Myelodysplastic SyndromesPhase 3ELEMENT-MDSNCT05949684
ELEMENT-MDS: A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Anemia Not Receiving Blood Transfusions
A Phase 3 study testing Luspatercept and Epoetin Alfa in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 144 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Luspatercept vs epoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia in adults due to IPSS-R very low, low, intermediate-risk MDS in ESA-naïve participants who are non-transfusion dependent (NTD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- Luspatercept and Epoetin Alfa
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 402 participants
- Where
- 144 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- 24 Oct 2023to 30 May 2031
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant has documented diagnosis of MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 that meet IPSS-R classification of very low, low, or intermediate-risk disease, (intermediate-risk of ≤ 3.5 IPSS-R score) confirmed via bone marrow aspirate and:.
- < 5% blasts in bone marrow and < 1% blasts in peripheral blood.
- Participant is not transfusion dependent (NTD) based on IWG2018 criteria.
- Participant is erythropoiesis-stimulating agent naive. Participants may be randomized at the investigator's discretion if the participant received no more than 2 prior doses of epoetin alfa, epoetin alfa biosimilar, or darbepoetin alfa, with the last dose at least 8 weeks prior to randomization.
- Participant has a baseline endogenous serum erythropoietin (sEPO) level of ≤ 500 U/L.
- Participant has symptoms of anemia:.
- Participant records a severity score of "moderate" or greater on at least 1 PGI-S item of fatigue, weakness, shortness of breath, or dizziness performed during the screening period.
- Participant has a baseline Hb concentration prior to randomization of ≤ 9.5 g/dL. The baseline Hb will be calculated using the mean of the two lowest available Hb measurements within 16 weeks prior to randomization and must include at least one central lab Hb reading done within the screening period (no more than 35 days before randomization). The two Hb measurements must have been performed at least seven days apart. Hb levels less than 21 days following RBC transfusion should not be used. Split samples for local assessments are not required.
Who cannot join
- Participant with secondary MDS (that is, MDS that is known to have arisen as the result of chemical injury or treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation for other diseases).
- Participant with known history of diagnosis of AML.
- Participant with history of cerebrovascular accident (including ischemic, embolic, and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident), transient ischemic attack, deep venous thrombosis (including proximal and distal), pulmonary or arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis, or other venous thrombosis within 6 months prior to randomization.
- Participant with a history of pure red cell aplasia and/or antibody against erythropoietin.
- Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria apply.
Trial locations and contacts
144 sites in 19 countries.
144 sites in 19 countries
United States33 sites
Local Institution - 0191
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Local Institution - 0007
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
Local Institution - 0272
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Local Institution - 0070
Clovis, California, 93611
Local Institution - 0206
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Local Institution - 0044
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Halifax Health Medical Center
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114
Local Institution - 0270
Dyer, Indiana, 46311
Local Institution - 0202
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901
Local Institution - 0179
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Local Institution - 0212
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Local Institution - 0227
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102
Local Institution - 0128
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39401
Local Institution - 0240
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Local Institution - 0228
Houston, Texas, 77030
Local Institution - 0180
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Local Institution - 0203
Kennewick, Washington, 99336
Local Institution - 0174
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
Local Institution - 0211
Los Alamitos, California, 90720
Local Institution - 0258
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Local Institution - 0224
Margate, Florida, 33063
Local Institution - 0173
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Local Institution - 0247
Orange, California, 92868
Local Institution - 0209
Oxnard, California, 93030
Local Institution - 0163
Plantation, Florida, 33322
Local Institution - 0236
Richmond, Virginia, 23219
Local Institution - 0229
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
Local Institution - 0222
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55426
Local Institution - 0184
Skokie, Illinois, 60077
Local Institution - 0201
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Local Institution - 0238
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
Local Institution - 0106
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Local Institution - 0183
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
China23 sites
Local Institution - 0217
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044
Local Institution - 0030
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730
Local Institution - 0043
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
Local Institution - 0089
Changsha, Hunan, 410008
Local Institution - 0075
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Local Institution - 0223
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400016
Local Institution - 0029
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Local Institution - 0038
Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150010
Local Institution - 0109
Hefei, Anhui, 230001
Local Institution - 0079
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
Local Institution - 0032
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Local Institution - 0281
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315010
Local Institution - 0111
Qingdao, Shandong, 266003
Local Institution - 0218
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200030
Local Institution - 0048
