Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationNCT05942417
Echoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation in the Management of Chronic Ankle Instability in Physically Active Subjects.
A study testing Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation plus exercise and Strength program in people with Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation and Ankle Injuries and Disorders : Chronic Ankle Instability, run by Escoles Universitaries Gimbernat at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The lateral ankle complex sprain is the most prevalent musculoskeletal injury among the general population and athletes and is associated with long-term pain, disability, and high healthcare costs. One of the complications of a lateral ankle sprain is the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Ankle Injuries and Disorders : Chronic Ankle Instability, Exercise Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation plus exercise and Strength program
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2023to 1 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- History of at least one major ankle sprain. The initial sprain must have occurred at least 12 months prior to study participation, be associated with inflammatory symptoms (pain, edema) and have generated at least one day of interruption in physical activity.
- The most recent sprain must have occurred at least 3 months prior to study participation.
- History in the injured ankle of "dropping the ankle" (at least 2 episodes in the 6 months prior to study participation) and/or repeated sprains (two or more sprains in the same ankle) and/or feelings of instability in activities of daily living or sports (score less than 24 on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT).
- Have a score of less than 75% in three or more categories in the Foot and ankle Outcome Score(FAOS) or a level of less than 80% in sports activities in the Foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM).
- Pain on the Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) above 3 points out of 10 in their physical activity.
Who cannot join
- History of surgery in either of the two lower extremities that may interfere with the performance of the tests.
- History of a fracture in either of the two lower extremities requiring alignment.
- Acute injury to the musculoskeletal structures of other lower extremity joints in the previous 3 months, which impact joint integrity and function, resulting in at least one day of loss of physical activity.
- Chronic concomitant pathology at the level of the lower extremity (for example: osteoarthritis, vascular disease, neural pathology).
- Regular use of analgesic medication that may mask symptoms.
- Contraindications of percutaneous puncture and specific to the execution of neuromodulation.
- Being receiving physiotherapy or medical treatment during the intervention.
- Being pregnant at the start of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Echoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation (EPNM) of the Common Peroneal Nerve and Neuromuscular Exercise in the Management of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI): a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT).
The lateral ankle complex sprain is the most prevalent musculoskeletal injury among the general population and athletes and is associated with long-term pain, disability, and high healthcare costs. One of the complications of a lateral ankle sprain is the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI). Conservative treatment is the initial therapeutic option for patients with CAI, however, the best strategies are not yet clear. Clinically, a new invasive technique has appeared, known as echoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation (EPNM). To date there are no studies showing the efficacy of the technique in patients with CAI together with the combination of a neuromuscular exercise program.
Participants: Volunteers and adults, from the group of students of the Gimbernat University School with a history of ankle sprain and physically active who meet the inclusion criteria.
Read more
Study variables: Self-administered ankle function scales (Cumberland ankle instability tool: CAIT and foot and ankle ability:FAAM measure Scale), objective measurement of function in the lower limb (Test countermovement jump: CMJ and Side hop Test:SHT), measurement of isometric strength of the ankle musculature, measurement of dynamic balance (Test star excursion balance), range of motion measurement (Ankle Dorsiflexion) and pain measurement (Numeric pain rating scale: NPRS Scale).
Procedures: After carrying out the assessment, the participants will be randomized to participate in a neuromuscular exercise intervention (control group) or in a neuromuscular exercise intervention together with an application of EPNM in the common peroneal nerve (control group). experimental). The duration of the intervention in both cases will be 3 weeks, where in the control group there will be 2 sessions per week of exercise and in the experimental group 2 sessions per week of exercise plus an application of EPNM.
Objective and hypothesis: The main objective of the study will be to compare the short- and medium-term effects of both interventions in relation to the study variables to be measured. The investigators hypothesize that those patients who receive neuromodulation combined with the neuromuscular exercise program will have greater improvements.
Read the detailed description
The lateral ankle complex sprain is the most prevalent musculoskeletal injury among the general population and athletes and is associated with long-term pain, disability, and high health costs. A review of ankle injuries on 70 analyzed sports established that lateral ankle sprains accounted for 77% of all injuries, where the highest incidence rates were found in sports characterized by running, changes of direction or running. jump like basketball, soccer or volleyball.One of the complications of lateral ankle sprain is the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI) characterized by repeated episodes or perceptions of ankle instability, persistent symptoms such as pain, swelling, and decreased function with limitations in activities of daily living and sports participation that persist more than a year after the initial injury. Conservative treatment is the initial therapeutic option for patients with CAI, however, the best strategies are not yet clear. Numerous rehabilitation protocols to improve CAI-associated deficits have been examined. These range from simple progressive strength work or postural dynamic balance protocols to multi-component (strength, balance, mobility) rehabilitation approaches with effective results in improving strength. , balance and in function.Clinically, a new invasive technique has appeared, known as echoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation (EPNM). This minimally invasive intervention consists of the application of percutaneous electrical stimulation (biphasic square wave electrical current) through an acupuncture needle, as an electrode located in the vicinity of the nerve or motor point of the muscle to be treated under the guidance ultrasound where the generation of structural and excitation changes in the nerve is hypothesized, which as a consequence produces a decrease in its sensitization. It is an accessible, safe and economical technique to treat musculoskeletal conditions by physiotherapists. To date, there is limited evidence regarding its use. EPNM has been applied to different pathologies with good therapeutic results, but its use together with the combination of a multicomponent neuromuscular exercise program has never been studied.The main objective of the study will be to compare the effects in the short and medium term of an intervention with EPNM in the common peroneal nerve together with an exercise program in relation to the variables pain, range of motion in the ankle, strength of the ankle musculature , dynamic balance and functionality both in performance and in self-reports in patients with CAI.
