Spinal Cord InjuriesNCT05966896
Epidural Stimulation to Restore Voluntary Movement Following Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing implanted epidural stimulator in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This proof-of-concept case series will prospectively use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of spared spinal cord neural fibers to guide the selection of 2 research participants to receive a surgically implanted epidural stimulator with the goal of restoring voluntary movement after spinal cord injury (SCI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- implanted epidural stimulator
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Apr 2026to Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale B spinal cord injury diagnosis
- Beyond 6 months of injury date
- Spinal cord injury at a level range of cervical 7 to thoracic 8 (C7-T8) with signs of upper motor neuron injury
- 18 years or older
- Height 5'1" to 6'3"
- Weight 250 lbs or less
- Sufficient upper extremity strength to manage a stability aide
- Magnetic resonance imaging evidence of spared spinal cord neural fibers
Who cannot join
- Claustrophobia and/or other contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging
- Unstable or symptomatic cardiorespiratory issues, in the opinion of the investigators
- Recent (within 3 months) history of fracture, contractures, pressure sore, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infection, or other infections that might interfere with interventions
- Contraindications to epidural stimulator implantation surgery
- Received botox injections into the lower extremities within the past 6 months
- Pregnancy
- Cauda Equina injury
- Any other neurological disorder besides spinal cord injury
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
University of Colorado Anschutz
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
About this study
Official title: Epidural Stimulation to Restore Voluntary Movement Following Spinal Cord Injury: Spared Fibers Proof-of-concept Study
This proof-of-concept case series will prospectively use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of spared spinal cord neural fibers to guide the selection of 2 research participants to receive a surgically implanted epidural stimulator with the goal of restoring voluntary movement after spinal cord injury (SCI).
Because MRI evidence of spared spinal cord neural fibers demonstrated significant relationships with responsiveness to epidural stimulation in SCI in retrospective studies, the proposed study is a traditional feasibility study - a prospective investigation to be used to capture preliminary safety and effectiveness information to determine if MRI can/should be used in planning a future pivotal study.
Read the detailed description
This is an investigator-initiated proof of concept study performed at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CU Anschutz).
This 2-case proof-of-concept study will include 2 research participants with motor-complete SCI to evaluate the performance of the Medtronic epidural stimulator for restoring voluntary movement below the level of injury.
Participants will be enrolled at CU Anschutz. Screening data will be reviewed to determine participant eligibility. Two participants who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be entered into the study.
The following treatment regimen will be used: epidural stimulation + 6 months of intensive outpatient physical therapy.
Total duration of study participation will be 8 months.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- implanted epidural stimulator
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
implanted epidural stimulatorDevice
implantable multi-programmable neurostimulation system to deliver electrical stimulation to neural targets in the spinal cord
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Epidural stimulation with Physical Therapy | Experimental | Stimulation parameters will be optimized for each lower extremity and joint movement. During physical therapy sessions, electrode configurations may be adjusted as needed to optimize stimulation frequencies, and voltage intensity ranges to best enable voluntary control of lower extremity (ankle, knee, and hip) flexion and extension, as well as standing.
Intensive physical therapy will consist of 3 visits per week over the course of 6 months directed by a licensed physical therapist with over a decade of experience working with individuals with spinal cord injury, and the epidural stimulator will be ON continuously during these sessions. Physical therapy will involve neurorehabilitation to facilitate voluntary lower extremity movement in the presence of stimulation, with the research participants in the supine, seated, and standing positions. Receives: Device: implanted epidural stimulator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury lower extremity motor scores (ISNCSCI-LEMS)
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury lower extremity motor scores (ISNCSCI-LEMS) will be used to measure the degree of voluntary motor change. LEMS is conducted with the participant lying supine and five key muscle groups on each side are tested for their ability to contract against gravity and resistance. ISNCSCI motor testing has been shown to have adequate to excellent interrater reliability in individuals with spinal cord injury, and is a valid tool for this population.
Measured: at day 1, at month 7, and at month 8
Secondary outcomes (1)
The abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF)
The abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument will be used to measure the degree of participants' perception of change in quality of life after stimulator implantation. The WHOQOL-BREF assesses quality of life within the context of an individual's culture, value systems, personal goals, standards, and concerns. It has been studied and highly recommended for individuals with spinal cord injury. Scores for the abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument range from 0 - 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Measured: at day 1, at month 7, and at month 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2023
- Study start22 Apr 2026
- Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Colorado, DenverThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrew C Smith, PT, DPT, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Colorado, Denver
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05966896
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23-0202
- Other IDs
- 1K01HD106928-01A1
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Smith AC, Angeli CA, Ugiliweneza B, Weber KA 2nd, Bert RJ, Negahdar M, Mesbah S, Boakye M, Harkema SJ, Rejc E. Spinal cord imaging markers and recovery of standing with epidural stimulation in individuals with clinically motor complete spinal cord injury. Exp Brain Res. 2022 Jan;240(1):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06272-9. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
PubMed 34854934Rejc E, Smith AC, Weber KA 2nd, Ugiliweneza B, Bert RJ, Negahdar M, Boakye M, Harkema SJ, Angeli CA. Spinal Cord Imaging Markers and Recovery of Volitional Leg Movement With Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation in Individuals With Clinically Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Oct 21;14:559313. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.559313. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33192348Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3. Epub 2011 May 19.
