HealthyNCT05961449
Mechanisms of Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia
A study testing Cycling exercise in people with Healthy and Men, run by Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
This project aims to clarify the mechanisms underpinning the acute analgesic effect of exercise in healthy humans-a phenomenon called "Exercise-induced hypoalgesia" (EIH). This study will characterize, using a within-subject cross-over design, the effects of a single session of aerobic exercise vs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Cycling exercise
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 26 Apr 2023to 1 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Males aged between 18 and 30 years
- Lack of risks for physical exercise assessed using the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q)
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Fluency in French
- BMI between 17 and 30
Who cannot join
- Regular tobacco use
- Not willing or able to abstain from alcohol, recreational drugs, coffee, or tea from 24 hours prior to each experimental session.
- Not willing or able to restrain from physical activity > 24h prior to each experimental session, and to be in a fasted state on the day of each experimental session.
- Any neurological, cardio-vascular, respiratory, inflammatory, endocrine, psychiatric, oncological, rheumatological conditions. Such condition could put the participants at risk during maximal exercise testing and/or interfere with pain assessment.
- Presence of any medical devices (e.g., cardiac pacemaker) implants or prothesis unless it is beyond discussion that these will not put the subject's safety during the study at risk and will not interfere with the results of the study.
- Any chronic pain condition or recent history thereof (i.e. within the preceeding 2 years).
Show all 11Show fewer
- Wounds or skin alteration on testing sites.
- Impaired hearing. This would affect ability to detect the control auditory stimuli.
- Surgery < 12 months
- Any drug intake in the past 2 weeks including antibiotics, herbal medicines and other remedies except the following drugs that will be allowed up to 48 hours prior to the experiments: oral paracetamol or ibuprofen for a self-limiting condition (e.g. toothache, bruise). Oral antihistaminics and nasal aerosol and topical treatments for seasonal allergy up to 1 week before the experimental session.
- Any physical activity contraindication
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Belgium1 site
Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain
Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1200
About this study
Official title: Disentangling Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia in Healthy Adults Males.
This project aims to clarify the mechanisms underpinning the acute analgesic effect of exercise in healthy humans-a phenomenon called "Exercise-induced hypoalgesia" (EIH). This study will characterize, using a within-subject cross-over design, the effects of a single session of aerobic exercise vs. a control condition on the sensitivity to stimuli preferentially activating mechano vs. heat-sensitive nociceptors of the skin vs. muscle, within vs. outside exercising body parts. The investigators hypothesize (1) that EIH will be greater in the exercise session compared to the control session, (2) that EIH will be greater at the local site compared to the remote site if local changes in nociceptive sensitivity contribute to EIH, and (3) that exercise will preferentially affect blunt pressure-induced pain if EIH involves specific changes in sensitivity of muscle nociceptors.
- Being tested
- Cycling exercise, Cycling control
- Keywords
- healthy, males, adults
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cycling exerciseBehavioural
Participants will complete an experimental exercise that will consist in 25 minutes of cycling between 60-80 Revolution Per Minute (RPM) on a cycle ergometer (CST BX40; Cardiostrong; Germany) at ≥ 70% of the Heart Rate Reserve (HRR).
Cycling controlBehavioural
The control condition will include an exercise design similar to the experimental condition except that the resistance will be kept at 25 W and the RPM below 50. The intensity of the exercise will be kept at minimal levels by ensuring that the heart rate does not increase >25% from baseline.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental condition | Experimental | Participants will complete an experimental exercise that will consist in 25 minutes of cycling between 60-80 Revolution Per Minute (RPM) on a cycle ergometer (CST BX40; Cardiostrong; Germany) at ≥ 70% of the Heart Rate Reserve (HRR). Receives: Behavioral: Cycling exercise |
| Control condition | Sham comparator | The control condition will include an exercise design similar to the experimental condition except that the resistance will be kept at 25 W and the RPM below 50. The intensity of the exercise will be kept at minimal levels by ensuring that the heart rate does not increase >25% from baseline Receives: Behavioral: Cycling control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pressure pain threshold
The investigators will use blunt pressure to preferentially activate the mechano-sensitive deep-tissue nociceptors. The stimuli will be delivered with a manual digital algometer with a contact surface area of 1cm2 (FPIX; Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA) connected to a laptop computer through a USB-serial port. A bespoke Matlab (The Mathworks, USA, mathworks.com) script will provide visual feedback of the force application rate to the examinator. The participants will be asked to report the first onset of pain by pressing on a keyboard key. The procedure is safe, and there are no side effects to the stimulation. This outcome will measured before and after each of the condition of the study (experimental exercise vs. control exercise)-relative and absolute change will then be computed.
