grade will be recorded. Major complications are defined as ≥III.
Averse events will be recorded by a trained physician.
Treatment response after treatment will be graded based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) after chemotherapy. RECIST-criteria will be scored as 'complete response' , 'partial response', 'stable disease', and 'progressive disease'. The criteria will be scored by the radiologist according to international criteria.
Moreover, pathological outcomes will be recorded for solid tumor using the TNM-classification. This includes the extent of the tumor (T), extent of spread to lymph nodes (N), number of resected lymph nodes and number of positive lymph nodes, metastatic disease (M), resection margin (R), perineural invasion, and vascular invasion. The pathological analysis will be performed according to national guidelines.
Survival and disease-free survival will also be recorded. The follow-up will continue up to five years after the last treatment.
Survival will be calculated from the first day of treatment until death. If available, reason of death will also be recorded.
Disease-free survival is defined from the first day of treatment until first sign of recurrence.
Sample size calculation The sample size calculation was based on the primary objective, which is to assess the agreement of cancer cachexia diagnosis based on self-reported weight loss versus objectively measured weight loss. Assuming a null hypothesis intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.75, based on previously published literature, and an expected ICC of 0.65, with a significance level of 0.05 and statistical power of 90%, 270 subjects will be required. With an expected dropout rate of 10%, the total sample size is 300.
Data analysis plan Data analysis will be performed using R in the latest version available at the time of analysis (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
A short data analysis plan is presented here. For the primary objectives of the study, namely, to detect the agreement of cancer cachexia diagnosis based on self-reported weight versus objectively measured body weight and their respective association with treatment-related adverse events and treatment outcomes, the subjective self-reported weight change over the last six months and objective body weight data before treatment from the digital body weight scale will be used. The association between predictive variables and the occurrence of adverse events will be investigated through univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Predictive parameters include baseline measurements, body composition measurements, and physical activity. Moreover, the correlation between self-reported pre-treatment weight changes versus objectively measured weight changes will be evaluated.
Dissemination policy Research results, negative or positive, will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals. A writing committee, assigned by the principal investigators, will prepare the manuscripts. Co-authorship is reserved for all who contributed constructively to the study at the discretion of the principal investigators.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Periampullary and pancreatic cancer | – | –Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for periampullary or pancreatic cancer. |
| Upper-GI Cancer | – | –Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for esophageal or gastric cancer |
| Lower-GI Cancer | – | –Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for colorectal cancer or colorectal liver metastases |
| Hepatic cancer | – | –Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic or perihilar cholangiocarcinoma |
| Gynecological cancer | – | –Patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults, requiring neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or curative-intent surgery for cancer
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥ 18
- Diagnosed with cancer
- Planned for curative-intent surgery or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- ASA-classification V,
- severe liver cirrhosis Child grade C,
- end stage renal disease requiring dialysis,
- severe heart disease New York Heart Association class IV,
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring (home)oxygen therapy,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Body weight
Time frame: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks
At home measurement with memory integrated weight scale
Number of treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks
Chemotoxicity according to Common Toxicity Criteria v5.0
Postoperative complications
Time frame: 30 days postoperatively
Postoperative complications rated according to Clavien-Dindo classification
10 secondary outcomes
Functional mobility/muscle strength
Time frame: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Functional mobility
Time frame: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Change in body composition (adipose tissue surface and muscular tissue surface)
Time frame: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks
Treatment outcome
Time frame: after completion of chemotherapy, 5-14 weeks after start of treatment
Physical activity
Time frame: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks
Muscle strength
Time frame: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Aerobic capacity
Time frame: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Nutritional status
Time frame: 2-4 weeks before treatment start
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years after completion
Recurrence free survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years after completion
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 7888448Perry GS, Byers TE, Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Williamson DF. The validity of self-reports of past body weights by U.S. adults. Epidemiology. 1995 Jan;6(1):61-6. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199501000-00012.
- Background: PubMed 21296615Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 29345251Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M, Guttridge DC, Fearon KCH. Cancer-associated cachexia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Jan 18;4:17105. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.105.
- Background: PubMed 30378742van Dijk DPJ, Krill M, Farshidfar F, Li T, Rensen SS, Olde Damink SWM, Dixon E, Sutherland FR, Ball CG, Mazurak VC, Baracos VE, Bathe OF. Host phenotype is associated with reduced survival independent of tumour biology in patients with colorectal liver metastases. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Feb;10(1):123-130. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12358. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
- Background: PubMed 29519644van Dijk DPJ, Bakers FCH, Sanduleanu S, Vaes RDW, Rensen SS, Dejong CHC, Beets-Tan RGH, Olde Damink SWM. Myosteatosis predicts survival after surgery for periampullary cancer: a novel method using MRI. HPB (Oxford). 2018 Aug;20(8):715-720. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.378. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 27897432van Dijk DP, Bakens MJ, Coolsen MM, Rensen SS, van Dam RM, Bours MJ, Weijenberg MP, Dejong CH, Olde Damink SW. Low skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and visceral adiposity are associated with overall survival and surgical site infections in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017 Apr;8(2):317-326. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12155. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 23314651Wallengren O, Lundholm K, Bosaeus I. Diagnostic criteria of cancer cachexia: relation to quality of life, exercise capacity and survival in unselected palliative care patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1569-77. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1697-z. Epub 2013 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 15138470Ross PJ, Ashley S, Norton A, Priest K, Waters JS, Eisen T, Smith IE, O'Brien ME. Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers? Br J Cancer. 2004 May 17;90(10):1905-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601781.
- Background: PubMed 26256130Cawley J, Maclean JC, Hammer M, Wintfeld N. Reporting error in weight and its implications for bias in economic models. Econ Hum Biol. 2015 Dec;19:27-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 17578381Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007 Jul;8(4):307-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00347.x.
- Background: PubMed 29683922Peddle-McIntyre CJ, Cavalheri V, Boyle T, McVeigh JA, Jeffery E, Lynch BM, Vallance JK. A Review of Accelerometer-based Activity Monitoring in Cancer Survivorship Research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Sep;50(9):1790-1801. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001644.
- Background: PubMed 19097774Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cachexia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase II Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of SXRN Injection in Patients With Cancer Cachexia
Cachexia-Anorexia Syndrome, Cachexia; Cancer
Recruiting
Milk Fat Globule Membrane-Enhanced RUTF for Children With Severe Acute Malnutrition
Severe Acute Malnutrition, Cognitive Impairment
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
OLE Study Subsequent to Parent Study of Rilogrotug for the Treatment of Weight Loss and Anorexia in Patients With Cancer Cachexia and mCRC or mNSCLC
Cachexia; Cancer, Cachexia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
PBGENE-DMD Phase 1/2a Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (FUNCTION-DMD)
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy With Mutations Amenable to PBGENE-DMD
Enrolling by invitation
Effectiveness of Positive Deviance/Hearth in Treating Uncomplicated Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Children 6-59 Months in Mymensingh Division, Bangladesh
Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM), Undernutrition
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Steven Olde Damink, PhD, MSc., M.D. principal investigator
Maastricht University Medical Center
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cachexia and Cancer, run by Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht at 2 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nicole Hildebrand, M.D. (+31 (0)43-3881584, nicole.hildebrand@mumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Body weight (time frame: throughout treatment, average of 5-14 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05899205, which also lists 42 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2025.