Participants:
Voluntary subjects and adults, from the group of students of the Gimbernat University School with a history of ankle sprain and physically active, defined as participation in moderate aerobic physical activity of at least 30 minutes 5 days a week, or vigorous aerobic intensity of at least 20 minutes 3 days a week, will be evaluated to see if they can participate and be included in the study.
Variables under study:
Principal:
Self-administered scales: FAAM and CAIT. NPRS scale.
Secondaries:
Side hop test. Countermovement jump test. Star excursion balance test. Range of motion. Ankle Strength.
Randomization:
After the initial evaluation, the patients will be randomly assigned to receive a neuromuscular exercise program (control group) or to receive a neuromuscular exercise program plus a EPNM of the common peroneal nerve (experimental group). The hidden estimate is performed using a computer generated random table of numbers created prior to data collection by an outside researcher. Individualized and sequentially numbered index cards will be prepared. These will be placed in sealed opaque envelopes and the second external investigator will open the envelope and proceed with the treatment according to the screen.
Each group will be treated by a clinical physiotherapist, who will be the main investigator of the study, with more than 15 years of experience in the management of lower limb musculoskeletal injuries and more than 10 years of experience in the management of invasive techniques and ultrasound evaluation.
The researcher in charge of processing the data will be blinded with respect to belonging to the groups and likewise the researchers who will carry out the assessments will be blinded with respect to the group display of the participant. Participants in this study will not be blinded to their assigned group. All participants will read and sign an informed consent prior to inclusion in the study and will be asked to lead a lifestyle identical to the one they led before the start of the study.
Procedures:
Neuromuscular exercise program:
The strength program includes a protocol for using Theraband ® according to that described by Kaminsky et al. Participants will sit on the floor with one end of the Theraband attached to a back protector and the other end attached around the metatarsal heads of the foot to be worked on. The knee will be in full extension and the Theraband will initially be stretched to 70% of its resting length, without taking resistance into account. Strength exercises with bands will include ankle movements (dorsiflexion, inversion and eversion). The progression of the program will include an increase in series (1-3 sets of 8-10 repetitions) and an increase in resistance each week of the intervention depending on the subject's symptoms. Plantar flexion will be performed through the standing heel raise exercise. To progress the exercise in the three weeks, body weight will be taken into account. Therefore, during the first week the exercise will be performed with 30-35% of body weight, the second week with 40-45% and the third week with 50-55%.
The balance exercise program will consist of performing a series of exercises in a closed kinetic chain in a standing weight-bearing position that will be progressed from bilateral to unilateral depending on the acceptance of the load. The exercises applied in the study will be the bilateral squat and the unilateral squat in single-leg support with the maximum possible range of motion. To take into account the progress throughout the three weeks, in the bilateral squat during the first week you will work with 25-30% of the body weight, during the second week with 35-40% of the body weight and during the last week with 45-50% of body weight. In the unilateral squat you will work with 40% of the weight used in the squat each week. 3 sets of 10 repetitions will be performed.In the second week, the unilateral squat series will be performed through a backward lunge on an unstable platform (foam mat). Finally, in the third week, again with respect to the backward lunge, a disturbance will be carried out by placing a resistance band on the ankle that will favor greater activation of the muscles and in the last session a maximum range work will be carried out using assistance with a suspension system (TRX) with a weight that implies a high effort in the scale of perceived effort (8-10 points). All of these exercises will focus on motor control of the ankle, which will increase the strength of the intrinsic muscles and adequately contribute to the stabilization of the joint.
Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation (EPNM):
The experimental group, apart from the exercise program, will receive a session of EPNM in the common peroneal nerve of the affected lower extremity. The EPNM will be applied prior to the exercise program session. 3 interventions will be carried out, in a dosage of 1 per week. It will be done with the electrostimulator (ES-160 co.).The participant will be placed in a prone position with the foot outside the stretcher. The motor part of the common peroneal nerve that affects the innervation of the superficial peroneal nerve will be searched through an Ultrasound scanner with a high-frequency linear transducer (10 Hz). A dry puncture needle (0.25mmx0.40mm, Barcelona, Spain) will be inserted until it is close to the perineurium and a biphasic symmetric square wave electric current will be applied to the needle, with a frequency of 3 Hz, a width of pulse of 250 μsec and a maximum tolerable intensity, in order to cause visible muscle contraction, according to the protocol of other studies. Ten stimulations will be performed with a duration of 10 seconds, with a rest period of 10 seconds between each stimulation. The needle will remain stationary throughout the intervention and the skin will be previously cleaned with isopropyl alcohol and chlorhexidine.
