HIV InfectionsSCOPENCT05977881
Substance Checking Outreach and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Engagement Study
A study testing CHECKIT! in people with HIV Infections, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Through the proposed Substance Checking Outreach and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Engagement (SCOPE) study, the investigators will design and evaluate an overdose prevention and HIV prevention study among people who use drugs (PWUD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- CHECKIT!
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 493 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Jul 2023to 1 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years or older,
- self-reports having used illicit stimulants or opioids at least once in the past 3 months,
- self-reports being HIV negative
- reports injection drug use in the past 6 months OR reports at least one of the following indicators of sexual HIV risk exposure in the past 6 months:
- Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) diagnosis in the past 6 months
- "Condom-less" vaginal or anal sex in the past 6 months
Show all 9Show fewer
- Willing to provide a urine sample for urine drug screening of substances
- Willing to undergo rapid HIV testing
- Willing to undergo STI testing
Who cannot join
- Determined to be too high or drunk or cognitively impaired, less than 18 years of age
- unwilling to provide all required biological specimens (Phase 3 only)
- unwilling/unable to give consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Johns Hopkins School of Public Health
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
About this study
Official title: Impact of a Novel HIV Peer Navigation and Overdose Prevention Intervention on Engagement in the HIV Prevention and Treatment Cascade
Through the proposed Substance Checking Outreach and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Engagement (SCOPE) study, the investigators will design and evaluate an overdose prevention and HIV prevention study among people who use drugs (PWUD). Specifically, SCOPE will provide access to drug-checking services for PWUD to better understand the contents of the drug supply, in combination with PrEP for those who are HIV-, to both reduce overdose and HIV among PWUD in Baltimore City.
Read the detailed description
specific study aims are:
- To prepare the drug-checking technology for deployment in the community through a three-phase process.
- To calibrate drug-checking technology through testing samples of illicit substances on the Bruker Alpha obtained from the Baltimore Police crime lab (N=335) and those obtained through the SPARC outreach sessions (N=100).
- To validate the drug-checking technology, measuring sensitivity and specificity in detecting illicit substances of public health relevance, by testing samples obtained through partnerships through Baltimore-based harm reduction organizations and comparing findings to the gold standard (laboratory testing).
- To pilot the study Bruker Alpha Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) drug checking machine among People who use drugs (PWUD) (N=20).
- To develop a community-level, mobile, integrated drug checking and PrEP intervention aimed to increase PWUD engagement in the PrEP care continuum and reduce the burden of overdose.
- To recruit a longitudinal cohort of people who use drugs (N=500) and follow-up at 6-month intervals for 18 months.
- To implement the intervention and evaluate its impact on engagement in PrEP care (primary outcome) and overdose prevention among PWUD.
- To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of the intervention in terms of HIV cases averted among PWUD.
- To assess changes in drug-related wounds among N=100 PWUD in Baltimore who receive wound care services on the intervention van.
- To assess changes in drug-related wounds specifically attributed to xylazine.
The initial non-human subjects research plan focused on Aim's 1 drug checking machine calibration among samples procured from the Baltimore Police Forensics Lab tested in Dr. William Clarke's lab and from individuals interacting with SPARC staff during the outreach which occurs 3-4 times per week. These activities are referred to as "Phase 1" throughout this research plan. Based on emerging best practices and in consultation with other drug checking initiatives nationwide, the investigators have now expanded Aim 1 of the study to include three steps needed to prepare the machine for deployment in the field: The first (1a) was calibration of the machine to the local drug supply, as described above; the second (1b) which the investigators are adding in this amendment is an additional validation of the machine's functionality and comparison with gold standard technology; and the third (1c) is piloting the machine with 20 PWUD prior to rolling it out citywide.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- CHECKIT!
- Keywords
- Drug Use, Overdose, PrEP, Harm Reduction
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, Drug Overdose, Harm Reduction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CHECKIT!Other
Participants will not be assigned to the intervention as it will be available to everyone.
Check it will be a van-based HIV- and overdose-prevention program offered in the four areas of Baltimore city from which study participants are recruited. Intervention services will include point-of-care drug checking and PrEP assessment, prescription, and management, and they will be available to everyone, regardless of whether they are part of the SCOPE study cohort or not.
