Persistent Atrial FibrillationPIVCONCT05922917
Pulsed-field Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing pulsed-field ablation in people with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Pulsed-field Ablation, run by České Budějovice Hospital at 3 sites in Czechia.
Trial summary
Since a new method called pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged, allowing significantly simpler, safer, and faster creation of ablative lesions in paroxysmal AF and PsAF (13), redefining the "optimal" ablation approach started to appear mandatory. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Pulsed-field Ablation
- What is being tested?
- pulsed-field ablation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 518 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesCzechia
- Study dates
- 20 Jun 2023to 22 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Persistent or long-standing persistent AF proved on at least two 12-lead ECG recordings more than one week apart or > 7-day EKG Holter recordings
- Age ≥ 18 years at the time of study enrollment
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Paroxysmal AF
- Sinus rhythm on the 12-lead ECG on admission unless recent external electrical cardioversion was carried out within the last six months and the patient is treated by amiodarone
- LA diameter > 55 mm (measured in the parasternal long-axis view)
- History of AF ablation in the past
- History of cardiac surgery
- Significant valvular defect
Show all 28Show fewer
- Age below 18 years
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding
- Any disease with a life expectancy <1 year
- Terminal renal failure
- History of pacemaker or defibrillator implantation
- Significant thyroid disease
- Uncorrected congenital heart disease or valvular obstruction
- Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Active myocarditis
- Constrictive pericarditis
- Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
- Adrenal insufficiency
- Active vasculitis due to collagen vascular disease
- Presence on a heart transplant waiting list (UNOS category 1A or 1B or equivalent). Patients on a non-acute heart transplant waiting list (UNOS category 2 or 7 or equal) are eligible for inclusion in the study
- Recipient of any major organ transplant (e.g., lung, liver, heart)
- Patient who is undergoing or has undergone cytotoxic or cytostatic chemotherapy and radiation therapy for the treatment of malignancy within six months before randomization or clinical evidence of current malignancy, with the following exceptions: basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, prostate cancer (if the localized disease is stable, with life expectancy > 2.5 years in the opinion of the investigator)
- HIV positivity with a survival expectancy of less than five years due to HIV
- Chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min
- Chronic dialysis treatment
- Recent (within three months) self-reported history of alcoholism or illicit drug dependence
- Any illness (e.g., psychiatric illness) or situation that, in the opinion of the investigator, could place the subject at significant risk, confound the results of the study, or significantly affect the subject's participation in the study
- Unwillingness to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Czechia3 sites
Ceske Budejovice Hospital
České Budějovice, 37001
University Hospital
Olomouc, 77900
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Prague, 14037
About this study
Official title: Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Complex Procedure Using Pulsed-field Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Since a new method called pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged, allowing significantly simpler, safer, and faster creation of ablative lesions in paroxysmal AF and PsAF (13), redefining the "optimal" ablation approach started to appear mandatory. Our project (The PIVCO study) aims to determine a more standardized procedure representing optimal ablation strategy for patients suffering from PsAF using PFA and multielectrode ablation catheters. The central hypothesis is that ablation of the posterior LA wall (PWI), together with mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation added on top of PVI, will be associated with better effects in terms of rhythm control. Given the speed, safety, and ease of standardization of ablation using electroporation, a demonstration of the superiority of either approach could significantly impact the current standard of clinical care.
Read the detailed description
Purpose Since a new method called pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged, allowing significantly simpler, safer, and faster creation of ablative lesions in paroxysmal AF and PsAF (13), redefining the "optimal" ablation approach started to appear mandatory. Our project (The PIVCO study) aims to determine a more standardized procedure representing optimal ablation strategy for patients suffering from PsAF using PFA and multielectrode ablation catheters. The central hypothesis is that ablation of the posterior LA wall (PWI), together with mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation added on top of PVI, will be associated with better effects in terms of rhythm control. Given the speed, safety, and ease of standardization of ablation using electroporation, a demonstration of the superiority of either approach could significantly impact the current standard of clinical care.
Primary endpoints
(1) The primary endpoint will be a recurrence of AF (or atrial tachycardia, AT) lasting >30 seconds as assessed using repeated 7-day ECG Holter monitoring in patients without anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the entire post-blanking follow-up, i.e., starting three months after the index procedure. All patients should complete a 12-month follow-up period.
Secondary endpoints
(1) The first recurrence of on-AADs AF/AT lasting >6 minutes during the post-blanking follow-up period (i.e., disregarding all off-AAD episodes). (2) Number of hospitalizations and emergency out-patient visits related to AF/AT recurrence, worsening of heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. (3) Number of electrical cardioversions. (4) Proportion of patients on AADs at the end of follow-up. (5) PFA-related complications. (6) Assessment of the quality of life using standardized instruments (AFEQT, EQ5D). (7) Feasibility of achieving a complete block of the mitral isthmus and PWI using PFA (8) Proportion of patients with delayed conduction into LAA after mitral line (9) Number of patients that underwent repeated ablations during follow-up.
