AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal PolypsPhase 4NCT05964465

Mechanisms of Smell Improvement With Dupilumab.

A Phase 4 study testing Dupilumab in people with Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study seeks to explore the mechanism through which dupilumab improves olfactory cleft inflammation in patients with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The investigators expect this study to provide convincing evidence that dupilumab improves clinical olfaction via direct reduction in olfactory cleft… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
What is being tested?
Dupilumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
10 Aug 2023to 30 Jan 2025
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults ≥18 years of age
  • Meet criteria for CRSwNP as defined by ICAR-21
  • 2 out of 4 cardinal symptoms for ≥12 weeks
  • Visible evidence of inflammation on endoscopy or imaging
  • Bilateral visible nasal polyps ≥1 in each nasal cavity (0-4 scale each side)
  • Olfaction score ≥1 (0-3 scale)
  • Candidate for treatment with dupilumab for CRSwNP
  • Elected to proceed with dupilumab for treatment of CRSwNP

Who cannot join

  • Prior use of dupilumab
  • Previous treatment with another biologic medication for CRSwNP or asthma within 6 months
  • Any nasal or sinus surgery within the last 3 months
  • Oral corticosteroid use within the last 1 month
  • Current pregnancy, breast-feeding, or plan to become pregnant during next 3 months
  • Presence of antrochoanal nasal polyps; acute rhinosinusitis; upper respiratory infection;
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Allergic granulomatous angiitis/eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis;
  • Granulomatosis with polyangiitis; cystic fibrosis; Young syndrome;
  • Kartagener syndrome; or dyskinetic cilia syndrome
  • Poorly controlled asthma

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Mechanisms of Smell Improvement With Dupilumab

This study seeks to explore the mechanism through which dupilumab improves olfactory cleft inflammation in patients with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The investigators expect this study to provide convincing evidence that dupilumab improves clinical olfaction via direct reduction in olfactory cleft inflammation.

Being tested
Dupilumab
Keywords
Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Nasal Polyps, dupilumab
Medical subject headings
Nasal Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DupilumabDrug

    Monoclonal antibody blocking interleukin 4 and interleukin 13

Study groups in NCT05964465
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TreatmentExperimentalThe treatment group will receive dupilumab at 300mg SC Q2weeks. The first dose will be administered via subcutaneous injection in clinic at baseline. Subjects will self-administer study drug (dupilumab 300 mg) subcutaneous every 2 weeks after initial dosing at visit 2.
Receives: Drug: Dupilumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Volumetric Olfactory Cleft Opacification Based on CT.

    Non-contrast sinus computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained at Baseline and Week 12. Volumetric analysis of the olfactory cleft was performed using previously described methods. Total olfactory cleft volume and air volume were measured to calculate percent olfactory cleft opacification as [1 - (air volume/total olfactory cleft volume)] × 100. Percent olfactory cleft opacification ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater olfactory cleft inflammation and disease severity and lower values indicating less inflammation and improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)

  2. Change in Olfactory Cleft Endoscopy Score Based on Nasalendoscopy.

    Subjects will have sinonasal endoscopy at baseline and every follow up visit. This procedure allows visual inspection of the sinus mucosal lining and grading of polyps, including the olfactory cleft. Results for each side will be recorded separately and combined for a final Olfactory Cleft Endoscopy Scale (OCES) that ranges from 0-20, with higher scores representing increased disease severity.

    Measured: 3 months post-treatment

  3. Change in Olfactory Cleft Mucus IL-13 Concentration

    Olfactory cleft mucus samples were collected under endoscopic guidance at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 12. IL-13 concentrations were measured using a commercially available LegendPlex Th2 Cytometric Bead Array according to the manufacturer's instructions. The outcome reported here represents IL-13 concentration measured at Baseline and Week 12 to evaluate change after 3 months of dupilumab treatment.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)

  4. Change in Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score.

    Subjects will have sinonasal endoscopy at baseline and every follow up visit. This procedure allows visual inspection of the sinus mucosal lining and grading of polyps, including the olfactory cleft. Results for each side will be recorded separately and combined for a final Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score (LKES) that ranges from 0-20, with higher scores representing increased disease severity.

    Measured: 3 months post-treatment

  5. Change in Overall Polyp Score From Sinonasal Endoscopy

    Overall Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) was assessed by sinonasal endoscopy. Polyps were graded separately in each nasal cavity on a scale from 0 to 4 and summed to calculate a total bilateral score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater nasal polyp burden and more severe disease, while lower scores indicate less disease and improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Correlation Between Change in Olfactory Cleft Mucus IL-13 Level and Sniffin' Sticks TDI Score

    Quantitative psychophysical olfactory testing was performed using the Sniffin' Sticks Test. This validated test assesses odor threshold (T), odor discrimination (D), and odor identification (I). Individual component scores are summed to generate a Total TDI Score that reflects overall olfactory function, with higher scores indicating better olfactory function. The correlation between olfactory cleft mucus IL-13 levels and change in Total TDI Score from Baseline to Week 12 was assessed using Spearman correlation.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)

  2. Correlation Between Change in IL13 Level and QOD-NS Score

    Olfactory-specific quality of life was assessed using the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders - Negative Statements (QOD-NS), a validated patient-reported outcome measure of olfactory-specific quality of life. The QOD-NS total score ranges from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicating better olfactory-specific quality of life and lower scores indicating greater olfactory-related impairment. The correlation between change in olfactory cleft mucus IL-13 level and change in QOD-NS score from Baseline to Week 12 was assessed using Spearman correlation.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2023
  2. Study start10 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05964465
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00125142
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
15 Feb 2023
Last updated
5 Aug 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in