AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT05973058

Psychometric Properties of Motor Recovery Assessment Scales for Stroke

An observational study of Stroke, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Stroke is a common global health-care problem that is serious and disabling. In high-income countries, stroke is the third most common cause of death and is the main cause of acquired adult disability. The most common and widely recognised impairment caused by stroke is motor impairment, in function. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 70 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
How many people
57 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
5 Mar 2023to 15 Dec 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Stroke

Who may be able to join

  • The criteria for the inclusion of the subject will be;
  • Age between 40-70 years
  • Gender both male and female
  • Ability to comprehend simple instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination with a score of > 24.
  • Patient with first time of stroke (within three months of onset)
  • Unilateral hemiplegic stroke patients referred by Neuro-physician (both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke) (12).

Who cannot join

  • The criteria for the exclusion of the subject will be;
  • Recurrent stroke
  • Pre morbid diagnosis of the other neurological diseases such as TBI or Dementia
  • Neurosurgical operation prior to the current status
  • No informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Riphah Rehabilitation center

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Analysis and Comparison of Psychometric Properties of Fugl-Meyer Assessmet (FMA-M), Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) and Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) in Motor Recovery Post Stroke

Stroke is a common global health-care problem that is serious and disabling. In high-income countries, stroke is the third most common cause of death and is the main cause of acquired adult disability. The most common and widely recognised impairment caused by stroke is motor impairment, in function. Measuring motor recovery can assist the clinician in diagnosis, selection of the most appropriate therapy, and outcome measurement. To date, different functional scales measuring motor recovery have been developed and used in stroke. However, only a few are specifically designed for stroke patients. The Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) and The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement(STREAM) and Rivermead Motor Assessment(RMA) are the most commonly used for measuring motor recovery in stroke patients. To be clinically useful, a scale must be scientifically sound in terms of 3 basic psychometric properties: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. The objective of this study will be to compare the three clinical motor recovery measures, The Fugl-Meyer assessment motor domain (FMA-M) and mobility subscale of The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) and Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA), in stroke patients with a broad range of neurological and functional impairment from the acute stage up to 120 days after onset. stroke patients will be followed up prospectively with the 3 measures 30,60,90, and 120 days after stroke onset (DAS). Reliability (interrater reliability and internal consistency) and validity (concurrent validity, convergent validity, and predictive validity) of each measure will be examined. A comparison of the responsiveness of each of the 3 measures will be made on the basis of the entire group of patients. the degrees of responsiveness of the 3 balance measures will be calculated on the basis of the changes occurring between 30 to 60, 60 to90, and 90 to 120, and 30 to 120 DAS. Collected data will be analyzed by using spss 21.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a common global health-care problem that is serious and disabling. In high-income countries, stroke is the third most common cause of death and is the main cause of acquired adult disability.Stroke rehabilitation is a combined and coordinated use of medical, social, educational, and vocational measures to retrain a person who has suffered a stroke to his/her maximal physical, psychological, social, and vocational potential, consistent with physiologic and environmental limitations . In a classic report, Twitchell described in detail the pattern of motor recovery following stroke. At onset, the upper extremity (UE) is more involved than the lower extremity (LE), and eventual motor recovery in the UE is less than in the LE. The severity of UE weakness at onset and the timing of the return of movement in the hand are important predictors of eventual motor recovery in the UE. A systematic review of 58 studies confirms the most important predictive factor for upper limb recovery following stroke is the initial severity of motor impairment or function . The prognosis for return of useful hand function is unfavorable when UE paralysis is complete at onset or grasp strength is not measurable by 4 weeks. However, as many as 9% of patients with severe UE weakness at onset may gain good recovery of hand function. As many as 70% of patients showing some motor recovery in the hand by 4 weeks make a full or good recovery.Full recovery, when it occurs, usually is complete within 3 months of onset . Although most recovery from stroke takes place in the first 3 months, and only minor additional measurable improvement occurs after the 6 months following onset, recovery may continue over a longer period of time in some patients who have significant partial return of voluntary movement (8). A variety of laboratory approaches to assess motor recovery have been proposed, but the functional scales of balance measures are most commonly applied to stroke patients in clinical settings. To date, different functional scales measuring motor recovery have been developed and used in stroke research However, only a few are specifically designed for stroke patients. The Fugl-Meyer test (FMA) and the stroke Rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) and the Rivermead movement assessment (RMA) are the most commonly used for measuring motor recovery in stroke patients. As a consequence, researchers and clinicians have found that they are faced with a greater range of choices but limited information on which to base their selection. No reported studies have concurrently compared the psychometric properties of the 3 measures, the FMA,