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001
Local Institution - 0266
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000
Local Institution - 0083
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006
Local Institution - 0103
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300020
Local Institution - 0033
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 32500
Local Institution - 0108
Wuhan, Hubei, 430058
Local Institution - 0216
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710068
Local Institution - 0220
Xiamen, Fujian, 361003
Local Institution - 0194
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003
Germany11 sites
Local Institution - 0169
Berlin, 10117
Local Institution - 0028
Berlin, 14195
Local Institution - 0207
Düsseldorf, 40225
Local Institution - 0261
Erding, Bavaria, 85435
Local Institution - 0251
Jena, Thuringia, 07747
Local Institution - 0168
Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 56068
Local Institution - 0171
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
Local Institution - 0255
Lübeck, 23562
Local Institution - 0259
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48153
Local Institution - 0167
Mutlangen, 73557
Local Institution - 0166
Würzburg, 97080
Italy10 sites
Local Institution - 0135
Bologna, 40138
Local Institution - 0138
Florence, Tuscany, 50134
Local Institution - 0137
Milan, Lombardy, 20122
Local Institution - 0134
Milan, Milano, 20162
Local Institution - 0076
Reggio Calabria, 89133
Local Institution - 0244
Roma, 00168
Local Institution - 0256
Rome, Lazio, 00133
Local Institution - 0136
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
Local Institution - 0085
Turin, Piedmont, 10128
Local Institution - 0133
Verona, 37134
France9 sites
Local Institution - 0269
Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49933
Local Institution - 0116
La Tronche, Isère, 38700
Local Institution - 0011
Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, 06202
Local Institution - 0015
Paris, 75010
Local Institution - 0016
Pessac, Aquitaine, 33600
Local Institution - 0140
Toulouse, 31100
Local Institution - 0019
Tours, Indre-et-Loire, 37032
Local Institution - 0165
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Lorraine, 54511
Local Institution - 0248
Villejuif, Val-de-Marne, 94805
Spain8 sites
Local Institution - 0198
Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08035
Local Institution - 0199
Granada, 18012
Local Institution - 0197
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya [Cataluña], 08908
Local Institution - 0252
Madrid, 28006
Local Institution - 0271
Oviedo, 33011
Local Institution - 0200
Salamanca, 37007
Local Institution - 0274
Seville, 41013
Local Institution - 0196
Valencia, Valenciana, Comunitat, 46010
Australia6 sites
Local Institution - 0071
Blacktown, New South Wales, 2148
Local Institution - 0113
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Local Institution - 0054
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Local Institution - 0254
Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, 2450
Local Institution - 0246
Gold Coast, Queensland, 4217
Local Institution - 0052
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Greece5 sites
Local Institution - 0082
Alexandroupoli, Anatolikí Makedonía Kai Thráki, 681 00
Local Institution - 0084
Athens, Attikí, 115 27
Local Institution - 0245
Athens, Attikí, 11527
Local Institution - 0131
Chaïdári, Attikí, 12462
Local Institution - 0132
Pátrai, Achaḯa, 26504
India5 sites
Local Institution - 0243
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009
Local Institution - 0177
Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560027
Local Institution - 0178
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003
Local Institution - 0193
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110029
Local Institution - 0235
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110085
Brazil4 sites
Local Institution - 0059
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430-270
Local Institution - 0101
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
Local Institution - 0056
Rio de Janeiro, 20211-030
Local Institution - 0003
São Paulo, 05403-000
Canada4 sites
Local Institution - 0049
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 5G2
Local Institution - 0050
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9
Local Institution - 0017
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Local Institution - 0112
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
Chile4 sites
Local Institution - 0280
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7500587
Local Institution - 0278
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7500921
Local Institution - 0276
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7580206
Local Institution - 0277
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8420383
Colombia4 sites
Local Institution - 0147
Medellín, Antioquia, 05034
Local Institution - 0149
Montería, 230002
Local Institution - 0267
Piedecuesta, Santander Department, 681017
Local Institution - 0152
Valledupar, Cesar Department, 200001
Mexico4 sites
Local Institution - 0069
Huixquilucan, State of Mexico, 52787
Local Institution - 0142
Mexico City, 14080
Local Institution - 0156
Oaxaca City, Oaxaca, 68020
Local Institution - 0150
Puebla City, 72424
Poland4 sites
Local Institution - 0060
Gdansk, 80-952
Local Institution - 0061
Katowice, 40-519
Local Institution - 0130
Wałbrzych, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 58-309
Local Institution - 0062
Warsaw, 02-172
Argentina3 sites
Local Institution - 0010
Buenos Aires, C1425DND
Local Institution - 0009
Buenos Aires, C1426ANZ
Local Institution - 0012
Buenos Aires, CP1280AEB
Czechia3 sites
Local Institution - 0080
Brno, Brno-město, 625 00
Local Institution - 0092
Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, 708 52
Local Institution - 0090
Prague, 12808
Hungary3 sites
Local Institution - 0026
Budapest, 1088
Local Institution - 0024
Eger, Heves County, 3300
Local Institution - 0021
Nyíregyháza, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, 4400
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) vs Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) Very Low, Low, or Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Naive Participants Who Are Non-Transfusion Dependent (NTD): The "ELEMENT-MDS" Trial
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Luspatercept vs epoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia in adults due to IPSS-R very low, low, intermediate-risk MDS in ESA-naïve participants who are non-transfusion dependent (NTD).
