Diabetes Mellitus Type 2DIAVERANCT05924516
Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Digital Intervention for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
A study testing Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program in people with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, run by Maria del Carmen Gogeascoechea Trejo at 3 sites in Mexico.
Trial summary
This study aims to perform a digital intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes to analyze the efficacy of the digital intervention Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program in order to improve diabetes self-management and improve clinical outcomes, including chronic condition-related fatigue. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesMexico
- Study dates
- Feb 2024to Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients over 18 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed and treated in selected urban health centers of the Sanitary Jurisdiction V of Xalapa, Ver.
- Patients with smartphone and cell number.
- Participants must agree on sharing data from their clinical record.
- Participants must sign an informed consent.
- Participants must be willing to and install the mobile solution of the study.
Who cannot join
- Candidates without a smartphone or not being able to interact with it.
- Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, MODY (Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young) and gestational diabetes.
- Patients who do not wish to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Luis Fernandez-Luque, PhD contact
Mexico3 sites
Clínic "José A. Maraboto" Street Santiago Bonilla 85
Xalapa, Veracruz, 91020
Oscar Rodriguez Montes, MSc, orodriguez@adherahealth.com
Clinic "Revolución" Street Valentín Canalizó, 12
Xalapa, Veracruz, 91110
Oscar Rodriguez Montes, MSc, orodriguez@adherahealth.com
Clinic "Miguel Alemán" Avenue Miguel Alemán 107
Xalapa, Veracruz, 91140
Oscar Rodriguez Montes, MSc, orodriguez@adherahealth.com
About this study
Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Digital Intervention for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
This study aims to perform a digital intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes to analyze the efficacy of the digital intervention Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program in order to improve diabetes self-management and improve clinical outcomes, including chronic condition-related fatigue. This will be done through a randomized clinical trial in 3 of the main health centers in the city of Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
The digital health intervention is designed to be used for approximately 3 months. The study will enroll 150 participants (75 in control group and 75 in experimental group) who are patients with type 2 diabetes. There will be educational contents and personalized motivational messages through the Adhera Health Recommender System.
Read the detailed description
Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program (or AFDP) T2D adaptation is a digital health program based on behavioral and emotional change techniques that provides support to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The digital health solution is designed to be used for a period of 3 months and includes a mobile application that provides educational content and sends messages about 10 diabetes mellitus care areas with the aim of improving the quality of life of patients and therefore avoiding the occurrence of complications associated with the disease.
This is a clinical trial with 75 participants in the experimental intervention group and 75 in the control group, which will be carried out in 3 Primary Care Health centers in the City of Xalapa Veracruz, called Marabroto Center, Revolution Center and Miguel Alemán Center.
The researchers will focus on evaluating the main study variables to determine the changes in the indicators in glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, BMI, waist circumference and use of coping strategies.
The efficacy of the digital intervention will be measured in 2 ways: 1) Through the analysis of each of the study variables, where its decrease or increase represents that it was effective for the control of each indicator analyzed individually, and 2) Through the binary logistic regression model where all the variables of the study as a whole are analyzed and it is determined if the digital intervention had a global efficacy.
