AzTrials
AzTrials

ObesityPhase 3ATTAIN-JNCT05931380

A Study of Once-Daily Oral Orforglipron (LY3502970) in Japanese Adult Participants With Obesity Disease

A Phase 3 study testing Orforglipron in people with Obesity, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 16 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral orforglipron in participants with obesity disease with obesity-related health problems. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Obesity
What is being tested?
Orforglipron
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
238 participants
Where
16 sitesJapan
Study dates
31 Jul 2023to 19 Jun 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with a BMI ≥27 kg/m² and <35 kg/m² and at least 2 obesity-related health problems (treated or untreated), OR a BMI ≥35 kg/m² and at least 1 obesity-related health problem (treated or untreated). At least one obesity-related health problem should be hypertension, dyslipidemia or T2D (approximately 25% of participants).
  • Have a history of at least one self-reported unsuccessful dietary effort to lose body weight.
  • Males and females may participate in this trial. Female participants must not be pregnant, intending to be pregnant, breastfeeding, or intending to breastfeed.
  • Contraceptive use by participants should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies.
  • No male contraception is required except in compliance with specific local government study requirements.

Who cannot join

  • For participants with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D):
  • Have Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), history of ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar state/coma, or any other types of diabetes except T2D.
  • Have had 1 or more episode of severe hypoglycemia and/or 1 or more episode of hypoglycemia unawareness within the 180 days prior to screening.
  • Have renal impairment measured as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73 m², calculated by Japanese Society of Nephrology coefficient-modified chronic kidney disease-epidemiology equation during screening.
  • Have a known clinically significant gastric emptying abnormality.
  • For participants without Type 2 diabetes (T2D): Have any type of diabetes with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5 %.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Have a self-reported change in body weight >5 kg (11 pounds) within 90 days prior to screening.
  • Have chronic kidney disease.
  • Have lupus or rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Have the following cardiovascular conditions within 90 days prior to screening.
  • Have acute or chronic hepatitis.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

Japan16 sites
  • Yotsuya Medical Cube

    Chiyoda City, Tokyo, 102-0084

  • Nihonbashi Sakura Clinic

    Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-0025

  • Tokyo-Eki Center-building Clinic

    Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-0027

  • Fukuwa Clinic

    Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0031

  • Hiroshima Station Clinic

    Hiroshima, 732-0053

  • Shonan Takai Clinic

    Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0055

  • Takai Internal Medicine Clinic

    Kamakura-shi, Kanagawa, 247-0056

  • Shiraiwa Medical Clinic

    Kashihara, Osaka, 582-0005

  • Sugiura Clinic

    Kawaguchi, Saitama, 332-0012

  • Nishiyamadou Keiwa Hospital

    Naka, Ibaraki, 311-0133

  • Osaka Nishiumeda Clinic

    Osaka, 530-0001

  • Medical Corporation Yuga Higashirinkan Kaneshiro Diabetes Clinic

    Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0302

  • Heishinkai Medical Group ToCROM Clinic

    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0008

  • Medical Corporation Heishinkai OCROM Clinic

    Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0853

  • Tsuchiura Beryl Clinic

    Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, 300-0062

  • Ohishi Internal Medicine Clinic

    Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, 300-0835

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Oral LY3502970 Compared With Placebo in Japanese Adult Participants With Obesity Disease

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral orforglipron in participants with obesity disease with obesity-related health problems.

Conditions
Obesity
Being tested
Orforglipron, Placebo
Keywords
Overweight, Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Overweight, Nutrition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OrforglipronDrug

    Administered orally

  • PlaceboDrug

    Administered orally

Study groups in NCT05931380
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo QDPlacebo comparatorParticipants received matching placebo capsule orally once daily (QD). Treatment was initiated with placebo corresponding to 1 mg equivalent to Orforglipron, with dose escalation every 4 weeks to maintain blinding, and was continued through Week 72, unless dose interruption or modification was required. Treatment was administered as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
6 mg Orforglipron QDExperimentalParticipants received oral orforglipron capsule once daily. Treatment was initiated at 1 mg once daily, with dose escalation every 4 weeks to a target dose of 6 mg, which was maintained through Week 72, unless dose interruption or modification was required. Treatment was administered as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity.
Receives: Drug: Orforglipron
12 mg Orforglipron QDExperimentalParticipants received oral orforglipron capsule once daily. Treatment was initiated at 1 mg once daily, with dose escalation every 4 weeks to a target dose of 12 mg, which was maintained through Week 72, unless dose interruption or modification was required. Treatment was administered as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity.
Receives: Drug: Orforglipron
36 mg Orforglipron QDExperimentalParticipants received oral orforglipron capsule once daily. Treatment was initiated at 1 mg once daily, with dose escalation every 4 weeks to a target dose of 36 mg, which was maintained through Week 72, unless dose interruption or modification was required. Treatment was administered as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity.
Receives: Drug: Orforglipron

