DementiaeRADARNCT05905796
The Brain Health Study: A Pragmatic, Patient-Centered Trial
A study testing Brain Health Assessment in people with Dementia and Alzheimer Disease, run by University of California, San Francisco at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The eRADAR Brain Health Study is an embedded, pragmatic clinical trial to determine whether targeted screening for dementia using the eRADAR algorithm increases dementia detection within primary care compared to usual care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dementia, Alzheimer Disease
- What is being tested?
- Brain Health Assessment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,261 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Dec 2022to 26 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- No prior diagnosis of dementia (defined from EHR diagnosis codes) and not receiving medications for dementia
- Active patient at participating clinic
- Adequate data to calculate eRADAR score
Who cannot join
- Currently receiving hospice care
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
UCSF Primary Care at China Basin
San Francisco, California, 94107
Division of General Internal Medicine
San Francisco, California, 94115
Women's Health Primary Care
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
Official title: Low-cost Detection of Dementia Using Electronic Health Records Data: Validation and Testing of the Electronic Health Record Risk of Alzheimer's and Dementia Assessment Rule (eRADAR) Algorithm in a Pragmatic, Patient-centered Trial.
The eRADAR Brain Health Study is an embedded, pragmatic clinical trial to determine whether targeted screening for dementia using the eRADAR algorithm increases dementia detection within primary care compared to usual care.
Read the detailed description
eRADAR stands for "electronic health record (EHR) Risk of Alzheimer's and Dementia Assessment Rule." It is a low-cost tool or algorithm that uses readily available EHR data elements to identify patients at risk of undiagnosed dementia. The investigators will conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of implementing eRADAR as part of a supported outreach process on dementia detection rates. The investigators will also explore the impact of eRADAR implementation on healthcare utilization and patient experience.
- Conditions
- Dementia, Alzheimer Disease
- Being tested
- Brain Health Assessment
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia, Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brain Health AssessmentOther
Research interventionists, who will be trained and licensed health practitioners (e.g., social workers), will ask participants about changes in memory or thinking and daily function, screen for depression, and administer a standard cognitive screening test. Research interventionalists will use a standardized note template to document results in the participant's EHR. Research interventionists will notify participants and PCPs if follow-up is recommended.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brain Health Intervention | Experimental | Participants in the intervention arm were invited to attend a "brain health" visit with a trained research interventionist who was a licensed clinician (e.g., social worker.) They were sent a mailed outreach letter and information sheet, with follow-up phone calls. At the visit, the research interventionist asked about memory symptoms and ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) and screened for cognitive impairment and depression. Results were shared with the participant and their primary care physician (PCP), who was responsible for follow up and more evaluation if needed and for making a final diagnosis of dementia, if applicable. Receives: Other: Brain Health Assessment |
| Usual Care | No intervention | Individuals in this arm did not receive any intervention but rather usual care. University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) does not routinely screen for cognitive impairment (in line with current guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
New Diagnoses of Dementia (12 Months)
Number of patients who received new dementia diagnoses within 12 months, identified from the electronic health record (EHR) using a prespecified set of ICD-10 codes
Measured: 12 months after index date
Secondary outcomes (12)
New Diagnoses of Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (12 Months)
Number of patients who received a new diagnosis of dementia or mild cognitive impairment within 12 months, defined from EHR data
Measured: 12 months after index date
New Diagnoses of Dementia (18 Months)
Number of patients who received a new diagnosis of dementia within 18 months of index date, defined from EHR data
Measured: 18 months after index date
New Diagnoses of Dementia (6 Months)
Number of patients receiving new dementia diagnoses within 6 months of index date, defined using EHR data
Measured: 6 months after index date
New Dementia Medications (12 Months)
Number of patients who received a new medication for dementia in 12 months, defined from medication orders or dispensings in the electronic health record
Measured: 12 months after index date
Urgent Care or Emergency Department Visits (12 Months)
Number of patients who had at least 1 urgent care or emergency department visit in the 12 months following their index date
