Atrophic ScarNCT05936437
Clinical Benefits and Safety of Combined Polynucleotides and Hyaluronic Acid - Newest - for Acne Scars Treatment
A study testing Subjects treated with Newest medical device in people with Atrophic Scar, run by Mastelli S.r.l at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This clinical study wants to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a medical device combining "Polynucleotide Highly Purified Technology" (PN-HPT™) and hyaluronic acid (Newest-Mastelli S.r.l) for treating moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne scars. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrophic Scar
- What is being tested?
- Subjects treated with Newest medical device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 16 Nov 2023to 24 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women, with age ≥ 20 and ≤ 60 years with an approximately symmetric number of atrophic acne scars on the whole face;
- Subject presenting a grade 3 to 4 according to Goodman classification corresponding to moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne facial scars;
- Scar lesions have not be active
- Subject who never underwent surgical or laser face treatment for acne scars;
- Subjects with prior administration of oral steroids and/or isotretinoin should have interrupted this therapy at least 6 months before study kick off.
- Subject who agree to discontinue all dermatological treatment and procedures during the study;
- Subject willing to provide signed informed consent to clinical investigation participation;
- Subject able to communicate adequately with the Investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 20 or older than 60 years;
- Subjects with mild atrophic acne scars according to the Goodman classification (grade 1-2);
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding women;
- Systemic or local illnesses that might affect wound healing
- Severe solar elastosis or scarring;
- Concomitant intake of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications;
- Subjects who have followed a washout period of 2 weeks from topical corticosteroids, antibiotics, benzoyl-peroxide, azelaic acid, hydroxy acids, topical retinoids;
- History of autoimmune disease or chronic drug or alcohol abuse
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: An Open-label Study Evaluating the Clinical Benefits and Safety of Combined Polynucleotides and Hyaluronic Acid - Newest - for Acne Scars Treatment
This clinical study wants to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a medical device combining "Polynucleotide Highly Purified Technology" (PN-HPT™) and hyaluronic acid (Newest-Mastelli S.r.l) for treating moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne scars.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, open label study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of Newest in facial acne scars treatment. The study will be conducted at Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Rome (Italy). All procedures have to be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008.
A subject will be involved in the study for 6 months and photographs and instrumental assessment (Antera 3 D) will be performed at 1 months, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after first treatment administration; results will be compared with basal line evaluation (T0).
The sample size of 30 patients has been selected, based on the previous clinical results obtained from a "Preliminary Prospective and Randomized Study of Highly Purified Polynucleotide vs Placebo in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Scars". This sample size combined with this study model is statistically sufficient to provide robust estimation of the primary endpoint.
The study primary objective is to show the clinical improvement in acne facial scars treated with Newest.
The primary end-point of the study is the variation of post-acne scars characteristics evaluated through the Goodman Baron scale at follow up visits F.U. 3 and F.U. 6 versus baseline visit (T1). At the end of follow-up, an average reduction of at least two points of the Goodman score versus baseline will be considered as a positive outcome.
A descriptive statistical analysis will illustrate the percentage of patients with different score variation versus basal line.
The secondary objectives of the study are the improvement of the skin quality and the safety of the investigational device; the secondary end-points are:
- Centralized evaluation of the photos of scars, taken pre- and post-treatment and evaluated by a blinded investigator. Optionally the differences pre- and post-treatment in skin roughness, texture (elasticity/hydration), colors/evenness, vascular features, and pore dimensions could be also evaluated by means of 3D pictures (Antera 3D® or QuantifiCARE®).
- Aesthetic improvement of depressed facial atrophic scars using the "Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale" (GAIS) performed by both the patient and the investigator15; the percentage of questionnaire score improvement ≥ 2 between the two follow up visits will be considered of a clinical significance.
