Intellectual ImpairmentNCT05922215
Effects of Balance Training on Gait and Functional Strength in Children With Intellectual Disabilities
A study testing Dynamic Balance training and Static balance training in people with Intellectual Impairment, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Intellectual impairment is a developmental condition that first appears in childhood and causes substantial intellectual or cognitive limitations as well as inadequate adaptation to the demands of daily life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Intellectual Impairment
- What is being tested?
- Dynamic Balance training and Static balance training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 9 Mar 2023to 30 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Boys and Girls with Mild Intellectual Disabilities (IQ range 50-69)
- Age group: 7-14 years
- Students from a Special Education School
Who cannot join
- CP and Down's syndrome
- Those who were unable to complete follow-up tests.
- Subjects who took part in less than 80% of the intervention program.
- Participants with any psychological or behavioral issues.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
Rising Sun Institute for special children
Lahore, Punjab Province, 51000
About this study
Intellectual impairment is a developmental condition that first appears in childhood and causes substantial intellectual or cognitive limitations as well as inadequate adaptation to the demands of daily life. It may be viewed as a syndrome grouping (meta-syndrome), rather than as an illness or a disability; encompassing a wide range of clinical problems, including hereditary, viral, metabolic, and neurological issues. Prior to learning new abilities, there is a loss in cognitive functioning that is indicative of ID. Falling is a severe issue that affects people with intellectual disabilities frequently. Although studies based on retrospective data collected over time have not determined the exact prevalence of falling in the ID community, they have estimated that 30-60% of people fall within a 12-month period. Similar fall risk factors exist in the general population and in people with ID, such as advancing age, vision problems, and mobility issues. However, some characteristics, such as having frequent seizures and a high level of ambulation, seem more distinctive to ID. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of balance training on gait and functional strength in children with mild intellectual disabilities. This will be a Randomized Controlled Trial. Approval will be gained from the Ethical committee of the Riphah international university Lahore, Pakistan prior to the commencement of study. Written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and all information and data will be confidential. Subjects will be informed that there is no risk of study and they will be free to withdraw any time during process of study. 22 intellectually disabled children between the ages of 7 and 14 will be randomly allocated to the Experimental group (n=10) or a Control group (n=10). The Experimental group will be given the Baseline treatment comprising of Static balance training (i.e. heel and toe raises, alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) alongside Dynamic Balance training (weight shifting forward, backward, sideward, and diagonally with eyes opened and eyes closed, walking toe-to-heel barefoot, side walking, reverse walking and one-foot jumps), and Progressive activity training (including stepping over/on obstacles, throwing and catching a ball, and kicking a ball.) for 40 minutes per day, twice each week for 8 weeks. Whereas, the Control group will continue their regular school schedule, which will include participation in physical education activities at the same frequency. Along with that, only Baseline treatment including Static balance training (i.e. alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) will be given at the same intervals and for the same length of time as the intervention group, with the exception of additional Dynamic balance training and progressive activity training. The time up-and-go test, the 10-meter walk test and GMFM-88 were used to evaluate gait, and the Sit-to-stand test and the Stair Climbing test. were used to measure each participant's functional strength. Pre and Post treatment values will be evaluated and the Data will be analyzed using SPSS 22.0.
- Conditions
- Intellectual Impairment
- Being tested
- Dynamic Balance training, Static balance training
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dynamic Balance trainingOther
The Experimental group will be given the Baseline treatment comprising of Stretching \& Static balance training (i.e. heel and toe raises, alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) alongside Dynamic Balance training which will include (weight shifting forward, backward, sideward, and diagonally with eyes opened and eyes closed, walking toe-to-heel barefoot, side walking, reverse walking and one-foot jumps), and Progressive activity training (such as stepping over/on obstacles, throwing and catching a ball, and kicking a ball.) for 40 minutes per day, twice each week for 8 weeks.
Static balance trainingOther
The Control group will continue their regular school schedule, which will include participation in physical education activities at the same frequency. Along with that Baseline treatment including Static balance training (i.e. alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) only, at the same intervals and for the same length of time as the intervention group, with the exception of additional Dynamic balance training and progressive activity training.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Dynamic Balance training; Other: Static balance training |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Static balance training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Time Up and Go test
The Time Up and Go test (TUG) is a quick test that measures balance in both the static and dynamic planes. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair, and sit down while turning 180 degrees. During the test, the person is expected to wear their regular footwear and use any mobility aids that they would normally require.
Measured: Baseline and 8th week
Change in Sit to stand test
The Sit to stand also known as the 30 Second Chair Stand Test (30CST) is administered to test leg strength and endurance. Equipment: A chair with a straight back without arm rests (seat 17" high), and a stopwatch.
