Rectal CancerLORENANCT05927584
Local Excision for Organ Preservation in Early REctal Cancer With No Adjuvant Treatment
An observational study of Rectal Cancer and Rectum Neoplasm, run by Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Rectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignant tumors nowadays. There are several possible treatment options including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Surgery for early stage rectal cancer can be either a radical surgery (RS) or a local excision (LE). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer, Rectum Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Transanal local excision
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 13 May 2024to 1 May 2027
- How long will I take part?
- 36 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults diagnosed with early stage rectal cancer, meaning clinical TNM staging cT1N0M0, programmed to receive Local Excision as an exclusive therapy according to each center´s standard practice.
Who may be able to join
- Patients age 18 years or older.
- Histologic proof of infiltrating rectal adenocarcinoma. or
- Preoperative biopsy compatible with rectal adenoma or intramucous adenocarcinoma with endoscopic or radiological suspicion of infiltrating adenocarcinoma.
- Endoscopic criteria: Kudo´s crypt pattern of V or higher, despite non confirmatory preoperative histology. endoscópicos: patrón de criptas V o superior según la clasificación de Kudo, que define lesiones infiltrantes, a pesar de que la histología preoperatoria no sea confirmatoria .
- Ultrasonographic criteria: hipoecogenic rectal tumor invading the intermediate hyperecogenic layer (submucosal), but does not infiltrate the hypoecogenic outer layer (muscularis propia).
- Radiological criterio in MR: tumor invades the submucosal layer without infiltration of the rectal muscularis propia. The usual low signal submucosal image is substituted with an aberrant signal, meaning the loss of the zebra pattern in a normal rectal wall.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Rectal neoplasm with an inferior limit no further than 2cm proximal to the anorectal verge, both in digital rectal examination and in radiology examinations, ideally magnetic resonance (MR).
- Rectal neoplasms up to 3 cm of major diameter.
- Clinical preoperative staging of cT1N0M0, based on endoscopy, MR, +/- endorectal ultrasound.
- Cases in which LE as exclusive treatment with curative intent is prescribed after MDT discusión, regardless of the approach both via flexible endoscopy and transanal endoscopic microsurgery and its variations.
- Neoplasms with low risk histologic criteria known preoperatively or lack of information regarding this aspect:
- Submucosal infiltration of less than 1000µm (sm1 in the Kikuchi classification) .
- Tumor budding absent.
- En bloc resection in patients with a previous endoscopic resection.
- Vascular, lymphatic and perineural invasión absent.
- Low histologic grade.
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 18 years old.
- Rectal neoplasms different from adenocarcinoma.
- Neoplasms in which the inferior edge is farther than 2cm proximal to the anorectal verge in the preoperative MR.
- Any other clinical stage other than cT1N0M0 (any T>1, N+, or M+).
- Neoplasms larger than 3cm.
- Preoperatively demonstration of PPHF:
Show all 12Show fewer
- Submucosal infiltration deeper than 1000µm (sm2 and sm3 in the Kikuchi classification)
- Tumor budding present.
- Piecemeal resection in cases with previous endoscopic resection.
- Vascular, lymphatic and perineural invasión presence.
- High histologic grade.
- Any patient with planned systemic treatment with RTQT combined with the LE after MDT discusión, regardless of the preoperative clinical or postoperative pathological stage.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
Madrid, 28028
Carlos Cerdán Santacruz, PhD, +34639638156, carloscerdansantacruz@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Local Excision for Organ Preservation in Early REctal Cancer With No Adjuvant Treatment (LORENA Trial).
Rectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignant tumors nowadays. There are several possible treatment options including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Surgery for early stage rectal cancer can be either a radical surgery (RS) or a local excision (LE).
A radical surgery removes the rectum including the tumor and the lymph nodes through which it spreads, improving survival but with a possible impact in the patients quality of life (QoL). A local excision only removes the tumor and a safety margin of healthy rectum. This has the potential to avoid the possible complications and QoL decrease. However there are some complications after a LE and also poor prognostic factors inherent to the tumor biology that can lead the surgical team to perform a RS after LE with worse outcomes. These are impossible to know before the procedure.
