Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNCT05906264
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patient
A study testing Tele-intervention in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study was designed in order to evaluate the compliance of a pulmonary rehabilitation program using a wearable device and the application effect of the program according to the characteristics of each patient, in COPD patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Tele-intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 9 Jun 2022to 14 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- COPD patients 18 years of age or older
- ECOG PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status) <2
- Smart phone user
- Those who understand the contents of the questionnaire and agree to the research
Who cannot join
- Patients with history of lung cancer surgery
- Patients with bronchiectasis, severe tuberculosis destroyed lung, active pulmonary tuberculosis, non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM), and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Compliance and Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patient
This study was designed in order to evaluate the compliance of a pulmonary rehabilitation program using a wearable device and the application effect of the program according to the characteristics of each patient, in COPD patients.
Read the detailed description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. Symptoms of COPD often restricts exercise capacity and activities of daily life of patients. Accordingly, patients with symptomatic COPD have reduced health-related quality of life, which leads to substantial socioeconomic burden.
In order to overcome the limitation associated with COPD pharmacotherapy, the need for a combination of nonpharmacologic therapies, including pulmonary rehabilitation has been suggested constantly. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a method of relieving respiratory distress symptoms through exhalation and inspiratory training, improving exercise ability and contributes in improving lung function and overall quality of life.
Nevertheless, compliance of pulmonary rehabilitation in daily life is low in most COPD patients. Thus, we applied wearable device to detect and evaluate application, compliance and effectiveness pulmonary rehabilitation program in COPD patients, according to the patients' characteristics. Moreover, we sought to use the results of this study as a basic data to establish a strategy for a customized education program for each patient that can be applied to non-face-to-face digital therapeutics in the future.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- Tele-intervention
- Keywords
- Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Tele-rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tele-interventionBehavioural
Tele-intervention every week to check compliance and encourage the rehabilitation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary rehabilitation, Control | No intervention | for COPD patients, who have been trained with the pulmonary rehabilitation program * Compliance will be checked by monitoring wearable device at one month * Pulmonary function and symptom improvement effect will be checked at 3 months |
| Pulmonary rehabilitation, Intervention | Active comparator | Compared to Control group, Intervention group will be provided with additional tele-intervention every week to check the compliance and encourage of the rehabilitation Receives: Behavioral: Tele-intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Activity minutes in 1 month
metabolic equivalents (METs)/day
Measured: 1 month after training
Pulmonary function test
Maximum phonation time (seconds)
Measured: 1 month after training
Dyspnea scale
mMRC dyspnea scale (0-4)
Measured: 1 month after training
Secondary outcomes (4)
Activity minutes in 3 months
metabolic equivalents (METs)/day
Measured: 3 month after training
Pulmonary function test
Pulmonary function test (FEV1/FVC)
Measured: 3 month after training
Dyspnea scale
mMRC dyspnea scale (0-4)
Measured: 3 month after training
Functional capacity
6 minute walk test (m/6min)
Measured: 3 month after training
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2023
- Study start9 Jun 2022
- Primary completion14 Mar 2025
- Study completion14 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Samsung Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Compared to control group, interventional group will be provided tele-intervention every week, checking compliance and encouraging the rehabilitation.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05906264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SMC_COPD_Rehab
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Mirza S, Clay RD, Koslow MA, Scanlon PD. COPD Guidelines: A Review of the 2018 GOLD Report. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Oct;93(10):1488-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.026.
PubMed 30286833Eisner MD, Anthonisen N, Coultas D, Kuenzli N, Perez-Padilla R, Postma D, Romieu I, Silverman EK, Balmes JR; Committee on Nonsmoking COPD, Environmental and Occupational Health Assembly. An official American Thoracic Society public policy statement: Novel risk factors and the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep 1;182(5):693-718. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1757ST.
PubMed 20802169Mathioudakis AG, Janssens W, Sivapalan P, Singanayagam A, Dransfield MT, Jensen JS, Vestbo J. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: in search of diagnostic biomarkers and treatable traits. Thorax. 2020 Jun;75(6):520-527. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214484. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
PubMed 32217784Simmering JE, Polgreen LA, Comellas AP, Cavanaugh JE, Polgreen PM. Identifying Patients With COPD at High Risk of Readmission. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Aug 29;3(4):729-738. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.4.2016.0136.
PubMed 28848899Miravitlles M, Murio C, Guerrero T, Gisbert R; DAFNE Study Group. Decisiones sobre Antibioticoterapia y Farmacoeconomia en la EPOC. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD. Chest. 2002 May;121(5):1449-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1449.
PubMed 12006427Ko FW, Chan KP, Hui DS, Goddard JR, Shaw JG, Reid DW, Yang IA. Acute exacerbation of COPD. Respirology. 2016 Oct;21(7):1152-65. doi: 10.1111/resp.12780. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
PubMed 27028990Zeng Y, Jiang F, Chen Y, Chen P, Cai S. Exercise assessments and trainings of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a literature review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jun 26;13:2013-2023. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S167098. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29983556Lacasse Y, Goldstein R, Lasserson TJ, Martin S. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub2.
PubMed 17054186Ribeiro F, Theriault ME, Debigare R, Maltais F. Should all patients with COPD be exercise trained? J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 May;114(9):1300-8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01124.2012. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
PubMed 23412902Oga T, Nishimura K, Tsukino M, Hajiro T, Mishima M. Dyspnoea with activities of daily living versus peak dyspnoea during exercise in male patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2006 Jun;100(6):965-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.10.006. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
PubMed 16298519Bianchi R, Gigliotti F, Romagnoli I, Lanini B, Castellani C, Binazzi B, Stendardi L, Bruni GI, Scano G. Impact of a rehabilitation program on dyspnea intensity and quality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiration. 2011;81(3):186-95. doi: 10.1159/000273675. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
PubMed 20090282Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
PubMed 12900694
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Compliance and Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patient
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05906264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMC_COPD_Rehab
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Tele-rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was designed in order to evaluate the compliance of a pulmonary rehabilitation program using a wearable device and the application effect of the program according to the characteristics of each patient, in COPD patients.
