AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsNCT05922449

Using Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Lung Preservation During VATS Pulmonary Surgery

A study testing Thoracic Paravertebral Block in people with Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, run by Beijing Tongren Hospital at 2 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) may extend the length of stay of patients and even increase perioperative mortality after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) pulmonary surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
What is being tested?
Thoracic Paravertebral Block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
302 participants
Where
2 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Jul 2023to 31 Mar 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients scheduled for elective VATS lobectomy/segmentectomy had an expected operation duration (from skin incision to suture) greater than 1h
  • Age>18
  • American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: I - III

Who cannot join

  • Patients with acute or chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD) grade ≥ Grade III, poorly controlled asthma or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, according to the new definition of ARDS at the 2011 Berlin Conference)
  • Patients with severe cardiovascular complications (defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) Grade IV, acute coronary syndrome, or persistent ventricular tachycardia)
  • Patients who had a history of ipsilateral thoracotomy or had a history of mechanical ventilation within 4 weeks
  • Patients with contraindications to TPVB (coagulation dysfunction, anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, skin ulcer infection, local anesthetic allergy, Spinal deformity, etc.)
  • Patients with trachea malformation or tracheotomy
  • Pregnant or lactating patients

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

China2 sites
  • Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000

  • Beijing tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Using Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Lung Preservation During VATS Pulmonary Surgery: A Dual Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) may extend the length of stay of patients and even increase perioperative mortality after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) pulmonary surgery. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) can provide effective analgesia after VATS, however little is known about the effect of TPVB on PPCs. This study aims to determine whether TPVB combined with general anesthesia results in reducing PPCs and achieve perioperative lung protection in VATS pulmonary surgery compared with simple general anesthesia.

Methods: A total of 302 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy/segmentectomy will be randomly divided into two groups: Paravertebral block group (PV group) and Control group (C group). Patients of PV group will receive thoracic paravertebral block: 15 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine will be administered to the T4 and T7 thoracic paravertebral spaces respectively before general anesthesia. Patients of C group will not undergo intervention. Both groups of patients adopted protective ventilation strategy during operation. Perioperative protective mechanical ventilation and standard fluid management will be applied in both groups. Patient controlled intravenous analgesia was used for postoperative analgesia. The primary endpoint is the composite outcome of PPCs within 7 days after surgery. Secondary end points include blood gas analysis, postoperative lung ultrasound score, NRS score, QoR-15 score, hospitalization related indicators and long-term prognosis indicators.

Read the detailed description

Surgical resection is still the go-to treatment for lung cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer death As a minimally invasive operation, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has significantly reduced surgical trauma and systemic inflammation, and has become the standard treatment method for lung cancer.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are one of the most common complications after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, with an incidence of 40.8%. PPCs increase hospitalization time, hospitalization cost, and perioperative mortality, and affect the treatment effect and utilization of medical resources. One of the most pressing clinical issues is how to lower the prevalence of PPCs. Previous research has shown that lung protective ventilation strategies, including low tidal volume, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), low inhalation oxygen concentration, etc., have a good prognosis in patients with lung injury, but they may not fully prevent acute lung injury caused by one-lung ventilation (OLV) during VATS.

The incidence of pain 24 hours after VATS was 38%, and the incidence of chronic pain 6 months after VATS was 25%. Poor postoperative analgesia will affect postoperative recovery, which may raise the risk of pulmonary complications due to insufficient respiratory function and weak sputum excretion. Thus, it is crucial to effectively control acute discomfort following VATS.

Ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a commonly used regional block technique in thoracic surgery. Local anesthetics can be injected into the paravertebral space to block the ipsilateral sympathetic and somatosensory nerves. TPVB combined with general anesthesia (GA) can reduce the pain after VATS, decreases the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9, reduce the inflammatory reaction after thoracic surgery, improve the postoperative survival rate by blocking the unilateral sympathetic nerve, improve the postoperative rehabilitation of patients after VATS lung cancer radical surgery, and reduce the postoperative tumor recurrence. According to a recent retrospective propensity matching analysis, TPVB and GA together were linked to a decreased incidence of PPCs (29.8% vs. 34.2%). However, a prospective study on the effects of GA combined with GA alone vs GA coupled with TPVB on PPCs following VATS pulmonary surgery has not been retrieved.

The aim of this study is designed to explore whether general anesthesia combined with thoracic paravertebral block can reduce atelectasis, lung inflammation, and lung injury compared to general anesthesia during VATS pulmonary surgery, thereby reducing the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, achieving lung protection, and improving long-term prognosis of patients.

Being tested
Thoracic Paravertebral Block
Keywords
Postoperative pulmonary complications, Thoracic paravertebral block, Postoperative analgesia, Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Thoracic Paravertebral BlockProcedure or surgery

    Patients randomly assigned to PV group will be placed in lateral position, and punctured using the out of plane technique guided by ultrasound (Shenzhen Huasheng Navi low-frequency convex array probe). 15 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered to the T4 and T7 thoracic paravertebral spaces respectively, for a total of 30 ml. After injection, the pleura of the punctured segment and adjacent segments could be obviously moved down. Upon successful puncture, the patient was transferred to the supine position. After 5, 10, and 15 minutes, the range of sensory blockage was tested at T3~T8 to cover the surgical area.

