StrokeINTeRAcTNCT05970367
Intensive Motor Rehabilitation With Technology for Patients With Central Neurological Disease
A study testing Intensive rehabilitation programme in people with Stroke and Spinal Cord Injuries, run by KU Leuven at 2 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
This project will consist of 1 large clinical trial with 3 core concepts: (1) Clinical benefits of an intensive rehabilitation programme using advanced technology, compared to the control group; (2) A full health economic evaluation combined with model-based estimation of costs and benefits; (3) process evaluation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries, Chronic Disease
- What is being tested?
- Intensive rehabilitation programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2023to 9 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures;
- A diagnosis of central neurological disease, made by a specialist. Conditions may include stroke or spinal cord injury:
- Stroke: Participants must have received a diagnosis of stroke for the first time, have been diagnosed at least 3 months ago, and live at home.
- SCI: Participants have a rating A, B, C or D on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) measurement scale, which refers to patients with complete or incomplete impairment. All levels of SCI can be included, if there is a clear patient need linked to the upper and/or lower extremities.
- At least 3 months post discharge from hospital/rehabilitation centre, living at home;
- Having a maximum recovery of 85% of independence in daily functioning (FIM/SCIM);
Show all 11Show fewer
- Had a normal functional state prior to the pathology: a pre-pathology Barthel Index > 85/100;
- Unilateral or bilateral weakness of the affected upper or lower limbs (No maximum score in all affected limbs = motricity index: score 5 on 3/3 segments)
- Having the clinical opportunity to engage in exercise therapy with available technology, assessed by a specialist;
- Age of > 18 years;
- Sufficient cognitive ability to understand the games and give informed consent, assessed by a specialist;.
Who cannot join
- Having other neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that may affect the protocol, assessed by a specialist;
- No ability to initiate movements against gravity in the upper and lower limbs;
- Severe visual impairment, communication, cognitive and language formation problems that would prevent the intervention and measurement process, assessed by a specialist;
- Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might the compromise participant's safety or compliance with the CIP;
- Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Impact of an Intensive Motor Rehabilitation Programme Integrating Technology for Adults With Central Neurological Disease: A Randomised Controlled Rehabilitation Study in the Chronic Phase
This project will consist of 1 large clinical trial with 3 core concepts: (1) Clinical benefits of an intensive rehabilitation programme using advanced technology, compared to the control group; (2) A full health economic evaluation combined with model-based estimation of costs and benefits; (3) process evaluation.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries, Chronic Disease
- Being tested
- Intensive rehabilitation programme
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, intensive, technology
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries, Chronic Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intensive rehabilitation programmeOther
Intensive rehabilitation using advanced technology, based on the patient's goals.
Including cardiovascular fitness training, goal-oriented training, physiotherapy with and without advanced technology and self-management.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intensive rehabilitation program | Experimental | 3 weeks of intensive rehabilitation --> follow-up 9 months standard care Receives: Other: Intensive rehabilitation programme |
| Standard care | No intervention | Follow-up 9 months standard care --> 3 weeks of intensive rehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), which measures independence in daily functioning after stroke. The FIM consists of 18 items designed to assess to what extent a person needs assistance in performing activities of daily living safely and efficiently. The activities consist of a number of basic skills related to self-care, pelvic floor function, transfers, gait, communication and social abilities. The FIM has acceptable reliability and has been found valid in people with stroke.
Min: 13; Max: 91; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), an assessment of achievements of daily function of patients with spinal cord lesions. The scale consists of 19 tasks organized in 3 subscales: self-care, respiration and sphincter management, and mobility. The SCIM is valid and reliable.
Min: 0; Max: 100; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change in The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), is an evidence-based outcome measure designed to capture a patient's self-perception of performance in everyday living, over time. This outcome can be used in both study populations.
Min: 1; Max: 10; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Change in EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L, measures quality of life at five levels of health (mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). From this, a weighted health index can be calculated for an individual or population. This scale can also be used for both populations.
Min: 1; Max: 100; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - every month during follow-up - 9 months
Change in Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)
Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), is an individualised evaluation method. It is scored on an ordinal 5-point scale, which captures a person's individual treatment goal and is scored afterwards on the achievement of that treatment goal. The GAS can and will be used for both stroke and spinal cord injury.
Min: -2; Max: +2; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Change in The fatigue severity scale (FSS)
The fatigue severity scale (FSS) contains 9 questions assessing the perceived severity of fatigue symptoms in the past week in various daily situations. The patient indicates the extent to which fatigue determines functioning. Again, this will be used for both stroke and spinal cord injury.
Min: 9; Max: 63; Higher = worse
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale
During the intervention the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale will be completed to after every therapy block to assess subjective experiences of the patients during physical load.
Min: 6; Max: 20; Higher = worse
Measured: During intervention (up to 9 months)
Change in the 6-minute Walk-Test (6MWT)
The 6-minute Walk-Test (6MWT) is used to measure functional capacity. The maximum distance the patient can cover within 6 minutes is measured.
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in the action research Arm Test (ARAT)
The action research Arm Test (ARAT) is an observational measure to assess upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning), including 19 items. Task performance is rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (no movement) to 3 (movement performed normally).