- Adverse events (AE) will be monitored throughout the trial. A safety assessment has to be conducted by the investigator at each scheduled visit. The intensity (mild/moderate/severe) will be assessed according to the investigator's judgement. If a patient drops out of the study, the possible reasons for drop-out, including no improvement in the scar, or occurrence of unacceptable signs/symptoms, need to be documented.
All the screened patients at the baseline visit (T0), after checking the inclusion/exclusion criteria, will be prospectively randomized in the clinical study. The Investigator has to grade the post-acne scar's severity according to the "Goodman Baron classification". The eligible patient will undergo the first injection with the study medical device and the investigator shall evaluate the clinical result by the Goodman score. At follow up visits the patient and the investigator have to judge the aesthetic improvement of scars by checking the GAIS questionnaire.
A total of 4 administrations of the investigational product are scheduled: at the baseline visit (T1), at T2, T3 and T4, with an interval of 2 weeks from each other. The clinical evaluation (Goodman score) has to be performed in addition to the basal visit (T1) also after 3 and 6 months of follow-up respectively.
Standardized photographs shall be taken prior to the first injection of the study product and at every study visit in order to document treatment effect. A reference basal photo should be taken of each patient, with a snapshot of the facial region most damaged by the acne scars. A service basal photo on which the shooted damaged facial area is marked out should be the reference photo for further evaluations.
Note that no covering make-up should be used on the photographs. Each Investigator and other study site personnel designated to take photographs shall be thoroughly trained in the photographic equipment and techniques before study start, if applicable.
Photographs shall be taken at the baseline visit before treatment (T1). If the photographs are considered good quality, the Investigator may proceed with treatment of the subject; if the photographs are considered not good enough, the photography shall be repeated.
All snapshot must be taken against a neutral background and artificial light only, in same circumstances (same perspective/angle, same distance) and ideally with the same camera (usually using a 5 mega pixel camera and analyzed as for color and pigmentation by a computer program).
The subject should keep the eyes closed during photography and shall have a neutral facial expression.
- Conditions
- Atrophic Scar
- Being tested
- Subjects treated with Newest medical device
- Keywords
- Post-acne atrophic scars, Polynucleotides, Hyaluronic acid, Mastelli, Acne scars, Newest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Subjects treated with Newest medical deviceDevice
Newest is a sterile, non-pyrogenic, viscoelastic gel for single use for intradermal infiltrations. Newest is a medical device containing 2ml of the original association of polynucleotides (10mg/ml) and hyaluronic acid (10mg/ml).
Total number of treatments will consist in 4 Newest administrations: at T0 - basal, at T1- 2 weeks, at T2 - 4 weeks, at T3- 6 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study arm | Experimental | Eligible subjects aged 20 to 60 years and in good general health, with grade 3 to 4 moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne scars according to the Goodman Baron classification Receives: Device: Subjects treated with Newest medical device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Goodman Baron score
The primary end-point of the study is the blinded assessment of variations of scar characteristics evaluated through the Goodman Baron score at scheduled visits versus baseline visit (T1)
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Skin quality difference
Centralized evaluation of the photos of scars, taken pre- and post-treatment and evaluated by a blinded investigator. Optionally the differences pre- and post-treatment in skin roughness, texture (elasticity/hydration), colors/evenness, vascular features, and pore dimensions could be also evaluated by means of 3D pictures (Antera 3D® or QuantifiCARE®).
Measured: 6 months
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Aesthetic improvement of depressed facial atrophic scars using the "Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale" (GAIS) performed by both the patient and the investigator; the percentage of questionnaire score improvement ≥ 2 between the two follow up visits will be considered of a clinical significance
Measured: 6 months
Adverse events (AE)
Adverse events (AE) will be monitored throughout the trial. A safety assessment has to be conducted by the investigator at each scheduled visit. The intensity (mild/moderate/severe) will be assessed according to the investigator's judgement. If a patient drops out of the study, the possible reasons for drop-out, including no improvement in the scar, or occurrence of unacceptable signs/symptoms, need to be documented.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2023
- Study start16 Nov 2023
- Primary completion24 Jul 2025
- Study completion24 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrophic ScarStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mastelli S.r.l
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emanuele Bartoletti, MD, Principal investigator, Director of the International School of Aesthetic Medicine of the Fatebenefratelli Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05936437
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEW-ACT-22
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Araco A, Araco F. Preliminary Prospective and Randomized Study of Highly Purified Polynucleotide vs Placebo in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Scars. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Jun 14;41(7):NP866-NP874. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab125.
