AzTrials
AzTrials

GlaucomaRETROXENNCT05904613

Evaluation of the Impact of the XEN® Implant on Endothelial Cell Density, 3 Years After Surgery

An observational study of Glaucoma, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Glaucoma is a blinding optic neuropathy affecting 80 million people worldwide, with primary open-angle glaucoma being the most common etiology. Today, the therapeutic arsenal includes drug-based hypotonizing treatments, lasers and surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Glaucoma
How many people
43 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
9 Oct 2018to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients treated for primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-pressure glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma or secondary glaucoma in the ophthalmology department of the Paris Saint-Joseph hospital group.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female ≥ 18 years of age
  • French-speaking patient
  • Patients treated for primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-pressure glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma or secondary glaucoma in the ophthalmology department of the Paris Saint-Joseph hospital group.
  • Patients who have undergone surgery with XEN® alone or in combination with cataract surgery by lens phacoemulsification, for one or both eyes.

Who cannot join

  • Patient with any other associated ophthalmological disease, other than simple cataract already operated on or operated on simultaneously with XEN® application, with no intra- or postoperative complications
  • History of filtering surgery prior to XEN® treatment
  • Filtering surgery after XEN® treatment
  • History of vitrectomy (removal of the vitreous body from the eye)
  • Angle-closure glaucoma
  • Uveitic glaucoma (linked to inflammation which may itself have an effect on the cornea)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Pre-existing endothelial dystrophy, iridocorneoendothelial syndrome (ICE) (glaucoma with corneal pathology)
  • Endothelial cell count below 1000 cells
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient under court protection.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

    Paris, 75014

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Retrospective Study Evaluating the Impact of the XEN® Implant on Endothelial Cell Density Measured Using Specular Microscopy at 3 Years After Surgery

Glaucoma is a blinding optic neuropathy affecting 80 million people worldwide, with primary open-angle glaucoma being the most common etiology. Today, the therapeutic arsenal includes drug-based hypotonizing treatments, lasers and surgery. In France, the most common surgical techniques are trabeculectomy and deep non-perforating sclerectomy (SPNP). The principle behind these filtering techniques is to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) by creating an escape route for aqueous humor from the anterior chamber (AC) of the eye into the subconjunctival space, creating a filtration bubble (FB).

A new minimally invasive treatment option has been developed to limit intra- and post-operative complications. This new technique is based on an ab interno approach, with implantation through the anterior chamber of a 6mm-long, 45µm-lumen collagen tube called XEN®. As a result, there is no dissection of the conjunctivotenone planes, as is the case in traditional surgery.

Read more

Since June 2017, surgeons have been able to use the XEN® technique in the ophthalmology department at GHPSJ.

Today, no study has yet assessed endothelial cell loss more than 2 years after this surgery. Indeed, the presence of an anterior chamber device of any type can be associated with endothelial cell loss, which increases over time well after the surgical procedure, and may require removal of the device several years after surgery.

Recent studies have investigated peripheral endothelial cell loss with other drainage systems. They show a significant decrease in peripheral endothelial cell density in relation to the implant placed in the anterior chamber. The aim of this study is to evaluate central and peripheral endothelial cell density in the long term after XEN® placement. At the visit more than 3 years after XEN® implant placement, IOP and pachymetry measurements were taken, along with a measurement of peripheral and central endothelial cell density. Corneal peripheral endothelial cell density is measured on the different quadrants of the treated eye, as well as on the controlateral eye. Measurements will be made for each eye for patients undergoing surgery on both eyes.

Read the detailed description

Glaucoma is a blinding optic neuropathy affecting 80 million people worldwide, with primary open-angle glaucoma being the most common etiology. Today, the therapeutic arsenal includes drug-based hypotonizing treatments, lasers and surgery. In France, the most common surgical techniques for glaucoma are trabeculectomy and deep non-perforating sclerectomy (SPNP). These are two filtering techniques designed to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) by creating an escape route for aqueous humor from the anterior chamber (AC) of the eye into the subconjunctival space, creating a filtering bubble (FB). They can be performed alone, or at the same time as cataract surgery. The short-term complications encountered with these techniques are early hypotony and its attendant complications (choroidal detachment, hypotonic maculopathy, haemorrhages, etc.), the most frequent cause of which is conjunctival leakage of the bubble. In the medium term, tension rises with a deep anterior chamber are evidence of an over-tight scleral flap, which may require suture lysis. Finally, problems of excessive conjunctivotenone scarring affect 25% to 30% of patients, and are responsible for the majority of late tension increases. In the longer term, the most frequent complication is cataract. The rarest but most serious complication is infection of the BF, which occurs more frequently when the walls of the BF are ischemic or perforated. It can be complicated by endophthalmitis, which can lead to irreversible loss of visual acuity.

A new minimally invasive treatment option has been developed to limit intra- and post-operative complications. This new technique is based on an ab interno approach, with implantation through the anterior chamber of a 6mm-long, 45µm-lumen collagen tube called XEN®. There is no need to dissect the conjunctivotenon planes, as is the case with traditional surgery.

The geometry of the XEN® implant has been designed to prevent major hypotonia. This new technique avoids the complications associated with conjunctival dissection, while being faster and offering a standardized surgical technique. ). Today, XEN® implant placement is used in simple surgery or combined with cataract surgery for open-angle glaucoma, incipient to moderate, associated or not with a cataract, progressive and unbalanced under local hypotonizing treatment.

Since June 2017, surgeons have been able to use the XEN® technique in the GHPSJ ophthalmology department.

To date, no study has assessed endothelial cell loss more than 2 years after this surgery. Indeed, the presence of an anterior chamber device of any type may be associated with endothelial cell loss that increases over time, well after the operation, and may require removal of the device several years after the operation. One study showed that the microinvasive ab interno Alcon Cypass® device (a device similar to XEN®) caused significant endothelial cell loss 2 years after device implantation, and was unacceptable compared with conventional glaucoma surgery. The damage was proportional to the surface area of the implant in the anterior chamber, and led to the immediate withdrawal of the device from the market.

Recent studies have examined peripheral endothelial cell loss with other drainage systems. They show a significant reduction in peripheral endothelial cell density in relation to the implant placed in the anterior chamber. Intracameral devices appear to have an impact on endothelial integrity. To date, no study has assessed long-term central and peripheral endothelial cell density after XEN® placement.

At the visit more than 3 years after XEN® implantation, intraocular pressure (IOP) is measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer, pachymetry with a NIDEK automatic refractometer and central and peripheral endothelial cell density with a NIDEK specular microscope. Peripheral corneal endothelial cell density is measured on the various ocular quadrants. The same measurements are taken on the controlateral eye. Patients undergoing surgery on both eyes receive the same measurements for each eye.

Conditions
Glaucoma
Keywords
glaucoma, Xen implant
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. assessment of long-term (>3years) central and peripheral endothelial cell density after XEN® placement.

    Difference in central and peripheral endothelial cell density between the upper nasal quadrant and the other quadrant (lower nasal, upper and lower temporal quadrant)

    Measured: at least 3 years after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2023
  2. Study start9 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
43 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05904613
Sponsor's protocol ID
RETROXEN
Acronym
RETROXEN
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
6 Jun 2023
Last updated
29 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Glaucoma, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

assessment of long-term (>3years) central and peripheral endothelial cell density after XEN® placement. (time frame: at least 3 years after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in