Measured: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months
Change in cold detection threshold and heat pain threshold
The investigators will apply thermal stimuli to the skin to activate selectively heat-sensitive Aδ- and C-cutaneous fibre afferents. The thermal stimuli will be produced by a contact thermode based on Peltier elements (TCS-2; QST.lab, Strasbourg). The cold detection threshold (CDT) will be estimated by asking participants to press a button as soon as a decrease in skin temperature is noticed. The heat pain threshold (HPT) will be estimated by asking participants to press a button as soon as the increase in skin temperature becomes painful. This device is safe and routinely used for diagnostic purposes. The thermal stimulators will be used, in accordance with safety guidelines. If requested by the participant, the stimulation procedure can be stopped at any time, with no after effect. This outcome will measured before and after each of the condition of the study (experimental exercise vs. control exercise)-relative and absolute change will then be computed.
Measured: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months
Change in rating of mechanical activation of cutaneous nociceptive afferents
The investigators will use calibrated mechanical pinprick stimulators with a small surface probe to selectively activate the skin mechanosensitive nociceptors (The PinPrick; MRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Upon each stimulation, the participants will be asked to provide a rating of pain on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anchored from "No sensation" to "Worst pain imaginable" with a mark in the middle denoting the transition from unpainful to painful sensations. To avoid sensitization/habituation of the skin, the location of the stimulus will be slightly changed for each stimulation. The sensation perceived by pinprick stimulation are most often described as pricking and sometimes like a touch sensation. The procedure is safe, and there are no side effects to the stimulation. This outcome will measured before and after each of the condition of the study (experimental exercise vs. control exercise)-relative and absolute change will then be computed.
Measured: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months
Change in auditory detection threshold
The auditory stimulation will consist in a progressively increasing tone delivered at a comfortable hearing level using a pair of commercially available headphones. The participants will report the perception of the sound by pressing on a keyboard key. This outcome will measured before and after each of the condition of the study (experimental exercise vs. control exercise)-relative and absolute change will then be computed.
Measured: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2023
- Study start26 Apr 2023
- Primary completion1 Oct 2023
- Study completion1 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Université Catholique de LouvainThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- A within-subject, cross-over design, will be used: participants will complete two conditions (exercise vs. control) in counter-balanced randomized order.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Université Catholique de Louvain
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- André Mouraux, Full professor, MD, Principal investigator, Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05961449
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EIH
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Disentangling Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia in Healthy Adults Males.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05961449
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EIH
- Keywords
- healthy, males, adults
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Université Catholique de LouvainUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project aims to clarify the mechanisms underpinning the acute analgesic effect of exercise in healthy humans-a phenomenon called "Exercise-induced hypoalgesia" (EIH). This study will characterize, using a within-subject cross-over design, the effects of a single session of aerobic exercise vs. a control condition on the sensitivity to stimuli preferentially activating mechano vs. heat-sensitive nociceptors of the skin vs. muscle, within vs. outside exercising body parts. The investigators hypothesize (1) that EIH will be greater in the exercise session compared to the control session, (2) that EIH will be greater at the local site compared to the remote site if local changes in nociceptive sensitivity contribute to EIH, and (3) that exercise will preferentially affect blunt pressure-induced pain if EIH involves specific changes in sensitivity of muscle nociceptors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A within-subject, cross-over design, will be used: participants will complete two conditions (exercise vs. control) in counter-balanced randomized order.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental condition | Experimental | Behavioral: Cycling exerciseParticipants will complete an experimental exercise that will consist in 25 minutes of cycling between 60-80 Revolution Per Minute (RPM) on a cycle ergometer (CST BX40; Cardiostrong; Germany) at ≥ 70% of the Heart Rate Reserve (HRR). |
| Control condition | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Cycling controlThe control condition will include an exercise design similar to the experimental condition except that the resistance will be kept at 25 W and the RPM below 50. The intensity of the exercise will be kept at minimal levels by ensuring that the heart rate does not increase >25% from baseline |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Males aged between 18 and 30 years
- Lack of risks for physical exercise assessed using the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q)
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Fluency in French
- BMI between 17 and 30
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Regular tobacco use
- Not willing or able to abstain from alcohol, recreational drugs, coffee, or tea from 24 hours prior to each experimental session.