Assessment and monitoring:
The variables under study will be evaluated at 3 different times: pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention (a week after the intervention), medium-term measurement (a month after the intervention).
Adverse effects:
All patients will be asked to report any type of adverse effect they may experience throughout the study and up to one month after completion. An adverse effect is defined as a medium-term sequelae with any symptom perceived as painful or unacceptable by the participant and requiring treatment. As the introduction of the needle in some patients may induce post-treatment discomfort, subjects will be notified to report any incident. The EPNM has adverse effects that are infrequent and not serious, such as post-puncture pain that usually lasts from a few hours to a few days of mild intensity, the possible appearance of a bruise that will be minimized thanks to the use of the ultrasound and with pressure techniques on the area, the irritation of the nerve that will be minimized by the use of the ultrasound again and finally the possibility of infection, for this reason a disinfectant will be used on the area before the technique and gloves of a only use.
The therapeutic exercise program has been subsequently used by other research groups and is very safe because it is an incremental program individually adapted in intensity to each subject. Potential adverse effects are also rare, where the most common may be increased ankle pain, which will be controlled with load adaptation, possible generation of late-onset muscle soreness, which usually has a peak duration of 48 hours and a possible fall with the work of instability and disturbance, which is minimized with the presence of the therapist controlling the session at all times.
Sample size calculation:
The sample size and power calculation were calculated using the G-Power 3.1.9.4 software (Heinrich Heine Düsseldorf University).The calculations have been based using an a priori analysis with a mixed F-Anova test for repeated measures, with a Cohen's d of 0.25, a 5% level of significance (α= 0.05), 80% statistical power, two groups and 3 repeated measures(64). The estimated sample size was at least 28 subjects, 14 for each group. A dropout rate of 5% was considered during follow-up, so 15 subjects were finally included per group.
Statistical analysis of data:
- Descriptive data in mean, range and standard deviation.
- Normal distribution/homoscedasticity of the data (See whether the data are parametric or non-parametric).
- Mixed-model repeated measures analysis of variance ( ANOVA) will used to see the interaction between time-group in the different variables.
- Calculate the effect size of the difference between pre and post on the different variables with the cohen's d calculation. A effect size less than 0.2 will be considered trivial, between 0.2-0.5 low, between 0.5-0.8 moderate and greater than 0.8 high.
- Conditions
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Ankle Injuries and Disorders : Chronic Ankle Instability, Exercise Therapy
- Being tested
- Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation plus exercise, Strength program
- Keywords
- Ankle, exercise therapy, chronic ankle instability, echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation
- Medical subject headings
- Ankle Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation plus exerciseProcedure or surgery
This group is taking the EPNM and the exercise program
Strength programProcedure or surgery
This group is taking the exercise program
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neuromodulation Percutaneous echoguided plus exercise | Experimental | The experimental group will receive a EPNM in the common peroneal nerve of the affected ankle. . Three interventions will be carried out, in a dosage of 1 per week. Moreover, a 3-week of strength exercises will be carried out with two sessions per week. The strength program includes a protocol for the use of Theraband ® according to that described by Kaminsky et al. Moreover, the participants will have to do a balance exercises program.The EPNM will be applied prior to the exercise program session Receives: Procedure: Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation plus exercise |
| Strength program | Active comparator | The strength program includes a Theraband® use protocol as described by Kaminsky et al.
The balance exercise program will consist of performing a series of closed kinetic chain exercises in a weight-bearing standing position that will progress from bilateral to unilateral depending on the acceptance of the load. Receives: Procedure: Strength program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
"Foot and ankle ability measure" : FAAM questionnaire
It is a Likert scale that consists of 29 items, which have a score from 0 to 4, representing different levels of difficulty, divided into two subscales: activities of daily living (ADL) (21 items) and sports (8 items). items). The values are added to calculate the result of each subscale, 84 points for ADLs and 32 points for sports. For the analysis of the result, the percentage of each subscale is used separately. The test-retest reliability is high, 0.89 for the ADLs and 0.87 for the sports subscale. In fact, the FAAM scale has been shown to be valid for use in patients with ankle instability. It has been suggested that the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is 8 and 9 points for the ADL subscale and the sports subscale, respectively.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
"Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool" (CAIT)
It has shown to be a valid and reliable tool to assess functional ankle instability. With an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.96, the CAIT scale has demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability. The scale consists of 9 items with a maximum score of 30 points, where the highest results indicate greater stability. It has been suggested that the MCID is 3 or more points.
