HemorrhageBANETNCT05928091
Evaluation of the Impact of an Expert Opinion During the Management of Patients With Severe Bleeding on Oral Anticoagulants.
A study testing Phone call to an expert team in people with Hemorrhage, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 15 sites in France.
Trial summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of an expert opinion during the management of patients with severe bleeding on oral anticoagulants. The main question it aims to answer is : Does an expert help of decision during the management of patients with severe bleeding is superior to classic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemorrhage
- What is being tested?
- Phone call to an expert team
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 16 Oct 2023to 20 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major patient treated with oral anticoagulants, admitted in an emergency department
- For suspected major bleeding defined according to the criteria of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Able to give informed consent to participate in research or, in the event of an emergency, to take charge of a reference person
- Affiliated to a Social Security scheme.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
- Administration within the last 24 hours of parenteral anticoagulant.
- Refusal to participate
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
France15 sites
CH Aurillac
Aurillac, 15000
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble, 38000
CH Le Puy
Le Puy-en-Velay, 43000
Hospice civils de Lyon
Lyon, 69000
CH de Montbrison
Montbrison, 42600
CH Montluçon
Montluçon, 03000
CH de Moulins
Moulins, 03000
CHU de Nice
Nice, 06000
CHR Orléans
Orléans, 45000
La Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, 75013
CHU de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42000
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31000
CHU Tours
Tours, 37000
CH de Vichy
Vichy, 03200
About this study
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of an expert opinion during the management of patients with severe bleeding on oral anticoagulants. The main question it aims to answer is :
- Does an expert help of decision during the management of patients with severe bleeding is superior to classic management ? The centers will be randomized in one of the two groups : control group and interventional group.
Read more
Patients will be followed for 3 months. At their inclusion they will be managed in conformity of the randomisation of their center.
They will be followed at hour 0 + 6 , H0+24 and at the end of hospitalization. After 3 months, they will be called to assess the occurrence of thrombotic events ou hemorrhage complications.
Researchers will compare the classic management versus the management with an expert opinion to see if the expert opinion is superior to classic management.
- Conditions
- Hemorrhage
- Being tested
- Phone call to an expert team
- Keywords
- anticoagulants, hemorrhage
- Medical subject headings
- Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Phone call to an expert teamOther
Patients will be treated as the expert said when the investigator called him
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | No intervention | Doctors will manage bleeding as usual. |
| Experimental group | Experimental | Investigators will call a phone number, and an expert will guide them to manage the bleeding. Receives: Other: Phone call to an expert team |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effectiveness of bleeding management
The effectiveness of the management of bleeding will be evaluated with a rate of compliance with the recommendations in the event of major bleeding under oral anticoagulants
Measured: Hour 24
Secondary outcomes (9)
Mortality rate all causes
Mortality rate all causes after 3 months
Measured: Inclusion + 3 months
Hemostatic efficacy rate
Hemostatic efficacy rate at 24 hours evaluated by an independent blinded evaluation committee
Measured: Hour 24
Specific mortality rate related to haemorrhage
Specific mortality rate related to haemorrhage after 3 months
Measured: Inclusion + 3 months
Rate of new bleeding
Rate of new bleeding after 3 months
Measured: Inclusion + 3 months
Thromboembolic events
Major thrombosis including symptomatic proximal venous thrombosis, symptomatic or non-symptomatic pulmonary embolism, ischemic vascular accident, myocardial infarction, cerebral thrombophlebitis, mesenteric portal thrombosis at 3 months
Measured: Inclusion + 3 months
Duration of hospital stay
Duration of hospital stay over the entire 3-month follow-up
Measured: Inclusion + 3 months
Changes in haemostasis values
Rate of correction of haemostasis disorders at 6 hours post-reversion defined by an INR of less than 1.5 for Vitamin K Antagnist and normalization of activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, anti-Xa activity according to local normal values.
