End-Stage Kidney DiseasePhase 3BRAVONCT05931276
CSP #2026 - Beta Blocker Dialyzability on Cardiovascular Outcomes
A Phase 3 study testing Metoprolol Succinate and Carvedilol in people with End-Stage Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 18 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators aim to determine, using a point-of-care randomized controlled trial design, if hemodialysis patients, who are randomized to metoprolol succinate (a dialyzable, beta-1 selective beta blocker), have an improved cardiovascular outcome compared to those randomized to carvedilol (a non-dialyzable… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End-Stage Kidney Disease, End-Stage Renal Disease
- What is being tested?
- Metoprolol Succinate and Carvedilol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,540 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 May 2024to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- On hemodialysis
- Received one of the following beta blockers through the VA pharmacy: metoprolol (succinate or tartrate), atenolol, labetalol, carvedilol, bisoprolol
Who cannot join
- Impaired decision-making capacity
- Patients not receiving carvedilol who have a history of asthma
- known hypersensitivity to any component of either drug
- Provider unwilling to sign a new medication order for a randomized patient
- No surrogate consent will be allowed
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Christopher M Donnelly contact
18 sites in 1 country
United States18 sites, 18 recruiting
- Recruiting
New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, NM
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108-5153
Srihari Raju, MD, Srihari.Raju@va.gov
- Recruiting
Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Aurora, Colorado, 80045-7211
Srihari Raju, MD, srihari.raju@va.gov
- Not yet recruiting
VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA
Boston, Massachusetts, 02130-4817
Jade Fiotto, MPH, 617-232-9500, jade.fiotto@va.gov
- Recruiting
Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Srihari Raju, MD, srihari.raju@va.gov
- Not yet recruiting
VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Dallas, Texas, 75216-7167
Peter Van Buren, MD, peter.vanburen@va.gov
- Not yet recruiting
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
Decatur, Georgia, 30033-4004
Sheryl Caberto, MD, sheryl.caberto@va.gov
- Recruiting
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, 27705-3875
Srihari Raju, MD, srihari.raju@va.gov
- Recruiting
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
Gainesville, Florida, 32608-1135
Srihari Raju, MD, Srihari.Raju@va.gov
- Recruiting
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA
Iowa City, Iowa, 52246-2292
Srihari Raju, MD, Srihari.Raju@va.gov
- Recruiting
VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, California, 90822
Srihari Raju, MD, Srihari.Raju@va.gov
- Recruiting
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417-2309
Areef Ishani, MD MS, (612) 467-4431 ext. 314431, areef.ishani@va.gov
Areef Ishani, MD MS
- Recruiting
Omaha VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE
Omaha, Nebraska, 68105-1850
Srihari Raju, MD, Srihari.Raju@va.gov
- Recruiting
Philadelphia MultiService Center, Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106
Srihari Raju, MD, srihari.raju@va.gov
- Recruiting
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240
Srihari Raju, MD, srihari.raju@va.gov
- Not yet recruiting
Salisbury W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Richard Handler, MD, richard.handler@va.gov
- Recruiting
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148-0001
Srihari Raju, MD, srihari.raju@va.gov
- Not yet recruiting
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
Seattle, Washington, 98108-1532
Margaret Fleet, MD, margaret.fleet@va.gov
- Not yet recruiting
VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
West Haven, Connecticut, 06516-2770
Crystal Jobson, MD, crystal.jobson@va.gov
About this study
Official title: CSP #2026 - Beta Blocker Dialyzability on Cardiovascular Outcomes (BRAVO)
The investigators aim to determine, using a point-of-care randomized controlled trial design, if hemodialysis patients, who are randomized to metoprolol succinate (a dialyzable, beta-1 selective beta blocker), have an improved cardiovascular outcome compared to those randomized to carvedilol (a non-dialyzable, non-selective beta blocker with alpha-1 antagonist properties). The investigators will also examine intervention practices to identify components that best support engagement and sustainability.