Detailed description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. Symptoms of COPD often restricts exercise capacity and activities of daily life of patients. Accordingly, patients with symptomatic COPD have reduced health-related quality of life, which leads to substantial socioeconomic burden.
In order to overcome the limitation associated with COPD pharmacotherapy, the need for a combination of nonpharmacologic therapies, including pulmonary rehabilitation has been suggested constantly. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a method of relieving respiratory distress symptoms through exhalation and inspiratory training, improving exercise ability and contributes in improving lung function and overall quality of life.
Nevertheless, compliance of pulmonary rehabilitation in daily life is low in most COPD patients. Thus, we applied wearable device to detect and evaluate application, compliance and effectiveness pulmonary rehabilitation program in COPD patients, according to the patients' characteristics. Moreover, we sought to use the results of this study as a basic data to establish a strategy for a customized education program for each patient that can be applied to non-face-to-face digital therapeutics in the future.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Compared to control group, interventional group will be provided tele-intervention every week, checking compliance and encouraging the rehabilitation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary rehabilitation, Control | No intervention | –for COPD patients, who have been trained with the pulmonary rehabilitation program * Compliance will be checked by monitoring wearable device at one month * Pulmonary function and symptom improvement effect will be checked at 3 months |
| Pulmonary rehabilitation, Intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: Tele-interventionCompared to Control group, Intervention group will be provided with additional tele-intervention every week to check the compliance and encourage of the rehabilitation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- COPD patients 18 years of age or older
- ECOG PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status) <2
- Smart phone user
- Those who understand the contents of the questionnaire and agree to the research
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with history of lung cancer surgery
- Patients with bronchiectasis, severe tuberculosis destroyed lung, active pulmonary tuberculosis, non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM), and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-interventionTele-intervention every week to check compliance and encourage the rehabilitation | Behavioural | Pulmonary rehabilitation, Intervention |
Primary outcome
Activity minutes in 1 month
Time frame: 1 month after training
metabolic equivalents (METs)/day
Pulmonary function test
Time frame: 1 month after training
Maximum phonation time (seconds)
Dyspnea scale
Time frame: 1 month after training
mMRC dyspnea scale (0-4)
4 secondary outcomes
Activity minutes in 3 months
Time frame: 3 month after training
Pulmonary function test
Time frame: 3 month after training
Dyspnea scale
Time frame: 3 month after training
Functional capacity
Time frame: 3 month after training
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 30286833Mirza S, Clay RD, Koslow MA, Scanlon PD. COPD Guidelines: A Review of the 2018 GOLD Report. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Oct;93(10):1488-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.026.
- Background: PubMed 20802169Eisner MD, Anthonisen N, Coultas D, Kuenzli N, Perez-Padilla R, Postma D, Romieu I, Silverman EK, Balmes JR; Committee on Nonsmoking COPD, Environmental and Occupational Health Assembly. An official American Thoracic Society public policy statement: Novel risk factors and the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep 1;182(5):693-718. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1757ST.
- Background: PubMed 32217784Mathioudakis AG, Janssens W, Sivapalan P, Singanayagam A, Dransfield MT, Jensen JS, Vestbo J. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: in search of diagnostic biomarkers and treatable traits. Thorax. 2020 Jun;75(6):520-527. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214484. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 28848899Simmering JE, Polgreen LA, Comellas AP, Cavanaugh JE, Polgreen PM. Identifying Patients With COPD at High Risk of Readmission. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Aug 29;3(4):729-738. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.4.2016.0136.
- Background: PubMed 12006427Miravitlles M, Murio C, Guerrero T, Gisbert R; DAFNE Study Group. Decisiones sobre Antibioticoterapia y Farmacoeconomia en la EPOC. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD. Chest. 2002 May;121(5):1449-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1449.
- Background: PubMed 27028990Ko FW, Chan KP, Hui DS, Goddard JR, Shaw JG, Reid DW, Yang IA. Acute exacerbation of COPD. Respirology. 2016 Oct;21(7):1152-65. doi: 10.1111/resp.12780. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
- Background: PubMed 29983556Zeng Y, Jiang F, Chen Y, Chen P, Cai S. Exercise assessments and trainings of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a literature review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jun 26;13:2013-2023. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S167098. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 17054186Lacasse Y, Goldstein R, Lasserson TJ, Martin S. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 23412902Ribeiro F, Theriault ME, Debigare R, Maltais F. Should all patients with COPD be exercise trained? J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 May;114(9):1300-8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01124.2012. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 16298519Oga T, Nishimura K, Tsukino M, Hajiro T, Mishima M. Dyspnoea with activities of daily living versus peak dyspnoea during exercise in male patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2006 Jun;100(6):965-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.10.006. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
- Background: PubMed 20090282Bianchi R, Gigliotti F, Romagnoli I, Lanini B, Castellani C, Binazzi B, Stendardi L, Bruni GI, Scano G. Impact of a rehabilitation program on dyspnea intensity and quality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiration. 2011;81(3):186-95. doi: 10.1159/000273675. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
- Background: PubMed 12900694Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Axatilimab and Corticosteroids as Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Multidisciplinary Care, Structured and Targeted on the COPD Patient's Clinical Pathway.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
The AIRWARD Study: A Study to Test Whether Verducatib Helps People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating and Promoting Resilience in Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome
Tourette Syndrome, Tic Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tele-intervention in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Activity minutes in 1 month (time frame: 1 month after training). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05906264, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2025.