Measured: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
"Numeric Pain Rating Scale" (NPRS)
Scale used to assess pain intensity, where 0 is absence of pain and 10 represents maximum pain.There are no data for the MCID in patients with CAI, however it appears that changes between 1.5 and 2.1 points can be considered as the MCID for patients with musculoskeletal pain conditions. This variable will ask about the intensity of pain during sports practice.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (5)
"Side hop test" (SHT)
Subjects will be asked to jump laterally and medially between two tape marks that are 30 centimeters apart 10 times as fast as possible. One repetition is considered a lateral jump of 30 cm and return to the starting position. Two series will be carried out and the total time in seconds necessary to complete each of them will be recorded. Time will be recorded by a hand chronometer [ICC 0.84, Standard error measurement(SEM) 2.10 seconds and MDC 5.82 seconds]. The rest between series will be one minute and the lowest time will be used for the study. If a participant falls, puts the contralateral foot on the ground or does not correctly complete the distance of 30 cm between the lines, we consider it invalid and the participant should repeat the test.
Measured: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
"Countermovement jump unilateral test" (Unilateral CMJ)
For this test, subjects will be asked to perform a vertical jump in a standing position with their hands placed on their pelvis. To do this, there will first be a descent phase where the subjects will flex the knee approximately 90 degrees to then take off as quickly as possible keeping the lower extremity extended during the flight phase. The extremity that we do not value will remain at all times without contact on the ground. There will be 3 repetitions with a 30-second rest between each one where we will stay with the highest value. For the measurement, the My Jump 2 application will be used. The validity of the application has been seen to be high (ICC= 0.997, 95% (Intraclass Coefficient (CI): 0.996-0.998, P < 0.001) with an almost perfect correlation coefficient (r= 0.995, P< 0.001) between the application and the gold standard, which is a force platform.
Measured: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
Isometric ankle strength measurement
Measurement of three muscle groups: the inverters, the evertors/plantarflexors, the inverters/dorsiflexors. Isometric assessment of the ankle in inversion/dorsiflexion and in eversion/plantarflexion selectively assesses the tibialis anterior and peroneus longus and brevis muscles, respectively. The measurement will be made with the Microfet2 hand pressure dynamometer (Hogan Scientific, LLC, Salt Lake City, USA. (ICC 0.61, 95% CI=0.09-0.81 for dorsiflexors, ICC 0.74, 95% CI= 0.425-0.879 for inverters and ICC 0.84, 95% CI=0.431-0.905 for evertors in the standardized positions to ensure consistency throughout the study. For this variable, 3 measurements of 5 seconds duration will be carried out with 20 seconds of rest between measurements. The value to take into account will be the peak isometric force in kg and will be normalized with the body mass of the subjects.
Measured: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
"Star Excursion Balance Test" (SEBT)
Is a measure of dynamic balance that has been shown to be valid with moderate to good reliability.The 3 SEBT directions to be measured are the anterior, the posterolateral and the posteromedial, as support to previous investigations (ICC intra 0.85-0.91 and ICC inter 0.99-1) with reported minimum detectable change values (MDC). ) of the normalized reach distance of 5.9% for the anterior direction, 7.8% for the posteromedial direction, and 7.6% for the posterolateral direction. 3 consecutive measurements will be made in each direction. The order of the addresses will be randomized.
Measured: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
Range of Motion (ROM)
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion will be measured with the My Rom app (version 3.0.4). Its validity has been demonstrated with respect to the Limit® mini digital inclinometer (r = 0.989, 95% CI = 0.986-0.993) and its reliability (ICC = 0.976, 95% CI = 0.966- 0.983, Dorsiflex app Coefficient of variation(CV) = 5.1 ± 2.3%; Digital inclinometer CV = 4.9 ± 2.5%) during the lunge test under load.
Measured: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2023
- Study start1 Oct 2023
- Primary completion15 Jan 2025
- Study completion1 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (58)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Escoles Universitaries Gimbernat
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ricardo Ortega, Study director, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05942417
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023137
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 30 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.
Publications
Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Ortega-Santiago R, De-la-Llave-Rincon AI, Cleland JA, Pareja JA, Fahandezh-Saddi-Diaz H, Arias-Buria JL. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus surgery for women with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized parallel-group trial. Eur J Pain. 2023 Aug;27(7):860-870. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2117. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
PubMed 36987682Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PubMed 17695343Carlesso LC, Macdermid JC, Santaguida LP. Standardization of adverse event terminology and reporting in orthopaedic physical therapy: application to the cervical spine. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Aug;40(8):455-63. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3229.
