Periodontal DiseasesNCT05932017
Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization
An observational study of Periodontal Diseases and Periodontal Pocket, run by Texas A&M University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of a small camera (videoscope) in conjunction with magnification glasses during surgery vs. surgery only using magnification glasses. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Pocket, Periodontitis
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2023to Mar 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients will be identified at the Texas A\&M University dental school clinic.
Who may be able to join
- Patients that are treatment planned for open flap debridement in two or more quadrants
- age >18 years old
- Stage III periodontitis diagnosis
- Probing depths ≥5mm with bleeding on probing
Who cannot join
- systemic disease affecting bone metabolism
- current smokers
- diabetes
- pregnant women
- adults unable to consent
- prisoners
Show all 9Show fewer
- previous or current bisphosphonate use
- recent joint replacement requiring prophylactic antibiotics
- teeth that necessitate and undergo osseous recontouring (shaping of the bone) will be excluded
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Texas A&M University School of Dentistry
Dallas, Texas, 75246
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization. A Pilot Study
This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of a small camera (videoscope) in conjunction with magnification glasses during surgery vs. surgery only using magnification glasses. Both methods are routinely used and are standard of care methods of visualization. The small camera (videoscope) is a device which allows us to see the area under high magnification and projects live video feed on a computer screen.
The study is a split-mouth design pilot study. The patients are only receiving treatment that was previously diagnosed prior to entering the study. The treatment performed is standard treatment that fits in the routine standard of care. No interventional treatment is being performed. The only difference is the method of visualization/observation by the practitioner used during the surgical procedure. One side of the mouth will be treated with just loupes while the other side of the mouth will be treated with loupes and the videoscope.
Read the detailed description
It is well known that tartar makes at-home oral hygiene care more difficult. The plaque and bacteria that accumulate on tartar are considered the primary factors contributing to gum disease. Conventional gum surgery is commonly performed using loupes (magnification glasses). The use of a videoscope, a handheld miniature camera, allows for greater visualization during surgery. While the debris on the root surface of teeth is not visible with loupes, it is easily observed when the root surface is visualized with the high magnification of the videoscope. The videoscope allows for up to 40x magnification to visualize underneath the gumline. The use of loupes and the videoscope are methods of visualization that are standard of care at the Texas A\&M College of Dentistry.
This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of the videoscope in conjunction with loupes during surgery vs. surgery only using loupes. No aspect of this study is investigational, however, bacterial samples will be collected from the patients at multiple time points to assess outcomes. The collection of bacterial samples for research will be conducted through paper points and an oral rinse. These methods are well-established methods of data collection.
Data will be sent to OralDNA labs for analysis. A special contract is required between the school and the company as they will be paid for the services rendered.
Hypothesis: Does the use of the videoscope in conjunction with loupes, as compared to only using loupes for visualization during surgery, have a positive effect (i.e. reduced inflammation and active disease) on the outcomes of gum surgery.
- Conditions
- Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Pocket, Periodontitis, Periodontal Inflammation, Periodontal Attachment Loss, Periodontal Bone Loss
- Keywords
- videoscope
- Medical subject headings
- Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Pocket, Periodontitis, Periodontal Attachment Loss, Alveolar Bone Loss
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving routine, pre-diagnosed, standard of care procedures. | Single cohort of patients receiving previously prescribed treatment. The only variable will be the modality of visualization utilized on each side of the mouth during the surgical procedure. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Probing Depth (in millimeters)
The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Measured: baseline
Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters)
The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Measured: baseline
Bleeding on Probing (yes or no)
Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.
Measured: baseline
Probing Depth (in millimeters)
The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Measured: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.
Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters)
The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Measured: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.
Bleeding on Probing
Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.
Measured: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.
Probing Depth (in millimeters)
The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Measured: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.
Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters)
The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Measured: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.
Bleeding on Probing
Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.
Measured: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.
Probing Depths (in millimeters)
The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Measured: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.
Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters)
The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Measured: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.
Bleeding on Probing
Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.
Measured: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Bacterial Species Identification
Fluid from just underneath the subject's gums will be collected using a using a commercially available test (paper strip). The strip will be analyzed for bacteria. Minimal discomfort is associated with this procedure. The bacterial sampling is not routinely done in our clinic and considered to be a research only procedure. The test samples will be analyzed by OralDNA® Labs.
Measured: These will be collected at the initial visit
Bacterial Species Identification
Fluid from just underneath the subject's gums will be collected using a using a commercially available test (paper strip). The strip will be analyzed for bacteria. Minimal discomfort is associated with this procedure. The bacterial sampling is not routinely done in our clinic and considered to be a research only procedure. The test samples will be analyzed by OralDNA® Labs.
Measured: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.
Bacterial Species Identification
Fluid from just underneath the subject's gums will be collected using a using a commercially available test (paper strip). The strip will be analyzed for bacteria. Minimal discomfort is associated with this procedure. The bacterial sampling is not routinely done in our clinic and considered to be a research only procedure. The test samples will be analyzed by OralDNA® Labs.
