Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD)Phase 1/2AMARONENCT05919693
A 2-part Study Consisting of Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Safety Study, and a Dose-finding Masked Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal (IVT) EYE103 in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) or Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD)
A Phase 1/2 study testing EYE103 in people with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD) and Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), run by EyeBiotech Ltd. at 32 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
EYE103-101 is a 2-part study assessing safety and preliminary efficacy of EYE103 in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) given as monotherapy or neovascular macular degeneration (NVAMD) given in combination with anti-VEGF. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD), Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
- What is being tested?
- EYE103
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 32 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Jun 2023to 26 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be willing and able to understand the study procedures and the risks involved and provide written informed consent before the first study-related activity
- DME patients must be ≥ 18 years of age, NVAMD patients must be ≥ 50 years of age
- Diagnosis of either DME or NVAMD. DME patients must be treatment naïve. NVAMD patients can be either treatment naïve or treatment experienced.
- DME patients must have vision loss in the study eye
- NVAMD patients can be either treatment-naïve or treatment experienced with vision loss in the study eye
Who cannot join
- Be pregnant or breastfeeding
- History of cataract surgery and/or minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) within 3 months of Screening
- Yttrium-Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser capsulotomy within 2 months of Screening
- Any other condition except for DME or NVAMD or that could affect interpretation of study assessments
Trial locations and contacts
32 sites in 4 countries.
32 sites in 4 countries
United States27 sites
Abilene, TX
Abilene, Texas, 79606
Amarillo, TX
Amarillo, Texas, 79109
Austin, TX
Austin, Texas, 78705
Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Bellaire, TX
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Dallas, TX
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Germantown, TN
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Hagerstown, MD
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Katy, TX
Katy, Texas, 77494
Knoxville, TN
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922
Lakewood, CO
Lakewood, Colorado, 80288
Lemont, NV
Lemont, Illinois, 60439
McAllen, TX
McAllen, Texas, 78503
Modesto, CA
Modesto, California, 95356
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, California, 94040
Nashville, TN
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Plano, TX
Plano, Texas, 75075
Pompano Beach
Pompano Beach, Florida, 33064
Reno, NV
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Round Rock, TX
Round Rock, Texas, 78681
Sacramento, CA
Sacramento, California, 95825
Sacramento, CA
Sacramento, California, 95841
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, Texas, 78240
The Woodlands, TX
The Woodlands, Texas, 77384
West Columbia, SC
West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169
Argentina2 sites
Caba, Argentina
Caba, 1023
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1121ABB
United Kingdom2 sites
London, England
London, England, NW10 7NS
London, UK
London, W1G7LB
About this study
Official title: A 2-part Study Consisting of an Open-label Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Safety Study, and a Dose-finding Single-masked Comparative Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Intravitreal (IVT) EYE103 in a Mixed Population of Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) or Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD)
EYE103-101 is a 2-part study assessing safety and preliminary efficacy of EYE103 in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) given as monotherapy or neovascular macular degeneration (NVAMD) given in combination with anti-VEGF.
In the first part, termed the multiple ascending dose (MAD) portion of study, the safety of EYE103 will be assessed at escalating doses. Approximately 12 participants will be entered in this part of the study.
In the second part of the study, called the dose finding part two doses of EYE103 will be selected and their effectiveness will be compared. Approximately 80 participants will be entered in this part of the study.
Read the detailed description
EYE103-101 is a 2-part study assessing safety and preliminary efficacy of EYE103 in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) given as monotherapy or neovascular macular degeneration (NVAMD) given in combination with anti-VEGF.
In the first part, termed the multiple ascending dose (MAD) portion of study, the safety of EYE103 will be assessed at escalating doses. Approximately 12 participants will be entered in this part of the study.
In the second part of the study, called the dose finding part two doses of EYE103 will be selected and their effectiveness will be compared. Approximately 80 participants will be entered in this part of the study.
