HealthyPhase 4NCT05962385
State Dependence of Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
A Phase 4 study testing Brain state while receiving TMS in people with Healthy, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study will examine whether the benefits of brain stimulation on mental functioning can be enhanced if an individual is actively engaging the target brain networks while receiving brain stimulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Brain state while receiving TMS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Aug 2023to 17 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 - 65,
- healthy controls
Who cannot join
- Diagnosed psychiatric disorder
- Potential contraindications to EEG (e.g. visible scalp abrasions, non-removable hair extensions and/or hair styling that would impede proper EEG recording)
- Potential contraindication to TMS (as identified by the TMS safety screener)
- Any previous adverse reaction to TMS or MRI
- Diagnosed epilepsy or previously experienced a seizure
- Diagnosed neurological condition, such as stroke or tinnitus
Show all 11Show fewer
- Experienced a head trauma that was diagnosed as concussion
- Current use of, or recent withdrawal from, medications that can increase the risk of seizure
- Currently pregnant
- Any metal in the head (excluding mouth)
- Any implanted medical device
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
About this study
The study will examine whether the benefits of brain stimulation on mental functioning can be enhanced if an individual is actively engaging the target brain networks while receiving brain stimulation. The study includes two separate sessions and people will complete either a cognitive task or a perceptual task while receiving transcranial magnetic stimulation. The study will measure change in brain function with EEG.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Brain state while receiving TMS
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brain state while receiving TMSDevice
Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered while participants engaged in either a cognitive control task or a perceptual discrimination task. Each participant completed both active-state and control-state TMS conditions across separate sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy control (Within-subject TMS Study) | Experimental | Participants completed both active-state transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and control-state TMS conditions in a repeated-measures, within-subject design. TMS was delivered during high prefrontal cortex (PFC)-demand cognitive control states and during low PFC-demand perceptual discrimination states. Receives: Device: Brain state while receiving TMS |
| No TMS Follow-up Study | No intervention | Participants completed the behavioral paradigm without TMS in a separate follow-up sample under the same IRB protocol. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Theta Power Task-Evoked Change Score
Pre- to post-TMS change in theta-band oscillatory power was measured by electroencephalography during performance of a cognitive control task. The cognitive control task was administered immediately before and after TMS. Task-evoked theta responses were averaged across trials at each time point, and a within-subject change score was computed as post-intervention theta power minus pre-intervention theta power for each condition. Values are reported in decibels (dB), with higher values indicating greater post-intervention theta power relative to baseline.
Measured: Immediately before and after TMS during the experimental session; 0 to 500 milliseconds after each TMS stimulus
Cortical Theta Generator Excitability
Theta-band spectral power evoked by TMS was measured using TMS-EEG event-related spectral perturbations in the 0 to 500 millisecond window following single-pulse TMS and within the theta oscillatory band of 4 to 8 Hz. For each participant, TMS-evoked theta responses were averaged across trials for each condition: Active-state TMS and Control-state TMS. Responses are measured in decibels (dB) relative to baseline, with higher values indicating greater cortical theta generator excitability.
Measured: Immediately following TMS stimulation; 0 to 500 milliseconds after each TMS stimulus
Secondary outcomes (4)
Cognitive Control Enhancement (Accuracy)
Pre/Post ratios of response accuracy in a cognitive control task. Accuracy was computed for each run of the cognitive control task, as the proportion of correct behavioural responses relative to the number of task trials (120). Scores \> 1 indicate an improvement in cognitive control performance relative to baseline; scores \< 1 indicate a reduction in cognitive control performance relative to baseline.
This is done Immediately before (Pre) and within 5 minutes after (Post) TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions. In the No TMS Arm, outcome was assessed in the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task. Each cognitive control assessment lasted up to 20 minutes each.
Measured: Immediately before and within 5 minutes after TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions; in the No TMS arm, assessed during the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task.
Cognitive Control Enhancement (Reaction Time)
Pre/Post difference of reaction time in a cognitive control task.
Measured: Immediately before and within 5 minutes after TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions; in the No TMS arm, assessed during the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task.
Cognitive Control Enhancement (D'-Context)
Pre/Post ratios of D'-Context during the cognitive control task. D'-Context was computed separately for each run as a signal-detection measure of sensitivity to contextual information, calculated from the standardized hit rate for AX trials and false-alarm rate for BX trials [D'-Context = z(AX hit rate) - z(BX false-alarm rate)]. Higher D'- Context values indicate greater sensitivity to task context and better cognitive control performance. Pre/Post ratios were calculated relative to baseline performance; scores \> 1 indicate an improvement in D'-Context relative to baseline, whereas scores \< 1 indicate a reduction in D'-Context relative to baseline.
Measured: Immediately before and within 5 minutes after TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions; in the No TMS arm, assessed during the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task.