Conditions
Stroke
Keywords
Stroke, Motor recovery, Psychometric properties
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-M) scale

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. It is applied clinically and in research to determine disease severity, describe motor recovery, and to plan and assess treatment.The FMA-M consists of upper and lower extremity. The motor component for upper extremity consists of total A-D with total scale 66.The motor component for lower extremity consists of total E-F with total scale of 34.

    Measured: change from Baseline motor recovery at 30 days after stroke (DAS),change from 30 DAS to 60 DAS, change from 60 to 90 DAS, and change from 90 to 120 DAS.

  2. Rivermead motor assessment (RMA) scale

    The Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) assesses the motor performance of patients with stroke and was developed for both clinical and research use. The RMA consists of test items in three sections that are ordered hierarchically, that is, the first items are easier and become increasingly more difficult toward the end of the evaluation.The three sections test:

    1. Gross function (13 items) e.g., walking with and without out an aid, negotiating stairs with and without the rail, walking, turning and retrieving an object, and running. ii) Leg and trunk movements (10 items) e.g., standing on one leg and flexing the knee in a weight bearing position. iii) Arm movements (15 items) e.g., control items such as pronating/supinating the forearm and bouncing a ball, and functional items such as cutting putty, grasping and releasing objects, and tying a bow.

    In total there will be 38 items. For each item, the score will be either '0' or '1'.

    Measured: change from Baseline motor recovery at 30 days after stroke (DAS),change from 30 DAS to 60 DAS, change from 60 to 90 DAS, and change from 90 to 120 DAS.

  3. Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM)

    The final version of the STREAM measure consists of 30 items or test movements that are equally distributed among 3 subscales: upper-limb movements, lower-limb movements, and basic mobility items. The STREAM scoring form, including the criteria for scoring the items, is presented in the Appendix. Limb movements are scored on a 3-point scale. Mobility items are scored on a 4-point scale similar to that used for scoring limb movements except that a category has been added to allow for independence with the help of a mobility aid. Thus, the maximum raw total STREAM score is 70, with each of the limb subscales scored out of 20 points and the mobility subscale scored out of 30 points.

    Measured: change from Baseline motor recovery at 30 days after stroke (DAS),change from 30 DAS to 60 DAS, change from 60 to 90 DAS, and change from 90 to 120 DAS.

  4. Barthel Scale/Index (BI)

    The Barthel Scale/Index (BI) is an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL). Ten variables describing ADL and mobility are scored, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge. Time taken and physical assistance required to perform each item are used in determining the assigned value of each item. Barthel Index measures the degree of assistance required by an individual on 10 items of mobility and self care ADL. The total maximum score will be 20 scale as the items have scales ranging from 0-1 to 0-3.

    Measured: first reading at 30, than second reading at 60, third reading 90, and lastly at120th day after stroke(For convergent validity)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Aug 2023
  2. Study start5 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion15 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
57 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05973058
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/lhr/0205 Uzra Batool
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
31 Mar 2023
Last updated
27 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stroke, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-M) scale (time frame: change from Baseline motor recovery at 30 days after stroke (DAS),change from 30 DAS to 60 DAS, change from 60 to 90 DAS, and change from 90 to 120 DAS.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in