- Being tested
- EYE103
- Keywords
- Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD), Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EYE103Drug
EYE103 is a humanized antibody formulated for IVT administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dose 1 | Experimental | Part 1 MAD Portion Dose 1 - Low Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| Dose 2 | Experimental | Part 1 MAD Portion Dose 2 - Low-Mid Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| Dose 3 | Experimental | Part 1 MAD Portion Dose 3 - Mid-High Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| Dose 4 | Experimental | Part 1 MAD Portion Dose 4 - High Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| DME Medium Dose | Experimental | Part 2 Naïve DME monotherapy Medium Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| DME High Dose | Experimental | Part 2 Naïve DME monotherapy High Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| Naïve NVAMD Medium Dose | Experimental | Part 2 Naïve NVAMD combination therapy Medium Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| Naïve NVAMD High Dose | Experimental | Part 2 Naïve NVAMD combination therapy High Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| Experienced NVAMD Medium Dose | Experimental | Part 2 Experienced NVAMD combination therapy Medium Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
| Experienced NVAMD High Dose | Experimental | Part 2 Experienced NVAMD combination therapy High Dose Receives: Drug: EYE103 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)
Systemic DLTs are defined as a Grade III (severe), IV (life threatening) or V (death related to adverse event) toxicities as defined in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria, or any significant severe toxicity deemed related to study drug by the principal investigator. Ocular DLTs are defined as: loss of 4 or more lines of visual acuity, clinically significant inflammation, increase of intra-ocular pressure (IOP) from baseline of > or =15 mmHg, accelerated formation of cataract, other severe ocular abnormalities not usually seen in subjects with the condition under study, or significant retinal or choroidal vascular abnormalities seen on fluorescein angiogram deemed related to study drug by the investigator.
Measured: Up to approximately 12 weeks
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. Therefore, an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Measured: Up to approximately 12 weeks
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An SAE is defined as any adverse experience occurring at any dose that results in any of the following outcomes: Results in death; Is life threatening (immediate risk of death); results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; requires participant hospitalization or prolongs participant hospitalization; or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant
Measured: Up to approximately 24 weeks
Number of Participants Who Experienced Clinically Meaningful Changes in Laboratory Assessments
Clinical laboratory tests, including overnight fasting serum chemistry, lipid panel, hematology, and coagulation panel were collected at baseline and at week 12 study visit. Any laboratory test result considered by the investigator to be clinically significant was considered to be an AE. Clinically significant abnormal values were followed up until repeat test results return to normal, stabilize, or are no longer clinically significant.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) to Week 12 in the Study Eye - DME Participants
Participants' BCVA in the study eye is measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. Mean change in ETDRS letters from baseline to week 12 is presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA to Week 12 in the Study Eye -NVAMD Participants
Participants' BCVA in the study eye is measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. Mean change in ETDRS letters from baseline to week 12 is presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (8)
Number of Participants With ETDRS BCVA Response- Treatment-Naive DME Participants
Participants' BCVA in the study eye is measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of participants who gained 15 or more letters as measured by ETDRS from baseline in the study eye is presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With ETDRS BCVA Response- Treatment-Naive NVAMD Participants
Participants' BCVA in the study eye is measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of participants who gained 15 or more letters as measured by ETDRS from baseline in the study eye is presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change in Retinal Central Subfield Thickness (CST) From Baseline in the Study Eye on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SDOCT): Treatment-naive DME Participants
SDOCT machines and technicians were certified at each study site by the independent reading center (IRC) prior to study start. Images were sent to the IRC for assessment. A negative change (decrease) in retinal CST from baseline indicates a decrease in retinal thickness or swelling and is considered a better outcome than no change or an increase in CST. The mean change at 12 weeks in the study eye for retinal CST from baseline is presented.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Mean Change in Retinal CST From Baseline in the Study Eye on SDOCT: Treatment-naive NVAMD Participants
SDOCT machines and technicians were certified at each study site by the independent reading center (IRC) prior to study start. Images were sent to the IRC for assessment. A negative change (decrease) in retinal CST from baseline indicates a decrease in retinal thickness or swelling and is considered a better outcome than no change or an increase in CST. The mean change at 12 weeks in the study eye for retinal CST from baseline is presented.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Loss of Vision From Baseline by 15 or More Letters at Week 12-Treatment Naive DME Participants
Participants' BCVA in the study eye is measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of participants who lost 15 or more letters as measured by ETDRS from baseline in the study eye is presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Loss of Vision From Baseline by 15 or More Letters at Week 12-Treatment Naive NVAMD Participants
Participants' BCVA in the study eye is measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of participants who lost 15 or more letters as measured by ETDRS from baseline in the study eye is presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change in Excess Retinal Fluid From Baseline at Week 12: Treatment-naive DME Participants