Method: The participant is urged to complete as many full stands as they can in the allotted 30 seconds. Between each stand, the person is told to sit down completely. The tester silently counts the completion of each correct stand while keeping an eye on the participant's performance to verify perfect form.
Measured: Baseline and 8th week
Change in Stair climb test
The stair climb test, also known as the stair climb power test, is a field-based evaluation of lower body strength, power, and physical function that is clinically relevant, safe, and affordable. Equipment: Stairs (8 - 14 steps) with handrails, stopwatch. Scoring: Total time to ascend and descend steps is recorded to the nearest 100th of a second.
The patient should use the assistive device (if any) normally used to perform the activity at the time of testing.
Measured: baseline and 8th week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2023
- Study start9 Mar 2023
- Primary completion15 Aug 2023
- Study completion30 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Intellectual ImpairmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fareeha Kausar, PP-DPT, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05922215
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/RCR & AHS/23/0707
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 27 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vuijk PJ, Hartman E, Scherder E, Visscher C. Motor performance of children with mild intellectual disability and borderline intellectual functioning. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Nov;54(11):955-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01318.x. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
PubMed 20854287Wang J, Gao Y, Kwok HHM, Huang WYJ, Li S, Li L. Children with Intellectual Disability Are Vulnerable to Overweight and Obesity: A Cross-Sectional Study among Chinese Children. Child Obes. 2018 Jul;14(5):316-326. doi: 10.1089/chi.2018.0015. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
PubMed 29975552Stanish HI, Curtin C, Must A, Phillips S, Maslin M, Bandini LG. Physical Activity Enjoyment, Perceived Barriers, and Beliefs Among Adolescents With and Without Intellectual Disabilities. J Phys Act Health. 2016 Jan;13(1):102-10. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0548. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
PubMed 25830443Maiano C, Hue O, Morin AJS, Lepage G, Tracey D, Moullec G. Exercise interventions to improve balance for young people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Apr;61(4):406-418. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14023. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
PubMed 30230530
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Balance Training on Gait and Functional Strength in Children With Intellectual Disabilities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05922215
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/RCR & AHS/23/0707
- Conditions
- Intellectual Impairment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intellectual impairment is a developmental condition that first appears in childhood and causes substantial intellectual or cognitive limitations as well as inadequate adaptation to the demands of daily life. It may be viewed as a syndrome grouping (meta-syndrome), rather than as an illness or a disability; encompassing a wide range of clinical problems, including hereditary, viral, metabolic, and neurological issues. Prior to learning new abilities, there is a loss in cognitive functioning that is indicative of ID. Falling is a severe issue that affects people with intellectual disabilities frequently. Although studies based on retrospective data collected over time have not determined the exact prevalence of falling in the ID community, they have estimated that 30-60% of people fall within a 12-month period. Similar fall risk factors exist in the general population and in people with ID, such as advancing age, vision problems, and mobility issues. However, some characteristics, such as having frequent seizures and a high level of ambulation, seem more distinctive to ID. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of balance training on gait and functional strength in children with mild intellectual disabilities. This will be a Randomized Controlled Trial. Approval will be gained from the Ethical committee of the Riphah international university Lahore, Pakistan prior to the commencement of study. Written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and all information and data will be confidential. Subjects will be informed that there is no risk of study and they will be free to withdraw any time during process of study. 22 intellectually disabled children between the ages of 7 and 14 will be randomly allocated to the Experimental group (n=10) or a Control group (n=10). The Experimental group will be given the Baseline treatment comprising of Static balance training (i.e. heel and toe raises, alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) alongside Dynamic Balance training (weight shifting forward, backward, sideward, and diagonally with eyes opened and eyes closed, walking toe-to-heel barefoot, side walking, reverse walking and one-foot jumps), and Progressive activity training (including stepping over/on obstacles, throwing and catching a ball, and kicking a ball.) for 40 minutes per day, twice each week for 8 weeks. Whereas, the Control group will continue their regular school schedule, which will include participation in physical education activities at the same frequency. Along with that, only Baseline treatment including Static balance training (i.e. alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) will be given at the same intervals and for the same length of time as the intervention group, with the exception of additional Dynamic balance training and progressive activity training. The time up-and-go test, the 10-meter walk test and GMFM-88 were used to evaluate gait, and the Sit-to-stand test and the Stair Climbing test. were used to measure each participant's functional strength. Pre and Post treatment values will be evaluated and the Data will be analyzed using SPSS 22.0.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Other: Dynamic Balance training, Other: Static balance training |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Static balance training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Boys and Girls with Mild Intellectual Disabilities (IQ range 50-69)
- Age group: 7-14 years
- Students from a Special Education School
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- CP and Down's syndrome
- Those who were unable to complete follow-up tests.
