Difficult IntubationPROVUNCT05902858
Effect of Standard Laryngoscopy Versus Video-laryngoscopy
A study testing Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope and Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope in people with Difficult Intubation, run by Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The aim of this open-label, randomized, 3-parallel arm trial is to compare success of intubation rate at first try between three groups that will be intubated: 1. Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope (control group), 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Difficult Intubation
- What is being tested?
- Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope and Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 114 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 18 Jan 2023to Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients undergoing elective surgery requiring oral tracheal intubation;
- ≥18 years of age;
- simplified Arné score ≥11;
- Written informed consent will be obtained from every participant.
Who cannot join
- ≤18 years of age
- interincisor distance at maximal mouth opening ≤2 cm;
- planned awake fiberoptic intubation because patients are patients considered to be high-risk for difficult intubation or difficult mask ventilation (e.g. with neck tumours, complete cervical arthrodesis; neck circumference >50 cm);
- patients at risk of gastric aspiration
- planned nasal intubation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
Alessandria, Piedmont, 15121
About this study
Official title: Efferct of Standard Laryngoscopy Versus Video-laryngoscop on First-attempt Success in Difficult Airways Undergoing ProVu TM Video Stylet Guided Intubationa (PROVU)
The aim of this open-label, randomized, 3-parallel arm trial is to compare success of intubation rate at first try between three groups that will be intubated:
- Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope (control group),
- Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope,
- Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope.
Read the detailed description
Critical anesthetic incidents in the operating room are often related to airway management. Difficult airway management is defined as the clinical situation in which an anesthesiologist with conventional training has difficulty with upper airway face mask ventilation, difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both. Airway management has undergone a major transformation since the development of hyper-angle videolaryngoscopy (VL). Recently, the ProVuTM video stylet (Flexicare Medical Ltd, Mountain Ash, UK), which combines visualization technology with a tube guidance system, has been proposed as a new device for endotracheal intubation in participants with difficult airway management.
The investigators hypothesized that the ProVuTM video stylet combined with videolaryngoscopy or standard laryngoscopy may improve the success rate of intubation on the first attempt compared with using a videolaryngoscope alone in patientes with predicted difficult intubation. In fact, using ProVuTM the position of the video stylet tip can be adjusted continuously during the tracheal intubation maneuver.
- Conditions
- Difficult Intubation
- Being tested
- Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope
- Keywords
- PROVU, Videolaryngoscopy, Laryngoscopy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscopeDevice
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscopeDevice
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscopeDevice
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope Receives: Device: Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope |
| Provu TM video stylet + hyperangulated videolaryngoscope | Experimental | Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope Receives: Device: Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope |
| Provu TM video stylet + Macintosh laryngoscope | Experimental | Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope Receives: Device: Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Success rate on first intubation attemps
The first-attempt intubation success is defined as tracheal tube placement with a single maneuver after insertion of the tube in the mouth. Reinsertion of the tube in the mouth counts as an additional attempt.
Measured: During the procedure
Secondary outcomes (9)
Time of intubation
Time from insertion of the laryngoscope beyond the dental rhyme to cuffed tube
Measured: During the procedure
Time of laryngoscopy
Time from insertion of the laryngoscope beyond the dental rhyme to the insertion of the tube beyond the dental rhyme
Measured: During the procedure
Number of intubation attempts
Times of reinsertion of the tube beyond the dental rhyme
Measured: During the procedure
Complications
Evaluation of the type and rate of complications, including desaturation < 90%, esophageal intubation, tooth breakage and bleeding from the oropharyngeal mucosa
Measured: During the procedure
Use of "jaw trust" or "BURP"
Need to perform adjuvant maneuvers (jaw trust or BURP), measured with yes/no
Measured: During the procedure
Need of another anesthesiologist intervention
Required intervention of another anesthesiologist, measured with yes/no, after 3 failed intubation attempt or after request of the first anesthesiologist
Measured: During the procedure
Needs to change the path of the intubation strategy
Needs to change intubation strategy, measured with yes/no, includes use of fiberoptic intubation, change of videolaryngoscope or postpone intervention
Measured: During the procedure
Learning curve analysis of intubation rate success
Improvement of intubation rate success
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Learning curve analysis of time of procedure
Improvement of time of procedure
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2023
- Study start18 Jan 2023
- Primary completionJun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Difficult IntubationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- open-label, randomized, 3-parallel arm, monocentric trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Flexicare Medical Ltd
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mirco Leo, Physician, Principal investigator, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05902858
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ASO.RianGen.22.03
- Acronym
- PROVU
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Harrison SL, Ahmad I, Elwen F, Curtis A, Dua G, Surda P, Johnstone C. Awake tracheal intubation with the ProVu video stylet: a case series. Anaesth Rep. 2021 Mar 29;9(1):e12102. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12102. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
PubMed 33817645Leo M, Zanza C, Mahajan A, Planinsic R, Piccolella F, Ruvolo D, Savarese B, Savioli G, Shiffer D, Voza A, Racca G, Panasyuk M, Leo R, Girombelli A, Saglietti F, Nuzzolo G, Mosca S, Racca F, Longhitano Y. Provu video stylet-assisted intubation under direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in high Arne score patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2026 Mar 18;26(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12871-026-03754-7.