PubMed 20710083David P, Halimi M, Mora I, Doutrellot PL, Petitjean M. Isokinetic testing of evertor and invertor muscles in patients with chronic ankle instability. J Appl Biomech. 2013 Dec;29(6):696-704. doi: 10.1123/jab.29.6.696. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
PubMed 23343782Kim KJ, Kim YE, Jun HJ, Lee JS, Ji SH, Ji SG, Seo TH, Kim YO. Which Treatment is More Effective for Functional Ankle Instability: Strengthening or Combined Muscle Strengthening and Proprioceptive Exercises? J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Mar;26(3):385-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.385. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
PubMed 24707089Balsalobre-Fernandez C, Romero-Franco N, Jimenez-Reyes P. Concurrent validity and reliability of an iPhone app for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion and inter-limb asymmetries. J Sports Sci. 2019 Feb;37(3):249-253. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1494908. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
PubMed 29962280Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004 Aug;8(4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004.
PubMed 15207508Kendrick DB, Strout TD. The minimum clinically significant difference in patient-assigned numeric scores for pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;23(7):828-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.07.009.
PubMed 16291435Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00101-3.
PubMed 10534586Collins CK, Masaracchio M, Cleland JA. The effectiveness of strain counterstrain in the treatment of patients with chronic ankle instability: A randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2014 Aug;22(3):119-28. doi: 10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000069.
PubMed 25125933Alfuth M, Hahm MM. RELIABILITY, COMPARABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF FOOT INVERSION AND EVERSION STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS USING A HAND-HELD DYNAMOMETER. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;11(1):72-84.
PubMed 26900502Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Adair B, Pua YH, Williams GP, McGaw R, Clark RA. Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0140822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140822. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26509265Bogataj S, Pajek M, Hadzic V, Andrasic S, Padulo J, Trajkovic N. Validity, Reliability, and Usefulness of My Jump 2 App for Measuring Vertical Jump in Primary School Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 25;17(10):3708. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103708.
PubMed 32466091Caffrey E, Docherty CL, Schrader J, Klossner J. The ability of 4 single-limb hopping tests to detect functional performance deficits in individuals with functional ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Nov;39(11):799-806. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3042.
PubMed 19881005Wright CJ, Linens SW, Cain MS. Establishing the Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Minimal Detectable Change for the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Sep;98(9):1806-1811. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
PubMed 28137476
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Echoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation (EPNM) of the Common Peroneal Nerve and Neuromuscular Exercise in the Management of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI): a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05942417
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023137
- Conditions
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Ankle Injuries and Disorders : Chronic Ankle Instability, Exercise Therapy
- Keywords
- Ankle, exercise therapy, chronic ankle instability, echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Escoles Universitaries GimbernatUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The lateral ankle complex sprain is the most prevalent musculoskeletal injury among the general population and athletes and is associated with long-term pain, disability, and high healthcare costs. One of the complications of a lateral ankle sprain is the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI). Conservative treatment is the initial therapeutic option for patients with CAI, however, the best strategies are not yet clear. Clinically, a new invasive technique has appeared, known as echoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation (EPNM). To date there are no studies showing the efficacy of the technique in patients with CAI together with the combination of a neuromuscular exercise program.
Participants: Volunteers and adults, from the group of students of the Gimbernat University School with a history of ankle sprain and physically active who meet the inclusion criteria.
Study variables: Self-administered ankle function scales (Cumberland ankle instability tool: CAIT and foot and ankle ability:FAAM measure Scale), objective measurement of function in the lower limb (Test countermovement jump: CMJ and Side hop Test:SHT), measurement of isometric strength of the ankle musculature, measurement of dynamic balance (Test star excursion balance), range of motion measurement (Ankle Dorsiflexion) and pain measurement (Numeric pain rating scale: NPRS Scale).
Procedures: After carrying out the assessment, the participants will be randomized to participate in a neuromuscular exercise intervention (control group) or in a neuromuscular exercise intervention together with an application of EPNM in the common peroneal nerve (control group). experimental). The duration of the intervention in both cases will be 3 weeks, where in the control group there will be 2 sessions per week of exercise and in the experimental group 2 sessions per week of exercise plus an application of EPNM.
Objective and hypothesis: The main objective of the study will be to compare the short- and medium-term effects of both interventions in relation to the study variables to be measured. The investigators hypothesize that those patients who receive neuromodulation combined with the neuromuscular exercise program will have greater improvements.