Measured: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.
Bacterial Species Identification
Fluid from just underneath the subject's gums will be collected using a using a commercially available test (paper strip). The strip will be analyzed for bacteria. Minimal discomfort is associated with this procedure. The bacterial sampling is not routinely done in our clinic and considered to be a research only procedure. The test samples will be analyzed by OralDNA® Labs.
Measured: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2023
- Study start1 Jul 2023
- Primary completionMar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Periodontal DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Texas A&M University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Carlos Parra Carrasquer, DDS, Principal investigator, Texas A&M University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05932017
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB2022-1044
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization. A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05932017
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB2022-1044
- Conditions
- Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Pocket, Periodontitis, Periodontal Inflammation, Periodontal Attachment Loss, Periodontal Bone Loss
- Keywords
- videoscope
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Texas A&M UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of a small camera (videoscope) in conjunction with magnification glasses during surgery vs. surgery only using magnification glasses. Both methods are routinely used and are standard of care methods of visualization. The small camera (videoscope) is a device which allows us to see the area under high magnification and projects live video feed on a computer screen.
The study is a split-mouth design pilot study. The patients are only receiving treatment that was previously diagnosed prior to entering the study. The treatment performed is standard treatment that fits in the routine standard of care. No interventional treatment is being performed. The only difference is the method of visualization/observation by the practitioner used during the surgical procedure. One side of the mouth will be treated with just loupes while the other side of the mouth will be treated with loupes and the videoscope.
Detailed description
It is well known that tartar makes at-home oral hygiene care more difficult. The plaque and bacteria that accumulate on tartar are considered the primary factors contributing to gum disease. Conventional gum surgery is commonly performed using loupes (magnification glasses). The use of a videoscope, a handheld miniature camera, allows for greater visualization during surgery. While the debris on the root surface of teeth is not visible with loupes, it is easily observed when the root surface is visualized with the high magnification of the videoscope. The videoscope allows for up to 40x magnification to visualize underneath the gumline. The use of loupes and the videoscope are methods of visualization that are standard of care at the Texas A\&M College of Dentistry.
This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of the videoscope in conjunction with loupes during surgery vs. surgery only using loupes. No aspect of this study is investigational, however, bacterial samples will be collected from the patients at multiple time points to assess outcomes. The collection of bacterial samples for research will be conducted through paper points and an oral rinse. These methods are well-established methods of data collection.
Data will be sent to OralDNA labs for analysis. A special contract is required between the school and the company as they will be paid for the services rendered.
Hypothesis: Does the use of the videoscope in conjunction with loupes, as compared to only using loupes for visualization during surgery, have a positive effect (i.e. reduced inflammation and active disease) on the outcomes of gum surgery.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving routine, pre-diagnosed, standard of care procedures. | – | –Single cohort of patients receiving previously prescribed treatment. The only variable will be the modality of visualization utilized on each side of the mouth during the surgical procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients will be identified at the Texas A\&M University dental school clinic.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients that are treatment planned for open flap debridement in two or more quadrants
- age >18 years old
- Stage III periodontitis diagnosis
- Probing depths ≥5mm with bleeding on probing
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- systemic disease affecting bone metabolism
- current smokers
- diabetes
- pregnant women
- adults unable to consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Probing Depth (in millimeters)
Time frame: baseline
The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters)
Time frame: baseline
The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Bleeding on Probing (yes or no)
Time frame: baseline
Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.
Probing Depth (in millimeters)
Time frame: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.
The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters)
Time frame: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.
The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Bleeding on Probing
Time frame: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.
Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.
Probing Depth (in millimeters)
Time frame: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.
The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters)
Time frame: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.
The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Bleeding on Probing
Time frame: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.
Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.
Probing Depths (in millimeters)
Time frame: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.
The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters)
Time frame: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.
The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).
Bleeding on Probing
Time frame: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.
Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.
4 secondary outcomes
Bacterial Species Identification
Time frame: These will be collected at the initial visit
Bacterial Species Identification
Time frame: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.
Bacterial Species Identification
Time frame: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.
Bacterial Species Identification
Time frame: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Periodontal Diseases
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Periodontal Status and Biomarkers in MASLD
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
Recruiting
Thermosensitive Hyaluronic Gel With Octenidine as an Adjunctive to Subgingival Instrumentation
Periodontal Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Retrospective Comparative Evaluation of Omega-3 and Resveratrol Supplementation in Patients With Periodontitis
Periodontitis
Recruiting
Effects of Different Activation Techniques on Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Apical Periodontitis
Apical Periodontitis, Endodontic Retreatment
Recruiting
Ozone Gel Versus Chlorohexidine Gel as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Treatment of Stage II Periodontitis Grade B Among Smokers Patients
Ozone Gel, Chlorohexidine Gel
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Carlos Parra Carrasquer, DDS principal investigator
Texas A&M University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Periodontal Diseases and Periodontal Pocket, run by Texas A&M University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Probing Depth (in millimeters) (time frame: baseline). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2024.