- Subjects who took part in less than 80% of the intervention program.
- Participants with any psychological or behavioral issues.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Balance trainingThe Experimental group will be given the Baseline treatment comprising of Stretching \& Static balance training (i.e. heel and toe raises, alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) alongside Dynamic Balance training which will include (weight shifting forward, backward, sideward, and diagonally with eyes opened and eyes closed, walking toe-to-heel barefoot, side walking, reverse walking and one-foot jumps), and Progressive activity training (such as stepping over/on obstacles, throwing and catching a ball, and kicking a ball.) for 40 minutes per day, twice each week for 8 weeks. | Other | Experimental Group |
| Static balance trainingThe Control group will continue their regular school schedule, which will include participation in physical education activities at the same frequency. Along with that Baseline treatment including Static balance training (i.e. alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) only, at the same intervals and for the same length of time as the intervention group, with the exception of additional Dynamic balance training and progressive activity training. | Other | Control Group, Experimental Group |
Primary outcome
Change in Time Up and Go test
Time frame: Baseline and 8th week
The Time Up and Go test (TUG) is a quick test that measures balance in both the static and dynamic planes. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair, and sit down while turning 180 degrees. During the test, the person is expected to wear their regular footwear and use any mobility aids that they would normally require.
Change in Sit to stand test
Time frame: Baseline and 8th week
The Sit to stand also known as the 30 Second Chair Stand Test (30CST) is administered to test leg strength and endurance. Equipment: A chair with a straight back without arm rests (seat 17" high), and a stopwatch. Method: The participant is urged to complete as many full stands as they can in the allotted 30 seconds. Between each stand, the person is told to sit down completely. The tester silently counts the completion of each correct stand while keeping an eye on the participant's performance to verify perfect form.
Change in Stair climb test
Time frame: baseline and 8th week
The stair climb test, also known as the stair climb power test, is a field-based evaluation of lower body strength, power, and physical function that is clinically relevant, safe, and affordable. Equipment: Stairs (8 - 14 steps) with handrails, stopwatch. Scoring: Total time to ascend and descend steps is recorded to the nearest 100th of a second. The patient should use the assistive device (if any) normally used to perform the activity at the time of testing.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Dec 2023.
- Background: PubMed 20854287Vuijk PJ, Hartman E, Scherder E, Visscher C. Motor performance of children with mild intellectual disability and borderline intellectual functioning. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Nov;54(11):955-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01318.x. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 29975552Wang J, Gao Y, Kwok HHM, Huang WYJ, Li S, Li L. Children with Intellectual Disability Are Vulnerable to Overweight and Obesity: A Cross-Sectional Study among Chinese Children. Child Obes. 2018 Jul;14(5):316-326. doi: 10.1089/chi.2018.0015. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
- Background: PubMed 25830443Stanish HI, Curtin C, Must A, Phillips S, Maslin M, Bandini LG. Physical Activity Enjoyment, Perceived Barriers, and Beliefs Among Adolescents With and Without Intellectual Disabilities. J Phys Act Health. 2016 Jan;13(1):102-10. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0548. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 30230530Maiano C, Hue O, Morin AJS, Lepage G, Tracey D, Moullec G. Exercise interventions to improve balance for young people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Apr;61(4):406-418. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14023. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Intellectual Impairment
Recruiting
Evaluation of a Decision-Support Tool for Blood Biomarker Testing for Alzheimer's Disease in Primary Care
Cognitive Abnormality
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of RM-718 in Healthy Subjects and Patients With MC4R Pathway Impairment
Hypothalamic Obesity, Prader-Willi Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
FOXP1 Syndrome: The Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment is Characterizing FOXP1-related Neurodevelopmental Disorders Using Genetic, Medical, and Neuropsychological Measures.
FOXP1, Mental Retardation With Language Impairment and With or Without Autistic Features
Not yet recruiting
Vestibular Stimulation Versus Foot Intrinsic Muscle Exercises in Children With Down Syndrome
Down Syndrome, Balance Impairment
Recruiting
Interventions in Mathematics and Cognitive Skills
Math Learning Disability, Child Development
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fareeha Kausar, PP-DPT principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dynamic Balance training and Static balance training in people with Intellectual Impairment, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Time Up and Go test (time frame: Baseline and 8th week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05922215, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2023.