PubMed 41851852
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efferct of Standard Laryngoscopy Versus Video-laryngoscop on First-attempt Success in Difficult Airways Undergoing ProVu TM Video Stylet Guided Intubationa (PROVU)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05902858
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROVU / ASO.RianGen.22.03
- Conditions
- Difficult Intubation
- Keywords
- PROVU, Videolaryngoscopy, Laryngoscopy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di AlessandriaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Flexicare Medical Ltd
- Study start
- 18 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this open-label, randomized, 3-parallel arm trial is to compare success of intubation rate at first try between three groups that will be intubated:
- Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope (control group),
- Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope,
- Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope.
Detailed description
Critical anesthetic incidents in the operating room are often related to airway management. Difficult airway management is defined as the clinical situation in which an anesthesiologist with conventional training has difficulty with upper airway face mask ventilation, difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both. Airway management has undergone a major transformation since the development of hyper-angle videolaryngoscopy (VL). Recently, the ProVuTM video stylet (Flexicare Medical Ltd, Mountain Ash, UK), which combines visualization technology with a tube guidance system, has been proposed as a new device for endotracheal intubation in participants with difficult airway management.
The investigators hypothesized that the ProVuTM video stylet combined with videolaryngoscopy or standard laryngoscopy may improve the success rate of intubation on the first attempt compared with using a videolaryngoscope alone in patientes with predicted difficult intubation. In fact, using ProVuTM the position of the video stylet tip can be adjusted continuously during the tracheal intubation maneuver.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- open-label, randomized, 3-parallel arm, monocentric trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Device: Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscopeConventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope |
| Provu TM video stylet + hyperangulated videolaryngoscope | Experimental | Device: Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscopeIntubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope |
| Provu TM video stylet + Macintosh laryngoscope | Experimental | Device: Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscopeIntubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patients undergoing elective surgery requiring oral tracheal intubation;
- ≥18 years of age;
- simplified Arné score ≥11;
- Written informed consent will be obtained from every participant.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ≤18 years of age
- interincisor distance at maximal mouth opening ≤2 cm;
- planned awake fiberoptic intubation because patients are patients considered to be high-risk for difficult intubation or difficult mask ventilation (e.g. with neck tumours, complete cervical arthrodesis; neck circumference >50 cm);
- patients at risk of gastric aspiration
- planned nasal intubation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscopeAfter the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope | Device | Control Group |
| Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscopeAfter the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope | Device | Provu TM video stylet + hyperangulated videolaryngoscope |
| Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscopeAfter the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope | Device | Provu TM video stylet + Macintosh laryngoscope |
Primary outcome
Success rate on first intubation attemps
Time frame: During the procedure
The first-attempt intubation success is defined as tracheal tube placement with a single maneuver after insertion of the tube in the mouth. Reinsertion of the tube in the mouth counts as an additional attempt.
9 secondary outcomes
Time of intubation
Time frame: During the procedure
Time of laryngoscopy
Time frame: During the procedure
Number of intubation attempts
Time frame: During the procedure
Complications
Time frame: During the procedure
Use of "jaw trust" or "BURP"
Time frame: During the procedure
Need of another anesthesiologist intervention
Time frame: During the procedure
Needs to change the path of the intubation strategy
Time frame: During the procedure
Learning curve analysis of intubation rate success
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Learning curve analysis of time of procedure
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2023.
- Background: PubMed 33817645Harrison SL, Ahmad I, Elwen F, Curtis A, Dua G, Surda P, Johnstone C. Awake tracheal intubation with the ProVu video stylet: a case series. Anaesth Rep. 2021 Mar 29;9(1):e12102. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12102. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41851852Leo M, Zanza C, Mahajan A, Planinsic R, Piccolella F, Ruvolo D, Savarese B, Savioli G, Shiffer D, Voza A, Racca G, Panasyuk M, Leo R, Girombelli A, Saglietti F, Nuzzolo G, Mosca S, Racca F, Longhitano Y. Provu video stylet-assisted intubation under direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in high Arne score patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2026 Mar 18;26(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12871-026-03754-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Difficult Intubation
Enrolling by invitation
Pediatric Intubation Simulations With Bougie
Difficult Airway Intubation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sniper Intubation for Training of Undergraduate Medical Student
Intubation;Difficult
RecruitingObservational study
Airway Ultrasound in Oncologic Maxillofacial Patients
Head and Neck Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sniffing Position vs Left Head Rotation (LeHeR) Maneuver for Glottic View During Direct Laryngoscopy
Difficult Intubation, Laryngoscopy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
LeHeR Maneuver vs Sniffing Position During Video Laryngoscopy in Predicted Difficult Airway
Difficult Airway, Difficult Intubation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mirco Leo, Physician principal investigator
Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope and Intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope in people with Difficult Intubation, run by Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Success rate on first intubation attemps (time frame: During the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05902858, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2023.