Interventions
Procedures that will be performed on the day of admission for ablation:
- 12-lead ECG
- Randomization to group PVI or PVI+
- Physical examination
- Medication taken
- Medical history
- Laboratory tests (biochemistry - NTproBNP, K, urea, creatinine, ALT, AST, GMT, CRP; KO - Hb, leu, PLT)
- Cardiac CT scan as decided by the attending physician
- Transthoracic echocardiography (left atrial [LA] dimension in PLAX, LAVi, transverse and longitudinal LA dimension in A4CH, LA area in A4CH, left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF), LV dimension in PLAX, estimation of PASP, quantification of any valvular defect
- Esophageal echocardiography (TEE) of the heart as decided by the attending physician to exclude intracardiac thrombosis
- Quality of life questionnaires (EQ5DY, AFEQT)
Catheter ablation strategy
In all patients, ablation will be performed by electroporation (Farapulse system), as recommended, with at least two applications per each ablation spot. Based on the randomization, patients will be treated using two distinct approaches:
Group PVI (Pulmonary vein isolation only)
- No ablation at the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)
- Transseptal puncture
- PVI (plus application to the superior anterior aspect of the right superior pulmonary vein [RSPV])
- In the absence of AF termination - cardioversion
- Induction - in case of persistent arrhythmia (regardless of regularity of activation in the atria) - cardioversion, without further ablation outside PVI
Group PVI+ (Complex ablation procedure)
- Transseptal puncture
- PVI (plus application to the superior anterior aspect of the RSPV)
- Roofline
- Box isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (line on the LA roof between left superior pulmonary vein [LSPV] and RSPV, the line between left inferior pulmonary vein [LIPV] and right inferior pulmonary vein [RIPV])
- Ablation along the coronary sinus (CS) from the endocardium, in the form of limited energy application in the left postero-septum
- Posterolateral mitral isthmus line
- In the absence of termination of AF to SR or when AF is converted to AT, cardioversion will be performed
- Verification and eventual completion of the bidirectional mitral line conduction block
- Ablation at CTI - completion of the bidirectional conduction block
- Induction (burst atrial pacing from proximal CS at different cycle lengths of 300 ms, 250 ms, and 200 ms, each step for 5-10 seconds; then RAMP pacing 300-200 ms)
- If AF or AT is induced, cardioversion will be performed
Follow-up The following information will be recorded on the day of discharge: Date of hospital discharge after ablation, length of in-hospital stays, early complications of ablation, and medication at the discharge (all antiarrhythmic drugs except beta-blockers will permanently be discontinued at hospital discharge).
Four 7-day Holter ECG monitoring recordings will be done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after ablation (in case of recurrence of AF after ablation, standard treatment according to the treating physician's decision, including the possibility of antiarrhythmic medication, electrical cardioversion or repeated ablation, will be applied).
A telephone visit be done at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after ablation with an inquiry about complications of the ablation procedure, perceived recurrence of AF, use of antiarrhythmic and antithrombotic medication, elective cardioversion, hospitalization, and reasons for it.
An in-office visit will be done 12 months after ablation in the hospital's out-patient department, including an inquiry about complications of the ablation procedure, perceived and documented recurrence of AF, use of antiarrhythmic and antithrombotic medication, elective cardioversion, hospitalization and reasons for it after ablation, physical examination, medication history, ECG, echocardiography and quality of life questionnaires.
- Being tested
- pulsed-field ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pulsed-field ablationDevice
application of pulsed-field energy for pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablations
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PVI | Active comparator | Pulmonary vein isolation Receives: Device: pulsed-field ablation |
| PVI+ | Experimental | Pulmonary vein isolation supplemented by the additional lesions: left atrial posterior wall isolation, mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus lines Receives: Device: pulsed-field ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Atrial fibrillation recurrence
The primary endpoint will be a recurrence of AF (or atrial tachycardia, AT) lasting >30 seconds as assessed using repeated 7-day ECG Holter monitoring in patients without anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the entire post-blanking follow-up, i.e., starting 60 days after the index procedure. All patients should complete a 12-month follow-up period.
Measured: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Atrial fibrillation recurrence on AADs
The first recurrence of on-AADs AF/AT lasting >60 minutes during the post-blanking follow-up period (i.e., disregarding all off-AAD episodes).
Measured: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
AF burden
AF/AT burden (calculated as total time spent in arrhythmia over total monitoring time during the whole follow-up).
Measured: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
AADs usage
Number of patients using AADs at the end of follow-up.