Min: 0; Max: 57; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in rhe Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is designed to assess motor functioning in upper and lower limbs, in patients with post-stroke. Patients are assessed on 50 test items and on an ordinal 3-point scale.
Min: 0; Max: 100; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in the functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)
The functional Ambulation Classification (FAC): is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This 6-point scale assesses ambulation status by determining how much human support the patient needs when walking, whether or not they use a personal assistive device.
Min: 0; Max: 5; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
The 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) measures the time needed for a person to walk 10 meters. It is used to determine functional mobility and gait.
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in the Stroke Self-efficacy Questionnaire
The Stroke Self-efficacy Questionnaire Evaluate individuals' confidence in carrying out activities of daily living.
Min: 0; Max: 60; Higher = better
Measured: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2023
- Study start10 Jul 2023
- Primary completion9 Jul 2025
- Study completion9 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial (RCT)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AZ Herentals, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof Geert Verheyden, KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05970367
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S67164
- Acronym
- INTeRAcT
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Coremans M, Allewijn I, Bataillie F, De Bruyn L, Fobelets M, Jacobs F, Janssens S, Pattyn L, Putman K, Schiltz A, Tedesco Triccas L, Van Thienen F, Verheyden G. Impact of a Personalized, High-Dose, Intensive Motor Rehabilitation Program, Integrating Advanced Technology for Adults With Central Neurological Conditions (INTeRAcT): Protocol for a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial With a Clinical, Health Economic, and Process Evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026 May 4;15:e93234. doi: 10.2196/93234.
PubMed 42095779
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of an Intensive Motor Rehabilitation Programme Integrating Technology for Adults With Central Neurological Disease: A Randomised Controlled Rehabilitation Study in the Chronic Phase
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05970367
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTeRAcT / S67164
- Conditions
- Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries, Chronic Disease
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, intensive, technology
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AZ Herentals, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project will consist of 1 large clinical trial with 3 core concepts: (1) Clinical benefits of an intensive rehabilitation programme using advanced technology, compared to the control group; (2) A full health economic evaluation combined with model-based estimation of costs and benefits; (3) process evaluation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial (RCT)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intensive rehabilitation program | Experimental | Other: Intensive rehabilitation programme3 weeks of intensive rehabilitation --> follow-up 9 months standard care |
| Standard care | No intervention | –Follow-up 9 months standard care --> 3 weeks of intensive rehabilitation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures;
- A diagnosis of central neurological disease, made by a specialist. Conditions may include stroke or spinal cord injury:
- At least 3 months post discharge from hospital/rehabilitation centre, living at home;
- Having a maximum recovery of 85% of independence in daily functioning (FIM/SCIM);
- Had a normal functional state prior to the pathology: a pre-pathology Barthel Index > 85/100;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Having other neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that may affect the protocol, assessed by a specialist;
- No ability to initiate movements against gravity in the upper and lower limbs;
- Severe visual impairment, communication, cognitive and language formation problems that would prevent the intervention and measurement process, assessed by a specialist;
- Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might the compromise participant's safety or compliance with the CIP;
- Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intensive rehabilitation programmeIntensive rehabilitation using advanced technology, based on the patient's goals. Including cardiovascular fitness training, goal-oriented training, physiotherapy with and without advanced technology and self-management. | Other | Intensive rehabilitation program |
Primary outcome
Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), which measures independence in daily functioning after stroke. The FIM consists of 18 items designed to assess to what extent a person needs assistance in performing activities of daily living safely and efficiently. The activities consist of a number of basic skills related to self-care, pelvic floor function, transfers, gait, communication and social abilities. The FIM has acceptable reliability and has been found valid in people with stroke. Min: 13; Max: 91; Higher = better
Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), an assessment of achievements of daily function of patients with spinal cord lesions. The scale consists of 19 tasks organized in 3 subscales: self-care, respiration and sphincter management, and mobility. The SCIM is valid and reliable. Min: 0; Max: 100; Higher = better
11 secondary outcomes
Change in The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Change in EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - every month during follow-up - 9 months
Change in Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Change in The fatigue severity scale (FSS)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months
Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale
Time frame: During intervention (up to 9 months)
Change in the 6-minute Walk-Test (6MWT)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in the action research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in rhe Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in the functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Change in the Stroke Self-efficacy Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months (stroke only)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42095779Coremans M, Allewijn I, Bataillie F, De Bruyn L, Fobelets M, Jacobs F, Janssens S, Pattyn L, Putman K, Schiltz A, Tedesco Triccas L, Van Thienen F, Verheyden G. Impact of a Personalized, High-Dose, Intensive Motor Rehabilitation Program, Integrating Advanced Technology for Adults With Central Neurological Conditions (INTeRAcT): Protocol for a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial With a Clinical, Health Economic, and Process Evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026 May 4;15:e93234. doi: 10.2196/93234.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intensive rehabilitation programme in people with Stroke and Spinal Cord Injuries, run by KU Leuven at 2 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) (time frame: Baseline - 3weeks - 9months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05970367, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2026.