Read the detailed description
Approximately 35,000 Veterans have end stage kidney disease (ESKD) with an incidence of 13,000 annually. These numbers are increasing because of the epidemic of diabetes, the most common cause of ESKD, among the Veteran population. Patients with ESKD on hemodialysis have substantial cardiovascular morbidity. Veterans annual mortality is in excess of 15% and more than half the deaths are due to cardiovascular disease. Beta blockers have been shown to prevent cardiovascular events in randomized clinical trials in patients without chronic kidney disease, particularly those with heart failure and after myocardial infarction. Beta blockers are a mainstay of therapy in dialysis patients, with two-thirds of Veterans on dialysis receiving a beta blocker. There are no head-to-head randomized studies comparing the two most commonly used beta blockers in ESKD patients in the United States, metoprolol and carvedilol, but observational studies suggest superior outcomes for patients treated with metoprolol. The identification of the superior beta blocker may significantly improve the morbidity and mortality of the VA dialysis population.
The investigators aim to compare two beta blockers with similar indications, usage and availability within the VA but with major differences in patients dialysis clearance and adrenergic effects. The investigators aim to determine if patients undergoing dialysis have improved survival when using metoprolol succinate, a beta blocker that is removed by dialysis and is beta-1 selective, compared to carvedilol, a beta blocker that is not removed by dialysis and is not beta-selective and is also an alpha-blocker.
- Conditions
- End-Stage Kidney Disease, End-Stage Renal Disease
- Being tested
- Metoprolol Succinate, Carvedilol
- Keywords
- Dialysis, beta-Blockers, Adrenergic, Cardiovascular Diseases, Point of Care Research, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Metoprolol Succinate, Carvedilol, Hemodialysis
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic, Cardiovascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Metoprolol SuccinateDrug
a dialyzable, beta-1 selective beta blocker
CarvedilolDrug
a non-dialyzable, non-selective beta blocker with alpha-1 antagonist properties
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Metoprolol Succinate | Active comparator | Depending on baseline type and dose of beta blocker:
* 25 milligrams once daily (12.5 milligrams once daily if > NYHA class II)
* 50 milligrams (or 25 milligrams) once daily
* 100 milligrams (or 50 milligrams) once daily
* 200 milligrams (or 100 milligrams titrated to 200 milligrams) once daily Receives: Drug: Metoprolol Succinate |
| Carvedilol | Active comparator | Depending on baseline type and dose of beta blocker:
* 3.125 milligrams twice daily
* 6.25 milligrams twice daily
* 12.5 milligrams twice daily
* 25 milligrams twice daily (may titrate to 5 0 milligrams twice daily if > 85 kilograms) Receives: Drug: Carvedilol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to major cardiovascular event
The Primary outcome measure will be time to a non-fatal adverse cardiovascular event, defined as a composite outcome comprised of the first occurrence after randomization of any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality
Measured: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Non-fatal myocardial infarction
Non-fatal myocardial infarction
Measured: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
Non-fatal stroke
Non-fatal stroke
Measured: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
Hospitalization for heart failure
Hospitalization for heart failure
Measured: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality
Measured: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jul 2023
- Study start22 May 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for End-Stage Kidney DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study design is a multicenter clinically integrated prospective randomized open-label blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,540 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Areef Ishani, MD MS, Study chair, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05931276
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026
- Acronym
- BRAVO
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Leatherman SM, Ishani A. Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Jun 1;35(6):812-814. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000340. Epub 2024 Feb 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 38419159
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CSP #2026 - Beta Blocker Dialyzability on Cardiovascular Outcomes (BRAVO)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05931276
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BRAVO / 2026
- Conditions
- End-Stage Kidney Disease, End-Stage Renal Disease
- Keywords
- Dialysis, beta-Blockers, Adrenergic, Cardiovascular Diseases, Point of Care Research, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Metoprolol Succinate, Carvedilol, Hemodialysis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,540 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 22 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators aim to determine, using a point-of-care randomized controlled trial design, if hemodialysis patients, who are randomized to metoprolol succinate (a dialyzable, beta-1 selective beta blocker), have an improved cardiovascular outcome compared to those randomized to carvedilol (a non-dialyzable, non-selective beta blocker with alpha-1 antagonist properties). The investigators will also examine intervention practices to identify components that best support engagement and sustainability.