Read more
The goal of this registry is to determine the frequency of these poor prognostic biological factors and complications in patients undergoing LE for early rectal cancer.
The main question it aims to answer are:
- How frequently does LE allow for rectum preservation?
Participants will undergo LE for early rectal cancer when it is considered the best treatment by their surgeons according to their expertise and protocols. Patients will follow the standard treatment that would be given to them, and the biological prognostic factors and the appearance of complications will be recorded.
Read the detailed description
Registry´s main hypothesis:
Exclusive LE is insufficient for in situ rectum preservation in cT1N0M0 extraperitoneal rectal adenocarcinoma in ≥20% of the patients treated with this approach in real everyday´s clinical practice.
A database will be design recording demographics, tumor details, type of intervention, complications, histological details and further necessity of treatments and rectal preservation along time. It will be hosted online through the REDCap system.
Data entry will be done baseline, after surgical procedure, and at different follow-up periods, at 30 postoperative day and at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after surgical intervention.
Sample size calculation:
Previous evidence states that most patients would be willing to assume a recurrence risk of 20% (IQR 10-35%) in locally advanced rectal cancer after chemo-radiotherapy in order to join the watch and wait strategy for organ preservation. In the project the investigators propose a salvage TME rate of less than 20% at three years to be acceptable. With this approach, accepting a risk α of 0.05 and a risk β of 0.2, a two-tailed test would require a total of 145 patients to identify a difference of 0.1 units. A proportion in the reference group of 0.2 and a loss rate of 5% has been estimated.
Clinical variables
Clinical and demographic data will be collected from each patient, using their computerised clinical history, and a data collection notebook will be prepared.
- Centre code: Each participating centre will receive a unique code that will be the first variable in the database in order to identify the participation of each centre in the study.
- Patient code: Each patient included in each centre will receive a consecutive numerical code to identify the different cases registered in the study.
- Demographic variables: Sex, date of birth, weight (kg), height (cm).
- Comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors: ASA classification, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, smoking, heart disease, immunosuppression.
- Preoperative laboratory values: haemoglobin (mg/dl), albumin (mg/dl), carcinoembryonic antigen (mg/dl).
- Preoperative clinical staging: Tests performed (MRI, endoanal ultrasound, endoscopic techniques), distance of the tumour to the ano-rectal ridge, distance of the tumour to the external anal margin, tumour size (cranial-caudal axis), percentage of rectal circumference occupation (<25%, 25-50%, >50%).
- Operative data: Date of resection, resection approach (endoscopic vs. surgical), transanal resection devices (TEM, TEO, TAMIS, Robot-TAMIS), technique used (local full-wall resection vs. submucosal dissection), intraoperative complications (bleeding, vaginal perforation, tumour perforation/rupture), medical complications).
- Postoperative complications: Clavien-Dindo classification, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, bleeding.
- Pathological data: pT classification, histological grade, circumferential margins, vascular, lymphatic and perineural infiltration, micron infiltration of submucosa and tumour budding.
- Need to complete treatment: Reason (local resection complication, high risk factors, inadequate surgical margins, piecemeal resection, local recurrence, final pathological staging greater than pT1), radical surgery (dichotomous), technique used (total mesorectal excision, abdominoperineal amputation of rectum), time from local excision to radical surgery (date), stoma preparation (dichotomous), type of stoma (ileostomy vs. Colostomy, temporary vs. definitive), transit reconstruction within the study period (in temporary stomas), adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant radio-chemotherapy,
- Follow-up: complications recorded prospectively at 60 days by means of periodic visits to the coloproctology clinic, with the end of follow-up for the patient within the study being the annual check-up. The number of consultations during the first year, recurrence (indicating date and management) and death will be assessed. Oncological follow-up will be carried out with control of tumour markers (CEA), control imaging tests (CAT scan associated with PET/CT in the case of recurrence), and selected biopsies according to the results.
Statistical method:
The data obtained from each patient will be entered into a database and the analysis will be performed with a statistical programme Stata 13.1 (StataCorp, Texas, USA).
A descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical variables will be performed. Categorical variables will be presented as percentages and frequencies. Qualitative variables will be presented as percentages and frequencies. Quantitative variables will be described as mean and standard deviation (SD) if they follow a normal distribution or as median and interquartile range (IQR), in case of skewness.
The association between the variables collected and the target variables of the study will be performed by Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, in the case of categorical variables and, for continuous variables, by Student's t-test for independent samples or Mann-Whitney U-test, respectively, depending on whether or not their distribution conforms to the normal distribution.
Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival and overall mesorectal resection-free survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored.
Chronogram and study´s stages:
- March - September, 2023: Study´s protocol design and approval by the promoter center´s local ethics committee. Recruitment period for other participant centers.
- October,- December 2023: Unique registry database design in the REDCap platform.
- January 2024 - December 2024: Recruitment of the necessary cases according to the sample size calculation.
- January - December 2025: 1-year follow-up of patients included in the study.
- January - April 2026: Interim analysis after the first year of oncologic follow-up for assessment of the primary endpoint of the study (organ preservation with exclusive local resection) as well as some of the secondary endpoints.
- December 2027: Follow-up period to complete the study at 3 years.
Ethical and legal aspects:
The investigation will be conducted according to the 2013 Fortaleza´s update of the the Helsinki Declaration, and to each participant´s country law.
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer, Rectum Neoplasm
- Being tested
- Transanal local excision
- Keywords
- Early rectal cancer, Local excision, Total Mesorectal Excision, Organ preservation
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transanal local excisionProcedure or surgery
Transanal full thickness local excision
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Local excision | * Patients older than 18 years
* Diagnosis of rectal cancer
* Inferior edge of the tumour not further than 2 cm above the anorectal ring
* Clinical TNM staging T1N0M0 Receives: Procedure: Transanal local excision |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Success rate
Rate of patients with no need of Total Mesorectal Excision after follow-up
Measured: 36 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Morbidity rate
Postoperative complication rate, description, and severity according to Clavien Dindo classification
Measured: 2 months
Radicality of resection
Describe the rate of margin tumor infiltration
Measured: 1 month
Histological poor outcome predictor rate
Describe the rate of lymphatic, vascular and perineural invasion, histological grade, mean submucosal invasion depth
Measured: 1 month
Radical rescue surgery specimen quality
Describe the quality of Total Mesorectal Excision specimen in terms of mesorectal fascia integrity
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2023
- Study start13 May 2024
- Primary completion1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 May 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 36 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rodrigo Tovar Perez, MD, Principal investigator, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La PrincesaCarlos Cerdán Santacruz, PhD, Study director, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La PrincesaÓscar Cano Valderrama, PhD, Study chair, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de VigoFrancisco Jiménez Escovar, PhD, Study chair, Hospital de Galdakao UsansoloBlas Flor Lorente, PhD, Study chair, Hospital Politécnico Universitario la FeJavier García Septiem, PhD, Study chair, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La PrincesaRodrigo Oliva Pérez, PhD, Study chair, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05927584
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUP-23/5216
- Acronym
- LORENA
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 14 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Tovar Perez R, Cerdan Santacruz C, Cano-Valderrama O, Jimenez Escovar F, Flor Lorente B, Perez RO, Garcia Septiem J. Local Excision for organ preservation in early REctal cancer with No Adjuvant treatment (LORENA Trial): prospective observational study protocol. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2024 Sep;102(9):506-512. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.013. Epub 2024 May 18.
PubMed 38763491
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Local Excision for Organ Preservation in Early REctal Cancer With No Adjuvant Treatment (LORENA Trial).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05927584
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LORENA / HUP-23/5216
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer, Rectum Neoplasm
- Keywords
- Early rectal cancer, Local excision, Total Mesorectal Excision, Organ preservation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La PrincesaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
- Study start
- 13 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignant tumors nowadays. There are several possible treatment options including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Surgery for early stage rectal cancer can be either a radical surgery (RS) or a local excision (LE).