Detailed description
The lateral ankle complex sprain is the most prevalent musculoskeletal injury among the general population and athletes and is associated with long-term pain, disability, and high health costs. A review of ankle injuries on 70 analyzed sports established that lateral ankle sprains accounted for 77% of all injuries, where the highest incidence rates were found in sports characterized by running, changes of direction or running. jump like basketball, soccer or volleyball.One of the complications of lateral ankle sprain is the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI) characterized by repeated episodes or perceptions of ankle instability, persistent symptoms such as pain, swelling, and decreased function with limitations in activities of daily living and sports participation that persist more than a year after the initial injury. Conservative treatment is the initial therapeutic option for patients with CAI, however, the best strategies are not yet clear. Numerous rehabilitation protocols to improve CAI-associated deficits have been examined. These range from simple progressive strength work or postural dynamic balance protocols to multi-component (strength, balance, mobility) rehabilitation approaches with effective results in improving strength. , balance and in function.Clinically, a new invasive technique has appeared, known as echoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation (EPNM). This minimally invasive intervention consists of the application of percutaneous electrical stimulation (biphasic square wave electrical current) through an acupuncture needle, as an electrode located in the vicinity of the nerve or motor point of the muscle to be treated under the guidance ultrasound where the generation of structural and excitation changes in the nerve is hypothesized, which as a consequence produces a decrease in its sensitization. It is an accessible, safe and economical technique to treat musculoskeletal conditions by physiotherapists. To date, there is limited evidence regarding its use. EPNM has been applied to different pathologies with good therapeutic results, but its use together with the combination of a multicomponent neuromuscular exercise program has never been studied.The main objective of the study will be to compare the effects in the short and medium term of an intervention with EPNM in the common peroneal nerve together with an exercise program in relation to the variables pain, range of motion in the ankle, strength of the ankle musculature , dynamic balance and functionality both in performance and in self-reports in patients with CAI.
Participants:
Voluntary subjects and adults, from the group of students of the Gimbernat University School with a history of ankle sprain and physically active, defined as participation in moderate aerobic physical activity of at least 30 minutes 5 days a week, or vigorous aerobic intensity of at least 20 minutes 3 days a week, will be evaluated to see if they can participate and be included in the study.
Variables under study:
Principal:
Self-administered scales: FAAM and CAIT. NPRS scale.
Secondaries:
Side hop test. Countermovement jump test. Star excursion balance test. Range of motion. Ankle Strength.
Randomization:
After the initial evaluation, the patients will be randomly assigned to receive a neuromuscular exercise program (control group) or to receive a neuromuscular exercise program plus a EPNM of the common peroneal nerve (experimental group). The hidden estimate is performed using a computer generated random table of numbers created prior to data collection by an outside researcher. Individualized and sequentially numbered index cards will be prepared. These will be placed in sealed opaque envelopes and the second external investigator will open the envelope and proceed with the treatment according to the screen.
Each group will be treated by a clinical physiotherapist, who will be the main investigator of the study, with more than 15 years of experience in the management of lower limb musculoskeletal injuries and more than 10 years of experience in the management of invasive techniques and ultrasound evaluation.
The researcher in charge of processing the data will be blinded with respect to belonging to the groups and likewise the researchers who will carry out the assessments will be blinded with respect to the group display of the participant. Participants in this study will not be blinded to their assigned group. All participants will read and sign an informed consent prior to inclusion in the study and will be asked to lead a lifestyle identical to the one they led before the start of the study.
Procedures:
Neuromuscular exercise program:
The strength program includes a protocol for using Theraband ® according to that described by Kaminsky et al. Participants will sit on the floor with one end of the Theraband attached to a back protector and the other end attached around the metatarsal heads of the foot to be worked on. The knee will be in full extension and the Theraband will initially be stretched to 70% of its resting length, without taking resistance into account. Strength exercises with bands will include ankle movements (dorsiflexion, inversion and eversion). The progression of the program will include an increase in series (1-3 sets of 8-10 repetitions) and an increase in resistance each week of the intervention depending on the subject's symptoms. Plantar flexion will be performed through the standing heel raise exercise. To progress the exercise in the three weeks, body weight will be taken into account. Therefore, during the first week the exercise will be performed with 30-35% of body weight, the second week with 40-45% and the third week with 50-55%.
The balance exercise program will consist of performing a series of exercises in a closed kinetic chain in a standing weight-bearing position that will be progressed from bilateral to unilateral depending on the acceptance of the load. The exercises applied in the study will be the bilateral squat and the unilateral squat in single-leg support with the maximum possible range of motion. To take into account the progress throughout the three weeks, in the bilateral squat during the first week you will work with 25-30% of the body weight, during the second week with 35-40% of the body weight and during the last week with 45-50% of body weight. In the unilateral squat you will work with 40% of the weight used in the squat each week. 3 sets of 10 repetitions will be performed.In the second week, the unilateral squat series will be performed through a backward lunge on an unstable platform (foam mat). Finally, in the third week, again with respect to the backward lunge, a disturbance will be carried out by placing a resistance band on the ankle that will favor greater activation of the muscles and in the last session a maximum range work will be carried out using assistance with a suspension system (TRX) with a weight that implies a high effort in the scale of perceived effort (8-10 points). All of these exercises will focus on motor control of the ankle, which will increase the strength of the intrinsic muscles and adequately contribute to the stabilization of the joint.
Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation (EPNM):
The experimental group, apart from the exercise program, will receive a session of EPNM in the common peroneal nerve of the affected lower extremity. The EPNM will be applied prior to the exercise program session. 3 interventions will be carried out, in a dosage of 1 per week. It will be done with the electrostimulator (ES-160 co.).The participant will be placed in a prone position with the foot outside the stretcher. The motor part of the common peroneal nerve that affects the innervation of the superficial peroneal nerve will be searched through an Ultrasound scanner with a high-frequency linear transducer (10 Hz). A dry puncture needle (0.25mmx0.40mm, Barcelona, Spain) will be inserted until it is close to the perineurium and a biphasic symmetric square wave electric current will be applied to the needle, with a frequency of 3 Hz, a width of pulse of 250 μsec and a maximum tolerable intensity, in order to cause visible muscle contraction, according to the protocol of other studies. Ten stimulations will be performed with a duration of 10 seconds, with a rest period of 10 seconds between each stimulation. The needle will remain stationary throughout the intervention and the skin will be previously cleaned with isopropyl alcohol and chlorhexidine.
Assessment and monitoring:
The variables under study will be evaluated at 3 different times: pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention (a week after the intervention), medium-term measurement (a month after the intervention).
Adverse effects:
All patients will be asked to report any type of adverse effect they may experience throughout the study and up to one month after completion. An adverse effect is defined as a medium-term sequelae with any symptom perceived as painful or unacceptable by the participant and requiring treatment. As the introduction of the needle in some patients may induce post-treatment discomfort, subjects will be notified to report any incident. The EPNM has adverse effects that are infrequent and not serious, such as post-puncture pain that usually lasts from a few hours to a few days of mild intensity, the possible appearance of a bruise that will be minimized thanks to the use of the ultrasound and with pressure techniques on the area, the irritation of the nerve that will be minimized by the use of the ultrasound again and finally the possibility of infection, for this reason a disinfectant will be used on the area before the technique and gloves of a only use.
The therapeutic exercise program has been subsequently used by other research groups and is very safe because it is an incremental program individually adapted in intensity to each subject. Potential adverse effects are also rare, where the most common may be increased ankle pain, which will be controlled with load adaptation, possible generation of late-onset muscle soreness, which usually has a peak duration of 48 hours and a possible fall with the work of instability and disturbance, which is minimized with the presence of the therapist controlling the session at all times.
Sample size calculation:
The sample size and power calculation were calculated using the G-Power 3.1.9.4 software (Heinrich Heine Düsseldorf University).The calculations have been based using an a priori analysis with a mixed F-Anova test for repeated measures, with a Cohen's d of 0.25, a 5% level of significance (α= 0.05), 80% statistical power, two groups and 3 repeated measures(64). The estimated sample size was at least 28 subjects, 14 for each group. A dropout rate of 5% was considered during follow-up, so 15 subjects were finally included per group.
Statistical analysis of data:
- Descriptive data in mean, range and standard deviation.
- Normal distribution/homoscedasticity of the data (See whether the data are parametric or non-parametric).
- Mixed-model repeated measures analysis of variance ( ANOVA) will used to see the interaction between time-group in the different variables.
- Calculate the effect size of the difference between pre and post on the different variables with the cohen's d calculation. A effect size less than 0.2 will be considered trivial, between 0.2-0.5 low, between 0.5-0.8 moderate and greater than 0.8 high.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neuromodulation Percutaneous echoguided plus exercise | Experimental | Procedure: Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation plus exerciseThe experimental group will receive a EPNM in the common peroneal nerve of the affected ankle. . Three interventions will be carried out, in a dosage of 1 per week. Moreover, a 3-week of strength exercises will be carried out with two sessions per week. The strength program includes a protocol for the use of Theraband ® according to that described by Kaminsky et al. Moreover, the participants will have to do a balance exercises program.The EPNM will be applied prior to the exercise program session |
| Strength program | Active comparator | Procedure: Strength programThe strength program includes a Theraband® use protocol as described by Kaminsky et al. The balance exercise program will consist of performing a series of closed kinetic chain exercises in a weight-bearing standing position that will progress from bilateral to unilateral depending on the acceptance of the load. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- History of at least one major ankle sprain. The initial sprain must have occurred at least 12 months prior to study participation, be associated with inflammatory symptoms (pain, edema) and have generated at least one day of interruption in physical activity.
- The most recent sprain must have occurred at least 3 months prior to study participation.
- History in the injured ankle of "dropping the ankle" (at least 2 episodes in the 6 months prior to study participation) and/or repeated sprains (two or more sprains in the same ankle) and/or feelings of instability in activities of daily living or sports (score less than 24 on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT).
- Have a score of less than 75% in three or more categories in the Foot and ankle Outcome Score(FAOS) or a level of less than 80% in sports activities in the Foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM).
- Pain on the Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) above 3 points out of 10 in their physical activity.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- History of surgery in either of the two lower extremities that may interfere with the performance of the tests.
- History of a fracture in either of the two lower extremities requiring alignment.
- Acute injury to the musculoskeletal structures of other lower extremity joints in the previous 3 months, which impact joint integrity and function, resulting in at least one day of loss of physical activity.
- Chronic concomitant pathology at the level of the lower extremity (for example: osteoarthritis, vascular disease, neural pathology).