Measured: At the last documented follow-up (up to 3 years)
Hospitalization rate
Number of hospitalisations for all reasons and related to AF/AT recurrence, worsening of heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases.
Measured: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
Cardioversion
Number of electrical or pharmacological cardioversions.
Measured: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
Complications
PFA-related complications: composite of cardiac tamponade requiring drainage, persistent phrenic nerve palsy lasting more than 24 hours, persistent sinoatrial or atrioventricular block lasting more than 24 hours, major serious vascular complications requiring intervention or prolonging hospitalization, stroke or transient ischemic attack, atrioesophageal fistula, worsening of renal functions due to haemolysis, ST segment elevation or depression with hemodynamic instability, acute myocardial infarction or death within 90 days after ablation.
Measured: Within 90 days after ablation
Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)
Assessment of the quality of life using standardised instrument AFEQT. Three domains and global QoL will be assessed using a calculated score of 0 to 100% (100% = the best quality of life) based on the patient´s response to 20 questions.
Measured: 12 months following ablation procedure
EuroQol Group questionnaire on quality of life
Assessment of mobility, self-care, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression by a Likert scale (1-3, 1 = no limitation, 3 = severe limitation) complemented by visual aid score (1-100, the higher score, the better quality of life).
Measured: 12 months following ablation procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2023
- Study start20 Jun 2023
- Primary completion31 Jul 2026
- Study completion22 Oct 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Persistent Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 518 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- České Budějovice Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Olomouc
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05922917
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CZ-060620231904
- Acronym
- PIVCO
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Complex Procedure Using Pulsed-field Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05922917
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PIVCO / CZ-060620231904
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 518 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- České Budějovice HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Olomouc
- Study start
- 20 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Oct 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Since a new method called pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged, allowing significantly simpler, safer, and faster creation of ablative lesions in paroxysmal AF and PsAF (13), redefining the "optimal" ablation approach started to appear mandatory. Our project (The PIVCO study) aims to determine a more standardized procedure representing optimal ablation strategy for patients suffering from PsAF using PFA and multielectrode ablation catheters. The central hypothesis is that ablation of the posterior LA wall (PWI), together with mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation added on top of PVI, will be associated with better effects in terms of rhythm control. Given the speed, safety, and ease of standardization of ablation using electroporation, a demonstration of the superiority of either approach could significantly impact the current standard of clinical care.
Detailed description
Purpose Since a new method called pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged, allowing significantly simpler, safer, and faster creation of ablative lesions in paroxysmal AF and PsAF (13), redefining the "optimal" ablation approach started to appear mandatory. Our project (The PIVCO study) aims to determine a more standardized procedure representing optimal ablation strategy for patients suffering from PsAF using PFA and multielectrode ablation catheters. The central hypothesis is that ablation of the posterior LA wall (PWI), together with mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation added on top of PVI, will be associated with better effects in terms of rhythm control. Given the speed, safety, and ease of standardization of ablation using electroporation, a demonstration of the superiority of either approach could significantly impact the current standard of clinical care.
Primary endpoints
(1) The primary endpoint will be a recurrence of AF (or atrial tachycardia, AT) lasting >30 seconds as assessed using repeated 7-day ECG Holter monitoring in patients without anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the entire post-blanking follow-up, i.e., starting three months after the index procedure. All patients should complete a 12-month follow-up period.
Secondary endpoints
(1) The first recurrence of on-AADs AF/AT lasting >6 minutes during the post-blanking follow-up period (i.e., disregarding all off-AAD episodes). (2) Number of hospitalizations and emergency out-patient visits related to AF/AT recurrence, worsening of heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. (3) Number of electrical cardioversions. (4) Proportion of patients on AADs at the end of follow-up. (5) PFA-related complications. (6) Assessment of the quality of life using standardized instruments (AFEQT, EQ5D). (7) Feasibility of achieving a complete block of the mitral isthmus and PWI using PFA (8) Proportion of patients with delayed conduction into LAA after mitral line (9) Number of patients that underwent repeated ablations during follow-up.
