StrokeNCT05948384
Mirror Therapy Versus PNF on LE Function in Stroke
A study testing PNF in people with Stroke, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Many rehabilitation strategies are being implemented to treat stroke. Constraint-induced movement therapy and robotics are two potentially useful treatment options for rehabilitation. Range of motion exercises, PNF, mirror therapy is also used. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- PNF
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 24 Jul 2023to 19 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Both male and female
- ACA stroke
- Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
- MMSE grade >24
- Spasticity at modified Ashworth scale between 1 and 2
- Modified Rankin scale 4
Who cannot join
- Any orthopedic impairment of lower extremity like LLD, fractures, dislocations, amputations, deformity of joint
- Any other neurological condition (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, SCI)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
Women Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences
Abbottābād, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Mirror Therapy and PNF on Lower Extremity Function in Chronic Stroke Patients.
Many rehabilitation strategies are being implemented to treat stroke. Constraint-induced movement therapy and robotics are two potentially useful treatment options for rehabilitation. Range of motion exercises, PNF, mirror therapy is also used. Fitness training, high-intensity treatment, and repetitive-task training are all promising strategies that might help improve elements of gait. Repeated task training may also help with transfer functions
Read the detailed description
PNF and mirror therapy has its effect on chronic stroke patients. Both mirror therapy and PNF work on the concept of neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity is the ability of the nervous system to change its activity in response to intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli by reorganizing its structure, functions, or connections after injuries. Because of brain plasticity, neurorehabilitation has evolved, as evidenced by numerous physiotherapeutic approaches such as proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and mirror treatment (MT). The reorganization also includes the expansion of cortical regions, which offer the neural foundation for the recovery or adaption of motor activity following injury.
As the literature supports the individual effects of both techniques in stroke population but as per author's access, there is no literature provide the comparison among both techniques i.e. PNF and mirror therapy in lower limb for chronic stroke patients on gait and functionality. Hence the author established the research question that is there any difference among these techniques in stroke population in terms of its effects and efficiency on gait and functionality. The study will provide an insight to the clinician about which technique has the superior/ better effects for the lower extremity functions in chronic stroke patients thus telling the effects two neurorehabilitation methods i.e. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and mirror therapy (MT).
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- PNF
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PNFOther
For the PNF intervention, we applied a lower extremity hip extension-abduction-internal rotation with knee extension pattern, together with the rhythmic initiation of a repeated stretch and a combination of isotonic techniques. By this we'll target rectus femoris, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, biceps femoris and semitendinosus musculature of the patient. The session will be given in 2 sets of 5 repetitions with rest of 45 seconds
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PNF Group | Active comparator | For the PNF intervention, we applied a lower extremity hip extension-abduction-internal rotation with knee extension pattern, together with the rhythmic initiation of a repeated stretch and a combination of isotonic techniques. By this we'll target rectus femoris, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, biceps femoris and semitendinosus musculature of the patient. The session will be given in 2 sets of 5 repetitions with rest of 45 seconds Receives: Other: PNF |
| Mirror Therapy Group | Other | Mirror treatment is a sort of motor imagery in which the patient exercises his unaffected limb while looking at himself in the mirror. It involves placing the affected limb behind a mirror. The mirror is positioned so the reflection of the opposing limb appears in place of the hidden limb. The patient then looks into the mirror on the side with unaffected limb and makes "mirror symmetric" movement. It will implemented for about 30 minutes with 2, 2 minutes rest in between. Patient will perform as many repetitions as they could of knee flexion \& extension, ankle dorsiflexion \& plantarflexion and functional tasks (rolling the foot over the roller, reaching would be accomplished by asking the patient to reach towards objects through his leg e.g. touching the feet to a certain object at a particular height and distance, cycling) depending on patient's ability to do so. Receives: Other: PNF |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lower extremity functional scale
a reliable patient-rated outcome measure for assessing lower extremity function. This is a 20-item self-report questionnaire. The highest attainable score is 80 points, signifying excellent function. The lowest possible score is 0, indicating very poor function. It has an outstanding internal reliability (=0.96) and a valid tool. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week
Measured: 8 week
Secondary outcomes (3)
Dynamic gait index
It assesses the participant's ability to maintain walking balance while reacting to varied task demands under diverse dynamic settings. It is a beneficial test for those who have vestibular and balance issues, as well as those who are at danger of falling. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week
Measured: 8 week
Time Up and Go Test
Time up and go test is a quick and widely used clinical performance-based measure of lower extremity function, mobility and fall risk with a specificity of 0.70 and sensitivity of 0.57 and reliability of 0.98.The higher the score reflects the worst functional status. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week
Measured: 8 week
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale
It is a patient-centered outcome measure designed to assess health-related quality of life in stroke patients. Patients must answer each question with a reference to the previous week. It is a self-report measure with 49 items divided into 12 areas. A 5-point Likert scale is used to rate the items. The Cronbach alpha ranged from 0.75-0.89. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week
Measured: 8 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2023
- Study start24 Jul 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion19 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05948384
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC01540 Shahnoor Syed
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Amarenco P. Transient Ischemic Attack. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1933-1941. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1908837. No abstract available.
PubMed 32402163Sherin A, Ul-Haq Z, Fazid S, Shah BH, Khattak MI, Nabi F. Prevalence of stroke in Pakistan: Findings from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa integrated population health survey (KP-IPHS) 2016-17. Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(7):1435-1440. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.2824.
