StrokeNCT05906602
Motor and Neurophysiological Changes After Ischemic Conditioning in Individuals With Stroke
A study testing Real Ischemic Conditioning in people with Stroke, run by University of Illinois at Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test ischemic conditioning (blood flow restriction) as a neuromodulatory technique to improve gait function in stroke. Neuromodulation is emerging as a promising adjunct strategy to facilitate changes in brain activity and improve motor behavior following a neurological injury… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Real Ischemic Conditioning
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 May 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Single, stroke > 6 months since onset
- Residual hemiparetic gait deficits (e.g., abnormal gait pattern)
Who cannot join
- Lesions affecting the brainstem or cerebellum
- Other neurological disorders that may interfere with motor function
- Unhealed decubiti, persistent infections that may interfere with ability to perform test procedures
- Significant cognitive or communication impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE<21)), which could impede the understanding of the purpose of procedures of the study
- Botulinum toxin (Botox) treatments to the lower limb within the past 6 months
- Pregnant women
Show all 23Show fewer
- Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or ischemic conditioning (IC) (Listed below)
- TMS General Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous adverse reaction to TMS
- Skull abnormalities or fractures
- Concussion within the last 6 months
- Unexplained, recurring headaches
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker
- Metal implants in the head or face
- History of seizures or epilepsy
- Use of medications that could alter cortical excitability or increase risk of seizure (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants)
- Current pregnancy
- IC General Exclusion Criteria:
- History of thrombosis (i.e., blood clots) including venous thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
- Blood clots in the leg, or any condition in which compression of the thigh or transient ischemia is contraindicated (i.e., open wounds in the leg, bruising, nerve damage, etc.)
- Peripheral arterial grafts in the lower extremity
- History of uncontrolled hypertension
- History of peripheral vascular disease or hematological disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to test ischemic conditioning (blood flow restriction) as a neuromodulatory technique to improve gait function in stroke. Neuromodulation is emerging as a promising adjunct strategy to facilitate changes in brain activity and improve motor behavior following a neurological injury such as stroke.
The main questions this trial aims to answer are:
Read more
- Can ischemic conditioning produce neuromodulatory changes in the lower limb primary motor cortex?
- Can ischemic conditioning be used as a neuromodulatory technique to improve strength and motor control in individuals with stroke when compared to sham ischemic conditioning?
Participants will take part in two sessions of ischemic conditioning where a cuff (similar to ones that measure blood pressure) will be placed around the thigh and inflated to one of two blood flow restriction pressures (real ischemic conditioning (real IC) and sham ischemic conditioning (sham IC)). Each participant will experience measures of brain activity and motor behavior testing before and after both sessions (real IC and sham IC).
Researchers will investigate ischemic conditioning as neuromodulation modality in stroke to see if ischemic conditioning can produce beneficial changes in brain activity and improvements on subsequent motor behavior tasks.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Real Ischemic Conditioning, Sham Ischemic Conditioning
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Real Ischemic ConditioningDevice
10-minute cycles of blood flow restriction (5 minutes) followed by blood flow release (5 minutes), repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes.
Sham Ischemic ConditioningDevice
Sham ischemic conditioning will mirror ischemic conditioning procedures, differing solely in cuff pressure during blood flow restriction to replicate to replicate perceived tightness without arterial blood flow restriction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ischemic Conditioning then Sham Ischemic Conditioning | Experimental | While seated, a rapid inflation cuff, similar to those used to measure blood pressure, will be placed around the paretic thigh to perform real ischemic conditioning. The pressure of the cuff will be increased for 5 minutes followed by no pressure for 5 minutes, repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. After a washout period of at least 1 week, participants will then experience sham ischemic conditioning. While seated, a rapid inflation cuff, similar to those used to measure blood pressure, will be placed around the paretic thigh to perform sham or fake ischemic conditioning. The pressure of the cuff will be increased for 5 minutes followed by no pressure for 5 minutes, repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. Receives: Device: Real Ischemic Conditioning; Device: Sham Ischemic Conditioning |
| Sham Ischemic Conditioning then Ischemic Conditioning | Sham comparator | While seated, a rapid inflation cuff, similar to those used to measure blood pressure, will be placed around the paretic thigh to perform sham or fake ischemic conditioning. The pressure of the cuff will be increased for 5 minutes followed by no pressure for 5 minutes, repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. After a washout period of at least 1 week, participants will then experience ischemic conditioning. While seated, a rapid inflation cuff, similar to those used to measure blood pressure, will be placed around the paretic thigh to perform real ischemic conditioning. The pressure of the cuff will be increased for 5 minutes followed by no pressure for 5 minutes, repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. Receives: Device: Real Ischemic Conditioning; Device: Sham Ischemic Conditioning |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Corticomotor Excitability
Excitability of the primary lower limb motor cortex will be assessed using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) will be recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle of the paretic leg. Higher values indicate more corticomotor excitability.
