AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple MyelomaNCT05956457

PRO and Wearable Data Insights From Individuals With R/R Multiple Myeloma

A study testing Digital Health Coaching Program and Fitbit in people with Multiple Myeloma and Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy, run by Pack Health at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the feasibility of a digital health coaching program for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). One hundred adults with R/R MM will be enrolled at The University of Washington. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Digital Health Coaching Program and Fitbit
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Sep 2023to 31 Aug 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 or older
  • Confirmed diagnosis of MM as determined by participants' primary physicians at the study site. Patients with concurrent AL amyloidosis will be eligible.
  • Initiation of at least the second line of MM-directed therapy for multiple myeloma at time of study enrollment. Participants must have been exposed to at least one proteasome inhibitor (PI) and/or one immunomodulatory drug (IMiD).

Who cannot join

  • Individuals who are terminally ill, defined as individuals identified by their physician as likely having 6 months or less to live, or those individuals transitioned to comfort measures only (meaning only supportive care measures without curative focused treatment)
  • Individuals who have previously participated in Pack Health digital health coaching
  • Physician-assessed lack of sufficient English proficiency
  • Lack of ownership of a personal smartphone or device allowing for access to text, email or mobile application
  • Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric, or other condition that could interfere with participant's safety, provision of informed consent, or compliance with study procedures
  • Concurrent enrollment on a therapeutic study in R/R MM that precludes simultaneous enrollment onto our non-therapeutic study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Washington

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

    Trenton Grossfeld, 206.606.1774, tgrossfeld@fredhutch.org

    Rahul Banerjee, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes and Wearable Data Among Individuals With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

This study will evaluate the feasibility of a digital health coaching program for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). One hundred adults with R/R MM will be enrolled at The University of Washington. Individuals who agree to take part in the study and sign an informed consent will be enrolled in a 3-month digital health coaching program. The program will provide weekly phone calls plus the delivery of learning materials to text or email. Questionnaires and data from a wrist-worn activity tracker will be collected. Outcomes include treatment and symptom experience, quality of life, financial burden, and how confident people feel to manage their health. Information about your condition and treatment will be collected, along with how often you use services like the emergency room, for care. This data will provide a better understanding of how a person experiences their R/R MM.

Read the detailed description

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a chronic malignancy with no current cure. Previously dependent on myeloablative chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation to induce prolonged remission, recent advances in targeted therapies are enhancing overall survival and extending the duration between treatments. Monoclonal antibodies, including CD38-directed monoclonal antibodies, combination immunotherapies, and T-cell therapies are among the many promising agents for treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) MM. This improvement in treatment outcomes is accompanied by significant risk for toxicities such a neutropenia and subsequent infections which themselves can be life-threatening. Several studies indicate a high symptom burden and poor health-related quality of life for individuals with multiple myeloma, with most of what is known from clinical trials of highly selective populations or qualitative studies conducted outside of the US among mostly white patients. These factors, coupled with the rapidly changing multiple myeloma treatment landscape, limits the generalizability to wider population as well as an understanding of MM's impact across the disease course. A more complete investigation of the symptom burden, health self-efficacy, and financial, physiologic, and psychosocial well-being among patients with multiple myeloma is urgently needed to provide a comprehensive view of the ways in which multiple myeloma and its treatments affects individuals' lives.

The purpose of this study is to explore the use of symptom monitoring and digital life coaching (DLC) to inform a more complete understanding of the impact of multiple myeloma on symptom burden, health self-efficacy, and financial, physiologic, and psychosocial well-being among a diverse U.S.-based, contemporary sample. The benefits of routine symptom monitoring have been demonstrated in recent studies, where overall survival increased among cancer patients who routinely monitored their symptoms. As the science related to symptom monitoring continues to evolve, exploring interventions to support both the assessment of and interventions related to disease and treatment-related sequelae it is important to identify how symptoms can best be monitored and managed. Studies to date have explored how symptom monitoring can be conducted for patients in the ambulatory setting, where patients do not receive around the clock assessment and management as they would in the hospital setting. In this context, digital or eHealth technologies are increasingly emerging as ways to promote health behaviors, and to monitor individuals with chronic health states, including cancer. An integrative review of 28 articles specifically evaluating eHealth interventions for patients with cancer identified 16 unique eHealth interventions, largely centered around educational support and decision aids. Telehealth counseling and navigation was found to be effective in supporting psychosocial needs in a small study (n=20) of underserved (defined by the authors as those who were primarily unemployed and uninsured) breast cancer patients. In a study of 1371 cancer patients, 71% reported using a mobile phone daily and 93% reported having internet access from home, of which 68% reported daily internet use, suggesting that internet-based technologies may be purposeful in the sharing of information with and coordination of care for cancer patients. Despite literature indicating its potential efficacy, few interventional studies have been published that evaluate digital health coaching and its relationship with self-efficacy and symptom management, specifically in R/R MM patients. As such, there is a gap in the literature on how digital health coaching might be used to support patients during cancer treatment and into survivorship.