A radical surgery removes the rectum including the tumor and the lymph nodes through which it spreads, improving survival but with a possible impact in the patients quality of life (QoL). A local excision only removes the tumor and a safety margin of healthy rectum. This has the potential to avoid the possible complications and QoL decrease. However there are some complications after a LE and also poor prognostic factors inherent to the tumor biology that can lead the surgical team to perform a RS after LE with worse outcomes. These are impossible to know before the procedure.
The goal of this registry is to determine the frequency of these poor prognostic biological factors and complications in patients undergoing LE for early rectal cancer.
The main question it aims to answer are:
- How frequently does LE allow for rectum preservation?
Participants will undergo LE for early rectal cancer when it is considered the best treatment by their surgeons according to their expertise and protocols. Patients will follow the standard treatment that would be given to them, and the biological prognostic factors and the appearance of complications will be recorded.
Detailed description
Registry´s main hypothesis:
Exclusive LE is insufficient for in situ rectum preservation in cT1N0M0 extraperitoneal rectal adenocarcinoma in ≥20% of the patients treated with this approach in real everyday´s clinical practice.
A database will be design recording demographics, tumor details, type of intervention, complications, histological details and further necessity of treatments and rectal preservation along time. It will be hosted online through the REDCap system.
Data entry will be done baseline, after surgical procedure, and at different follow-up periods, at 30 postoperative day and at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after surgical intervention.
Sample size calculation:
Previous evidence states that most patients would be willing to assume a recurrence risk of 20% (IQR 10-35%) in locally advanced rectal cancer after chemo-radiotherapy in order to join the watch and wait strategy for organ preservation. In the project the investigators propose a salvage TME rate of less than 20% at three years to be acceptable. With this approach, accepting a risk α of 0.05 and a risk β of 0.2, a two-tailed test would require a total of 145 patients to identify a difference of 0.1 units. A proportion in the reference group of 0.2 and a loss rate of 5% has been estimated.
Clinical variables
Clinical and demographic data will be collected from each patient, using their computerised clinical history, and a data collection notebook will be prepared.
- Centre code: Each participating centre will receive a unique code that will be the first variable in the database in order to identify the participation of each centre in the study.
- Patient code: Each patient included in each centre will receive a consecutive numerical code to identify the different cases registered in the study.
- Demographic variables: Sex, date of birth, weight (kg), height (cm).
- Comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors: ASA classification, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, smoking, heart disease, immunosuppression.
- Preoperative laboratory values: haemoglobin (mg/dl), albumin (mg/dl), carcinoembryonic antigen (mg/dl).
- Preoperative clinical staging: Tests performed (MRI, endoanal ultrasound, endoscopic techniques), distance of the tumour to the ano-rectal ridge, distance of the tumour to the external anal margin, tumour size (cranial-caudal axis), percentage of rectal circumference occupation (<25%, 25-50%, >50%).
- Operative data: Date of resection, resection approach (endoscopic vs. surgical), transanal resection devices (TEM, TEO, TAMIS, Robot-TAMIS), technique used (local full-wall resection vs. submucosal dissection), intraoperative complications (bleeding, vaginal perforation, tumour perforation/rupture), medical complications).
- Postoperative complications: Clavien-Dindo classification, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, bleeding.
- Pathological data: pT classification, histological grade, circumferential margins, vascular, lymphatic and perineural infiltration, micron infiltration of submucosa and tumour budding.
- Need to complete treatment: Reason (local resection complication, high risk factors, inadequate surgical margins, piecemeal resection, local recurrence, final pathological staging greater than pT1), radical surgery (dichotomous), technique used (total mesorectal excision, abdominoperineal amputation of rectum), time from local excision to radical surgery (date), stoma preparation (dichotomous), type of stoma (ileostomy vs. Colostomy, temporary vs. definitive), transit reconstruction within the study period (in temporary stomas), adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant radio-chemotherapy,
- Follow-up: complications recorded prospectively at 60 days by means of periodic visits to the coloproctology clinic, with the end of follow-up for the patient within the study being the annual check-up. The number of consultations during the first year, recurrence (indicating date and management) and death will be assessed. Oncological follow-up will be carried out with control of tumour markers (CEA), control imaging tests (CAT scan associated with PET/CT in the case of recurrence), and selected biopsies according to the results.