Cognitive Control Enhancement (Evidence Accumulation Bias)
Pre/Post ratios of drift diffusion model (DDM) response bias during the cognitive control task. Response bias was quantified using the DDM starting-point parameter (z), which reflects the relative position of the decision process between the two response boundaries before evidence accumulation begins. Values shifted toward one boundary indicate a greater pre-decision bias toward the corresponding response, whereas values closer to the midpoint indicate less response bias. Pre/Post ratios were calculated relative to baseline; scores \> 1 indicate an increase in response bias relative to baseline, whereas scores \< 1 indicate a reduction in response bias relative to baseline.
Measured: Immediately before and within 5 minutes after TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions; in the No TMS arm, assessed during the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2023
- Study start24 Aug 2023
- Primary completion31 Jul 2025
- Study completion17 Nov 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MinnesotaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Repeated measures design - across two separate sessions (one week apart, counterbalanced between participants), participants will receive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) whilst engaging in either a cognitive control or a perceptual task.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alik Widge, Principal investigator, University of Minnesota
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05962385
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PSYCH-2023-32060
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- State Dependence of Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05962385
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PSYCH-2023-32060
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MinnesotaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Nov 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Oct 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will examine whether the benefits of brain stimulation on mental functioning can be enhanced if an individual is actively engaging the target brain networks while receiving brain stimulation. The study includes two separate sessions and people will complete either a cognitive task or a perceptual task while receiving transcranial magnetic stimulation. The study will measure change in brain function with EEG.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Repeated measures design - across two separate sessions (one week apart, counterbalanced between participants), participants will receive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) whilst engaging in either a cognitive control or a perceptual task.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy control (Within-subject TMS Study) | Experimental | Device: Brain state while receiving TMSParticipants completed both active-state transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and control-state TMS conditions in a repeated-measures, within-subject design. TMS was delivered during high prefrontal cortex (PFC)-demand cognitive control states and during low PFC-demand perceptual discrimination states. |
| No TMS Follow-up Study | No intervention | –Participants completed the behavioral paradigm without TMS in a separate follow-up sample under the same IRB protocol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age 18 - 65,
- healthy controls
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Diagnosed psychiatric disorder
- Potential contraindications to EEG (e.g. visible scalp abrasions, non-removable hair extensions and/or hair styling that would impede proper EEG recording)
- Potential contraindication to TMS (as identified by the TMS safety screener)
- Any previous adverse reaction to TMS or MRI
- Diagnosed epilepsy or previously experienced a seizure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brain state while receiving TMSTranscranial magnetic stimulation was delivered while participants engaged in either a cognitive control task or a perceptual discrimination task. Each participant completed both active-state and control-state TMS conditions across separate sessions. | Device | Healthy control (Within-subject TMS Study) |
Primary outcome
Theta Power Task-Evoked Change Score
Time frame: Immediately before and after TMS during the experimental session; 0 to 500 milliseconds after each TMS stimulus
Pre- to post-TMS change in theta-band oscillatory power was measured by electroencephalography during performance of a cognitive control task. The cognitive control task was administered immediately before and after TMS. Task-evoked theta responses were averaged across trials at each time point, and a within-subject change score was computed as post-intervention theta power minus pre-intervention theta power for each condition. Values are reported in decibels (dB), with higher values indicating greater post-intervention theta power relative to baseline.
Cortical Theta Generator Excitability
Time frame: Immediately following TMS stimulation; 0 to 500 milliseconds after each TMS stimulus
Theta-band spectral power evoked by TMS was measured using TMS-EEG event-related spectral perturbations in the 0 to 500 millisecond window following single-pulse TMS and within the theta oscillatory band of 4 to 8 Hz. For each participant, TMS-evoked theta responses were averaged across trials for each condition: Active-state TMS and Control-state TMS. Responses are measured in decibels (dB) relative to baseline, with higher values indicating greater cortical theta generator excitability.
4 secondary outcomes
Cognitive Control Enhancement (Accuracy)
Time frame: Immediately before and within 5 minutes after TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions; in the No TMS arm, assessed during the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task.
Cognitive Control Enhancement (Reaction Time)
Time frame: Immediately before and within 5 minutes after TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions; in the No TMS arm, assessed during the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task.
Cognitive Control Enhancement (D'-Context)
Time frame: Immediately before and within 5 minutes after TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions; in the No TMS arm, assessed during the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task.
Cognitive Control Enhancement (Evidence Accumulation Bias)
Time frame: Immediately before and within 5 minutes after TMS in the Active-state and Control-state TMS conditions; in the No TMS arm, assessed during the first and last administrations of the cognitive control task.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alik Widge principal investigator
University of Minnesota
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Brain state while receiving TMS in people with Healthy, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Theta Power Task-Evoked Change Score (time frame: Immediately before and after TMS during the experimental session; 0 to 500 milliseconds after each TMS stimulus). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2026.