Pack Health, LLC is an independent, patient engagement company that was established in 2014 with the mission of helping patients access the right care for their condition and develop the self-management skills to achieve better health and overall well-being. Pack Health offers a symptom management program involving both interpersonal interactions as well as e-modules for patients diagnosed with cancer to better manage pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety and navigate their care more effectively through digital health coaching and tools.

A recent pilot study at UCSF conducted in collaboration with Pack Health examined the impact of digital life coaching (DLC) on symptom outcomes for individuals with MM undergoing upfront stem cell transplantation. Outcomes suggest the efficacy of a coaching program for engagement up to day +100 post-transplant, with 73% (n=11) DLC engagement and 94% PRO completion. A randomized study of DLC versus usual care in individuals with MM undergoing upfront stem cell transplantation is underway. However, patients with R/R MM (where the disease has come back after prior lines of therapy such as transplantation) may have unique needs. An opportunity exists to explore how a digital health coaching platform might be used for symptom monitoring and coaching during treatment for R/R MM for whom the chronic nature of therapy may influence both needs and outcomes in relation to a DLC intervention.

This is a prospective study of patients with R/R MM to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of DLC and its potential to augment existing standards of care for patient support. Patients enrolled in the program will be assigned to a health advisor who will act as an educator and accountability partner, supporting patients as they experience treatment for R/R MM. Throughout the engagement, patient reported outcomes (PROs) will be collected at multiple time points to assess the patient status and will be used to explore relationships between medical management, health related quality of life (HRQoL), and engagement in the program. Patients will be enrolled and will complete all assessments at baseline, 30, 60 and 90 days after consent. Findings from this study will establish feasibility of a DLC intervention for individuals with R/R MM and provide greater insight into their symptom burden, health self-efficacy, and financial, physiologic, and psychosocial well-being through the integration of patient reported, wearable and clinical data.

Being tested
Digital Health Coaching Program, Fitbit
Keywords
Digital health, Patient reported outcomes, Wearable Activity Trackers
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma, Hematologic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Digital Health Coaching ProgramBehavioural

    Also called Pack Health Digital Health Coaching

    Digital health intervention consisting of weekly calls from a Health Advisor to a participant, accompanied by delivery of evidence-based content across health and wellness domains (e.g. nutrition, exercise, physical, emotional and financial health) up to 4 times weekly via text, email or mobile application.

  • FitbitDevice

    Also called Charge 5

    A wrist-worn activity tracker allowing for the capture of physical activity, including but not limited to step-count and minutes of activity, to be captured daily.

Study groups in NCT05956457
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single Arm Cohort Receiving Digital Health CoachingExperimentalAll study participants will be enrolled in a 3-month digital health coaching program. They will also receive a Fitbit device to be worn daily for the capture of physical activity data.
Receives: Behavioral: Digital Health Coaching Program; Device: Fitbit

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of the Digital Health Coaching Intervention

    A retention rate greater than or equal to 70%. Retention is defined as individuals who agree to participate in the digital health coaching program and complete the 3 months of engagement post-enrollment. Engagement is defined as the completion of 1 nudge (call, text, or email) per module out of 5 nudge opportunities

    Measured: At 3 months following the start of the coaching intervention

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in Cancer Behavior Inventory-Brief Form (CBI-B)

    This 12-item instrument measures self-efficacy in coping with cancer across 7 domains. These include: Seeking and Understanding Medical Information, Emotion Regulation, Coping with Treatment Related Side Effects, Accepting Cancer/ Maintaining a Positive Attitude, Seeking Social Support, and Using Spiritual Coping. The instrument utilizes a 9-point response scale ranging from 1 "Not at all confident" to 9 "Confident".