Study groups in NCT05922449
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Paravertebral block group (PV group)ExperimentalThis group of patients will undergo ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block in T4 and T7 thoracic paravertebral spaces before general anesthesia.
Receives: Procedure: Thoracic Paravertebral Block
Control group (C group)No interventionThis group of patients did not undergo any nerve block procedures before general anesthesia.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The incidence of the composite of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within 7 days after surgery

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage. Patients with at least one complication were considered eligible for the primary end points.

    Postoperative pulmonary complications include pneumonia; aspiration pneumonitis; atelectasis; respiratory failure; bronchospasm; pulmonary congestion; pleural effusion; pneumothorax.

    Measured: Within the first 7 days after operation

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)

    Unit: mmHg

    Measured: Preoperative; one-lung ventilation (OLV) for 30 minutes; 5 minutes after the end of one lung ventilation; 30 minutes after entering the postoperative pulmonary complications (PACU)

  2. Arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2)

    Unit: mmHg

    Measured: Preoperative; one-lung ventilation (OLV) for 30 minutes; 5 minutes after the end of one lung ventilation; 30 minutes after entering the postoperative pulmonary complications (PACU)

  3. Oxygenation index (OI)

    OI =PaO2/Inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2), Unit: mmHg

    Measured: Preoperative; one-lung ventilation (OLV) for 30 minutes; 5 minutes after the end of one lung ventilation; 30 minutes after entering the postoperative pulmonary complications (PACU)

  4. Arterial blood pH

    Unitless

    Measured: Preoperative; one-lung ventilation (OLV) for 30 minutes; 5 minutes after the end of one lung ventilation; 30 minutes after entering the postoperative pulmonary complications (PACU)

  5. Concentration of arterial blood lactate

    Unit: mmol/L

    Measured: Preoperative; one-lung ventilation (OLV) for 30 minutes; 5 minutes after the end of one lung ventilation; 30 minutes after entering the postoperative pulmonary complications (PACU)

  6. Heart rate

    Unit: beats per minute

    Measured: Preoperative; one-lung ventilation (OLV) for 30 minutes; 5 minutes after the end of one lung ventilation; 30 minutes after entering the postoperative pulmonary complications (PACU)

  7. Invasive arterial blood pressure

    Unit: mmHg

    Measured: Preoperative; one-lung ventilation (OLV) for 30 minutes; 5 minutes after the end of one lung ventilation; 30 minutes after entering the postoperative pulmonary complications (PACU)

  8. Transcutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2)

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage

    Measured: Preoperative; one-lung ventilation (OLV) for 30 minutes; 5 minutes after the end of one lung ventilation; 30 minutes after entering the postoperative pulmonary complications (PACU)

  9. Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)

    Unit: point Operation method: Each side of the chest of the patient was divided into six regions with the front axillary line, the posterior axillary line, and the nipple line as the boundary. Use the ultrasonic probe to scan each area from right to left, from top to bottom, and from front to back.

    LUS score = sum of all 12 regions, Min = 0; Max = 36. The higher the score, the worse the degree of ventilation is considered.

    Score according to the number of B lines in the LUS image of each area. 0: B lines ≤ 2; 1 point: > 2 well-spaced B-lines; 2 points: Multiple coalescent B lines; 3 points: white lung (lung consolidation).

    Measured: Preoperative; Postoperative day1; Postoperative day 2

  10. Numerical rating scale (NRS)

    Unit: point, including chest NRS score for rest and cough. Participants were asked to rate their average pain intensity for rest and cough by selecting a single number from 0 to 10. The end-point descriptors for the NRS was "No pain"(0) to "The most intense pain imaginable" (10). The higher the score, the more severe the pain situation.

    Measured: Preoperative; Postoperative day1; Postoperative day 2; 1 and 3 months after operation

  11. Patient's postoperative consumption of sufentanil

    Provided through patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) equipment; Unit: mcg.

    Measured: Within 48 hours after operation

  12. The incidence of opioid-related adverse effects

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage. Opioid-related adverse effects include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, pruritus.

    Measured: Within 48 hours after operation

  13. Quality of recovery with the 15-item (QoR-15)

    Unit: point. QoR-15 is a global measure of recovery after surgery that evaluates five dimensions of recovery: physical comfort (5 items), physical independence (2 items), emotional state (4 items), psychological support (2 items), and pain (2 items). Each item is rated on an 11- point scale based on its frequency on the questionnaire (greater score at greater frequency for positive items and less frequency for negative items). The total score ranged from 0 (poorest recovery quality) to 150 (best recovery quality).