Measured: 12 months after index date
Hospitalizations and Inpatient Admissions (12 Months)
Average number of hospitalizations and inpatient stays per participant within 12 months of index date
Measured: 12 months after index date
Scheduled Visits Missed (12 Months)
Average number of scheduled clinic visits missed ("no shows") per participant
Measured: 12 months after index date
Primary Care Visits (6 Months)
Average number of visits per participant in primary care within 6 months after the index date
Measured: 6 months after index date
Primary Care Visits (12 Months)
Average number of primary care visits per participant in the 12 months after their index date
Measured: 12 months after index date
B-12 Lab Tests (12 Months)
Number of patients with at least one B12 lab test in the 12 months after their index date
Measured: 12 months after index date
Neuroimaging Tests (12 Months)
Number of patients with at least one neuroimaging study (CT head, MRI brain) in the 12 months after their index date
Measured: 12 months after index date
Neurology Referrals (12 Months)
Number of patients with at least one referral to Neurology or the Memory and Aging Center in the 12 months after their index date
Measured: 12 months after index date
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2023
- Study start7 Dec 2022
- Primary completion6 Oct 2025
- Study completion26 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,261 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kaiser Permanente, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Deborah Barnes, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, San FranciscoSascha Dublin, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, KP Washington Health Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05905796
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1R01AG069734
- Other IDs
- 1R01AG069734
- Acronym
- eRADAR
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: This Individual Participant Data (IPD) plan applies to all quantitative study data, such as data collected specifically for the study and those derived from electronic health records (EHR), as well as the data collected via planned study surveys, which include only short qualitative free-text fields. The investigators do not plan to share transcripts from in-depth qualitative interviews or recorded study assessment visits. Data will be maintained on secure servers behind the firewalls at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). De-identified or limited datasets containing individual-level data on which publications are based will be made available to qualified researchers for specified analyses. The investigators will make the data available to users only under a data-use agreement (DUA).
Publications
Dublin S, Greenwood-Hickman MA, Karliner L, Hsu C, Coley RY, Colemon L, Carrasco A, King D, Grace A, Lee SJ, Walsh JME, Barrett T, Broussard J, Singh U, Idu A, Yaffe K, Boustani M, Barnes DE. The electronic health record Risk of Alzheimer's and Dementia Assessment Rule (eRADAR) Brain Health Trial: Protocol for an embedded, pragmatic clinical trial of a low-cost dementia detection algorithm. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;135:107356. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107356. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
PubMed 37858616Lee SJ, Larson EB, Dublin S, Walker R, Marcum Z, Barnes D. A Cohort Study of Healthcare Utilization in Older Adults with Undiagnosed Dementia. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):13-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4162-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 28849435Barnes DE, Zhou J, Walker RL, Larson EB, Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Marcum ZA, Dublin S. Development and Validation of eRADAR: A Tool Using EHR Data to Detect Unrecognized Dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):103-111. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16182. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
PubMed 31612463Coley RY, Smith JJ, Karliner L, Idu AE, Lee SJ, Fuller S, Lam R, Barnes DE, Dublin S. External Validation of the eRADAR Risk Score for Detecting Undiagnosed Dementia in Two Real-World Healthcare Systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):351-360. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07736-6. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
PubMed 35906516
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Low-cost Detection of Dementia Using Electronic Health Records Data: Validation and Testing of the Electronic Health Record Risk of Alzheimer's and Dementia Assessment Rule (eRADAR) Algorithm in a Pragmatic, Patient-centered Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05905796
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- eRADAR / 1R01AG069734
- Conditions
- Dementia, Alzheimer Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,261 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kaiser Permanente, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 7 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Oct 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The eRADAR Brain Health Study is an embedded, pragmatic clinical trial to determine whether targeted screening for dementia using the eRADAR algorithm increases dementia detection within primary care compared to usual care.
