Self-managementETHOPEENCT05950451
Self-management Education in Multi-professional Health Centres
An observational study of Self-management, run by Rennes University Hospital at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the best educative and organizational dimensions favouring the development of self-management education in multiprofessional health centres. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Self-management
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2023to 15 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: For the first phase, the population study will be composed of all the regional health authorities agencies. For the second phase, the population study will be composed of 10 to 15 multiprofessional health centres, with in each 5 to 7 individual interviews with health care professionals. The population will be composed of 105 health care professionals
First phase (quantitative survey): All regional health authority agencies will be surveyed on all self-management programmes developed by multiprofessional health centres since 2014 (estimated number of 270 in France in 2021).
Second phase (qualitative survey): In the first time, for the selection of the multiprofessional health centres , we will realized a varied sampling in search of maximum variation of the multiprofessional health centres according to the results of the first phase (continuation or not of the program, location of the programme, number of health care professionals in the educational team and presence of expert patients, theme of the programme...). In a second phase, for the individual interviews, we will carry out a varied sampling in search of maximum variation reflecting the plurality of the educational team observed in the documentary survey of each multiprofessional health centres.
The educational team includes healthcare professionals from the multiprofessional health centres and expert patients.
There is no exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the best educative and organizational dimensions favouring the development of self-management education in multiprofessional health centres. The main question is to identify the favorable characteristics in creation, implementation and maintenance in developing self-management education programme in multiprofessional health centres.
Read the detailed description
The study wil be composed of 2 phases. Phase 1 will consist of a national questionnaire survey of French Regional Health Authorities (ARS) to identify and characterize all multiprofessional health centres running a self-management programme in France. It will be supported by the informal inter-ARS network of self-management project managers.
Phase 2 will consist of a qualitative survey of multiprofessional health centres. On the basis of the various significant variables identified in phase 1, different multiprofessional health centres will be selected to provide a varied sample (location, number of healthcare professionals, themes, etc.). This will enable an in-depth analysis of the findings of the quantitative survey, and a comparison with the realities of the multiprofessional health centre's health care professionals.
- Conditions
- Self-management
- Being tested
- No intervention
- Keywords
- Patient education as topic, Primary health care, multimorbidity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No interventionOther
No intervention is led during this descriptive study
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Favourable educational and organizational dimensions to self-management in multiprofessional health centre
The outcome will consist of a description and analysis of the programmes underlying educational theory and organizational features, the contributions of health care professionals from the multiprofessional health centres and intervening partners, the link with the hospital, the link with local players, particularly medico-social players, and the patients participating in the programme.
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Number of Health care programmes developed in multiprofessional health centres realised in France
Measured: 7 months
Number of Health care programmes developed in multiprofessional health centres realised each year since 2014 in France
Measured: 7 months
Number of Health care programmes developed in multiprofessional health centres realised in each health authority agency
Measured: 7 months
Descriptive data of self-management programmes' characteristics developed in multiprofessional health centres, since 2014
Number and percentage of programmes according to the coordinator's profession, Average number of multiprofessional health centres involved in each self-management programmes and percentage of self-management programmes according to the professions involved, Number and percentage of self-management programmes with co-construction with a patient association, Average number of years of existence of the self-management programmes initiated by multiprofessional health centres, Number and percentage of self-management programmes classified by theme, Number and percentage of self-management programmes by location (urban, semi-rural, rural), Number and percentage of renewal of self-management programmes among those in place for more than 4 years.