Retinal fluid in the study eye was measured by central subfield thickness (CST) as evaluated on SDOCT. SDOCT machines and technicians were certified at each study site by the independent reading center (IRC) prior to study start. Images were sent to the IRC for assessment. This outcome measure evaluates the relative change in excess CST above > 300 um from baseline to Week 12, expressed as a percentage of the baseline value. The percent change from baseline in CST in the study eye is calculated as follows: (Excess CST Baseline-Excess CST Week 12/Excess CST Baseline) *100. Positive values represent a percent reduction in excess retinal fluid (clinical improvement), and negative values represent a percent increase in excess retinal fluid (clinical worsening).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change in Excess Retinal Fluid From Baseline at Week 12: Treatment-naive NVAMD Participants
Retinal fluid in the study eye was measured by central subfield thickness (CST) as evaluated on SDOCT. SDOCT machines and technicians were certified at each study site by the independent reading center (IRC) prior to study start. Images were sent to the IRC for assessment. This outcome measure evaluates the relative change in excess CST above > 300 um from baseline to Week 12, expressed as a percentage of the baseline value. The percent change from baseline in CST in the study eye is calculated as follows: (Excess CST Baseline-Excess CST Week 12/Excess CST Baseline) *100. Positive values represent a percent reduction in excess retinal fluid (clinical improvement), and negative values represent a percent increase in excess retinal fluid (clinical worsening).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2023
- Study start12 Jun 2023
- Primary completion26 Aug 2024
- Study completion26 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Part 1 is a multiple-dose escalation study and patients will be enrolled sequentially in ascending order through the dose levels until the highest level is reached or until a maximum tolerated dose is reached, whichever comes first. Part 2 is randomized single-masked study where patients on all arms will be enrolled in parallel.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- EyeBiotech Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05919693
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EYE103-101
- Other IDs
- MK-3000-003
- Acronym
- AMARONE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 2-part Study Consisting of an Open-label Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Safety Study, and a Dose-finding Single-masked Comparative Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Intravitreal (IVT) EYE103 in a Mixed Population of Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) or Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05919693
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMARONE / EYE103-101
- Keywords
- Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD), Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EyeBiotech Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Sep 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
EYE103-101 is a 2-part study assessing safety and preliminary efficacy of EYE103 in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) given as monotherapy or neovascular macular degeneration (NVAMD) given in combination with anti-VEGF.
In the first part, termed the multiple ascending dose (MAD) portion of study, the safety of EYE103 will be assessed at escalating doses. Approximately 12 participants will be entered in this part of the study.
In the second part of the study, called the dose finding part two doses of EYE103 will be selected and their effectiveness will be compared. Approximately 80 participants will be entered in this part of the study.
Detailed description
EYE103-101 is a 2-part study assessing safety and preliminary efficacy of EYE103 in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) given as monotherapy or neovascular macular degeneration (NVAMD) given in combination with anti-VEGF.
In the first part, termed the multiple ascending dose (MAD) portion of study, the safety of EYE103 will be assessed at escalating doses. Approximately 12 participants will be entered in this part of the study.
In the second part of the study, called the dose finding part two doses of EYE103 will be selected and their effectiveness will be compared. Approximately 80 participants will be entered in this part of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 10
- Model description
- Part 1 is a multiple-dose escalation study and patients will be enrolled sequentially in ascending order through the dose levels until the highest level is reached or until a maximum tolerated dose is reached, whichever comes first. Part 2 is randomized single-masked study where patients on all arms will be enrolled in parallel.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dose 1 | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 1 MAD Portion Dose 1 - Low Dose |
| Dose 2 | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 1 MAD Portion Dose 2 - Low-Mid Dose |
| Dose 3 | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 1 MAD Portion Dose 3 - Mid-High Dose |
| Dose 4 | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 1 MAD Portion Dose 4 - High Dose |
| DME Medium Dose | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 2 Naïve DME monotherapy Medium Dose |
| DME High Dose | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 2 Naïve DME monotherapy High Dose |
| Naïve NVAMD Medium Dose | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 2 Naïve NVAMD combination therapy Medium Dose |
| Naïve NVAMD High Dose | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 2 Naïve NVAMD combination therapy High Dose |
| Experienced NVAMD Medium Dose | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 2 Experienced NVAMD combination therapy Medium Dose |
| Experienced NVAMD High Dose | Experimental | Drug: EYE103Part 2 Experienced NVAMD combination therapy High Dose |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Be willing and able to understand the study procedures and the risks involved and provide written informed consent before the first study-related activity
- DME patients must be ≥ 18 years of age, NVAMD patients must be ≥ 50 years of age
- Diagnosis of either DME or NVAMD. DME patients must be treatment naïve. NVAMD patients can be either treatment naïve or treatment experienced.
