AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerLBOACPNCT05939856

Lymph Node Dissection Before or After Cystectomy

A study testing Lymph node dissection before bladder resection and Lymph node dissection after bladder resection in people with Bladder Cancer, run by Jagiellonian University at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare different ways of performing surgery for bladder cancer. Specifically, the goal is to determine whether it is better to remove the lymph nodes before removing the bladder or after removing the bladder during radical cystectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer
What is being tested?
Lymph node dissection before bladder resection and Lymph node dissection after bladder resection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
27 Jul 2023to 23 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the Department of Urology University Hospital in Krakow

Who cannot join

  • Previous pelvic lymph node dissection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Department of Urology, University Hospital, Jagiellonian University

    Krakow, 30-688

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Lymph Node Dissection Before or After Cystectomy - Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare different ways of performing surgery for bladder cancer. Specifically, the goal is to determine whether it is better to remove the lymph nodes before removing the bladder or after removing the bladder during radical cystectomy.

The study aims to answer two main questions:

Read more
  • Does the order of surgical steps during radical cystectomy affect the occurrence of complications after surgery?
  • Does the order of surgical steps during radical cystectomy impact the duration of the operation and the number of lymph nodes removed?

Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will undergo lymph node removal before bladder resection, while the other group will have lymph node removal after bladder resection during radical cystectomy.

Throughout their hospital stay and for 30 days following the operation, participants will be closely monitored for various factors including operative details, pathology results, and any complications that may arise.

Read the detailed description

Lymph node dissection (LND) is an integral part of radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer. LND provides important diagnostic and prognostic information, and according to most studies, is associated with therapeutic benefit. The optimal extent and template for LND in bladder cancer remains to be established. Currently, there are no specific recommendations regarding the sequence of lymph nodes removal and bladder resection during radical cystectomy, and the decision is based mainly on individual surgeon preference.

The aim of the LBOAC pilot randomized trial is to evaluate the difference in intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing LND before bladder resection during RC and those undergoing LND after bladder resection during RC.

LBOAC is a pilot randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. The primary objective of the trial is the comparison of complication rate within 30 postoperative days. Secondary objectives of LBOAC include comparing lymph node yield and operative time between the two groups.

Data for will be collected using electronic case report forms (eCRFs) at baseline and within 30 days after the surgery.

This pilot study is designed to test feasibility of, to support the refinements of the protocol and to aid in sample calculation that can be used for larger scale trial.

Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Being tested
Lymph node dissection before bladder resection, Lymph node dissection after bladder resection
Keywords
Bladder Cancer, Muscle-invasive bladder cancer, Radical cystectomy, Lymph node dissection
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lymph node dissection before bladder resectionOther

    Lymph node dissection before bladder resection

  • Lymph node dissection after bladder resectionOther

    Lymph node dissection after bladder resection

Study groups in NCT05939856
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1 Lymph node dissection before bladder resectionOtherLymph node dissection will be performed before bladder resection during radical cystectomy
Receives: Other: Lymph node dissection before bladder resection
2 Lymph node dissection after bladder resectionOtherLymph node dissection will be performed after bladder resection during radical cystectomy
Receives: Other: Lymph node dissection after bladder resection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Early complications rate

    Complications rate within 30 postoperative days

    Measured: Within 30 days after the surgery

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Lymph node yield

    Number of lymph nodes removed

    Measured: When pathology report is available (on average, the pathology report is available within 14 days after the surgery)

  2. Operative time

    Total operative time, bladder resection time, lymph node dissection time

    Measured: At the end of the surgery (after the completion of skin closure and wound dressing)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2023
  2. Study start27 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion23 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion23 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05939856
Sponsor's protocol ID
LBOACPUJ
Acronym
LBOACP
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
6 Jun 2023
Last updated
10 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lymph node dissection before bladder resection and Lymph node dissection after bladder resection in people with Bladder Cancer, run by Jagiellonian University at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Early complications rate (time frame: Within 30 days after the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in