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Being tested
- Luspatercept, Epoetin Alfa
- Keywords
- Luspatercept, BMS-986346, ACE-536, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Epoetin alfa, Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA), Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Anaemia
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LuspaterceptBiological
Also called BMS-986346, ACE-536, Reblozyl®
Specified dose on specified days
Epoetin AlfaBiological
Also called Epogen®, PROCRIT®, BINOCRIT
Specified dose on specified days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Luspatercept | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Luspatercept |
| Epoetin Alfa | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Epoetin Alfa |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with lower-risk non-transfusion dependent myelodysplastic syndromes (NTD-MDS) who converted to Transfusion Dependence (TD) during any continuous 16-week interval within the 96-week treatment period
TD is defined as ≥ 3 red blood cells (RBC) units/16 weeks assessed by International Working Group (IWG) 2018.
Measured: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 grams/deciliter (g/dL) in any continuous 16-week interval within the 48 week Treatment Period in the absence of transfusion
Measured: Up to Week 48
Secondary outcomes (25)
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in any continuous 24-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week treatment period in the absence of transfusion
Measured: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.0 g/dL in any continuous 24-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week treatment period in the absence of transfusion
Measured: Up to Week 96
Mean Hb change over fixed 24-week periods compared to the baseline Hb
Measured: Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in any continuous 16-week interval within the 96-week treatment period in the absence of transfusion
Measured: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with TD by week 48
Measured: Up to Week 48
Time to TD (IWG 2018 defined as ≥ 3 RBC units/16 weeks) during any continuous 16-week interval until the end of study
Measured: Up to 5 years
Time from first Luspatercept dose to first RBC transfusion
Measured: Up to 5 years
Duration of mHI-E in participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥1.5g/dL in any continuous 16-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week treatment period in absence of transfusion
mHI-E: median hematologic improvement in erythroid response
Measured: Up to Week 96
Time from first dose to first day of response (increase in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in any continuous 16-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week Treatment Period in the absence of transfusion)
Measured: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with RBC transfusion independence over at least a consecutive 24-week period
Measured: Up to 5 years
Number of transfusions
Measured: Up to 5 years
Number of transfusions visits/units
Measured: Up to 5 years
Change from baseline in subscales of self-reported health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An)
Measured: Up to 5 years
Change from baseline in self-reported HRQoL assessed by the European quality of life questionnaire 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L)
Measured: Up to 5 years
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs)
Measured: Up to 42 days post last dose
Number of participants with antidrug antibody (ADA) (positive or negative)
Measured: Up to Week 96
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum concentration
Measured: Up to Week 96
PK: Area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC)
Measured: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with a platelet response at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Platelet response is defined as an increase from baseline in number of platelets to ≥ 30 × 10^9/L at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96.
Measured: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with a neutrophil response at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Neutrophil response is defined as an absolute increase from baseline of > 0.5 × 10^9/L neutrophils at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96.
Measured: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progression
Measured: Up to 5 years
Time to AML progression
Measured: Up to 5 years
Number of participants with high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) progression
Measured: Up to 5 years
Time to high-risk MDS progression
Measured: Up to 5 years
Time from date of randomization up to death due to any cause
Measured: Up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jul 2023
- Study start24 Oct 2023
- Primary completion24 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 402 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05949684
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA056-025
- Other IDs
- 2022-500430-29
- Acronym
- ELEMENT-MDS
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: BMS will provide access to individual anonymized participant data upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria. Additional information regarding Bristol Myer Squibb's data sharing policy and process can be found at https://www.bms.com/researchers-and-partners/clinical-trials-and-research.html
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) vs Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) Very Low, Low, or Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Naive Participants Who Are Non-Transfusion Dependent (NTD): The "ELEMENT-MDS" Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05949684
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ELEMENT-MDS / CA056-025
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Keywords
- Luspatercept, BMS-986346, ACE-536, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Epoetin alfa, Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA), Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Anaemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 402 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Luspatercept vs epoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia in adults due to IPSS-R very low, low, intermediate-risk MDS in ESA-naïve participants who are non-transfusion dependent (NTD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Luspatercept | Experimental | Biological: Luspatercept |
| Epoetin Alfa | Active comparator | Biological: Epoetin Alfa |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participant has documented diagnosis of MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 that meet IPSS-R classification of very low, low, or intermediate-risk disease, (intermediate-risk of ≤ 3.5 IPSS-R score) confirmed via bone marrow aspirate and:.