Individual-level service usage data collected by intervention staff will not be considered in analysis of outcomes. However, study participants will self-report Check it utilization on the internally-developed surveys at 6, 12, and 18 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SCOPE Cohort | Other | A cohort of PWUD (N=500) living in Baltimore. We will follow-up with participants every 6 months (for 18 months) in five recruitment zones throughout Baltimore (n=125/zone). The four recruitment zones will overlap the intervention sites. There will be four study visits (baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months) total for participants. Receives: Other: CHECKIT! |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Current PrEP status as assessed by study team instrument items
Investigators will measure current PrEP status by assessing participant self-report using an internally developed questionnaire. Change in current PrEP status will be measured using three survey items asking participants 1) if they are currently prescribed either form of PrEP (pill form or injection), 2) currently taking/not taking the prescription, and 3) which type/brand of PrEP are they currently taking. The response range options for current prescription and currently taking PrEP are binary (yes/no) and nominal (choices) for type of PrEP prescribed. Participants will indicate whether they are currently prescribed PrEP, currently taking PrEP and which type prescribed/taking at each study visit.
Measured: Measured at Baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months
Change in PrEP uptake as assessed by study team instrument items
Change in PrEP status (uptake) at follow-up is measured using three items with response range options for current prescription and currently taking PrEP are binary (yes/no) and nominal (choices) for type of PrEP prescribed. If participants self-report current PrEP use at follow-up, investigators will confirm the biological presence of PrEP using dried blood spot (DBS) sampling. Samples will be transported to the Clinical Pharmacology Analytical Laboratory (CPAL) where they will be processed using FDA-validated assays analyzing drug and metabolite concentrations. Sample results will be used to compare participant self-report on the study team survey instrument (e.g., what is the concordance/discordance between PrEP presence in DBS samples and yes/no responses to the currently taking PrEP survey item).
Measured: Measured at 6, 12, 18 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in HIV Risk Behaviors as assessed by study team instrument items
Investigators will measure change in HIV risk behaviors using self-report with an internally developed questionnaire; there are several items in the instrument to capture 1) episodes of syringe sharing in the prior 30 days and 2) episodes of unprotected vaginal or anal intercourse. Response options for HIV risk behaviors are continuous (counts # of times of episodes) and response options for HIV prevention techniques used are nominal; e.g., 'used a condom with my main sexual partner', or 'take HIV PrEP', or, 'did you use syringes after someone else?'.
Measured: Measured at Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2023
- Study start28 Jul 2023
- Primary completion1 May 2026
- Study completion1 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (48)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The study interventional model is at the community level; the intervention will be offered in all areas in which the cohort will be recruited.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 493 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore City Health Department, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Susan Sherman, PhD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05977881
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00017498
- Other IDs
- 5R01DA053184
- Acronym
- SCOPE
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 14 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Project de-identified IPD will made available for published analyses upon request. The investigators will also include the study protocol (IPD supporting information).
Publications
Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Nov;(328):1-8.
PubMed 30500322Hedegaard H, Minino AM, Warner M. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Nov;(329):1-8.
PubMed 30500323Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Infection Risk, Prevention, and Testing Behaviors among Persons Who Inject Drugs-National HIV Behavioral Surveillance: Injection Drug Use, 23 U.S. Cities, 2018. HIV Surveillance Special Report. 2020;24.
Des Jarlais DC, Nugent A, Solberg A, Feelemyer J, Mermin J, Holtzman D. Syringe Service Programs for Persons Who Inject Drugs in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Areas - United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Dec 11;64(48):1337-41. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6448a3.
PubMed 26655918Beyrer C, Malinowska-Sempruch K, Kamarulzaman A, Kazatchkine M, Sidibe M, Strathdee SA. Time to act: a call for comprehensive responses to HIV in people who use drugs. Lancet. 2010 Aug 14;376(9740):551-63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60928-2.