- DME patients must have vision loss in the study eye
- NVAMD patients can be either treatment-naïve or treatment experienced with vision loss in the study eye
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Be pregnant or breastfeeding
- History of cataract surgery and/or minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) within 3 months of Screening
- Yttrium-Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser capsulotomy within 2 months of Screening
- Any other condition except for DME or NVAMD or that could affect interpretation of study assessments
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EYE103EYE103 is a humanized antibody formulated for IVT administration | Drug | DME High Dose, DME Medium Dose, Dose 1, Dose 2, Dose 3, Dose 4, Experienced NVAMD High Dose, Experienced NVAMD Medium Dose, Naïve NVAMD High Dose, Naïve NVAMD Medium Dose |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 weeks
Systemic DLTs are defined as a Grade III (severe), IV (life threatening) or V (death related to adverse event) toxicities as defined in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria, or any significant severe toxicity deemed related to study drug by the principal investigator. Ocular DLTs are defined as: loss of 4 or more lines of visual acuity, clinically significant inflammation, increase of intra-ocular pressure (IOP) from baseline of > or =15 mmHg, accelerated formation of cataract, other severe ocular abnormalities not usually seen in subjects with the condition under study, or significant retinal or choroidal vascular abnormalities seen on fluorescein angiogram deemed related to study drug by the investigator.
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 weeks
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. Therefore, an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: Up to approximately 24 weeks
An SAE is defined as any adverse experience occurring at any dose that results in any of the following outcomes: Results in death; Is life threatening (immediate risk of death); results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; requires participant hospitalization or prolongs participant hospitalization; or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant
Number of Participants Who Experienced Clinically Meaningful Changes in Laboratory Assessments
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Clinical laboratory tests, including overnight fasting serum chemistry, lipid panel, hematology, and coagulation panel were collected at baseline and at week 12 study visit. Any laboratory test result considered by the investigator to be clinically significant was considered to be an AE. Clinically significant abnormal values were followed up until repeat test results return to normal, stabilize, or are no longer clinically significant.
Mean Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) to Week 12 in the Study Eye - DME Participants
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Participants' BCVA in the study eye is measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. Mean change in ETDRS letters from baseline to week 12 is presented.
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA to Week 12 in the Study Eye -NVAMD Participants
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Participants' BCVA in the study eye is measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. Mean change in ETDRS letters from baseline to week 12 is presented.
8 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With ETDRS BCVA Response- Treatment-Naive DME Participants
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With ETDRS BCVA Response- Treatment-Naive NVAMD Participants
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change in Retinal Central Subfield Thickness (CST) From Baseline in the Study Eye on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SDOCT): Treatment-naive DME Participants
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Mean Change in Retinal CST From Baseline in the Study Eye on SDOCT: Treatment-naive NVAMD Participants
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Loss of Vision From Baseline by 15 or More Letters at Week 12-Treatment Naive DME Participants
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Loss of Vision From Baseline by 15 or More Letters at Week 12-Treatment Naive NVAMD Participants
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change in Excess Retinal Fluid From Baseline at Week 12: Treatment-naive DME Participants
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change in Excess Retinal Fluid From Baseline at Week 12: Treatment-naive NVAMD Participants
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Dose-masked Study of Intravitreal Remigromig (EYE103) in Participants With NVAMD or Macular Edema Following BRVO
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD), Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Trial of EYE201/MK-8748 in People With Macular Degeneration (MK-8748-002)
Macular Degeneration, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Trial of EYE201/MK-8748 in People With Macular Degeneration (MK-8748-003)
Macular Degeneration, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
32 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing EYE103 in people with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (NVAMD) and Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), run by EyeBiotech Ltd. at 32 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 32 sites in United States, Argentina, United Kingdom, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Sep 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) (time frame: Up to approximately 12 weeks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2026.