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 72

    Values reported as "LS Mean" are model-based estimates (MBE) of the adjusted (unconditional) treatment effect. MBEs was calculated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the following variables: treatment group, baseline value, baseline Body Mass Index (BMI) category (<35 kilogram per meter square [kg/m²] or ≥35 kg/m²), and stratification factors (sex and baseline type 2 diabetes status). Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 5% Body Weight Reduction From Baseline

    Percentage of participants with ≥5% body weight reduction was analysed by Logistic regression with the following variables: treatment group, baseline value, baseline BMI category (<35 kg/m² or ≥35 kg/m²), and stratification factors (sex and baseline type 2 diabetes status). Stratification factors were defined by the combination of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no). The model also allowed the treatment effect to vary across baseline values and stratification factors.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 72

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ≥10% Body Weight Reduction From Baseline

    Percentage of participants with ≥10% body weight reduction was analysed by Logistic regression with the following variables: treatment group, baseline value, baseline BMI category (<35 kg/m² or ≥35 kg/m²), and stratification factors (sex and baseline type 2 diabetes status). Stratification factors were defined by the combination of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no). The model also allowed the treatment effect to vary across baseline values and stratification factors.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 72

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ≥15% Body Weight Reduction From Baseline

    Percentage of participants with ≥15% body weight reduction was analysed by Logistic regression with the following variables: treatment group, baseline value, baseline BMI category (<35 kg/m² or ≥35 kg/m²), and stratification factors (sex and baseline type 2 diabetes status). Stratification factors were defined by the combination of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no). The model also allowed the treatment effect to vary across baseline values and stratification factors.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 72

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ≥20% Body Weight Reduction From Baseline

    Percentage of participants with ≥20% body weight reduction was analysed by Logistic regression with the following variables: treatment group, baseline value, baseline BMI category (<35 kg/m² or ≥35 kg/m²), and stratification factors (sex and baseline type 2 diabetes status). Stratification factors were defined by the combination of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no). The model also allowed the treatment effect to vary across baseline values and stratification factors.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 72

  4. Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 72

    Values reported as "LS Mean" are model-based estimates (MBE) of the adjusted (unconditional) treatment effect. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model with the following variables: baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata in the model, including treatment-by-baseline and treatment-by-strata interaction terms. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no). The model also allowed the treatment effect to vary across baseline values and stratification factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Had Improvements in Hypertension

    Percentage of participants achieving hypertension improvement ((Systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg) was analysed using logistic regression with the following variables: treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata in the model. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no). The estimates (odds ratio and corresponding confidence intervals) were derived using observed data.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 72

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Had Improvements in Dyslipidemia

    Percentage of participants achieving dyslipidemia improvement (Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <140 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), triglycerides <150 mg/dL, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥40 mg/dL) was analysed using logistic regression with the following variables: treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata in the model. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no). The estimates (odds ratio and corresponding confidence intervals) were derived using observed data.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 72

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Target Value (<6.5% [48 mmol/Mol])

    Percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <6.5% was analysed using logistic regression with the following variables: baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and sex in the model, including treatment-by-baseline and treatment-by-sex interaction terms.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 72

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT) at Week 72

    Values represented under "LS Mean" are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model with the following variables: baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata in the model, including treatment-by-baseline and treatment-by-strata interaction terms. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Umbilical Level at Week 72

    Values represented under "LS Mean" are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model with the following variables: baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata in the model, including treatment-by-baseline and treatment-by-strata interaction terms. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 72

    Values represented under "LS Mean" are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model with the following variables: baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata in the model, including treatment-by-baseline and treatment-by-strata interaction terms. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  11. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) at Week 72

    Values represented as LS means are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect on the log-transformed scale. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model for log(Actual Value/Baseline), including log-transformed baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata (defined by joint levels of sex [female, male] and baseline type 2 diabetes status [yes, no]) as covariates, with treatment-by-log(baseline) and treatment-by-strata interaction terms included in the model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  12. Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 72