PubMed 20650515Aspinall EJ, Nambiar D, Goldberg DJ, Hickman M, Weir A, Van Velzen E, Palmateer N, Doyle JS, Hellard ME, Hutchinson SJ. Are needle and syringe programmes associated with a reduction in HIV transmission among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;43(1):235-48. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt243. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
PubMed 24374889Glick SN, Prohaska SM, LaKosky PA, Juarez AM, Corcorran MA, Des Jarlais DC. The Impact of COVID-19 on Syringe Services Programs in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep;24(9):2466-2468. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02886-2. No abstract available.
PubMed 32333209Alpren C, Dawson EL, John B, Cranston K, Panneer N, Fukuda HD, Roosevelt K, Klevens RM, Bryant J, Peters PJ, Lyss SB, Switzer WM, Burrage A, Murray A, Agnew-Brune C, Stiles T, McClung P, Campbell EM, Breen C, Randall LM, Dasgupta S, Onofrey S, Bixler D, Hampton K, Jaeger JL, Hsu KK, Adih W, Callis B, Goldman LR, Danner SP, Jia H, Tumpney M, Board A, Brown C, DeMaria A Jr, Buchacz K. Opioid Use Fueling HIV Transmission in an Urban Setting: An Outbreak of HIV Infection Among People Who Inject Drugs-Massachusetts, 2015-2018. Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(1):37-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305366. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
PubMed 31725317Atkins A, McClung RP, Kilkenny M, Bernstein K, Willenburg K, Edwards A, Lyss S, Thomasson E, Panneer N, Kirk N, Watson M, Adkins E, DiNenno E, Hogan V, Neblett Fanfair R, Napier K, Ridpath AD, Perdue M, Chen M, Surtees T, Handanagic S, Wood H, Kennebrew D, Cohn C, Sami S, Eubank S, Furukawa NW, Rose B, Thompson A, Spadafora L, Wright C, Balleydier S, Broussard D, Reynolds P, Carnes N, Haynes N, Sapiano T, McBee S, Campbell E, Batdorf S, Scott M, Boltz M, Wills D, Oster AM. Notes from the Field: Outbreak of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Among Persons Who Inject Drugs - Cabell County, West Virginia, 2018-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 24;69(16):499-500. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6916a2. No abstract available.
PubMed 32324723Strathdee SA, Beyrer C. HIV Outbreak in Indiana. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1380-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1510396. No abstract available.
PubMed 26422741Geddes L, Iversen J, Memedovic S, Maher L. Intravenous fentanyl use among people who inject drugs in Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S314-S322. doi: 10.1111/dar.12668. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
PubMed 29405465Lambdin BH, Bluthenthal RN, Zibbell JE, Wenger L, Simpson K, Kral AH. Associations between perceived illicit fentanyl use and infectious disease risks among people who inject drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
PubMed 31733979Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2014: a clinical practice guideline. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014:67.
Shrestha R, Copenhaver M. Exploring the Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention Among High-Risk People Who Use Drugs in Treatment. Front Public Health. 2018 Jul 13;6:195. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00195. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30062091Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Infection Risk, Prevention, and Testing Behaviors among Persons Who Inject Drugs-National HIV Behavioral Surveillance: Injection Drug Use, 23 U.S. Cities, 2018. 2020;24:43.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of a Novel HIV Peer Navigation and Overdose Prevention Intervention on Engagement in the HIV Prevention and Treatment Cascade
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05977881
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCOPE / IRB00017498
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- Drug Use, Overdose, PrEP, Harm Reduction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 493 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore City Health Department, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- 28 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Through the proposed Substance Checking Outreach and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Engagement (SCOPE) study, the investigators will design and evaluate an overdose prevention and HIV prevention study among people who use drugs (PWUD). Specifically, SCOPE will provide access to drug-checking services for PWUD to better understand the contents of the drug supply, in combination with PrEP for those who are HIV-, to both reduce overdose and HIV among PWUD in Baltimore City.
Detailed description
specific study aims are:
- To prepare the drug-checking technology for deployment in the community through a three-phase process.
- To calibrate drug-checking technology through testing samples of illicit substances on the Bruker Alpha obtained from the Baltimore Police crime lab (N=335) and those obtained through the SPARC outreach sessions (N=100).