Measured: 7 months
Self-management programmes characteristics associated with the continuation of self-management programmes in France
Type of health care professional, number of health care professional
Measured: 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jul 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2023
- Primary completion30 Oct 2025
- Study completion15 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Self-managementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Rennes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rennes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05950451
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 35RC22_UF9821_ETHOPEE
- Acronym
- ETHOPEE
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers
Publications
Odgers-Jewell K, Ball LE, Kelly JT, Isenring EA, Reidlinger DP, Thomas R. Effectiveness of group-based self-management education for individuals with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analyses and meta-regression. Diabet Med. 2017 Aug;34(8):1027-1039. doi: 10.1111/dme.13340. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
PubMed 28226200GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
PubMed 33069326Horigan G, Davies M, Findlay-White F, Chaney D, Coates V. Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2017 Jan;34(1):14-26. doi: 10.1111/dme.13120. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
PubMed 26996982Mc Sharry J, Dinneen SF, Humphreys M, O'Donnell M, O'Hara MC, Smith SM, Winkley K, Byrne M. Barriers and facilitators to attendance at Type 2 diabetes structured education programmes: a qualitative study of educators and attendees. Diabet Med. 2019 Jan;36(1):70-79. doi: 10.1111/dme.13805. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
PubMed 30156335
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Self-management Education in Multi-professional Health Centres
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05950451
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ETHOPEE / 35RC22_UF9821_ETHOPEE
- Conditions
- Self-management
- Keywords
- Patient education as topic, Primary health care, multimorbidity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rennes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the best educative and organizational dimensions favouring the development of self-management education in multiprofessional health centres. The main question is to identify the favorable characteristics in creation, implementation and maintenance in developing self-management education programme in multiprofessional health centres.
Detailed description
The study wil be composed of 2 phases. Phase 1 will consist of a national questionnaire survey of French Regional Health Authorities (ARS) to identify and characterize all multiprofessional health centres running a self-management programme in France. It will be supported by the informal inter-ARS network of self-management project managers.
Phase 2 will consist of a qualitative survey of multiprofessional health centres. On the basis of the various significant variables identified in phase 1, different multiprofessional health centres will be selected to provide a varied sample (location, number of healthcare professionals, themes, etc.). This will enable an in-depth analysis of the findings of the quantitative survey, and a comparison with the realities of the multiprofessional health centre's health care professionals.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- For the first phase, the population study will be composed of all the regional health authorities agencies. For the second phase, the population study will be composed of 10 to 15 multiprofessional health centres, with in each 5 to 7 individual interviews with health care professionals. The population will be composed of 105 health care professionals
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No interventionNo intervention is led during this descriptive study | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Favourable educational and organizational dimensions to self-management in multiprofessional health centre
Time frame: 9 months
The outcome will consist of a description and analysis of the programmes underlying educational theory and organizational features, the contributions of health care professionals from the multiprofessional health centres and intervening partners, the link with the hospital, the link with local players, particularly medico-social players, and the patients participating in the programme.
5 secondary outcomes
Number of Health care programmes developed in multiprofessional health centres realised in France
Time frame: 7 months
Number of Health care programmes developed in multiprofessional health centres realised each year since 2014 in France
Time frame: 7 months
Number of Health care programmes developed in multiprofessional health centres realised in each health authority agency
Time frame: 7 months
Descriptive data of self-management programmes' characteristics developed in multiprofessional health centres, since 2014
Time frame: 7 months
Self-management programmes characteristics associated with the continuation of self-management programmes in France
Time frame: 7 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 28226200Odgers-Jewell K, Ball LE, Kelly JT, Isenring EA, Reidlinger DP, Thomas R. Effectiveness of group-based self-management education for individuals with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analyses and meta-regression. Diabet Med. 2017 Aug;34(8):1027-1039. doi: 10.1111/dme.13340. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 33069326GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 26996982Horigan G, Davies M, Findlay-White F, Chaney D, Coates V. Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2017 Jan;34(1):14-26. doi: 10.1111/dme.13120. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 30156335Mc Sharry J, Dinneen SF, Humphreys M, O'Donnell M, O'Hara MC, Smith SM, Winkley K, Byrne M. Barriers and facilitators to attendance at Type 2 diabetes structured education programmes: a qualitative study of educators and attendees. Diabet Med. 2019 Jan;36(1):70-79. doi: 10.1111/dme.13805. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers
Related trials for Self-management
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
Not yet recruiting
Use and Acceptability of an AI-Assisted Health Application for Individuals Living With a Chronic Condition
Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Not yet recruiting
A Nurse-Led Personalized Self-Management Counseling Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence and Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Medication Adherence, Glycemic Control for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Community Health Worker Nutrition Self-Management Support for Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Health
Hypertension (HTN), CKD - Chronic Kidney Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Self-management, run by Rennes University Hospital at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Favourable educational and organizational dimensions to self-management in multiprofessional health centre (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05950451, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2026.