PubMed 33755110
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label Study Evaluating the Clinical Benefits and Safety of Combined Polynucleotides and Hyaluronic Acid - Newest - for Acne Scars Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05936437
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEW-ACT-22
- Conditions
- Atrophic Scar
- Keywords
- Post-acne atrophic scars, Polynucleotides, Hyaluronic acid, Mastelli, Acne scars, Newest
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mastelli S.r.lIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical study wants to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a medical device combining "Polynucleotide Highly Purified Technology" (PN-HPT™) and hyaluronic acid (Newest-Mastelli S.r.l) for treating moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne scars.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, open label study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of Newest in facial acne scars treatment. The study will be conducted at Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Rome (Italy). All procedures have to be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008.
A subject will be involved in the study for 6 months and photographs and instrumental assessment (Antera 3 D) will be performed at 1 months, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after first treatment administration; results will be compared with basal line evaluation (T0).
The sample size of 30 patients has been selected, based on the previous clinical results obtained from a "Preliminary Prospective and Randomized Study of Highly Purified Polynucleotide vs Placebo in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Scars". This sample size combined with this study model is statistically sufficient to provide robust estimation of the primary endpoint.
The study primary objective is to show the clinical improvement in acne facial scars treated with Newest.
The primary end-point of the study is the variation of post-acne scars characteristics evaluated through the Goodman Baron scale at follow up visits F.U. 3 and F.U. 6 versus baseline visit (T1). At the end of follow-up, an average reduction of at least two points of the Goodman score versus baseline will be considered as a positive outcome.
A descriptive statistical analysis will illustrate the percentage of patients with different score variation versus basal line.
The secondary objectives of the study are the improvement of the skin quality and the safety of the investigational device; the secondary end-points are:
- Centralized evaluation of the photos of scars, taken pre- and post-treatment and evaluated by a blinded investigator. Optionally the differences pre- and post-treatment in skin roughness, texture (elasticity/hydration), colors/evenness, vascular features, and pore dimensions could be also evaluated by means of 3D pictures (Antera 3D® or QuantifiCARE®).
- Aesthetic improvement of depressed facial atrophic scars using the "Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale" (GAIS) performed by both the patient and the investigator15; the percentage of questionnaire score improvement ≥ 2 between the two follow up visits will be considered of a clinical significance.
- Adverse events (AE) will be monitored throughout the trial. A safety assessment has to be conducted by the investigator at each scheduled visit. The intensity (mild/moderate/severe) will be assessed according to the investigator's judgement. If a patient drops out of the study, the possible reasons for drop-out, including no improvement in the scar, or occurrence of unacceptable signs/symptoms, need to be documented.
All the screened patients at the baseline visit (T0), after checking the inclusion/exclusion criteria, will be prospectively randomized in the clinical study. The Investigator has to grade the post-acne scar's severity according to the "Goodman Baron classification". The eligible patient will undergo the first injection with the study medical device and the investigator shall evaluate the clinical result by the Goodman score. At follow up visits the patient and the investigator have to judge the aesthetic improvement of scars by checking the GAIS questionnaire.
A total of 4 administrations of the investigational product are scheduled: at the baseline visit (T1), at T2, T3 and T4, with an interval of 2 weeks from each other. The clinical evaluation (Goodman score) has to be performed in addition to the basal visit (T1) also after 3 and 6 months of follow-up respectively.