- Participant is not transfusion dependent (NTD) based on IWG2018 criteria.
- Participant is erythropoiesis-stimulating agent naive. Participants may be randomized at the investigator's discretion if the participant received no more than 2 prior doses of epoetin alfa, epoetin alfa biosimilar, or darbepoetin alfa, with the last dose at least 8 weeks prior to randomization.
- Participant has a baseline endogenous serum erythropoietin (sEPO) level of ≤ 500 U/L.
- Participant has symptoms of anemia:.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participant with secondary MDS (that is, MDS that is known to have arisen as the result of chemical injury or treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation for other diseases).
- Participant with known history of diagnosis of AML.
- Participant with history of cerebrovascular accident (including ischemic, embolic, and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident), transient ischemic attack, deep venous thrombosis (including proximal and distal), pulmonary or arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis, or other venous thrombosis within 6 months prior to randomization.
- Participant with a history of pure red cell aplasia and/or antibody against erythropoietin.
- Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria apply.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LuspaterceptAlso: BMS-986346, ACE-536, Reblozyl®Specified dose on specified days | Biological | Luspatercept |
| Epoetin AlfaAlso: Epogen®, PROCRIT®, BINOCRITSpecified dose on specified days | Biological | Epoetin Alfa |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with lower-risk non-transfusion dependent myelodysplastic syndromes (NTD-MDS) who converted to Transfusion Dependence (TD) during any continuous 16-week interval within the 96-week treatment period
Time frame: Up to Week 96
TD is defined as ≥ 3 red blood cells (RBC) units/16 weeks assessed by International Working Group (IWG) 2018.
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 grams/deciliter (g/dL) in any continuous 16-week interval within the 48 week Treatment Period in the absence of transfusion
Time frame: Up to Week 48
25 secondary outcomes
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in any continuous 24-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week treatment period in the absence of transfusion
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.0 g/dL in any continuous 24-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week treatment period in the absence of transfusion
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Mean Hb change over fixed 24-week periods compared to the baseline Hb
Time frame: Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in any continuous 16-week interval within the 96-week treatment period in the absence of transfusion
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with TD by week 48
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Time to TD (IWG 2018 defined as ≥ 3 RBC units/16 weeks) during any continuous 16-week interval until the end of study
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time from first Luspatercept dose to first RBC transfusion
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Duration of mHI-E in participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥1.5g/dL in any continuous 16-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week treatment period in absence of transfusion
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Time from first dose to first day of response (increase in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in any continuous 16-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week Treatment Period in the absence of transfusion)
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with RBC transfusion independence over at least a consecutive 24-week period
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Number of transfusions
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Number of transfusions visits/units
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Change from baseline in subscales of self-reported health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An)
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Change from baseline in self-reported HRQoL assessed by the European quality of life questionnaire 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs)
Time frame: Up to 42 days post last dose
Number of participants with antidrug antibody (ADA) (positive or negative)
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum concentration
Time frame: Up to Week 96
PK: Area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC)
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with a platelet response at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with a neutrophil response at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Number of participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progression
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time to AML progression
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Number of participants with high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) progression
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time to high-risk MDS progression
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time from date of randomization up to death due to any cause
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2026.
- BMS Clinical Trial InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- BMS Clinical Trial Patient RecruitingLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. BMS will provide access to individual anonymized participant data upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria. Additional information regarding Bristol Myer Squibb's data sharing policy and process can be found at https://www.bms.com/researchers-and-partners/clinical-trials-and-research.html
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of REM-422 in Patients With AML or Higher Risk MDS
Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Trisomy 8-Associated Autoinflammatory Disease (TRIAD) and Related Disorders
Trisomy 8 Mosaicism, Trisomy 8 Associated Autoinflammatory Disease
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 2
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia and Other Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes Using G-CSF Mobilized CD34+ Selected Hematopoietic Precursor Cells Co-Infused With a Reduced Dose of Non-Mobilized Donor T-cells
Severe Aplastic Anemia, MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
144 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Luspatercept and Epoetin Alfa in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 144 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 144 sites in United States, China, Germany, Italy, France and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with lower-risk non-transfusion dependent myelodysplastic syndromes (NTD-MDS) who converted to Transfusion Dependence (TD) during any continuous 16-week interval within the 96-week treatment period (time frame: Up to Week 96). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2026.