We believe that since it is a multifactorial disease, different variables that intervene in the complications of diabetes mellitus should be studied and not exclusively one single primary endpoint.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
- Being tested
- Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program
- Keywords
- Digital Interventions, mHealth, fatigue, behavioral
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fatigue, Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Adhera® Fatigue Digital ProgramBehavioural
The Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program is delivered via a mobile application and includes personalized educational and interactive content. The program is designed to support the wellbeing of people living with type 2 diabetes, including self-management education and support. This also includes a focus on diabetes-related fatigue.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | Control Group: Standard Treatment |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Experimental Group: Standard Treatment + Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program Receives: Behavioral: Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Hb1Ac)
The parameter will be measured in % reported in the control cards of the Health Centers where a normal level is <5.7%, prediabetes is between 5.7% to 6.4% and diabetes is above 6.5%. In patients with DM, 6 to 7% is a desired level, 7.1 to 8.5% is a moderate risk, 8.5 to 10% is a high risk, and 10% or more is a very high risk for the appearance of complications (WHO, 2021). This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Baseline
Glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb1Ac)
The parameter will be measured in % reported in the control cards of the Health Centers where a normal level is <5.7%, prediabetes is between 5.7% to 6.4% and diabetes is above 6.5%. In patients with DM, 6 to 7% is a desired level, 7.1 to 8.5% is a moderate risk, 8.5 to 10% is a high risk, and 10% or more is a very high risk for the appearance of complications (WHO, 2021). This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Month 3
Triglycerides
Triglycerides will be measured as an indicator of fat metabolism based on the fatty acid count (GPC, 2018). Its values are classified as normal <150 mg/dL; high limit of 150 to 199 mg/dL; high from 200 to 499 m/dL and very high 500 mg/dL and more. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Baseline
Triglycerides
Triglycerides will be measured as an indicator of fat metabolism based on the fatty acid count (GPC, 2018). Its values are classified as normal <150 mg/dL; high limit of 150 to 199 mg/dL; high from 200 to 499 m/dL and very high 500 mg/dL and more. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Month 3
Total Cholesterol
Total cholesterol, which includes lipoproteins of different density in the body, will be assessed (GPC, 2018). Its values are classified as normal when they are <200 mg/dL; intermediate high when they are between 200 and 239 mg/dL and high when they are above 240 mg/dL. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Baseline
Total Cholesterol
Total cholesterol, which includes lipoproteins of different density in the body, will be assessed (GPC, 2018). Its values are classified as normal when they are <200 mg/dL; intermediate high when they are between 200 and 239 mg/dL and high when they are above 240 mg/dL. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Month 3
Body Mass Index
It will be measured on the scale proposed by the WHO with the formula weight (kg) / height2 (mts) with the following categories: underweight <18.5; normal weight of 18.5-24.9; overweight: 24.9-29.9 and obesity >30. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Baseline
Body Mass Index
It will be measured on the scale proposed by the WHO with the formula weight (kg) / height2 (mts) with the following categories: underweight <18.5; normal weight of 18.5-24.9; overweight: 24.9-29.9 and obesity >30. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Month 3
Blood Pressure
It is classified as optimal <120/80 mmHg; normal 120-129/80-84 mmHg; high normal 130-139 mmHg/85-89 mmHg; grade 1 hypertension of 140-159/90-99 mmHg; grade 2 hypertension of 160-179/100-109 mmHg and grade 3 hypertension >180/>110 mmHg (WHO, 2021). This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Baseline
Blood Pressure
It is classified as optimal <120/80 mmHg; normal 120-129/80-84 mmHg; high normal 130-139 mmHg/85-89 mmHg; grade 1 hypertension of 140-159/90-99 mmHg; grade 2 hypertension of 160-179/100-109 mmHg and grade 3 hypertension >180/>110 mmHg (WHO, 2021). This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Month 3
Abdominal Perimeter
According to the CPG (2018) in men, an abdominal circumference <95 cm is considered normal, from 95 to 102 cm as a high risk for complications and >102 cm is considered a very high level of risk, while in women <82 cm is considered normal, 82 to 88 cm represents a high risk and <88 cm is a very high risk. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Baseline
Abdominal Perimeter
According to the CPG (2018), in men an abdominal circumference <95 cm is considered normal, from 95 to 102 cm as a high risk for complications and >102 cm is considered a very high level of risk, while in women <82 cm is considered normal, 82 to 88 cm represents a high risk and <88 cm is a very high risk. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Measured: Month 3
Use of coping strategies
It is based on the instrument "Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI)" prepared by Tobin et al., (1989) adapted by Cano et al., (2007) with a global evaluation of 0 to 160 points where the higher the score, the greater the use of coping strategies.
Measured: Baseline
Use of coping strategies
It is based on the instrument "Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI)" prepared by Tobin et al., (1989) adapted by Cano et al., (2007) with a global evaluation of 0 to 160 points where the higher the score, the greater the use of coping strategies.
Measured: Month 3
Secondary outcomes (3)
Use of health services
The instrument to assess the use of health services during the last 3 months is entitled "Questionnaire on the use of health services attributable to diabetes mellitus" from Betz Brown et al., (2014) and does not have a representative scale, it only provides the number of times you have attended emergency services in the last 90 days. Ideally, a patient with DM under control should not go to the emergency or hospitalization services.