    Measured: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2023
  2. Study start15 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion31 May 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
A single cohort of 100 individuals with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma will be enrolled in the study, all of which will be enrolled in a digital health coaching program and receive a Fitbit device for activity tracking.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05956457
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00016359
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
28 Jun 2023
Last updated
20 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC, Scher HI, Kris MG, Hudis C, Schrag D. Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment. JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7156.

    PubMed 28586821
  • Cocks K, Cohen D, Wisloff F, Sezer O, Lee S, Hippe E, Gimsing P, Turesson I, Hajek R, Smith A, Graham L, Phillips A, Stead M, Velikova G, Brown J; EORTC Quality of Life Group. An international field study of the reliability and validity of a disease-specific questionnaire module (the QLQ-MY20) in assessing the quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jul;43(11):1670-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.04.022. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

    PubMed 17574838
  • Cormican O, Dowling M. Managing relapsed myeloma: The views of patients, nurses and doctors. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Aug;23:51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 11.

    PubMed 27456375
  • de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, Blinder V, Araujo FS, Hlubocky FJ, Nicholas LH, O'Connor JM, Brockstein B, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK, Cella D. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):476-484. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30369. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

    PubMed 27716900
  • Girault A, Ferrua M, Lalloue B, Sicotte C, Fourcade A, Yatim F, Hebert G, Di Palma M, Minvielle E. Internet-based technologies to improve cancer care coordination: current use and attitudes among cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(4):551-557. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

    PubMed 25661828
  • Hari P. Recent advances in understanding multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2017 Dec;10(4):267-271. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

    PubMed 28633036
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

    PubMed 18929686
  • Heitzmann CA, Merluzzi TV, Jean-Pierre P, Roscoe JA, Kirsh KL, Passik SD. Assessing self-efficacy for coping with cancer: development and psychometric analysis of the brief version of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI-B). Psychooncology. 2011 Mar;20(3):302-12. doi: 10.1002/pon.1735.

    PubMed 20878830
  • Kelly M, Dowling M. Patients' lived experience of myeloma. Nurs Stand. 2011 Mar 16-22;25(28):38-44. doi: 10.7748/ns2011.03.25.28.38.c8397.

    PubMed 21488448
  • Kent EE, Ambs A, Mitchell SA, Clauser SB, Smith AW, Hays RD. Health-related quality of life in older adult survivors of selected cancers: data from the SEER-MHOS linkage. Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;121(5):758-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29119. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

    PubMed 25369293
  • LeBlanc MR, Hirschey R, Leak Bryant A, LeBlanc TW, Smith SK. How are patient-reported outcomes and symptoms being measured in adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma? A systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1419-1431. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02392-6. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

    PubMed 31848847
  • Lee MK, Schalet BD, Cella D, Yost KJ, Dueck AC, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA. Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Dec 10;4(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00271-0.

    PubMed 33305344
  • Lowe B, Wahl I, Rose M, Spitzer C, Glaesmer H, Wingenfeld K, Schneider A, Brahler E. A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2010 Apr;122(1-2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

    PubMed 19616305
  • Madduri D, Dhodapkar MV, Lonial S, Jagannath S, Cho HJ. SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: T-Cell-Directed Immune Therapies for Multiple Myeloma: Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells and Bispecific T-Cell-Engaging Agents. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Sep;19(9):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

    PubMed 31427259
  • Madore S, Kilbourn K, Valverde P, Borrayo E, Raich P. Feasibility of a psychosocial and patient navigation intervention to improve access to treatment among underserved breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Aug;22(8):2085-93. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2176-5. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

    PubMed 24639035

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Digital Health Coaching Program and Fitbit in people with Multiple Myeloma and Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy, run by Pack Health at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kelly Brassil, PhD (205-721-7542, dgxpharesearch@questdiagnostics.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of the Digital Health Coaching Intervention (time frame: At 3 months following the start of the coaching intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05956457, which also lists 30 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in