Measured: Hour 6
Rate of avoided and avoidable reversions
Rate of avoided and avoidable reversions
Measured: Hour 24
Deadlines for implementing a reversion
- Comparison of the time between the arrival of the patient in the emergency room and the implementation of the reversal
- Comparison of the time between the patient's arrival in the emergency room and the performance of diagnostic imaging, particularly cerebral
- Comparison of the time between the patient's arrival in the emergency room and the performance of a haemostatic procedure (interventional radiology, surgery, fibroscopy)
Measured: Hour 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2023
- Study start16 Oct 2023
- Primary completion20 Apr 2026
- Study completion20 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HemorrhageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Centers will be randomized in two arms : * control group : each center will manage hemorrhage of participation as they usually did * interventional group : management of hemorrhage will be guided by the expert team
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fares MOUSTAFA, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05928091
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PHRC IR 2019 BANET
- Other IDs
- 2021-A01684-37
- Acronym
- BANET
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Impact of an Expert Opinion During the Management of Patients With Severe Bleeding on Oral Anticoagulants.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05928091
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BANET / PHRC IR 2019 BANET
- Conditions
- Hemorrhage
- Keywords
- anticoagulants, hemorrhage
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of an expert opinion during the management of patients with severe bleeding on oral anticoagulants. The main question it aims to answer is :
- Does an expert help of decision during the management of patients with severe bleeding is superior to classic management ? The centers will be randomized in one of the two groups : control group and interventional group.
Patients will be followed for 3 months. At their inclusion they will be managed in conformity of the randomisation of their center.
They will be followed at hour 0 + 6 , H0+24 and at the end of hospitalization. After 3 months, they will be called to assess the occurrence of thrombotic events ou hemorrhage complications.
Researchers will compare the classic management versus the management with an expert opinion to see if the expert opinion is superior to classic management.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Centers will be randomized in two arms : * control group : each center will manage hemorrhage of participation as they usually did * interventional group : management of hemorrhage will be guided by the expert team
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | No intervention | –Doctors will manage bleeding as usual. |
| Experimental group | Experimental | Other: Phone call to an expert teamInvestigators will call a phone number, and an expert will guide them to manage the bleeding. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Major patient treated with oral anticoagulants, admitted in an emergency department
- For suspected major bleeding defined according to the criteria of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Able to give informed consent to participate in research or, in the event of an emergency, to take charge of a reference person
- Affiliated to a Social Security scheme.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
- Administration within the last 24 hours of parenteral anticoagulant.
- Refusal to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Phone call to an expert teamPatients will be treated as the expert said when the investigator called him | Other | Experimental group |
Primary outcome
Effectiveness of bleeding management
Time frame: Hour 24
The effectiveness of the management of bleeding will be evaluated with a rate of compliance with the recommendations in the event of major bleeding under oral anticoagulants
9 secondary outcomes
Mortality rate all causes
Time frame: Inclusion + 3 months
Hemostatic efficacy rate
Time frame: Hour 24
Specific mortality rate related to haemorrhage
Time frame: Inclusion + 3 months
Rate of new bleeding
Time frame: Inclusion + 3 months
Thromboembolic events
Time frame: Inclusion + 3 months
Duration of hospital stay
Time frame: Inclusion + 3 months
Changes in haemostasis values
Time frame: Hour 6
Rate of avoided and avoidable reversions
Time frame: Hour 24
Deadlines for implementing a reversion
Time frame: Hour 24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2026.
Related trials for Hemorrhage
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
RecruitingObservational study
A Study in Children and, Adults With Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (cTTP) Treated With Adzynma
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
TicAgreLor Versus Placebo to Prevent Cerebral ISCHemia in anEuRysmal Low Grade SAH A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Study
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Ischemia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fares MOUSTAFA principal investigator
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Phone call to an expert team in people with Hemorrhage, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 15 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effectiveness of bleeding management (time frame: Hour 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2026.