Measured: Baseline
Use of health services
The instrument to assess the use of health services during the last 3 months is entitled "Questionnaire on the use of health services attributable to diabetes mellitus" from Betz Brown et al., (2014) and does not have a representative scale, it only provides the number of times you have attended emergency services in the last 90 days. Ideally in a patient with DM under control should not go to the emergency or hospitalization services.
Measured: Month 3
Usability
It explores the degree to which a user evaluates the characteristics of the intervention, such as ease of use, simplicity, efficiency, information and user interface. It is supported by the Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) from Hedlefs et al., (2016) and is classified as <28 points is deficient; 29-56 points is acceptable; 57-84 points is good and 85-112 points is favorable.
Measured: Month 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2023
- Study startFeb 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionMay 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be enrolled in two groups: control and experimental. Participants in the control group will continue with standard treatment, meanwhile participants in the experimental group will continue with standard treatment and will be enrolled in the digital intervention for 3 months.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maria del Carmen Gogeascoechea Trejo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Adhera Health, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Maria del Carmen Gogeascoechea Trejo, Universidad Veracruzana
- Investigators
- María del Carmen Gogeascoechea Trejo, PhD, Study director, Universidad Veracruzana
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05924516
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- U1111-1284-0047
- Acronym
- DIAVERA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kim EK, Kwak SH, Jung HS, Koo BK, Moon MK, Lim S, Jang HC, Park KS, Cho YM. The Effect of a Smartphone-Based, Patient-Centered Diabetes Care System in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial for 24 Weeks. Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(1):3-9. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2197. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
PubMed 30377185Carrasco-Hernandez L, Jodar-Sanchez F, Nunez-Benjumea F, Moreno Conde J, Mesa Gonzalez M, Civit-Balcells A, Hors-Fraile S, Parra-Calderon CL, Bamidis PD, Ortega-Ruiz F. A Mobile Health Solution Complementing Psychopharmacology-Supported Smoking Cessation: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 27;8(4):e17530. doi: 10.2196/17530.
PubMed 32338624Brown JB, Ramaiya K, Besancon S, Rheeder P, Tassou CM, Mbanya JC, Kissimova-Skarbek K, Njenga EW, Muchemi EW, Wanjiru HK, Schneider E. Use of medical services and medicines attributable to diabetes in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 12;9(9):e106716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106716. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25216268Cano Garcia FJ, Rodriguez Franco L, Garcia Martinez J. Spanish version of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2007 Jan-Feb;35(1):29-39.
PubMed 17323223Rodriguez Montes OE, Gogeascoechea-Trejo MDC, Bermudez-Tamayo C. Perceived Usability as a Factor Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Mobile Health Diabetes Management: A Bayesian Mediation and Equity Analysis. J Clin Med. 2026 Mar 23;15(6):2465. doi: 10.3390/jcm15062465.
PubMed 41899388
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Digital Intervention for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05924516
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DIAVERA / U1111-1284-0047
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
- Keywords
- Digital Interventions, mHealth, fatigue, behavioral
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Maria del Carmen Gogeascoechea TrejoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Adhera Health, Inc.
- Study start
- Feb 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- May 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to perform a digital intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes to analyze the efficacy of the digital intervention Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program in order to improve diabetes self-management and improve clinical outcomes, including chronic condition-related fatigue. This will be done through a randomized clinical trial in 3 of the main health centers in the city of Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
The digital health intervention is designed to be used for approximately 3 months. The study will enroll 150 participants (75 in control group and 75 in experimental group) who are patients with type 2 diabetes. There will be educational contents and personalized motivational messages through the Adhera Health Recommender System.
Detailed description
Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program (or AFDP) T2D adaptation is a digital health program based on behavioral and emotional change techniques that provides support to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The digital health solution is designed to be used for a period of 3 months and includes a mobile application that provides educational content and sends messages about 10 diabetes mellitus care areas with the aim of improving the quality of life of patients and therefore avoiding the occurrence of complications associated with the disease.
