AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaPhase 4TRICORDANCT05919394

Triple vs High Dose Inhaled CORticosteroids

A Phase 4 study of Asthma, run by Galaxia Empírica at 17 sites in Spain.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Increase in inhaled corticosteroid dose vs triple therapy in T2-high asthma patients who remain uncontrolled with medium dose inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2 adrenergic combination: a real-life study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
17 sitesSpain
Study dates
1 Jun 2023to 14 Nov 2024
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients between 18 and 80 years of age diagnosed of uncontrolled asthma.
  • T2 high asthma: > 300 cels/mm3 blood Eos (current value) or 150 cels/mm3 blood Eos (current value) and a historical value ≥ 300 cels/mm3 or FENO ≥ 25 ppb (current value).
  • Uncontrolled asthma, this is, ACT <20 and/or > 1 of an exacerbation in the last 12 months, despite treatment with ICS/LABA at medium dose.
  • Written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who refuse to sign the informed consent form.
  • Medical situation that prevents the collection of study information.
  • Diagnosis of severe uncontrolled asthma established with criteria other than those established (ACT <20 and/or > 1 exacerbation in the last 12 months, despite treatment with ICS / LABA at medium dose).
  • Medical or administrative situation that prevents the patient from following up to a minimum of 52 weeks.
  • Treatment with high dose ICS/LABA, LAMA, systemic corticosteroid, azithromycin, monoclonal antibody.

Trial locations and contacts

17 sites in 1 country.

17 sites in 1 country

Spain17 sites
  • Hospital Universitario de A Coruña

    A Coruña, A Coruña, 15006

  • Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis de Alicante

    Alicante, Alicante, 03010

  • Hospital Universitario de Cruces

    Barakaldo, Bizkaia, 48903

  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, Barcelona, 08025

  • Hospital Universitario Galdakao-Usansolo

    Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves

    Granada, Granada, 18014

  • Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio

    Granada, Granada, 18016

  • Hospital Comarcal de Inca - Tramuntana

    Inca, Balearic Islands, 07300

  • Hospital Universitario De Jerez

    Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, 11407

  • Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti

    Lugo, Lugo, 27003

  • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal

    Madrid, Madrid, 28034

  • Hospital Costa del Sol

    Marbella, Álaga, 29603

  • Hospital Universitario Son Espases

    Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07120

  • Hospital Universitario de Navarra

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Hospital de Sagunto

    Sagunto, Valencia, 46520

  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca

    Salamanca, Salamanca, 37007

  • Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset

    Valencia, Valencia, 46017

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Increase in Inhaled Corticosteroid Dose vs Triple Therapy in T2-high Asthma Patients Who Remain Uncontrolled With Medium Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids/Long-acting β2 Adrenergic Combination: a Real-life Study. TRICORDA Study

Increase in inhaled corticosteroid dose vs triple therapy in T2-high asthma patients who remain uncontrolled with medium dose inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2 adrenergic combination: a real-life study.

Read the detailed description

It remains to be clarified whether triple therapy is better than high dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists combination (ICS/LABA) in patients with uncontrolled asthma despite the use of medium dose ICS/LABA combinations, particularly in cases with high T2 biomarkers´ values. The aim of this study is to evaluate, in a real-world setting, which is the best therapeutic strategy in this clinical scenario.

This study will be a randomized, open-label, two-arm, prospective, 12-month trial to be conducted in 53 hospital asthma units. Participants will be allocated to receive one of two therapeutic strategies: same ICS/LABA combination at highest doses or the same maintenance therapy plus a long-acting anticholinergic (LAMA). Follow up visits will be scheduled at 12-16, 24-28 and 52 weeks after the baseline visit. The investigators can optimise therapy according to their clinical opinion if the patient remains uncontrolled. Demographic, clinical and lung function information will be collected at each visit.

The primary endpoint will be the percentage of patients controlled at week 52, with both an ACT score of 20 or greater and no severe exacerbations). 620 patients (282 patients per treatment group, considering 10% drop-out) will be required for the study to have 80% power to detect non-inferiority limit of 10% in the rate of controlled patients between the high dose ICS/LABA arm and the triple therapy arm. All effectiveness analyses will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle. Secondary endpoints: percentage of patients controlled at week 24, ACT at weeks 12, 24 and 52, AIRQ at weeks 12, 24 and 52, quality of life (Mini-AQLQ) at weeks 12, 24 and 52, postbronchodilator FEV1 at weeks 12, 24 and 52, severe exacerbations at week 24 and 52. Differences between groups in 8 AM serum cortisol at week 52. Adherence at week 52 in the two study arms. Factors related to triple and high-dose ICS/LABA failure and success (control) at week 52.

