AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 1 DiabetesUCMODYNCT05918484

Usefulness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in MODY Diagnosis

An observational study of Type 1 Diabetes and MODY, run by Castilla-La Mancha Health Service at 9 sites in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Observational study about usefulness of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in the diagnosis of maturity-onset of the young (MODY) patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Type 1 Diabetes, MODY
What is being tested?
Intermittenly scanned continuous glucose monitoring and MODY genetic diagnostic test
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
500 participants
Where
9 sitesSpain
Study dates
1 Jul 2023to 31 Jan 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All T1D patients using isCGM in Castilla-La Mancha Public Health Service

Who may be able to join

  • Presence of T1D.
  • Age equal or higher than 18 years old.
  • In treatment with isCGM system.
  • Active data in Libreview.
  • isCGM use >70% of the possible time of use (isCGM data quality criteria).
  • Time in range >70%, glucose management index <7% and coefficiente of variation <36% in the last 14 days glucometric recording.

Who cannot join

  • Not receiving treatment with isCGM.
  • Diagnosis of T1D in the last three years.
  • Gestation in progress or programmed pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 1 country.

9 sites in 1 country

Spain9 sites
  • Albacete University Hospital

    Albacete, Albacete, 02006

  • La Mancha-Centro Hospital

    Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, 13600

  • Virgen de la Luz University Hospital

    Cuenca, Cuenca, 16002

  • Guadalajara University Hospital

    Guadalajara, Guadalajara, 19002

  • Maria Jose Picon

    Málaga, Malaga, 29010

  • Santa Barbara Hospital

    Puertollano, Ciudad Real, 13500

  • Virgen del Prado Hospital

    Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, 45600

  • Toledo University Hospital

    Toledo, Toledo, 45007

  • Valdepeñas General Hospital

    Valdepeñas, Ciudad Real, 13300

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Usefulness of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Maturity-onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) Patients

Observational study about usefulness of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in the diagnosis of maturity-onset of the young (MODY) patients.

Read the detailed description

Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of all patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Castilla-La Mancha (south-central Spanish region) using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM). This study aimed to asses the usefulness of isCGM in the diagnosis of MODY patients that were previously wrongly diagnosed as T1D patients.

The following glycometrics were taking into account as MODY predictors: time in range (70-180 mg/dL >70%, Glucose Management Index <7% y Coefficient of variation <36%. Patient´s clinical records of subjects meeting these glycometric criteria were reviewed for clinical suspicious of MODY (diagnosis before 35 years of age, first-degree family history of diabetes, negative pancreatic autoimmunity, preserved pancreatic beta cell function. Those patients meeting isCGM and clinical suspicious criteria were offered a diagnostic test for MODY.

The relationship between the qualitative outcome variable (MODY presence) and the quantitative variables will be performed using Student's t-test and ANOVA in situations of good fit with normality, and the Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis when there is not a good fit with normality, and the Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis when there is not.A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The protocol was approved by the reference Castilla-La Mancha Public Health Institute Ethic Committee.

Being tested
Intermittenly scanned continuous glucose monitoring, MODY genetic diagnostic test
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intermittenly scanned continuous glucose monitoringDevice

    Use of Intermittenly scanned continuous glucose monitoring (FreeStyle Libre) and meeting the glycometric data criteria:

    • Time in range 70-180 mg/L >70%
    • Glycemic management index <7%
    • Coefficient of variation <36%
  • MODY genetic diagnostic testOther

    Those patients fulfilling the glycometric data criteria and with clinical MODY suspicion:

    • diagnosis before 35 years of age
    • first-degree family history of diabetes.
    • negative pancreatic autoimmunity (Ac GAD, IA-2A and Ac ZnT8)
    • preserved pancreatic beta cell function defined as C-peptide > 0.2 ng/mL in the presence of plasma glycemia >140 mg/dL).

    Those patients who meet the previous criteria will proceed to the MODY genetic diagnostic test.

