AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailurePhase 2NCT05900050

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of VS-01 in Adult Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure and Ascites (UNVEIL-IT)®

A Phase 2 study testing VS-01 on top of SOC in people with Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure and Ascites, run by Genfit at 26 sites in 7 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study to evaluate the effects of the intraperitoneal, liposomal formulation VS-01 in patients with an acute episode of hepatic and/or extrahepatic organ dysfunctions and failures in the presence of liver cirrhosis (Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure, ACLF) and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 79 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, Ascites
What is being tested?
VS-01 on top of SOC
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
26 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
2 Jul 2023to 15 Oct 2025
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 79 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with ACLF Grade 1, 2, or 3a according to European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)-CLIF criteria;
  • Onset of ACLF not more than 14 days before Baseline (BL);
  • Presence of ascites requiring diagnostic or therapeutic paracentesis;
  • Patients with dry body weight ≥40 and <140 kg;
  • Written informed consent obtained prior to the start of any study-related procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of any of the following organ failure(s) as per the EASL-CLIF criteria and/or adapted from CLIF-C Organ Failure (CLIF-C OF)/CLIF- Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) scores:
  • Respiratory failure necessitating invasive mechanical ventilation;
  • Coagulation failure (INR > 3.2 or platelet count ≤20 x 109/L);
  • Severe cardiovascular failure requiring the use of high dose vasopressors;
  • ACLF grade 3b: Presence of four or more organ failures as per EASL CLIF criteria;
  • Presence of spontaneous or secondary bacterial peritonitis;
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Presence of uncontrolled severe infection(with hemodynamic instability or shock);
  • Poorly controlled seizure disorder;
  • Patients with history of upper gastro-intestinal bleeding over the past 7 days prior to BL, acute bleeding or bleeding upon paracentesis at screening (SCR) or BL;
  • Contraindication for paracentesis;
  • Coagulation disorders such as disseminated intravascular coagulation or hemophilia;
  • Potential or known hypersensitivity to liposomes;
  • Potential or known risk factors for allergic/anaphylactoid like reactions (e.g., mastocytosis/elevated basal tryptase) or multiple hypersensitivities;
  • Patients after organ transplantation receiving immunosuppressive medication;
  • Any severe disease considered to be potentially detrimental at the discretion of the Principal Investigator. This includes but is not limited to hepatocellular carcinoma outside Milan criteria, cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cancer over the past 2 years or people who inject drugs;
  • Need for Renal Replacement Therapy or any extracorporeal liver support device (e.g., MARS®, Prometheus®, plasmapheresis);
  • Alfapump® in place to manage ascites;
  • Pregnancy and lactation;
  • Women of child-bearing potential who are not willing to use adequate contraception;
  • Patients who participate in another clinical trial at the time of SCR or within 4 weeks prior to SCR.

Trial locations and contacts

26 sites in 7 countries.

26 sites in 7 countries

United States13 sites
  • Piedmont Atlanta Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30309

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • University of Missouri Health Care

    Columbia, Missouri, 65212

  • The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas

    Dallas, Texas, 75203

  • Baylor Clinic

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Columbia University Medical Center/ New York Presbyterian Hospital

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Richmond VA Medical Center

    Richmond, Virginia, 23249

  • Virginia Commonwealth University

    Richmond, Virginia, 23298

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • University of California Davis Medical Center

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • Tampa General Hospital

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • Medstar Georgetown University Hospital

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007

Other trials in United States

France4 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours

    Chambray-lès-Tours, 37170

  • Hôpital de la Croix Rousse

    Lyon, 69004

  • Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière

    Paris, 75013

  • CHU Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou

    Rennes, 35033

Other trials in France

Germany3 sites
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 13353

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Hanover, 30625

  • Universitatsklinikum Munster

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149

Other trials in Germany

Hungary2 sites
  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központ

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Heves Vármegyei Markhot Ferenc Oktatókórház és Rendelőintézet

    Eger, 3300

Other trials in Hungary

Italy2 sites
  • ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda

    Milan, 20162

  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I

    Roma, 00185

Other trials in Italy

Belgium1 site
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

    Edegem, 2650

Other trials in Belgium

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, Barcelona, 08036

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2a, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Proof of Concept Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VS-01 on Top of Standard of Care, Compared to Standard of Care Alone, in Adult Patients With Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)

A Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study to evaluate the effects of the intraperitoneal, liposomal formulation VS-01 in patients with an acute episode of hepatic and/or extrahepatic organ dysfunctions and failures in the presence of liver cirrhosis (Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure, ACLF) and accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity (ascites)

Being tested
VS-01 on top of SOC, SOC (Control Group)
Keywords
Chronic liver diseases, Hepatic Dysfunction, Extrahepatic Organ Dysfunction, Liver Failure, Renal Disease, Hepatic Impairment, Renal Impairment, Hepatic Decompensation, Cirrhosis
Medical subject headings
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, Ascites, Liver Diseases, Liver Failure, Kidney Diseases, Renal Insufficiency, Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VS-01 on top of SOCDrug

    Patients will receive VS-01 intraperitoneally on four consecutive days on top of SOC

  • SOC (Control Group)Other

    Patients will receive SOC for decompensated cirrhosis and ACLF

Study groups in NCT05900050
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VS-01 on top of SOC (Active Treatment Group)ExperimentalPatients randomized to Active Treatment group will receive VS-01 on top of SOC
Receives: Drug: VS-01 on top of SOC
SOC (Control Group)OtherPatients randomized to Control group will receive SOC defined as the standard medical management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ACLF
Receives: Other: SOC (Control Group)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (CLIF-C) ACLF Score at Day 7

    The CLIF-C ACLF score is derived from the CLIF-C organ failure (OF) score. The formula for the CLIF-C ACLF score is CLIF-ACLF = 10*[0.33*CLIF-C OF + 0.04*Age + 0.63*Ln(white cell count) -2]. The CLIF-C ACLF score ranges from 0-100, where a higher score indicated a greater mortality risk.

    Measured: Day 7

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Number of Deaths From Day 1 to Day 90

    90-Day mortality was reported as the number of deaths from Day 1 to Day 90.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 90

  2. Number of Deaths From Day 1 to Day 28

    28-Day mortality was reported as the number of deaths from Day 1 to Day 28.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 28

  3. Time to Death Through Day 90

    Time to death was calculated as death date - treatment start date. Participants who were not observed to have encountered the event through Day 90 were censored.

    The inter-quartile range was obtained via Kaplan Meier estimation.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 90

  4. Number of Participants With ACLF Resolution

    ACLF resolution was defined as ACLF grade 'No ACLF', for participants who had ACLF at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 7 and Day 28

  5. Time to ACLF Resolution Through Day 28

    ACLF resolution was defined as ACLF grade 'No ACLF', for participants who had ACLF at Baseline. Time to ACLF resolution was calculated as (ACLF resolution date - treatment start date). Participants who were not observed to have encountered the event through Day 28 were censored at min[trial discontinuation date; Day 28 visit date or treatment start date +27 if no visit date; last contact/assessment date for participant lost to follow-up; date of liver transplant or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)].

    The inter-quartile range was obtained via Kaplan Meier estimation.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 28

  6. Number of Participants With ≥ 1 ACLF Grade Regression

    ACLF regression was defined as regression of at least one full grade.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 7 and Day 28

  7. Time to ≥ 1 ACLF Grade Regression Through Day 28

    Time to ACLF ≥ 1 grade regression was calculated as (ACLF ≥ 1 grade regression date - treatment start date). Participants who were not observed to have encountered the event through Day 28 were censored.

    The inter-quartile range was obtained via Kaplan Meier estimation.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 28

  8. Secondary: Time to Transplant or Death Through Day 90

    Time to transplant was calculated as (transplant or death date - treatment start date). Participants who were not observed to have encountered the event through Day 90 were censored.

    The inter-quartile range was obtained via Kaplan Meier estimation.

    Measured: Day 1 through Day 90

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after at least one dose of the study drug had been administered, even if the event was not considered to be related to the study drug. A serious AE (SAE) was any untoward medical event that occurs at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event.

    Measured: Up to Day 90

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2023
  2. Study start2 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion15 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion15 Oct 2025

Why it stopped: Sponsor Decision

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05900050
Sponsor's protocol ID
VS01-IIa-01
Other IDs
2024-513706-56-00
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
2 Jun 2023
Last updated
23 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing VS-01 on top of SOC in people with Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure and Ascites, run by Genfit at 26 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 26 sites in United States, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (CLIF-C) ACLF Score at Day 7 (time frame: Day 7). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in