AzTrials
AzTrials

Acupuncture LearningNCT05943808

Teaching Acupuncture Points With Recorded VR Courses Versus Traditional Text

An observational study of Acupuncture Learning, run by China Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Compare the learning effectiveness of traditional book learning and VR pre-recorded courses as a reference for future development of VR teaching systems Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 17 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Acupuncture Learning
What is being tested?
Book reading and VR pre-recorded video watching
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Nov 2022to 30 Jun 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 17 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Mainly bachelor degree students

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals who have not previously been exposed to any courses related to Traditional Chinese Medicine acupuncture.
  • Participants who have received an explanation of the research purpose and the entire experimental process, have consented to participate in the study, and have signed an informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Individuals who refuse to sign the informed consent form.
  • The project leader and research advisors.
  • Students who have a direct teaching relationship with the researchers.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sheng-Teng Huang, PhD contact

+886422052121 ext. 4567

sheng.teng@yahoo.com

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • China Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, North District, 404

    Sheng-Teng Huang, MD PhD, 886-4-22052121 ext. 4567, sheng.teng@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Compare the learning effectiveness of traditional book learning and VR pre-recorded courses as a reference for future development of VR teaching systems

Read the detailed description

Traditional Chinese medicine acupuncture education primarily relies on two-dimensional textbooks as the main learning method. Although supplementary materials such as anatomy courses and acupoint anatomy books can partially compensate for the shortcomings of traditional textbooks in anatomical integration, these materials only provide predetermined anatomical views. They make it difficult for students to learn from arbitrary angles and anatomical levels. Therefore, the investigators are developing a Virtual Reality (VR) acupuncture bronze figure model and learning system in an attempt to enhance the depth of acupuncture point learning beyond traditional methods. In this research, the investigators will compare the learning outcomes of traditional book learning and VR pre-recorded courses.

Being tested
Book reading, VR pre-recorded video watching

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Book readingOther

    subjects are given an acupuncture textbook to read for 30 minutes

  • VR pre-recorded video watchingOther

    subjects are given an pre-recorded VR video to watch for 30 minutes

Study groups in NCT05943808
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Book readingTest subjects in this group are given a page range within a traditional acupuncture text book to study for 30 minutes.
Receives: Other: Book reading
VR pre-recorded video watchingTest subjects in this group are given a video which was pre-recorded with our Virtual reality system to study for 30 minutes.
Receives: Other: VR pre-recorded video watching

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Test score change

    Test subjects are first given a paper exam comprising of 40 questions. Exam time of 15 minutes. Subjects then study based on the assigned group. After 30 minutes of study. Subjects then take another paper exam (15 minutes).

    Measured: within singe 1 hour session

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2023
  2. Study start1 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05943808
Sponsor's protocol ID
CMUH111-REC3-186
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
5 Jul 2023
Last updated
19 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There are currently no plans to share data.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acupuncture Learning, run by China Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sheng-Teng Huang, PhD (+886422052121 ext. 4567, sheng.teng@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Test score change (time frame: within singe 1 hour session). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in