AzTrials
AzTrials

RelapseNCT05915273

Relapse and Failure Rates Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fixed Retainers

A study testing Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing Retainers, Lab-based Retainers and Chairside Retainers in people with Relapse, run by Nourhan M.Aly at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study was to compare the differences in relapse and failure rates in patients treated with fixed retainers (FRs) using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing technology, lab-based technique, and chairside method. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Relapse
What is being tested?
Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing Retainers, Lab-based Retainers and Chairside Retainers
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
43 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2019to 30 Sep 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • completion of comprehensive orthodontic treatment
  • class I molar and canine relationships
  • indication for a fixed retainer on the mandibular anterior teeth.
  • no extractions done as part of their treatment.
  • Treatment with preadjusted edgewise appliance.

Who cannot join

  • refusal to participate
  • refusal to have fixed retainers
  • poor oral hygiene
  • non-compliance

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Saint Louis University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Relapse and Failure Rates Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fixed Retainers: A 2-year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of this study was to compare the differences in relapse and failure rates in patients treated with fixed retainers (FRs) using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing technology, lab-based technique, and chairside method.

Conditions
Relapse
Being tested
Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing Retainers, Lab-based Retainers, Chairside Retainers
Medical subject headings
Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing RetainersOther

    Also called CAD/CAM

    Custom-bent fixed retainer wires from an in-office CAD/CAM system with FixR software and the BenderI machine (YOAT Corporation, Lynwood, WA). Dentaflex wires- round, 0.5mm in diameter, three-stranded Stainless Steel (Dentaurum GmbH \& Co., Ispringen, Germany)- were used for the CAD/CAM group

  • Lab-based RetainersOther

    The lab group used the same type of wire as the CAD/CAM group but was manually bent by a lab technician

  • Chairside RetainersOther

    The chairside group used three-stranded Stainless Steel, 0.974mm x 0.402 mm, flexible Ortho-FlexTech wires (Reliance, Itasca, IL)

Study groups in NCT05915273
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CAD/CAM groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing Retainers
Lab groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Lab-based Retainers
Chairside groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Chairside Retainers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in intercanine width (ICW)

    ICW was measured on the Meshlab software using the 3D ruler measurement tool. Pre-treatment, post-treatment, and post-retention measures were recorded and any change in the ICW was considered relapse.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Change in Little's Irregularity Index (LII)

    ICW was measured on the Meshlab software using the 3D ruler measurement tool. Pre-treatment, post-treatment, and post-retention measures were recorded and any change in the LII was considered relapse.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
43 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05915273
Sponsor's protocol ID
32524
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
13 Jun 2023
Last updated
22 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Tran G, Rucker R, Foley P, Bankhead B, Adel SM, Kim KB. Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;46(1):cjad079. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad079.

    PubMed 38168815

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing Retainers, Lab-based Retainers and Chairside Retainers in people with Relapse, run by Nourhan M.Aly at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in intercanine width (ICW) (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05915273, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in