AzTrials
AzTrials

Post Operative Pain, AcuteNCT05971368

A Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block VS Serrartus Anterior Muscle Block in VATS as Regard Their Effectiveness in Post-operative Analgesia

A study testing thoracic paravertebal block and serratus anterior muscle block in people with Post Operative Pain, Acute, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A comparative study between ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block VS ultrasound guided serrartus anterior muscle block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries as regard their effectiveness in post-operative analgesia Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Post Operative Pain, Acute
What is being tested?
thoracic paravertebal block and serratus anterior muscle block
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
4 Jun 2022to 10 Feb 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I to II
  • Both sexes.
  • Aged ≥ 20 to ≤ 65years.
  • Scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia.

Who cannot join

  • Patient's refusal.
  • Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) III to IV
  • Patients with major spine deformities.
  • Disruption of the local anatomy, secondary, for instance, to the presence of chest drains or surgical emphysema, resulting in difficulty in ultrasound interpretation and distortion of tissue planes.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders and coagulopathy.
  • Infection at the injection site.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Patients with pre-existing myopathy or neuropathy.
  • Ipsilateral diaphragmatic paresis.
  • Tumors in the paravertebral space at the level of injection.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

aya gamal abdelhamid, MSC contact

(202) 01067206719

ayagamal.3614@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculty of medicine Ain shams university

    Cairo, Abbasia, 1181

    faculty of medicine faculty of medicine ain shams university, +202-24346344, it@med.asu.edu.eg

    Research Ethics Committee, (202)16857539, rec-fmasu@med.asu.edu.eg

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block VS Ultrasound Guided Serrartus Anterior Muscle Block in Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgeries.

A comparative study between ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block VS ultrasound guided serrartus anterior muscle block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries as regard their effectiveness in post-operative analgesia

Read the detailed description

The use of loco-regional analgesia is recommended to control postoperative pain after VATS as it allows opioid sparing and facilitates early postoperative rehabilitation. Different loco-regional analgesic techniques could be used to control pain after thoracic surgery such as a paravertebral block, an intercostal block and serratus plane block. In this study, Thoracic paravertebral nerve block will be compared to Serratus anterior nerve block, both will be done Ultrasound guided (USG) using bupivacaine (0.25%) for postoperative analgesia.

Being tested
thoracic paravertebal block, serratus anterior muscle block
Keywords
regional anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • thoracic paravertebal blockProcedure or surgery

    • Group A: Patients will receive ultrasound guided thoraxic paravertebral block with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.4 ml/kg (max. 40 ml and not exceeding toxic dose of bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg) after induction of anesthesia.

    A high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed between transverse processes from the T4 level (the level of port introduction) in the paramedian plane while patients is in the lateral decubitus position. The transverse processes, superior costotransverse ligaments, and pleura will be well visualized. The block needle (22 gauge) will be advanced until it crosses the superior costotransverse ligament. The prepared 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered at 0.4 mL/kg (max. 40 mL) in the thoracic paravertebral space. Depression of the pleura will be observed as a result of the spread of local anesthetic.

  • serratus anterior muscle blockProcedure or surgery

    Group B: Patients will receive ultrasound guided serratus anterior muscle block with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.4 ml/kg (max. 40 ml and not exceeding toxic dose of bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg) after induction of anesthesia.

    While the patient is in the supine position, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed horizontally on the mid-axillary line at the level of 4th or 5th ribs on the side of the block. The serratus anterior, latissimus dorsi, and intercostal muscles will be identified. The block needle (22-gauge) will be advanced below the serratus anterior muscle (SAM) towards the fifth rib (using in-plane technique). The prepared 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered at 0.4 mL/kg (max. 40 mL) between the SAM and the rib. It will be observed that the solution of local anesthesia will spread between the SAM and the rib.

Study groups in NCT05971368
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: Patients will receive ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral blockActive comparatorGroup A: Patients will receive ultrasound guided thoraxic paravertebral block with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.4 ml/kg (max. 40 ml and not exceeding toxic dose of bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg) after induction of anesthesia.
Receives: Procedure: thoracic paravertebal block
Group B: Patients will receive ultrasound guided serratus anterior muscle blockActive comparatorGroup B: Patients will receive ultrasound guided serratus anterior muscle block with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.4 ml/kg (max. 40 ml and not exceeding toxic dose of bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg) after induction of anesthesia.
Receives: Procedure: serratus anterior muscle block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. total amount of opioid consumption in the two groups according to change in VAS score

    Postoperative pain will be assessed at time of evaluation or at any time the patient is complaining of pain by using visual analog scale (VAS) and VAS more than 3 will be managed by injection of nalbuphine 0.05mg / kg intravenously as a first rescue analgesia to reduce VAS score ≤ 3 and another titrating dose (2-3 mg nalbuphine) will be considered if the patient is still complaining in order to reach VAS score ≤ 3 (with maximum dose of 10 mg nalbuphine at a time)

    Measured: the first 24 hours postoperatively

  2. visual analog scale (VAS)

    Postoperative pain will be assessed at time of evaluation or at any time the patient is complaining of pain by using visual analog scale (VAS) and VAS more than 4 will be managed by injection of nalbuphine 5mg intravenously as a first rescue analgesia to reduce VAS score ≤ 3

    Measured: the first 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The onset of 1st analgesic request

    Postoperative pain will be assessed by using visual analog scale (VAS) and VAS more than 4 will be managed by injection of nalbuphine 5mg intravenously as a first rescue analgesia to reduce VAS score ≤ 3. comparison will be done between the two groups in the onset of 1st analgesic request

    Measured: The first 24 hours postoperatively

  2. mean arterial blood pressure of the patients

    After surgery, Patients will be observed immediately post-operative at 0 (PACU), and 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours after surgery for post-operative pain in form of increasing mean arterial blood pressure as a sign of uncontrolled pain

    Measured: first 24 hours postoperatively

  3. onset of ambulation

    controlling pain postoperatively will help in early ambulation which is a major goal post operative to decrease complications

    Measured: first 24 hours postoperatively

  4. complication of nerve block

    as hematoma , infection , pneumothorax .

    Measured: first 24 hours postoperatively

  5. heart rate of the patients

    After surgery, Patients will be observed immediately post-operative at 0 (PACU), and 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours after surgery for post-operative pain in form of increasing heart rate above 90 (pulse per min )as a sign of uncontrolled pain

    Measured: first 24 hours postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Aug 2023
  2. Study start4 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion4 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion10 Feb 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05971368
Sponsor's protocol ID
paravertebral vs serratus
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
16 Jun 2023
Last updated
8 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing thoracic paravertebal block and serratus anterior muscle block in people with Post Operative Pain, Acute, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact aya gamal abdelhamid, MSC ((202) 01067206719, ayagamal.3614@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

total amount of opioid consumption in the two groups according to change in VAS score (time frame: the first 24 hours postoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in