Interventions
Procedures that will be performed on the day of admission for ablation:
- 12-lead ECG
- Randomization to group PVI or PVI+
- Physical examination
- Medication taken
- Medical history
- Laboratory tests (biochemistry - NTproBNP, K, urea, creatinine, ALT, AST, GMT, CRP; KO - Hb, leu, PLT)
- Cardiac CT scan as decided by the attending physician
- Transthoracic echocardiography (left atrial [LA] dimension in PLAX, LAVi, transverse and longitudinal LA dimension in A4CH, LA area in A4CH, left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF), LV dimension in PLAX, estimation of PASP, quantification of any valvular defect
- Esophageal echocardiography (TEE) of the heart as decided by the attending physician to exclude intracardiac thrombosis
- Quality of life questionnaires (EQ5DY, AFEQT)
Catheter ablation strategy
In all patients, ablation will be performed by electroporation (Farapulse system), as recommended, with at least two applications per each ablation spot. Based on the randomization, patients will be treated using two distinct approaches:
Group PVI (Pulmonary vein isolation only)
- No ablation at the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)
- Transseptal puncture
- PVI (plus application to the superior anterior aspect of the right superior pulmonary vein [RSPV])
- In the absence of AF termination - cardioversion
- Induction - in case of persistent arrhythmia (regardless of regularity of activation in the atria) - cardioversion, without further ablation outside PVI
Group PVI+ (Complex ablation procedure)
- Transseptal puncture
- PVI (plus application to the superior anterior aspect of the RSPV)
- Roofline
- Box isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium (line on the LA roof between left superior pulmonary vein [LSPV] and RSPV, the line between left inferior pulmonary vein [LIPV] and right inferior pulmonary vein [RIPV])
- Ablation along the coronary sinus (CS) from the endocardium, in the form of limited energy application in the left postero-septum
- Posterolateral mitral isthmus line
- In the absence of termination of AF to SR or when AF is converted to AT, cardioversion will be performed
- Verification and eventual completion of the bidirectional mitral line conduction block
- Ablation at CTI - completion of the bidirectional conduction block
- Induction (burst atrial pacing from proximal CS at different cycle lengths of 300 ms, 250 ms, and 200 ms, each step for 5-10 seconds; then RAMP pacing 300-200 ms)
- If AF or AT is induced, cardioversion will be performed
Follow-up The following information will be recorded on the day of discharge: Date of hospital discharge after ablation, length of in-hospital stays, early complications of ablation, and medication at the discharge (all antiarrhythmic drugs except beta-blockers will permanently be discontinued at hospital discharge).
Four 7-day Holter ECG monitoring recordings will be done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after ablation (in case of recurrence of AF after ablation, standard treatment according to the treating physician's decision, including the possibility of antiarrhythmic medication, electrical cardioversion or repeated ablation, will be applied).
A telephone visit be done at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after ablation with an inquiry about complications of the ablation procedure, perceived recurrence of AF, use of antiarrhythmic and antithrombotic medication, elective cardioversion, hospitalization, and reasons for it.
An in-office visit will be done 12 months after ablation in the hospital's out-patient department, including an inquiry about complications of the ablation procedure, perceived and documented recurrence of AF, use of antiarrhythmic and antithrombotic medication, elective cardioversion, hospitalization and reasons for it after ablation, physical examination, medication history, ECG, echocardiography and quality of life questionnaires.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PVI | Active comparator | Device: pulsed-field ablationPulmonary vein isolation |
| PVI+ | Experimental | Device: pulsed-field ablationPulmonary vein isolation supplemented by the additional lesions: left atrial posterior wall isolation, mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus lines |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Persistent or long-standing persistent AF proved on at least two 12-lead ECG recordings more than one week apart or > 7-day EKG Holter recordings
- Age ≥ 18 years at the time of study enrollment
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Paroxysmal AF
- Sinus rhythm on the 12-lead ECG on admission unless recent external electrical cardioversion was carried out within the last six months and the patient is treated by amiodarone
- LA diameter > 55 mm (measured in the parasternal long-axis view)
- History of AF ablation in the past
- History of cardiac surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pulsed-field ablationapplication of pulsed-field energy for pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablations | Device | PVI, PVI+ |
Primary outcome
Atrial fibrillation recurrence
Time frame: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
The primary endpoint will be a recurrence of AF (or atrial tachycardia, AT) lasting >30 seconds as assessed using repeated 7-day ECG Holter monitoring in patients without anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the entire post-blanking follow-up, i.e., starting 60 days after the index procedure. All patients should complete a 12-month follow-up period.
8 secondary outcomes
Atrial fibrillation recurrence on AADs
Time frame: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
AF burden
Time frame: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
AADs usage
Time frame: At the last documented follow-up (up to 3 years)
Hospitalization rate
Time frame: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
Cardioversion
Time frame: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)
Complications
Time frame: Within 90 days after ablation
Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)
Time frame: 12 months following ablation procedure
EuroQol Group questionnaire on quality of life
Time frame: 12 months following ablation procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
A Study of Dual Energy THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF Catheter With TRUPULSE™ Generator in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Standard Treatment for Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Without Hypertension
Atrial Fibrillation (Persistent), Catheter Ablation
Recruiting
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
A Study of VARIPULSE Catheter and TRUPULSE Generator With VARIPULSE Pro Software in Participants With PAF or PsAF
Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing pulsed-field ablation in people with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Pulsed-field Ablation, run by České Budějovice Hospital at 3 sites in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Atrial fibrillation recurrence (time frame: Whole follow-up (up to 3 years)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2026.