Measured: Changes in corticomotor excitability will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Change in Transcallosal Inhibition
Inhibition from the stimulated hemisphere to the non-stimulated hemisphere will be quantified as a measure of the ipsilateral silent period (iSP) using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) will be recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle of the leg ipsilateral to TMS stimulation. Higher values indicate more inhibition from the stimulated hemisphere to the non-stimulated hemisphere.
Measured: Changes in transcallosal inhibition will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Change in Ankle Motor Control
Reaction time will be measured using a choice reaction time task involving rapid ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion movements in a custom built ankle-tracking device. Lower values reflect faster reaction times. Only dorsiflexion trials were analyzed to isolate TA activation, while both directions were included to minimize anticipatory activity.
Measured: Changes in ankle motor control will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Change in Lower Limb Strength
Participants will perform 3 trials each of maximum ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength. Higher values reflect more strength.
Measured: Changes in strength will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Subjective measures of pain will be reported during ischemic conditioning and sham ischemic conditioning using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Ratings from each session will be averaged for each participant, and the final value will represent the mean pain rating across all participants for each experimental condition.
Measured: During each real and sham ischemic conditioning session. Ratings from each session will be averaged for each participant, and the final value will represent the mean pain rating across all participants for each experimental condition.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2023
- Study start20 May 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Illinois at ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Illinois at Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sangeetha Madhavan, University of Illinois at Chicago
- Investigators
- Sangeetha Madhavan, PT, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Illinois at Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05906602
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-1620
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 19 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cummings M, Hannigan L, Madhavan S. Ischemic Conditioning Enhances Corticomotor Excitability, Strength, and Motor Control in the Short Term After Chronic Stroke. Neuromodulation. 2026 Jun 12:S1094-7159(26)00152-2. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2026.05.010. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42435025
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Motor and Neurophysiological Changes After Ischemic Conditioning in Individuals With Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05906602
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022-1620
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Illinois at ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Feb 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test ischemic conditioning (blood flow restriction) as a neuromodulatory technique to improve gait function in stroke. Neuromodulation is emerging as a promising adjunct strategy to facilitate changes in brain activity and improve motor behavior following a neurological injury such as stroke.
The main questions this trial aims to answer are:
- Can ischemic conditioning produce neuromodulatory changes in the lower limb primary motor cortex?
- Can ischemic conditioning be used as a neuromodulatory technique to improve strength and motor control in individuals with stroke when compared to sham ischemic conditioning?
Participants will take part in two sessions of ischemic conditioning where a cuff (similar to ones that measure blood pressure) will be placed around the thigh and inflated to one of two blood flow restriction pressures (real ischemic conditioning (real IC) and sham ischemic conditioning (sham IC)). Each participant will experience measures of brain activity and motor behavior testing before and after both sessions (real IC and sham IC).