This is a clinical trial with 75 participants in the experimental intervention group and 75 in the control group, which will be carried out in 3 Primary Care Health centers in the City of Xalapa Veracruz, called Marabroto Center, Revolution Center and Miguel Alemán Center.
The researchers will focus on evaluating the main study variables to determine the changes in the indicators in glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, BMI, waist circumference and use of coping strategies.
The efficacy of the digital intervention will be measured in 2 ways: 1) Through the analysis of each of the study variables, where its decrease or increase represents that it was effective for the control of each indicator analyzed individually, and 2) Through the binary logistic regression model where all the variables of the study as a whole are analyzed and it is determined if the digital intervention had a global efficacy.
We believe that since it is a multifactorial disease, different variables that intervene in the complications of diabetes mellitus should be studied and not exclusively one single primary endpoint.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be enrolled in two groups: control and experimental. Participants in the control group will continue with standard treatment, meanwhile participants in the experimental group will continue with standard treatment and will be enrolled in the digital intervention for 3 months.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | –Control Group: Standard Treatment |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Adhera® Fatigue Digital ProgramExperimental Group: Standard Treatment + Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients over 18 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed and treated in selected urban health centers of the Sanitary Jurisdiction V of Xalapa, Ver.
- Patients with smartphone and cell number.
- Participants must agree on sharing data from their clinical record.
- Participants must sign an informed consent.
- Participants must be willing to and install the mobile solution of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Candidates without a smartphone or not being able to interact with it.
- Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, MODY (Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young) and gestational diabetes.
- Patients who do not wish to participate in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Adhera® Fatigue Digital ProgramThe Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program is delivered via a mobile application and includes personalized educational and interactive content. The program is designed to support the wellbeing of people living with type 2 diabetes, including self-management education and support. This also includes a focus on diabetes-related fatigue. | Behavioural | Experimental Group |
Primary outcome
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Hb1Ac)
Time frame: Baseline
The parameter will be measured in % reported in the control cards of the Health Centers where a normal level is <5.7%, prediabetes is between 5.7% to 6.4% and diabetes is above 6.5%. In patients with DM, 6 to 7% is a desired level, 7.1 to 8.5% is a moderate risk, 8.5 to 10% is a high risk, and 10% or more is a very high risk for the appearance of complications (WHO, 2021). This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb1Ac)
Time frame: Month 3
The parameter will be measured in % reported in the control cards of the Health Centers where a normal level is <5.7%, prediabetes is between 5.7% to 6.4% and diabetes is above 6.5%. In patients with DM, 6 to 7% is a desired level, 7.1 to 8.5% is a moderate risk, 8.5 to 10% is a high risk, and 10% or more is a very high risk for the appearance of complications (WHO, 2021). This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Triglycerides
Time frame: Baseline
Triglycerides will be measured as an indicator of fat metabolism based on the fatty acid count (GPC, 2018). Its values are classified as normal <150 mg/dL; high limit of 150 to 199 mg/dL; high from 200 to 499 m/dL and very high 500 mg/dL and more. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Triglycerides
Time frame: Month 3
Triglycerides will be measured as an indicator of fat metabolism based on the fatty acid count (GPC, 2018). Its values are classified as normal <150 mg/dL; high limit of 150 to 199 mg/dL; high from 200 to 499 m/dL and very high 500 mg/dL and more. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Total Cholesterol
Time frame: Baseline
Total cholesterol, which includes lipoproteins of different density in the body, will be assessed (GPC, 2018). Its values are classified as normal when they are <200 mg/dL; intermediate high when they are between 200 and 239 mg/dL and high when they are above 240 mg/dL. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Total Cholesterol
Time frame: Month 3
Total cholesterol, which includes lipoproteins of different density in the body, will be assessed (GPC, 2018). Its values are classified as normal when they are <200 mg/dL; intermediate high when they are between 200 and 239 mg/dL and high when they are above 240 mg/dL. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Body Mass Index