Detailed description
Approximately 35,000 Veterans have end stage kidney disease (ESKD) with an incidence of 13,000 annually. These numbers are increasing because of the epidemic of diabetes, the most common cause of ESKD, among the Veteran population. Patients with ESKD on hemodialysis have substantial cardiovascular morbidity. Veterans annual mortality is in excess of 15% and more than half the deaths are due to cardiovascular disease. Beta blockers have been shown to prevent cardiovascular events in randomized clinical trials in patients without chronic kidney disease, particularly those with heart failure and after myocardial infarction. Beta blockers are a mainstay of therapy in dialysis patients, with two-thirds of Veterans on dialysis receiving a beta blocker. There are no head-to-head randomized studies comparing the two most commonly used beta blockers in ESKD patients in the United States, metoprolol and carvedilol, but observational studies suggest superior outcomes for patients treated with metoprolol. The identification of the superior beta blocker may significantly improve the morbidity and mortality of the VA dialysis population.
The investigators aim to compare two beta blockers with similar indications, usage and availability within the VA but with major differences in patients dialysis clearance and adrenergic effects. The investigators aim to determine if patients undergoing dialysis have improved survival when using metoprolol succinate, a beta blocker that is removed by dialysis and is beta-1 selective, compared to carvedilol, a beta blocker that is not removed by dialysis and is not beta-selective and is also an alpha-blocker.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study design is a multicenter clinically integrated prospective randomized open-label blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Metoprolol Succinate | Active comparator | Drug: Metoprolol SuccinateDepending on baseline type and dose of beta blocker: * 25 milligrams once daily (12.5 milligrams once daily if > NYHA class II) * 50 milligrams (or 25 milligrams) once daily * 100 milligrams (or 50 milligrams) once daily * 200 milligrams (or 100 milligrams titrated to 200 milligrams) once daily |
| Carvedilol | Active comparator | Drug: CarvedilolDepending on baseline type and dose of beta blocker: * 3.125 milligrams twice daily * 6.25 milligrams twice daily * 12.5 milligrams twice daily * 25 milligrams twice daily (may titrate to 5 0 milligrams twice daily if > 85 kilograms) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- On hemodialysis
- Received one of the following beta blockers through the VA pharmacy: metoprolol (succinate or tartrate), atenolol, labetalol, carvedilol, bisoprolol
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Impaired decision-making capacity
- Patients not receiving carvedilol who have a history of asthma
- known hypersensitivity to any component of either drug
- Provider unwilling to sign a new medication order for a randomized patient
- No surrogate consent will be allowed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Metoprolol Succinatea dialyzable, beta-1 selective beta blocker | Drug | Metoprolol Succinate |
| Carvedilola non-dialyzable, non-selective beta blocker with alpha-1 antagonist properties | Drug | Carvedilol |
Primary outcome
Time to major cardiovascular event
Time frame: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
The Primary outcome measure will be time to a non-fatal adverse cardiovascular event, defined as a composite outcome comprised of the first occurrence after randomization of any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality
4 secondary outcomes
Non-fatal myocardial infarction
Time frame: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
Non-fatal stroke
Time frame: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
Hospitalization for heart failure
Time frame: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
All-cause mortality
Time frame: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38419159Leatherman SM, Ishani A. Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Jun 1;35(6):812-814. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000340. Epub 2024 Feb 29. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for End-Stage Kidney Disease
Recruiting
Dry Weight Reduction Intervention Via Extra Ultrafiltration
Fluid Accumulation, Blood Pressure Management
Not yet recruiting
Cycling During Dialysis: A Feasibility and Safety Study
Hemodialysis, Kidney Disease, End-Stage
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Management of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients
Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA), ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Horticultural Therapy on Acute Stress and Salivary Cortisol Levels in Hemodialysis Patients
End-Stage Renal Disease, Renal Dialysis
RecruitingPhase 4
Empagliflozin in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and End Stage Renal Disease
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Christopher M Donnelly contact
Areef Ishani, MD MS study chair
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Metoprolol Succinate and Carvedilol in people with End-Stage Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 18 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Christopher M Donnelly (Christopher.Donnelly2@va.gov), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to major cardiovascular event (time frame: Randomization to time to event; average follow-up 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05931276, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.