Researchers will investigate ischemic conditioning as neuromodulation modality in stroke to see if ischemic conditioning can produce beneficial changes in brain activity and improvements on subsequent motor behavior tasks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ischemic Conditioning then Sham Ischemic Conditioning | Experimental | Device: Real Ischemic Conditioning, Device: Sham Ischemic ConditioningWhile seated, a rapid inflation cuff, similar to those used to measure blood pressure, will be placed around the paretic thigh to perform real ischemic conditioning. The pressure of the cuff will be increased for 5 minutes followed by no pressure for 5 minutes, repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. After a washout period of at least 1 week, participants will then experience sham ischemic conditioning. While seated, a rapid inflation cuff, similar to those used to measure blood pressure, will be placed around the paretic thigh to perform sham or fake ischemic conditioning. The pressure of the cuff will be increased for 5 minutes followed by no pressure for 5 minutes, repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. |
| Sham Ischemic Conditioning then Ischemic Conditioning | Sham comparator | Device: Real Ischemic Conditioning, Device: Sham Ischemic ConditioningWhile seated, a rapid inflation cuff, similar to those used to measure blood pressure, will be placed around the paretic thigh to perform sham or fake ischemic conditioning. The pressure of the cuff will be increased for 5 minutes followed by no pressure for 5 minutes, repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. After a washout period of at least 1 week, participants will then experience ischemic conditioning. While seated, a rapid inflation cuff, similar to those used to measure blood pressure, will be placed around the paretic thigh to perform real ischemic conditioning. The pressure of the cuff will be increased for 5 minutes followed by no pressure for 5 minutes, repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Single, stroke > 6 months since onset
- Residual hemiparetic gait deficits (e.g., abnormal gait pattern)
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Lesions affecting the brainstem or cerebellum
- Other neurological disorders that may interfere with motor function
- Unhealed decubiti, persistent infections that may interfere with ability to perform test procedures
- Significant cognitive or communication impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE<21)), which could impede the understanding of the purpose of procedures of the study
- Botulinum toxin (Botox) treatments to the lower limb within the past 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Real Ischemic Conditioning10-minute cycles of blood flow restriction (5 minutes) followed by blood flow release (5 minutes), repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes. | Device | Ischemic Conditioning then Sham Ischemic Conditioning, Sham Ischemic Conditioning then Ischemic Conditioning |
| Sham Ischemic ConditioningSham ischemic conditioning will mirror ischemic conditioning procedures, differing solely in cuff pressure during blood flow restriction to replicate to replicate perceived tightness without arterial blood flow restriction. | Device | Ischemic Conditioning then Sham Ischemic Conditioning, Sham Ischemic Conditioning then Ischemic Conditioning |
Primary outcome
Change in Corticomotor Excitability
Time frame: Changes in corticomotor excitability will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Excitability of the primary lower limb motor cortex will be assessed using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) will be recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle of the paretic leg. Higher values indicate more corticomotor excitability.
Change in Transcallosal Inhibition
Time frame: Changes in transcallosal inhibition will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Inhibition from the stimulated hemisphere to the non-stimulated hemisphere will be quantified as a measure of the ipsilateral silent period (iSP) using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) will be recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle of the leg ipsilateral to TMS stimulation. Higher values indicate more inhibition from the stimulated hemisphere to the non-stimulated hemisphere.
Change in Ankle Motor Control
Time frame: Changes in ankle motor control will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Reaction time will be measured using a choice reaction time task involving rapid ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion movements in a custom built ankle-tracking device. Lower values reflect faster reaction times. Only dorsiflexion trials were analyzed to isolate TA activation, while both directions were included to minimize anticipatory activity.
Change in Lower Limb Strength
Time frame: Changes in strength will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Participants will perform 3 trials each of maximum ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength. Higher values reflect more strength.
1 secondary outcome
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Time frame: During each real and sham ischemic conditioning session. Ratings from each session will be averaged for each participant, and the final value will represent the mean pain rating across all participants for each experimental condition.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42435025Cummings M, Hannigan L, Madhavan S. Ischemic Conditioning Enhances Corticomotor Excitability, Strength, and Motor Control in the Short Term After Chronic Stroke. Neuromodulation. 2026 Jun 12:S1094-7159(26)00152-2. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2026.05.010. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
RecruitingPhase 3
Probucol for Symptomatic Intracranial and Extracranial Artery Stenosis
Ischemic Stroke, TIA
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Anti-inflammatory and Anti-thrombotic Therapy With colcHicine and Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Reduction in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Clevidipine for the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sangeetha Madhavan, PT, PhD principal investigator
University of Illinois at Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Real Ischemic Conditioning in people with Stroke, run by University of Illinois at Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Feb 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Corticomotor Excitability (time frame: Changes in corticomotor excitability will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05906602, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.