TES of Artemether-lumefantrine for Pf in the Philippines in 2015

In 2002, the Philippines changed its antimalarial drug policy to the combination treatment, CQ+SP as 1st-line treatment and artemether-lumefantrine as 2nd-line treatment. The DOH prescribed the use of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) combination as the second-line drug, limiting its use only in the treatment of confirmed Plasmodium falciparum until a further study on its efficacy was done before making it the first-line treatment. Consequently, AL became the first-line drug for falciparum malaria in the 2009 revised drug policy. The DOH in the past 6 years (2002-2007) adopted the use of AL in the highly endemic areas of the country and conducted therapeutic efficacy studies (TES) in 3 sentinel sites: Kalinga-Isabela, Palawan, and several Mindanao provinces showing 97-100% efficacy. Whereas CQ+SP showed variability and declining efficacy, results ranged from 70%-95% (CARAGA region). In Sultan Kudarat province, results in 2006-2007 showed 90% efficacy of CQ+SP and 96% for AL for falciparum malaria.

In the 2009 drug policy, chloroquine (CQ) remains the primary treatment for P. vivax malaria, with primaquine as an anti-relapse drug. Previous studies (1999-2005) elsewhere in the country have shown 100% efficacy of CQ or the CQ+PQ combination. However, in 2011, a recurrence of parasitemia was observed in one of 117 enrolled patients in Palawan. The last TES of AL as a first-line drug of choice for falciparum malaria was made in 2007. This study will update this drug's efficacy for this parasite.

STUDY OBJECTIVES The general objective of this study is to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum infections in Palawan province, the Philippines in 2015.

The specific objectives are:

1. To measure the clinical and parasitological efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) among patients aged between > 6 months and 59 years old suffering from uncomplicated falciparum malaria, by determining the proportion of patients with Early Treatment Failure (ETF), Late Clinical Failure (LTF), Late Parasitological Failure (LPF), or with an Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) as indicators of efficacy;
2. To evaluate the incidence of adverse events;
3. To formulate recommendations to enable the Department of Health to make informed decisions about the possible need for updating of the current national antimalarial treatment guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The design of this surveillance study is a one-arm, prospective evaluation of the clinical and parasitological response to directly observed treatment for uncomplicated falciparum. Individuals with uncomplicated malaria who met the study inclusion criteria were enrolled, treated on-site with AL, and monitored for a period of 28 days if they had falciparum malaria. The follow-up consisted of a fixed schedule of check-up visits and corresponding clinical and laboratory examinations. Study patients had been classified as therapeutic failures (early or late) or adequate responders based on the results of these assessments. The proportion of patients experiencing a therapeutic failure during the follow-up period had been used to estimate the efficacy of the study drug(s). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis will also help distinguish between a true recrudescence due to treatment failure and episodes of re-infection.

Barangay Health Workers and Barangay Malaria Microscopists were mobilized to recruit febrile patients (patients with body temperature ≥37.5 °C). Screened individuals were re-examined at the main health center for malaria symptoms, body temperature, and weight. All laboratory procedures and tests were carried out by trained staff.

STUDY AREA / SETTINGS. The study was conducted in the Rural Health Units (RHU) of Rizal, Bataraza, and Brookes Point. Several factors influenced the selection of sites: (a) adequate numbers of patients with symptomatic, uncomplicated P. falciparum; (b) willingness and availability of the selected healthcare facility staff to participate in the trial and to support the work with laboratory space; (c) access of patients to the health facility for weekly follow-ups; and (d) willingness of the Municipality Health Officer (MHO), the nurse and a trained Medical Technologist to take responsibility for conducting the trail, and security.

An attempt was made to include Panglima-Sugala, Tawi-Tawi as a TES site. Health staff was trained in malaria microscopy and TES procedures. However, no evaluable subject was enrolled for a period of seven months. Arrangements were made to conduct a limited survey to confirm the low number of cases. In the end, it was decided that the site be closed.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS. The population of interest consisted of patients aged between > 6 months to 59 years old diagnosed with uncomplicated falciparum malaria attending the study health clinic and having given, or whose parents or legal guardians had given informed consent for study inclusion and assent in children as appropriate.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Participants were recruited after the study received favorable approval of the protocol, participant information sheet, and written informed consent form from RITM Institutional Review Board (IRB). The study document versions given written approval by the IRB were used. The study was carried out according to the ethical guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki (version 2008), applicable guidelines of ICH-GCP (E6); and applicable regulations of the Department of Health, Manila. The participant's written informed consent was secured before enrolment and prior to initiating procedures specific to this study. For potential participants below 18 years old, this consent was obtained from either parent or a legally accepted guardian. An independent witness was present during the process of obtaining informed consent from a participant or parents/legal guardian who was illiterate.