Standardized photographs shall be taken prior to the first injection of the study product and at every study visit in order to document treatment effect. A reference basal photo should be taken of each patient, with a snapshot of the facial region most damaged by the acne scars. A service basal photo on which the shooted damaged facial area is marked out should be the reference photo for further evaluations.
Note that no covering make-up should be used on the photographs. Each Investigator and other study site personnel designated to take photographs shall be thoroughly trained in the photographic equipment and techniques before study start, if applicable.
Photographs shall be taken at the baseline visit before treatment (T1). If the photographs are considered good quality, the Investigator may proceed with treatment of the subject; if the photographs are considered not good enough, the photography shall be repeated.
All snapshot must be taken against a neutral background and artificial light only, in same circumstances (same perspective/angle, same distance) and ideally with the same camera (usually using a 5 mega pixel camera and analyzed as for color and pigmentation by a computer program).
The subject should keep the eyes closed during photography and shall have a neutral facial expression.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study arm | Experimental | Device: Subjects treated with Newest medical deviceEligible subjects aged 20 to 60 years and in good general health, with grade 3 to 4 moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne scars according to the Goodman Baron classification |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Men and women, with age ≥ 20 and ≤ 60 years with an approximately symmetric number of atrophic acne scars on the whole face;
- Subject presenting a grade 3 to 4 according to Goodman classification corresponding to moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne facial scars;
- Scar lesions have not be active
- Subject who never underwent surgical or laser face treatment for acne scars;
- Subjects with prior administration of oral steroids and/or isotretinoin should have interrupted this therapy at least 6 months before study kick off.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients younger than 20 or older than 60 years;
- Subjects with mild atrophic acne scars according to the Goodman classification (grade 1-2);
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding women;
- Systemic or local illnesses that might affect wound healing
- Severe solar elastosis or scarring;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects treated with Newest medical deviceNewest is a sterile, non-pyrogenic, viscoelastic gel for single use for intradermal infiltrations. Newest is a medical device containing 2ml of the original association of polynucleotides (10mg/ml) and hyaluronic acid (10mg/ml). Total number of treatments will consist in 4 Newest administrations: at T0 - basal, at T1- 2 weeks, at T2 - 4 weeks, at T3- 6 weeks. | Device | Study arm |
Primary outcome
Goodman Baron score
Time frame: 6 months
The primary end-point of the study is the blinded assessment of variations of scar characteristics evaluated through the Goodman Baron score at scheduled visits versus baseline visit (T1)
3 secondary outcomes
Skin quality difference
Time frame: 6 months
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Time frame: 6 months
Adverse events (AE)
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 33755110Araco A, Araco F. Preliminary Prospective and Randomized Study of Highly Purified Polynucleotide vs Placebo in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Scars. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Jun 14;41(7):NP866-NP874. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab125.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atrophic Scar
Enrolling by invitation
Nanofat Injection and Fractional CO2 Laser for Post-Traumatic Atrophic Scars
Post-Traumatic Atrophic Scar, Atrophic Scar
RecruitingObservational study
CIC101-02-LT is a Long-term Follow-up Study of Participants Treated With TRTP-101 and Will Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of TRTP-101.
Atrophic Scar
Recruiting
Evaluation of Juläine (TM) for the Treatment of Atrophic Facial Acne Scars
Acne Scars
Recruiting
Efficacy and Tolerability of a Hybrid Fractional Laser for the Treatment of Acne Scars in Patients With Skin of Color
Acne Scars - Mixed Atrophic and Hypertrophic, Hyperpigmentation
Recruiting
Poly-L-Lactic Acid in Atrophic Acne Scars
Atrophic Acne Scarring
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emanuele Bartoletti, MD principal investigator
Director of the International School of Aesthetic Medicine of the Fatebenefratelli Foundation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Subjects treated with Newest medical device in people with Atrophic Scar, run by Mastelli S.r.l at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Goodman Baron score (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05936437, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2025.