- Regular use of analgesic medication that may mask symptoms.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation plus exerciseThis group is taking the EPNM and the exercise program | Procedure or surgery | Neuromodulation Percutaneous echoguided plus exercise |
| Strength programThis group is taking the exercise program | Procedure or surgery | Strength program |
Primary outcome
"Foot and ankle ability measure" : FAAM questionnaire
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
It is a Likert scale that consists of 29 items, which have a score from 0 to 4, representing different levels of difficulty, divided into two subscales: activities of daily living (ADL) (21 items) and sports (8 items). items). The values are added to calculate the result of each subscale, 84 points for ADLs and 32 points for sports. For the analysis of the result, the percentage of each subscale is used separately. The test-retest reliability is high, 0.89 for the ADLs and 0.87 for the sports subscale. In fact, the FAAM scale has been shown to be valid for use in patients with ankle instability. It has been suggested that the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is 8 and 9 points for the ADL subscale and the sports subscale, respectively.
"Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool" (CAIT)
Time frame: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
It has shown to be a valid and reliable tool to assess functional ankle instability. With an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.96, the CAIT scale has demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability. The scale consists of 9 items with a maximum score of 30 points, where the highest results indicate greater stability. It has been suggested that the MCID is 3 or more points.
"Numeric Pain Rating Scale" (NPRS)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Scale used to assess pain intensity, where 0 is absence of pain and 10 represents maximum pain.There are no data for the MCID in patients with CAI, however it appears that changes between 1.5 and 2.1 points can be considered as the MCID for patients with musculoskeletal pain conditions. This variable will ask about the intensity of pain during sports practice.
5 secondary outcomes
"Side hop test" (SHT)
Time frame: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
"Countermovement jump unilateral test" (Unilateral CMJ)
Time frame: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
Isometric ankle strength measurement
Time frame: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
"Star Excursion Balance Test" (SEBT)
Time frame: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time frame: Though study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 36987682Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Ortega-Santiago R, De-la-Llave-Rincon AI, Cleland JA, Pareja JA, Fahandezh-Saddi-Diaz H, Arias-Buria JL. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus surgery for women with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized parallel-group trial. Eur J Pain. 2023 Aug;27(7):860-870. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2117. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
- Background: PubMed 17695343Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
- Background: PubMed 20710083Carlesso LC, Macdermid JC, Santaguida LP. Standardization of adverse event terminology and reporting in orthopaedic physical therapy: application to the cervical spine. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Aug;40(8):455-63. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3229.
- Background: PubMed 23343782David P, Halimi M, Mora I, Doutrellot PL, Petitjean M. Isokinetic testing of evertor and invertor muscles in patients with chronic ankle instability. J Appl Biomech. 2013 Dec;29(6):696-704. doi: 10.1123/jab.29.6.696. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
- Background: PubMed 24707089Kim KJ, Kim YE, Jun HJ, Lee JS, Ji SH, Ji SG, Seo TH, Kim YO. Which Treatment is More Effective for Functional Ankle Instability: Strengthening or Combined Muscle Strengthening and Proprioceptive Exercises? J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Mar;26(3):385-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.385. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
- Background: PubMed 29962280Balsalobre-Fernandez C, Romero-Franco N, Jimenez-Reyes P. Concurrent validity and reliability of an iPhone app for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion and inter-limb asymmetries. J Sports Sci. 2019 Feb;37(3):249-253. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1494908. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 15207508Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004 Aug;8(4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004.
- Background: PubMed 16291435Kendrick DB, Strout TD. The minimum clinically significant difference in patient-assigned numeric scores for pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;23(7):828-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.07.009.
- Background: PubMed 10534586Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00101-3.
- Background: PubMed 25125933Collins CK, Masaracchio M, Cleland JA. The effectiveness of strain counterstrain in the treatment of patients with chronic ankle instability: A randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2014 Aug;22(3):119-28. doi: 10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000069.
- Background: PubMed 26900502Alfuth M, Hahm MM. RELIABILITY, COMPARABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF FOOT INVERSION AND EVERSION STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS USING A HAND-HELD DYNAMOMETER. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;11(1):72-84.
- Background: PubMed 26509265Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Adair B, Pua YH, Williams GP, McGaw R, Clark RA. Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0140822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140822. eCollection 2015.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.
Related trials for Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Laser Therapy Versus Transcutaneous Electical Nerve Stimulation at Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
Not yet recruiting
Parasacral TENS Project
Overactive Bladder (OAB), Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
Recruiting
Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Polysomnographic Parameters in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Recruiting
TENS for Restoring Somatotopic Sensory Feedback in Lower Limb Amputees and Improving Phantom Limb Perception
Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee, Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ricardo Ortega study director
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Echoguided percutaneous neuromodulation plus exercise and Strength program in people with Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation and Ankle Injuries and Disorders : Chronic Ankle Instability, run by Escoles Universitaries Gimbernat at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
"Foot and ankle ability measure" : FAAM questionnaire (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05942417, which also lists 58 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2025.