The results of this study will help physicians to decide the most appropriate therapeutic strategy for a large number of asthma patients: those who do not gain control with medium dose ICS/LABA. If non-inferiority of triple therapy vs high dose ICS/LABA is demonstrated, it could lead to a modification of the current guidelines.

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
To compare in both treatment arms the percentage of patients controlled at week 52.
Keywords
Wheezing, Dyspnoea, Cough
Medical subject headings
Asthma, Respiratory Sounds, Dyspnea, Cough

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • To compare in both treatment arms the percentage of patients controlled at week 52.Drug

    Also called Triple therapy

    Participants will be assigned to receive one of two therapeutic strategies: the same ICS/LABA combination at the higher doses or the same maintenance treatment at medium doses plus a LAMA.

Study groups in NCT05919394
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Triple treatment with medium doses of CSI/LABA/LAActive comparatorMedium-dose inhaled triple therapy of inhaled corticosteroid: IC, long-acting beta-agonist: LABA and anticholinergic: LAMA
Receives: Drug: To compare in both treatment arms the percentage of patients controlled at week 52.
Treatment with high doses of CSI/LABAActive comparatorHigh doses of of inhaled corticosteroid: IC and long-acting beta-agonist: LABA
Receives: Drug: To compare in both treatment arms the percentage of patients controlled at week 52.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The percentage of patients controlled

    The primary endpoint will be the percentage of patients controlled at week 52, with both an ACT score of 20 or greater and no severe exacerbations.

    Measured: At 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Percentage of patients controlled

    Percentage of patients controlled at week 24, with both an ACT score of 20 or greater and no severe exacerbations.

    Measured: At week 24

  2. ASMA CONTROL TEST (ACT)

    This is a 5-point scale. Scores range from 5 (poor asthma control) to 25 (total asthma control), with higher scores reflecting better asthma control. An ACT score >19 indicates well-controlled asthma. The minimally important difference (MID) is 3 points.

    Measured: At weeks 12, 24 and 52

  3. AIRQ

    It is a patient assessment tool intended to help identify patients aged 12 years and older whose health may be at risk due to uncontrolled asthma. It is a 10-item, equally weighted asthma control questionnaire comprising 7 impairment items and 3 risk items.

    Measured: At weeks 12, 24 and 52

  4. Quality of life (Mini-AQLQ)

    This instrument has 15 questions in the same domains as the original AQLQ (symptoms, activities, emotions and environment). A change in score greater than 0.5 can be considered clinically important.

    Measured: At weeks 12, 24 and 52

  5. Postbronchodilator FEV1

    Performed with equipment and techniques that meet the standards developed by the Spanish Society of Respiratory Medicine (SEPAR) (18). Spirometry results will include pre-/ post-bronchodilator FEV1 (in litres) and % predicted value, FVC (in litres and % predicted) and FEV1/FVC ratio. Bronchodilator response is defined as an increase in post-bronchodilator FEV1 >12% and >0.2 l (measured 15 minutes after inhalation of 200 μg of salbutamol, using a spacer chamber) compared to pre-bronchodilator FEV1.

    Measured: At weeks 12, 24 and 52

  6. Severe exacerbations

    Severe exacerbations

    Measured: At week 24 and 52

  7. Differences between groups in 8 AM serum cortiso

    Differences between groups in 8 AM serum cortiso

    Measured: At week 52

  8. Adherence in the two study arms

    Adherence in the two study arms

    Measured: At week 52

  9. Factors related to triple and high-dose ICS/LABA failure and success (control)

    Factors related to triple and high-dose ICS/LABA failure and success (control)

    Measured: At week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion14 Nov 2024

Why it stopped: The study is closed due to lack of recruitment.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05919394
Sponsor's protocol ID
TRICORDA
Acronym
TRICORDA
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
1 Jun 2023
Last updated
4 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study of Asthma, run by Galaxia Empírica at 17 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 17 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The percentage of patients controlled (time frame: At 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in