    Measured: Preoperative; Postoperative day1; Postoperative day 2; 1 and 3 months after operation

  14. The incidence of various postoperative pulmonary complications

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage. Postoperative pulmonary complications include pneumonia; aspiration pneumonitis; atelectasis; respiratory failure; bronchospasm; pulmonary congestion; pleural effusion; pneumothorax.

    Measured: Within the first 7 days after surgery; 1 and 3 months after operation

  15. The incidence of various postoperative extrapulmonary complications

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage. Postoperative pulmonary complications include arrhythmia; cardiovascular complications (arrhythmias, acute coronary syndrome, mycardial infarction, acute congestive heart failure); cerebrovascular complications (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage); postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD); postoperative renal complications; shock; postoperative extrapulmonary infection.

    Measured: Within the first 7 days after surgery; 1 and 3 months after operation

  16. Postoperative mortality rate

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage.

    Measured: 1 and 3 months after operation

  17. Unplanned ICU hospitalization rate

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage.

    Measured: 1 months after operation

  18. Unplanned ICU hospitalization duration

    Unit: Hour.

    Measured: 1 months after operation

  19. Postoperative length of stay

    Unit: Day. from date of operation till date of discharge

    Measured: 1 months after operation

  20. Hospitalization expense

    Unit: CNY.

    Measured: 1 months after operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized parallel controlled trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
302 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05922449
Sponsor's protocol ID
TREC2023-KY020
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
1 Jun 2023
Last updated
9 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

    PubMed 35020204
  • Falcoz PE, Puyraveau M, Thomas PA, Decaluwe H, Hurtgen M, Petersen RH, Hansen H, Brunelli A; ESTS Database Committee and ESTS Minimally Invasive Interest Group. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeon database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):602-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv154. Epub 2015 Apr 26.

    PubMed 25913824
  • Lohser J, Slinger P. Lung Injury After One-Lung Ventilation: A Review of the Pathophysiologic Mechanisms Affecting the Ventilated and the Collapsed Lung. Anesth Analg. 2015 Aug;121(2):302-18. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000808.

    PubMed 26197368
  • Colquhoun DA, Leis AM, Shanks AM, Mathis MR, Naik BI, Durieux ME, Kheterpal S, Pace NL, Popescu WM, Schonberger RB, Kozower BD, Walters DM, Blasberg JD, Chang AC, Aziz MF, Harukuni I, Tieu BH, Blank RS. A Lower Tidal Volume Regimen during One-lung Ventilation for Lung Resection Surgery Is Not Associated with Reduced Postoperative Pulmonary Complications. Anesthesiology. 2021 Apr 1;134(4):562-576. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003729.

    PubMed 33635945
  • Lederman D, Easwar J, Feldman J, Shapiro V. Anesthetic considerations for lung resection: preoperative assessment, intraoperative challenges and postoperative analgesia. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Aug;7(15):356. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.67.

    PubMed 31516902
  • Bendixen M, Jorgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):836-844. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X. Epub 2016 May 6.

    PubMed 27160473
  • Bayman EO, Parekh KR, Keech J, Selte A, Brennan TJ. A Prospective Study of Chronic Pain after Thoracic Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2017 May;126(5):938-951. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001576.

    PubMed 28248713
  • Yeung JH, Gates S, Naidu BV, Wilson MJ, Gao Smith F. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 21;2(2):CD009121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009121.pub2.

    PubMed 26897642
  • Tong C, Zhu H, Li B, Wu J, Xu M. Impact of paravertebral blockade use in geriatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery on postoperative adverse outcomes. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5169-5176. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.13.

    PubMed 32030234
  • Ben Aziz M, Mukhdomi J. Thoracic Paravertebral Block. 2026 Jan 31. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570560/

    PubMed 34033322
  • Kang K, Meng X, Li B, Yuan J, Tian E, Zhang J, Zhang W. Effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov 12;18(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02071-8.

    PubMed 33183325
  • Chu H, Dong H, Wang Y, Niu Z. Effects of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block on MMP-9 and postoperative pain in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00976-1.

    PubMed 32143570
  • Tong C, Zheng J, Wu J. The effects of paravertebral blockade usage on pulmonary complications, atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay following thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Aug;79:110770. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110770. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

    PubMed 35334289
  • Kimura A, Suehiro K, Juri T, Fujimoto Y, Yoshida H, Tanaka K, Mori T, Nishikawa K. Hemodynamic Changes via the Lung Recruitment Maneuver Can Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Stroke Volume and Arterial Pressure During One-Lung Ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2021 Jul 1;133(1):44-52. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005375.

    PubMed 33687175
  • de la Gala F, Pineiro P, Reyes A, Vara E, Olmedilla L, Cruz P, Garutti I. Postoperative pulmonary complications, pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses after lung resection surgery with prolonged one-lung ventilation. Randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous and inhalational anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):655-663. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex230.

    PubMed 29121283

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Thoracic Paravertebral Block in people with Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, run by Beijing Tongren Hospital at 2 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The incidence of the composite of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within 7 days after surgery (time frame: Within the first 7 days after operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05922449, which also lists 28 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 5 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in