Detailed description
eRADAR stands for "electronic health record (EHR) Risk of Alzheimer's and Dementia Assessment Rule." It is a low-cost tool or algorithm that uses readily available EHR data elements to identify patients at risk of undiagnosed dementia. The investigators will conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of implementing eRADAR as part of a supported outreach process on dementia detection rates. The investigators will also explore the impact of eRADAR implementation on healthcare utilization and patient experience.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brain Health Intervention | Experimental | Other: Brain Health AssessmentParticipants in the intervention arm were invited to attend a "brain health" visit with a trained research interventionist who was a licensed clinician (e.g., social worker.) They were sent a mailed outreach letter and information sheet, with follow-up phone calls. At the visit, the research interventionist asked about memory symptoms and ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) and screened for cognitive impairment and depression. Results were shared with the participant and their primary care physician (PCP), who was responsible for follow up and more evaluation if needed and for making a final diagnosis of dementia, if applicable. |
| Usual Care | No intervention | –Individuals in this arm did not receive any intervention but rather usual care. University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) does not routinely screen for cognitive impairment (in line with current guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- No prior diagnosis of dementia (defined from EHR diagnosis codes) and not receiving medications for dementia
- Active patient at participating clinic
- Adequate data to calculate eRADAR score
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Currently receiving hospice care
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brain Health AssessmentResearch interventionists, who will be trained and licensed health practitioners (e.g., social workers), will ask participants about changes in memory or thinking and daily function, screen for depression, and administer a standard cognitive screening test. Research interventionalists will use a standardized note template to document results in the participant's EHR. Research interventionists will notify participants and PCPs if follow-up is recommended. | Other | Brain Health Intervention |
Primary outcome
New Diagnoses of Dementia (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
Number of patients who received new dementia diagnoses within 12 months, identified from the electronic health record (EHR) using a prespecified set of ICD-10 codes
12 secondary outcomes
New Diagnoses of Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
New Diagnoses of Dementia (18 Months)
Time frame: 18 months after index date
New Diagnoses of Dementia (6 Months)
Time frame: 6 months after index date
New Dementia Medications (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
Urgent Care or Emergency Department Visits (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
Hospitalizations and Inpatient Admissions (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
Scheduled Visits Missed (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
Primary Care Visits (6 Months)
Time frame: 6 months after index date
Primary Care Visits (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
B-12 Lab Tests (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
Neuroimaging Tests (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
Neurology Referrals (12 Months)
Time frame: 12 months after index date
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 37858616Dublin S, Greenwood-Hickman MA, Karliner L, Hsu C, Coley RY, Colemon L, Carrasco A, King D, Grace A, Lee SJ, Walsh JME, Barrett T, Broussard J, Singh U, Idu A, Yaffe K, Boustani M, Barnes DE. The electronic health record Risk of Alzheimer's and Dementia Assessment Rule (eRADAR) Brain Health Trial: Protocol for an embedded, pragmatic clinical trial of a low-cost dementia detection algorithm. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;135:107356. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107356. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 28849435Lee SJ, Larson EB, Dublin S, Walker R, Marcum Z, Barnes D. A Cohort Study of Healthcare Utilization in Older Adults with Undiagnosed Dementia. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):13-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4162-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 31612463Barnes DE, Zhou J, Walker RL, Larson EB, Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Marcum ZA, Dublin S. Development and Validation of eRADAR: A Tool Using EHR Data to Detect Unrecognized Dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):103-111. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16182. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
- Background: PubMed 35906516Coley RY, Smith JJ, Karliner L, Idu AE, Lee SJ, Fuller S, Lam R, Barnes DE, Dublin S. External Validation of the eRADAR Risk Score for Detecting Undiagnosed Dementia in Two Real-World Healthcare Systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):351-360. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07736-6. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. This Individual Participant Data (IPD) plan applies to all quantitative study data, such as data collected specifically for the study and those derived from electronic health records (EHR), as well as the data collected via planned study surveys, which include only short qualitative free-text fields. The investigators do not plan to share transcripts from in-depth qualitative interviews or recorded study assessment visits. Data will be maintained on secure servers behind the firewalls at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). De-identified or limited datasets containing individual-level data on which publications are based will be made available to qualified researchers for specified analyses. The investigators will make the data available to users only under a data-use agreement (DUA).
Related trials for Dementia
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deborah Barnes, PhD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
Sascha Dublin, MD, PhD principal investigator
KP Washington Health Research Institute
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Brain Health Assessment in people with Dementia and Alzheimer Disease, run by University of California, San Francisco at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
New Diagnoses of Dementia (12 Months) (time frame: 12 months after index date). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05905796, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2026.