PubMed 21601270Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014 May;137(Pt 5):1394-409. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu038. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
PubMed 24713270Angeli CA, Boakye M, Morton RA, Vogt J, Benton K, Chen Y, Ferreira CK, Harkema SJ. Recovery of Over-Ground Walking after Chronic Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 27;379(13):1244-1250. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803588. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
PubMed 30247091
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Epidural Stimulation to Restore Voluntary Movement Following Spinal Cord Injury: Spared Fibers Proof-of-concept Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05966896
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 23-0202
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, DenverUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 22 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This proof-of-concept case series will prospectively use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of spared spinal cord neural fibers to guide the selection of 2 research participants to receive a surgically implanted epidural stimulator with the goal of restoring voluntary movement after spinal cord injury (SCI).
Because MRI evidence of spared spinal cord neural fibers demonstrated significant relationships with responsiveness to epidural stimulation in SCI in retrospective studies, the proposed study is a traditional feasibility study - a prospective investigation to be used to capture preliminary safety and effectiveness information to determine if MRI can/should be used in planning a future pivotal study.
Detailed description
This is an investigator-initiated proof of concept study performed at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CU Anschutz).
This 2-case proof-of-concept study will include 2 research participants with motor-complete SCI to evaluate the performance of the Medtronic epidural stimulator for restoring voluntary movement below the level of injury.
Participants will be enrolled at CU Anschutz. Screening data will be reviewed to determine participant eligibility. Two participants who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be entered into the study.
The following treatment regimen will be used: epidural stimulation + 6 months of intensive outpatient physical therapy.
Total duration of study participation will be 8 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Epidural stimulation with Physical Therapy | Experimental | Device: implanted epidural stimulatorStimulation parameters will be optimized for each lower extremity and joint movement. During physical therapy sessions, electrode configurations may be adjusted as needed to optimize stimulation frequencies, and voltage intensity ranges to best enable voluntary control of lower extremity (ankle, knee, and hip) flexion and extension, as well as standing. Intensive physical therapy will consist of 3 visits per week over the course of 6 months directed by a licensed physical therapist with over a decade of experience working with individuals with spinal cord injury, and the epidural stimulator will be ON continuously during these sessions. Physical therapy will involve neurorehabilitation to facilitate voluntary lower extremity movement in the presence of stimulation, with the research participants in the supine, seated, and standing positions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale B spinal cord injury diagnosis
- Beyond 6 months of injury date
- Spinal cord injury at a level range of cervical 7 to thoracic 8 (C7-T8) with signs of upper motor neuron injury
- 18 years or older
- Height 5'1" to 6'3"
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Claustrophobia and/or other contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging
- Unstable or symptomatic cardiorespiratory issues, in the opinion of the investigators
- Recent (within 3 months) history of fracture, contractures, pressure sore, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infection, or other infections that might interfere with interventions
- Contraindications to epidural stimulator implantation surgery
- Received botox injections into the lower extremities within the past 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| implanted epidural stimulatorimplantable multi-programmable neurostimulation system to deliver electrical stimulation to neural targets in the spinal cord | Device | Epidural stimulation with Physical Therapy |
Primary outcome
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury lower extremity motor scores (ISNCSCI-LEMS)
Time frame: at day 1, at month 7, and at month 8
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury lower extremity motor scores (ISNCSCI-LEMS) will be used to measure the degree of voluntary motor change. LEMS is conducted with the participant lying supine and five key muscle groups on each side are tested for their ability to contract against gravity and resistance. ISNCSCI motor testing has been shown to have adequate to excellent interrater reliability in individuals with spinal cord injury, and is a valid tool for this population.
1 secondary outcome
The abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time frame: at day 1, at month 7, and at month 8
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 34854934Smith AC, Angeli CA, Ugiliweneza B, Weber KA 2nd, Bert RJ, Negahdar M, Mesbah S, Boakye M, Harkema SJ, Rejc E. Spinal cord imaging markers and recovery of standing with epidural stimulation in individuals with clinically motor complete spinal cord injury. Exp Brain Res. 2022 Jan;240(1):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06272-9. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
- Background: PubMed 33192348Rejc E, Smith AC, Weber KA 2nd, Ugiliweneza B, Bert RJ, Negahdar M, Boakye M, Harkema SJ, Angeli CA. Spinal Cord Imaging Markers and Recovery of Volitional Leg Movement With Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation in Individuals With Clinically Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Oct 21;14:559313. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.559313. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21601270Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3. Epub 2011 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 24713270Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014 May;137(Pt 5):1394-409. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu038. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
- Background: PubMed 30247091Angeli CA, Boakye M, Morton RA, Vogt J, Benton K, Chen Y, Ferreira CK, Harkema SJ. Recovery of Over-Ground Walking after Chronic Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 27;379(13):1244-1250. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803588. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Andrew C Smith, PT, DPT, PhD principal investigator
University of Colorado, Denver
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing implanted epidural stimulator in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury lower extremity motor scores (ISNCSCI-LEMS) (time frame: at day 1, at month 7, and at month 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05966896, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2026.