- Not willing or able to restrain from physical activity > 24h prior to each experimental session, and to be in a fasted state on the day of each experimental session.
- Any neurological, cardio-vascular, respiratory, inflammatory, endocrine, psychiatric, oncological, rheumatological conditions. Such condition could put the participants at risk during maximal exercise testing and/or interfere with pain assessment.
- Presence of any medical devices (e.g., cardiac pacemaker) implants or prothesis unless it is beyond discussion that these will not put the subject's safety during the study at risk and will not interfere with the results of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cycling exerciseParticipants will complete an experimental exercise that will consist in 25 minutes of cycling between 60-80 Revolution Per Minute (RPM) on a cycle ergometer (CST BX40; Cardiostrong; Germany) at ≥ 70% of the Heart Rate Reserve (HRR). | Behavioural | Experimental condition |
| Cycling controlThe control condition will include an exercise design similar to the experimental condition except that the resistance will be kept at 25 W and the RPM below 50. The intensity of the exercise will be kept at minimal levels by ensuring that the heart rate does not increase >25% from baseline. | Behavioural | Control condition |
Primary outcome
Change in pressure pain threshold
Time frame: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months
The investigators will use blunt pressure to preferentially activate the mechano-sensitive deep-tissue nociceptors. The stimuli will be delivered with a manual digital algometer with a contact surface area of 1cm2 (FPIX; Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA) connected to a laptop computer through a USB-serial port. A bespoke Matlab (The Mathworks, USA, mathworks.com) script will provide visual feedback of the force application rate to the examinator. The participants will be asked to report the first onset of pain by pressing on a keyboard key. The procedure is safe, and there are no side effects to the stimulation. This outcome will measured before and after each of the condition of the study (experimental exercise vs. control exercise)-relative and absolute change will then be computed.
Change in cold detection threshold and heat pain threshold
Time frame: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months
The investigators will apply thermal stimuli to the skin to activate selectively heat-sensitive Aδ- and C-cutaneous fibre afferents. The thermal stimuli will be produced by a contact thermode based on Peltier elements (TCS-2; QST.lab, Strasbourg). The cold detection threshold (CDT) will be estimated by asking participants to press a button as soon as a decrease in skin temperature is noticed. The heat pain threshold (HPT) will be estimated by asking participants to press a button as soon as the increase in skin temperature becomes painful. This device is safe and routinely used for diagnostic purposes. The thermal stimulators will be used, in accordance with safety guidelines. If requested by the participant, the stimulation procedure can be stopped at any time, with no after effect. This outcome will measured before and after each of the condition of the study (experimental exercise vs. control exercise)-relative and absolute change will then be computed.
Change in rating of mechanical activation of cutaneous nociceptive afferents
Time frame: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months
The investigators will use calibrated mechanical pinprick stimulators with a small surface probe to selectively activate the skin mechanosensitive nociceptors (The PinPrick; MRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Upon each stimulation, the participants will be asked to provide a rating of pain on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anchored from "No sensation" to "Worst pain imaginable" with a mark in the middle denoting the transition from unpainful to painful sensations. To avoid sensitization/habituation of the skin, the location of the stimulus will be slightly changed for each stimulation. The sensation perceived by pinprick stimulation are most often described as pricking and sometimes like a touch sensation. The procedure is safe, and there are no side effects to the stimulation. This outcome will measured before and after each of the condition of the study (experimental exercise vs. control exercise)-relative and absolute change will then be computed.
Change in auditory detection threshold
Time frame: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months
The auditory stimulation will consist in a progressively increasing tone delivered at a comfortable hearing level using a pair of commercially available headphones. The participants will report the perception of the sound by pressing on a keyboard key. This outcome will measured before and after each of the condition of the study (experimental exercise vs. control exercise)-relative and absolute change will then be computed.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
André Mouraux, Full professor, MD principal investigator
Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cycling exercise in people with Healthy and Men, run by Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pressure pain threshold (time frame: Throughout the entire study, approximately during 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2025.