Study groups in NCT05918484
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Type 1 diabetes patientsAll type 1 diabetes patients using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain).
Receives: Device: Intermittenly scanned continuous glucose monitoring; Other: MODY genetic diagnostic test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Positive predictive value

    Positive predictive value of the combination of the glucometric variables TIR>70%, GMI <7% and CV <36% in the diagnosis of MODY. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

  2. Negative predictive value

    Negative predictive value of the combination of the glucometric variables TIR>70%, GMI <7% and CV <36% in the diagnosis of MODY. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

  3. Sensitive

    Sensitive of the combination of the glucometric variables TIR>70%, GMI <7% and CV <36% in the diagnosis of MODY. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

  4. Specificity

    Specificity of the combination of the glucometric variables TIR>70%, GMI <7% and CV <36% in the diagnosis of MODY. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Percetage of wrongly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients

    To assess the percentage of MODY patients with misdiagnosis of DM1. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

  2. Time in range of interstitial glucose in MODY patients

    To assess the percetage of time in range (70-180 mg/dL, 3.9-10 mmol/L) of interstitial glucose in patients finally diagnosed as MODY. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

  3. Time above range of interstitial glucose in MODY patients.

    To assess the percentage of time above range (>180 mg/dL, >10 mmol/L) of patients finally diagnosed as MODY. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

  4. Time beloww range of interstitial glucose in MODY patients.

    To assess the percentage of time bellow range (<70 mg/dL, <3.9 mmol/L) of patients finally diagnosed as MODY. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

  5. Coefficient of variation of interstitial glucose in MODY patients.

    To assess the coefficient of variations of patients finally diagnosed as MODY. Units % (min 0, max 100)

    Measured: 14 days

  6. isCGM daily scan frequency in MODY patients

    To analyze the use of iCGM in patients finally diagnosed as MODY through daily frequency of scanning (number daily scans, min 0-max 100).

    Measured: 14 days

  7. Percentage of iCGM in MODY patients

    To analyze the percentage of iCGM use in patients finally diagnosed as MODY (% time in use, units %, mix 0- max 100).

    Measured: 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05918484
Sponsor's protocol ID
C-621
Acronym
UCMODY
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
7 Jun 2023
Last updated
10 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Under other researchers request.

Publications

  • Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, Bosi E, Buckingham BA, Cefalu WT, Close KL, Cobelli C, Dassau E, DeVries JH, Donaghue KC, Dovc K, Doyle FJ 3rd, Garg S, Grunberger G, Heller S, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hovorka R, Jia W, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Levine B, Mayorov A, Mathieu C, Murphy HR, Nimri R, Norgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Rodbard D, Saboo B, Schatz D, Stoner K, Urakami T, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

    PubMed 31177185
  • Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, Hirsch IB, Kirkman MS, Klupa T, Ludwig B, Norgaard K, Pettus J, Renard E, Skyler JS, Snoek FJ, Weinstock RS, Peters AL. The Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Adults. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2021 Nov;44(11):2589-2625. doi: 10.2337/dci21-0043. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

    PubMed 34593612
  • Tosur M, Philipson LH. Precision diabetes: Lessons learned from maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Sep;13(9):1465-1471. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13860. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

    PubMed 35638342
  • Broome DT, Pantalone KM, Kashyap SR, Philipson LH. Approach to the Patient with MODY-Monogenic Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 1;106(1):237-250. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa710.

    PubMed 33034350
  • Shields BM, Shepherd M, Hudson M, McDonald TJ, Colclough K, Peters J, Knight B, Hyde C, Ellard S, Pearson ER, Hattersley AT; UNITED study team. Population-Based Assessment of a Biomarker-Based Screening Pathway to Aid Diagnosis of Monogenic Diabetes in Young-Onset Patients. Diabetes Care. 2017 Aug;40(8):1017-1025. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0224.

    PubMed 28701371

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Type 1 Diabetes and MODY, run by Castilla-La Mancha Health Service at 9 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Positive predictive value (time frame: 14 days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05918484, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in