    Values represented as LS means are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect on the log-transformed scale. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model for log(Actual Value/Baseline), including log-transformed baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata (defined by joint levels of sex [female, male] and baseline type 2 diabetes status [yes, no]) as covariates, with treatment-by-log(baseline) and treatment-by-strata interaction terms included in the model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 72

    Values represented as LS means are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect on the log-transformed scale. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model for log(Actual Value/Baseline), including log-transformed baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata (defined by joint levels of sex [female, male] and baseline type 2 diabetes status [yes, no]) as covariates, with treatment-by-log(baseline) and treatment-by-strata interaction terms included in the model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  14. Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose at Week 72

    Values represented under "LS Mean" are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model with the following variables: baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata in the model, including treatment-by-baseline and treatment-by-strata interaction terms. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 72

    • Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is the glycosylated fraction of hemoglobin A, measured to reflect average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time.
    • Values represented under "LS Mean" are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect. MBE was calculated using an ANCOVA model with the following variables: baseline, treatment, baseline BMI group, and strata in the model, including treatment-by-baseline and treatment-by-strata interaction terms. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein at Week 72

    Values represented under "LS Mean" are model-based estimates (MBE) of the unconditional average treatment effect. MBE was calculated using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the following variables: baseline BMI group, baseline-by-time-by-treatment, and strata-by-time-by-treatment interaction terms in the model. Strata were defined by joint levels of sex (female, male) and baseline type 2 diabetes status (yes, no). An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  17. Time to Onset of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)

    Time to event was defined as the duration from randomization to adjudication committee-confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Descriptive statistics are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to onset of T2D (in weeks). Time to onset of T2D was also analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model, with treatment (pooled orforglipron dose groups) and sex as factors and baseline fasting serum glucose as a covariate. Hazard ratios with corresponding confidence intervals were estimated and reported in statistical analysis. Statistical significance between treatment groups was assessed using a two-sided log-rank test.

    Measured: Up to Week 72

  18. Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute Form For Domain and Component Scores at Week 72

    The SF-36v2 acute form, 1-week recall assesses participants' health-related quality of life on 8 domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Each domain is scored individually and information from these 8 domains is further aggregated into 2 health component summary scores, a Physical Component Summary, and a Mental Component Summary. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths (3-point, 5-point, or 6-point scales). Scoring of each domain and both summary scores are norm based and presented in the form of T scores, with mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health. Range cannot be specified in norm-based scores.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  19. Mean Change From Baseline in Impact of Weight on Quality-of-Life Lite Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite-CT) of Physical Function, Physical, and Psychosocial Composite Score at Week 72

    The IWQOL-Lite-CT is a 20-item, obesity-specific patient reported outcome instrument developed for use in obesity clinical trials. It assesses 2 primary domains of obesity-related health-related quality of life: physical (7 items), and psychosocial (13 items). A 5-item subset of the physical domain, the physical-function composite is also supported. Items in the physical-function composite describe physical impacts related to general and specific physical activities. All items are rated on either a 5-point frequency ("never" to "always") scale or a 5-point truth ("not at all true" to "completely true") scale. The two domain scores (Physical and Psychosocial) and composite score (Physical function) range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater functioning. Raw scores are then linearly transformed to a 0 (worst) -100 (best) scale using: 100×(average item score-1)/4. Higher scores indicate better quality of life/function; lower scores indicate greater impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 72

  20. Pharmacokinetics (PK): Mean Plasma Concentration of Orforglipron

    Plasma concentrations of orforglipron were measured at predefined pre-dose and post-dose sampling time points.

    Measured: Pre-dose at Weeks 8, 24, and 48; post-dose at Week 16 (4 to 12 hours) and Week 36 (1 to 4 hours)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jul 2023
  2. Study start31 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion19 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion19 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
238 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05931380
Sponsor's protocol ID
18744
Other IDs
J2A-JE-GZPD
Acronym
ATTAIN-J
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
27 Jun 2023
Last updated
20 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Yokote K, Yamauchi T, Shingaki T, Chin R, Oura T, Nagai Y, Shimomura I, Kadowaki T. Efficacy and safety of oral orforglipron in Japanese participants with obesity disease (ATTAIN-J): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2026 Oct 30:S2213-8587(26)00232-9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00232-9. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42962687

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Orforglipron in people with Obesity, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 16 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 72 (time frame: Baseline, Week 72). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05931380, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in