Time frame: Baseline
It will be measured on the scale proposed by the WHO with the formula weight (kg) / height2 (mts) with the following categories: underweight <18.5; normal weight of 18.5-24.9; overweight: 24.9-29.9 and obesity >30. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Body Mass Index
Time frame: Month 3
It will be measured on the scale proposed by the WHO with the formula weight (kg) / height2 (mts) with the following categories: underweight <18.5; normal weight of 18.5-24.9; overweight: 24.9-29.9 and obesity >30. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline
It is classified as optimal <120/80 mmHg; normal 120-129/80-84 mmHg; high normal 130-139 mmHg/85-89 mmHg; grade 1 hypertension of 140-159/90-99 mmHg; grade 2 hypertension of 160-179/100-109 mmHg and grade 3 hypertension >180/>110 mmHg (WHO, 2021). This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Blood Pressure
Time frame: Month 3
It is classified as optimal <120/80 mmHg; normal 120-129/80-84 mmHg; high normal 130-139 mmHg/85-89 mmHg; grade 1 hypertension of 140-159/90-99 mmHg; grade 2 hypertension of 160-179/100-109 mmHg and grade 3 hypertension >180/>110 mmHg (WHO, 2021). This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Abdominal Perimeter
Time frame: Baseline
According to the CPG (2018) in men, an abdominal circumference <95 cm is considered normal, from 95 to 102 cm as a high risk for complications and >102 cm is considered a very high level of risk, while in women <82 cm is considered normal, 82 to 88 cm represents a high risk and <88 cm is a very high risk. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Abdominal Perimeter
Time frame: Month 3
According to the CPG (2018), in men an abdominal circumference <95 cm is considered normal, from 95 to 102 cm as a high risk for complications and >102 cm is considered a very high level of risk, while in women <82 cm is considered normal, 82 to 88 cm represents a high risk and <88 cm is a very high risk. This parameter will be retrieved from the site's health record of the study participants.
Use of coping strategies
Time frame: Baseline
It is based on the instrument "Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI)" prepared by Tobin et al., (1989) adapted by Cano et al., (2007) with a global evaluation of 0 to 160 points where the higher the score, the greater the use of coping strategies.
Use of coping strategies
Time frame: Month 3
It is based on the instrument "Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI)" prepared by Tobin et al., (1989) adapted by Cano et al., (2007) with a global evaluation of 0 to 160 points where the higher the score, the greater the use of coping strategies.
3 secondary outcomes
Use of health services
Time frame: Baseline
Use of health services
Time frame: Month 3
Usability
Time frame: Month 3
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 30377185Kim EK, Kwak SH, Jung HS, Koo BK, Moon MK, Lim S, Jang HC, Park KS, Cho YM. The Effect of a Smartphone-Based, Patient-Centered Diabetes Care System in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial for 24 Weeks. Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(1):3-9. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2197. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 32338624Carrasco-Hernandez L, Jodar-Sanchez F, Nunez-Benjumea F, Moreno Conde J, Mesa Gonzalez M, Civit-Balcells A, Hors-Fraile S, Parra-Calderon CL, Bamidis PD, Ortega-Ruiz F. A Mobile Health Solution Complementing Psychopharmacology-Supported Smoking Cessation: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 27;8(4):e17530. doi: 10.2196/17530.
- Background: PubMed 25216268Brown JB, Ramaiya K, Besancon S, Rheeder P, Tassou CM, Mbanya JC, Kissimova-Skarbek K, Njenga EW, Muchemi EW, Wanjiru HK, Schneider E. Use of medical services and medicines attributable to diabetes in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 12;9(9):e106716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106716. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 17323223Cano Garcia FJ, Rodriguez Franco L, Garcia Martinez J. Spanish version of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2007 Jan-Feb;35(1):29-39.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41899388Rodriguez Montes OE, Gogeascoechea-Trejo MDC, Bermudez-Tamayo C. Perceived Usability as a Factor Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Mobile Health Diabetes Management: A Bayesian Mediation and Equity Analysis. J Clin Med. 2026 Mar 23;15(6):2465. doi: 10.3390/jcm15062465.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luis Fernandez-Luque, PhD contact
María del Carmen Gogeascoechea Trejo, PhD study director
Universidad Veracruzana
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Adhera® Fatigue Digital Program in people with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, run by Maria del Carmen Gogeascoechea Trejo at 3 sites in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Oscar Rodriguez Montes, MsC (+522281103876, oscrodriguez@uv.mx), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Hb1Ac) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05924516, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2024.