Statistical method:
The data obtained from each patient will be entered into a database and the analysis will be performed with a statistical programme Stata 13.1 (StataCorp, Texas, USA).
A descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical variables will be performed. Categorical variables will be presented as percentages and frequencies. Qualitative variables will be presented as percentages and frequencies. Quantitative variables will be described as mean and standard deviation (SD) if they follow a normal distribution or as median and interquartile range (IQR), in case of skewness.
The association between the variables collected and the target variables of the study will be performed by Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, in the case of categorical variables and, for continuous variables, by Student's t-test for independent samples or Mann-Whitney U-test, respectively, depending on whether or not their distribution conforms to the normal distribution.
Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival and overall mesorectal resection-free survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored.
Chronogram and study´s stages:
- March - September, 2023: Study´s protocol design and approval by the promoter center´s local ethics committee. Recruitment period for other participant centers.
- October,- December 2023: Unique registry database design in the REDCap platform.
- January 2024 - December 2024: Recruitment of the necessary cases according to the sample size calculation.
- January - December 2025: 1-year follow-up of patients included in the study.
- January - April 2026: Interim analysis after the first year of oncologic follow-up for assessment of the primary endpoint of the study (organ preservation with exclusive local resection) as well as some of the secondary endpoints.
- December 2027: Follow-up period to complete the study at 3 years.
Ethical and legal aspects:
The investigation will be conducted according to the 2013 Fortaleza´s update of the the Helsinki Declaration, and to each participant´s country law.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 36 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Local excision | – | Procedure: Transanal local excision* Patients older than 18 years * Diagnosis of rectal cancer * Inferior edge of the tumour not further than 2 cm above the anorectal ring * Clinical TNM staging T1N0M0 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults diagnosed with early stage rectal cancer, meaning clinical TNM staging cT1N0M0, programmed to receive Local Excision as an exclusive therapy according to each center´s standard practice.
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patients age 18 years or older.
- Histologic proof of infiltrating rectal adenocarcinoma. or
- Preoperative biopsy compatible with rectal adenoma or intramucous adenocarcinoma with endoscopic or radiological suspicion of infiltrating adenocarcinoma.
- Rectal neoplasm with an inferior limit no further than 2cm proximal to the anorectal verge, both in digital rectal examination and in radiology examinations, ideally magnetic resonance (MR).
- Rectal neoplasms up to 3 cm of major diameter.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients younger than 18 years old.
- Rectal neoplasms different from adenocarcinoma.
- Neoplasms in which the inferior edge is farther than 2cm proximal to the anorectal verge in the preoperative MR.
- Any other clinical stage other than cT1N0M0 (any T>1, N+, or M+).
- Neoplasms larger than 3cm.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transanal local excisionTransanal full thickness local excision | Procedure or surgery | Local excision |
Primary outcome
Success rate
Time frame: 36 months
Rate of patients with no need of Total Mesorectal Excision after follow-up
4 secondary outcomes
Morbidity rate
Time frame: 2 months
Radicality of resection
Time frame: 1 month
Histological poor outcome predictor rate
Time frame: 1 month
Radical rescue surgery specimen quality
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38763491Tovar Perez R, Cerdan Santacruz C, Cano-Valderrama O, Jimenez Escovar F, Flor Lorente B, Perez RO, Garcia Septiem J. Local Excision for organ preservation in early REctal cancer with No Adjuvant treatment (LORENA Trial): prospective observational study protocol. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2024 Sep;102(9):506-512. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.013. Epub 2024 May 18.
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Rodrigo Tovar Perez, MD principal investigator
Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Carlos Cerdán Santacruz, PhD study director
Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Óscar Cano Valderrama, PhD study chair
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rectal Cancer and Rectum Neoplasm, run by Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rodrigo Tovar Perez, MD (+34915202200 ext. 14301, triallorena@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Success rate (time frame: 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05927584, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2024.