AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Subdural HematomaNCT05900557

Neurologic Deficits and Recovery in Chronic Subdural Hematoma

A study testing ECoG monitoring in people with Chronic Subdural Hematoma, run by University of New Mexico.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common problems treated by neurosurgeons, particularly as the population ages. While often dismissed as a benign problem, it has become clear that cSDH is associated with worse long term functional and cognitive outcomes compared to matched controls. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
What is being tested?
ECoG monitoring
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Mar 2025to 1 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • chronic/ subacute subdural hematoma deemed necessary for surgical evacuation,
  • Ability to consent or have LAR consent

Who cannot join

  • emergent need for evacuation,
  • acute traumatic subdural hematoma, and
  • severe baseline disability (mRS>2) (modified Rankin Scale)

About this study

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common problems treated by neurosurgeons, particularly as the population ages. While often dismissed as a benign problem, it has become clear that cSDH is associated with worse long term functional and cognitive outcomes compared to matched controls. Though surgical techniques for treatment of cSDH are becoming more effective and safe, a persisting problem of fluctuating, stroke-like neurological deficits has re-emerged. Such deficits are not always directly related to hematoma mass effect and not always relieved with surgical decompression, but can result in prolonged hospital course, additional workup, and sometimes even additional invasive treatments. While the cause of such events is unknown, we recently documented for the first time that massive waves of spreading depolarization can occur in these patients and were closely linked to such neurologic deficits in some patients. In the current study, we plan to expand on these preliminary findings with rigorous, standardized application of post operative subdural electrocorticography monitoring, pioneered at our institution to detect SD. We also plan to build on our large retrospective analysis estimating the overall incidence of such deficits in cSDH patients by assessing multiple proposed risk factors for SD. In addition, for the first time, we will assess the short- and long-term consequences of cSDH and SD with detailed functional, cognitive, and headache related outcome measurement. These assessments are based on several remarkable cases we have observed with time-locked neurologic deterioration associated with recurrent SD. This study qualifies as a mechanistic clinical trial in that we will be prospectively assigning patients to the intervention of SD monitoring and assessing outcomes related to the occurrence of SD. This constitutes the application of a novel measure of brain signaling and assessing biomarkers of these physiologic processes of SD. These studies will provide critically needed information on this novel mechanism for neurologic deficits and worse outcomes after cSDH evacuation. Upon successful completion, we would identify a targetable mechanism for poor outcomes that occur commonly in patients with cSDH. This overall strategy offers the opportunity to radically improve the care of patients with cSDH by focusing on clinical trials of pharmacologic therapies for neurologic deficits in patients with cSDH.

Being tested
ECoG monitoring
Medical subject headings
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ECoG monitoringDiagnostic test

    Brief (1-5 days) of post operative ECoG monitoring to detect spreading depolarization.

Study groups in NCT05900557
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ECoG monitoringExperimentalPatients undergoing standard of care surgical evacuation of cSDH. will have subdural ECoG monitoring electrode placed crossing frontal and temporal lobes for 1-5 days of post operative monitoring. All subjects will undergo long term followup testing.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: ECoG monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post operative neurologic deterioration.

    Incidence of decline in Markwalder grading scale (0[normal]-4[comatose]) or Glasgow coma scale (3[no response] to 15[normal]) by one point.

    Measured: 1-5 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. eGOS

    Extended Glasgow outcome scale 1(dead)- 8(upper good recovery)

    Measured: 30day, 90 day, 180 day

  2. MoCA

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (1-30) 30 is the best

    Measured: 30day, 90 day, 180 day

  3. NIH toolbox cognitive battery

    The NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery provides an overall summary score along with fluid and crystallized cognition summary scores.

    Measured: 30day, 90 day, 180 day

  4. PROMIS 29 profile

    The PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain

    Measured: 30day, 90 day, 180 day

  5. TBI QOL

    The TBI-QOL consists of 20 independent calibrated item banks and 2 uncalibrated scales that measure physical, emotional, cognitive, and social aspects of health-related quality of life

    Measured: 30day, 90 day, 180 day

  6. Headache disability Index

    The Headache Disability Index (HDI) is a 27-item questionnaire.The first two questions asks the patient to identify the frequency (1 per month; more than 1 but less than 4 per month; more than 1 per week) and intensity (mild, moderate, severe) of their headache. The remaining questions evaluate quality of life issues to determine headache disability.

    Measured: 30day, 90 day, 180 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2025

Why it stopped: PI has left the institution

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Single arm study performing subdural ECoG monitoring to assess for presence or absence of spreading depolarization.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05900557
Sponsor's protocol ID
1454683
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
18 May 2023
Last updated
1 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ECoG monitoring in people with Chronic Subdural Hematoma, run by University of New Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post operative neurologic deterioration. (time frame: 1-5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in