AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainNCT05901090

Comparing the Effects of M-TAPA and TAP Block on Postoperative Analgesia in TAH

A study testing M-TAPA block and TAP block in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Cumhuriyet University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA block and TAP block and their effect on opioid consumption in patients undergoing open total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 to 70 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
What is being tested?
M-TAPA block and TAP block
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
12 Apr 2023to 1 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients older than 35 years of age who underwent open total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia and were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II-III according to the ASA risk classification.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who did not give consent,
  • patients with coagulopathy,
  • patients with signs of infection at the block application site,
  • patients using anticoagulants,
  • patients with local anesthetic drug allergies,
  • patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery,
  • patients with unstable hemodynamics,
  • patients who could not cooperate during postoperative pain assessment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Sivas Cumhuriyet University

    Sivas, 58000

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Effects of Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) and Transerversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) on Postoperative Pain Scores and Total Analgesic Consumption in Patients Ongoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Aim is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA block and TAP block and their effect on opioid consumption in patients undergoing open total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) surgery.

Read the detailed description

There were three randomized groups: Group M (M-TAPA block) (n=15), Group T (TAP block) (n=15) and Group C (no block) (n=15). All patients had standard general anesthesia. Group M had bilateral M-TAPA block with 0.25% bupivacaine (total volume of 40 ml) at the end of the surgery. Group T patients had TAP block with 0.25% bupivacaine (total volume of 40 ml) at the end of the surgery. Group Control had only tramadol for postoperative pain. Numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess postoperative pain on 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th hour after the surgery. Total tramadol consumption was calculated.

Being tested
M-TAPA block, TAP block
Keywords
m-tapa, tap block, total abdominal hysterectomy, regional anesthesia, postoperative pain
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • M-TAPA blockOther

    Also called Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach

    Following sterile conditions for bilateral M-TAPA block application, the transducer was inserted on the chondrium in the sagittal plane at the 9-10th rib level. Subsequently, a deep angle was created with the probe for visualization of the underside of the costochondrium. The sonovisible needle tip was placed just below the chondrium and saline (5 ml) was injected for site confirmation. After the confirmation, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered for each group for a total of 40 ml of local anesthetic. Blocks were applied using an 80 mm sonovisible needle with a 6-10 MHz linear probe under the guidance of a portable ultrasound. M-TAPA block with the same standard technique and drug dose was applied to the contralateral side for each group of M-TAPA patients.

  • TAP blockOther

    Also called Transversus abdominis plane block

    After the necessary sterilization conditions were established, the linear ultrasound probe was sterilely coated and placed in the middle of the iliac crest with the end limit of the ribs. Starting with skin, the layers in descending order, subcutaneous adipose tissue, external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, transversus abdominis muscle, and peritoneum were identified. As the tip of the 80 mm sonovisible needle passed through the muscular layers and fascia, a fascial click was felt and the needle was advanced with ultrasound in a controlled manner. After receiving the second click sensation (passage of the fascia of the internal oblique muscle), the location of the needle was fixed and frequently aspirated and applied to the plane so that 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied to each side. (40 ml in total)

Study groups in NCT05901090
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
M-TAPA blockActive comparatorPatients had bilateral M-TAPA block with 0.25% bupivacaine (total volume of 40 ml) at the end of the surgery for postoperative pain control.
Receives: Other: M-TAPA block
TAP blockActive comparatorPatients had bilateral TAP block with 0.25% bupivacaine (total volume of 40 ml) at the end of the surgery for postoperative pain control.
Receives: Other: TAP block
ControlNo interventionControl group patients were not subjected to any block or local infiltration anesthesia. Their postoperative pain was relieved with tramadol (intravenous) administration.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparing the numerical rating scale scores

    Numerical rating scale is used for pain assessment. The scores of the numerical rating scale changes between 0 to 10 points. 10 points mean "the most severe pain that the patient ever had". 0 point means "there is no pain." Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Measured: Postoperative 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Comparing total tramadol consumption

    Postoperative analgesic need

    Measured: Postoperative 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jun 2023
  2. Study start12 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion25 May 2023
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05901090
Sponsor's protocol ID
M-TAPA vs TAP block on TAH
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
1 Jun 2023
Last updated
13 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing M-TAPA block and TAP block in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Cumhuriyet University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparing the numerical rating scale scores (time frame: Postoperative 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in