AzTrials
AzTrials

MalnutritionAMASINNCT05918900

Analyses of Malnutrition Screening in Internal Medicine

An observational study of Malnutrition, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational study is to study the presence and consequences of malnutrition risk in hospitalized internal medicine patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How many patients are at risk of malnutrition at admission? 2. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Malnutrition
How many people
323 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
5 Jun 2023to 22 Sep 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients will be recruited at University Medicine Greifswald (Northeast Germany). Internal medicine patients with any gastrointestinal, endocrine, rheumatic, or nephrological disease admitted to the hospital will be identified in the respective wards and will be approached for study inclusion.

Who may be able to join

  • hospital admission for gastrointestinal, endocrine, rheumatic, or nephrological condition
  • provision of informed consent

Who cannot join

  • inability to provide consent
  • unfeasibility to perform malnutrition screening within 48h after admission

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University Medicine Greifswald

    Greifswald, 17475

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Descriptive and Comparative Analyses of Malnutrition Screening in Internal Medicine

The goal of this observational study is to study the presence and consequences of malnutrition risk in hospitalized internal medicine patients.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more
  1. How many patients are at risk of malnutrition at admission?
  2. Is there a link between an existing malnutrition risk and nutrition therapy that the patients receive?
  3. Is there a link between an existing malnutrition risk and clinical outcome (e.g. length of hospital stay, mortality, need for rehospitalization)?

Participants will be screened for malnutrition risk at admission using a validated questionnaire (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002). All relevant data regarding hospital stay will be obtained from the clinical information system after discharge.

Read the detailed description

Malnutrition is associated with adverse clinical outcome in hospitalized patients. Therefore, systematic screening for malnutrition risk at admission is recommended by almost all medical expert societies to identify patients who will benefit from nutritional therapy.

Although clinical and economic benefit of systematic malnutrition screening have been shown in various settings and for different patient groups, such screening is still not mandatory in most countries. In part, establishment of malnutrition screening is hampered by discrepant findings on the prevalence of malnutrition risk and the lack of evidence on a local level.

Hence, in this observational study the investigators examine the results of systematic malnutrition screening in internal medicine patients admitted to a university hospital in Northeast Germany. In particular, the investigators aim to determine the prevalence of malnutrition risk at hospital admission, the association between malnutrition risk and nutrition therapy as well as clinical outcome in different disciplines of internal medicine.

For this purpose, all patients undergo screening for malnutrition risk at admission using a validated instrument (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002). All relevant data regarding the patients' hospital stay will be obtained from the clinical information system after discharge.

Conditions
Malnutrition
Keywords
Malnutrition risk, Screening, Internal medicine, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, Gastroenterology, Nephrology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology
Medical subject headings
Malnutrition

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall presence of malnutrition risk

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in all internal medicine patients at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Presence of malnutrition risk in gastroenterology

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in patients with gastrointestinal disease at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Presence of malnutrition risk in endocrinology

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in patients with endocrine disease at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Presence of malnutrition risk in rheumatology

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in patients with rheumatic disease at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Presence of malnutrition risk in nephrology

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in patients with nephrological disease at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Relation of malnutrition risk to nutritional consultation

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and number of nutritional consultations. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Relation of malnutrition risk to nutritional diagnosis

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and nutritional diagnosis resulting from nutritional assessment by an expert dietitian. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Relation of malnutrition risk to intensive care treatment

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and admission to an intensive care unit. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Relation of malnutrition risk to intermediate care treatment

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and admission to an intermediate care unit. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Relation of malnutrition risk to mortality

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and in-hospital mortality. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Relation of malnutrition risk to length of hospital stay

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and length of hospital stay measured in days. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Relation of malnutrition risk and 30-day readmission

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after discharge. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Relation of malnutrition risk and 90-day readmission

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days after discharge. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2023
  2. Study start5 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completion22 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion22 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
323 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05918900
Sponsor's protocol ID
BB 073/23
Acronym
AMASIN
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
15 Jun 2023
Last updated
8 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Malnutrition, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall presence of malnutrition risk (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in