PubMed 33235553Guiu-Tula FX, Cabanas-Valdes R, Sitja-Rabert M, Urrutia G, Gomara-Toldra N. The Efficacy of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) approach in stroke rehabilitation to improve basic activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 12;7(12):e016739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016739.
PubMed 29233831Gandhi DB, Sterba A, Khatter H, Pandian JD. Mirror Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation: Current Perspectives. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Feb 7;16:75-85. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S206883. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32103968
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Mirror Therapy and PNF on Lower Extremity Function in Chronic Stroke Patients.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05948384
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC01540 Shahnoor Syed
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many rehabilitation strategies are being implemented to treat stroke. Constraint-induced movement therapy and robotics are two potentially useful treatment options for rehabilitation. Range of motion exercises, PNF, mirror therapy is also used. Fitness training, high-intensity treatment, and repetitive-task training are all promising strategies that might help improve elements of gait. Repeated task training may also help with transfer functions
Detailed description
PNF and mirror therapy has its effect on chronic stroke patients. Both mirror therapy and PNF work on the concept of neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity is the ability of the nervous system to change its activity in response to intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli by reorganizing its structure, functions, or connections after injuries. Because of brain plasticity, neurorehabilitation has evolved, as evidenced by numerous physiotherapeutic approaches such as proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and mirror treatment (MT). The reorganization also includes the expansion of cortical regions, which offer the neural foundation for the recovery or adaption of motor activity following injury.
As the literature supports the individual effects of both techniques in stroke population but as per author's access, there is no literature provide the comparison among both techniques i.e. PNF and mirror therapy in lower limb for chronic stroke patients on gait and functionality. Hence the author established the research question that is there any difference among these techniques in stroke population in terms of its effects and efficiency on gait and functionality. The study will provide an insight to the clinician about which technique has the superior/ better effects for the lower extremity functions in chronic stroke patients thus telling the effects two neurorehabilitation methods i.e. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and mirror therapy (MT).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PNF Group | Active comparator | Other: PNFFor the PNF intervention, we applied a lower extremity hip extension-abduction-internal rotation with knee extension pattern, together with the rhythmic initiation of a repeated stretch and a combination of isotonic techniques. By this we'll target rectus femoris, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, biceps femoris and semitendinosus musculature of the patient. The session will be given in 2 sets of 5 repetitions with rest of 45 seconds |
| Mirror Therapy Group | Other | Other: PNFMirror treatment is a sort of motor imagery in which the patient exercises his unaffected limb while looking at himself in the mirror. It involves placing the affected limb behind a mirror. The mirror is positioned so the reflection of the opposing limb appears in place of the hidden limb. The patient then looks into the mirror on the side with unaffected limb and makes "mirror symmetric" movement. It will implemented for about 30 minutes with 2, 2 minutes rest in between. Patient will perform as many repetitions as they could of knee flexion \& extension, ankle dorsiflexion \& plantarflexion and functional tasks (rolling the foot over the roller, reaching would be accomplished by asking the patient to reach towards objects through his leg e.g. touching the feet to a certain object at a particular height and distance, cycling) depending on patient's ability to do so. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Both male and female
- ACA stroke
- Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
- MMSE grade >24
- Spasticity at modified Ashworth scale between 1 and 2
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Any orthopedic impairment of lower extremity like LLD, fractures, dislocations, amputations, deformity of joint
- Any other neurological condition (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, SCI)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PNFFor the PNF intervention, we applied a lower extremity hip extension-abduction-internal rotation with knee extension pattern, together with the rhythmic initiation of a repeated stretch and a combination of isotonic techniques. By this we'll target rectus femoris, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, biceps femoris and semitendinosus musculature of the patient. The session will be given in 2 sets of 5 repetitions with rest of 45 seconds | Other | Mirror Therapy Group, PNF Group |
Primary outcome
Lower extremity functional scale
Time frame: 8 week
a reliable patient-rated outcome measure for assessing lower extremity function. This is a 20-item self-report questionnaire. The highest attainable score is 80 points, signifying excellent function. The lowest possible score is 0, indicating very poor function. It has an outstanding internal reliability (=0.96) and a valid tool. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week
3 secondary outcomes
Dynamic gait index
Time frame: 8 week
Time Up and Go Test
Time frame: 8 week
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale
Time frame: 8 week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32402163Amarenco P. Transient Ischemic Attack. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1933-1941. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1908837. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33235553Sherin A, Ul-Haq Z, Fazid S, Shah BH, Khattak MI, Nabi F. Prevalence of stroke in Pakistan: Findings from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa integrated population health survey (KP-IPHS) 2016-17. Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(7):1435-1440. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.2824.
- Background: PubMed 29233831Guiu-Tula FX, Cabanas-Valdes R, Sitja-Rabert M, Urrutia G, Gomara-Toldra N. The Efficacy of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) approach in stroke rehabilitation to improve basic activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 12;7(12):e016739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016739.
- Background: PubMed 32103968Gandhi DB, Sterba A, Khatter H, Pandian JD. Mirror Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation: Current Perspectives. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Feb 7;16:75-85. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S206883. eCollection 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Cardiac CT Angiography in Acute Stroke Imaging (SCOPE-CT)
Acute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attacks
Recruiting
OPTION-EMEA Clinical Trial
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Metformin in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Music Therapy in Post-Stroke Patients: A Clinical Trial
CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), Ictus
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Detecting and Predicting Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PNF in people with Stroke, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lower extremity functional scale (time frame: 8 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05948384, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2024.