- To validate the drug-checking technology, measuring sensitivity and specificity in detecting illicit substances of public health relevance, by testing samples obtained through partnerships through Baltimore-based harm reduction organizations and comparing findings to the gold standard (laboratory testing).
- To pilot the study Bruker Alpha Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) drug checking machine among People who use drugs (PWUD) (N=20).
- To develop a community-level, mobile, integrated drug checking and PrEP intervention aimed to increase PWUD engagement in the PrEP care continuum and reduce the burden of overdose.
- To recruit a longitudinal cohort of people who use drugs (N=500) and follow-up at 6-month intervals for 18 months.
- To implement the intervention and evaluate its impact on engagement in PrEP care (primary outcome) and overdose prevention among PWUD.
- To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of the intervention in terms of HIV cases averted among PWUD.
- To assess changes in drug-related wounds among N=100 PWUD in Baltimore who receive wound care services on the intervention van.
- To assess changes in drug-related wounds specifically attributed to xylazine.
The initial non-human subjects research plan focused on Aim's 1 drug checking machine calibration among samples procured from the Baltimore Police Forensics Lab tested in Dr. William Clarke's lab and from individuals interacting with SPARC staff during the outreach which occurs 3-4 times per week. These activities are referred to as "Phase 1" throughout this research plan. Based on emerging best practices and in consultation with other drug checking initiatives nationwide, the investigators have now expanded Aim 1 of the study to include three steps needed to prepare the machine for deployment in the field: The first (1a) was calibration of the machine to the local drug supply, as described above; the second (1b) which the investigators are adding in this amendment is an additional validation of the machine's functionality and comparison with gold standard technology; and the third (1c) is piloting the machine with 20 PWUD prior to rolling it out citywide.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The study interventional model is at the community level; the intervention will be offered in all areas in which the cohort will be recruited.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SCOPE Cohort | Other | Other: CHECKIT!A cohort of PWUD (N=500) living in Baltimore. We will follow-up with participants every 6 months (for 18 months) in five recruitment zones throughout Baltimore (n=125/zone). The four recruitment zones will overlap the intervention sites. There will be four study visits (baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months) total for participants. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- 18 years or older,
- self-reports having used illicit stimulants or opioids at least once in the past 3 months,
- self-reports being HIV negative
- reports injection drug use in the past 6 months OR reports at least one of the following indicators of sexual HIV risk exposure in the past 6 months:
- Willing to provide a urine sample for urine drug screening of substances
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Determined to be too high or drunk or cognitively impaired, less than 18 years of age
- unwilling to provide all required biological specimens (Phase 3 only)
- unwilling/unable to give consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CHECKIT!Participants will not be assigned to the intervention as it will be available to everyone. Check it will be a van-based HIV- and overdose-prevention program offered in the four areas of Baltimore city from which study participants are recruited. Intervention services will include point-of-care drug checking and PrEP assessment, prescription, and management, and they will be available to everyone, regardless of whether they are part of the SCOPE study cohort or not. Individual-level service usage data collected by intervention staff will not be considered in analysis of outcomes. However, study participants will self-report Check it utilization on the internally-developed surveys at 6, 12, and 18 months. | Other | SCOPE Cohort |
Primary outcome
Current PrEP status as assessed by study team instrument items
Time frame: Measured at Baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months
Investigators will measure current PrEP status by assessing participant self-report using an internally developed questionnaire. Change in current PrEP status will be measured using three survey items asking participants 1) if they are currently prescribed either form of PrEP (pill form or injection), 2) currently taking/not taking the prescription, and 3) which type/brand of PrEP are they currently taking. The response range options for current prescription and currently taking PrEP are binary (yes/no) and nominal (choices) for type of PrEP prescribed. Participants will indicate whether they are currently prescribed PrEP, currently taking PrEP and which type prescribed/taking at each study visit.
Change in PrEP uptake as assessed by study team instrument items
Time frame: Measured at 6, 12, 18 months
Change in PrEP status (uptake) at follow-up is measured using three items with response range options for current prescription and currently taking PrEP are binary (yes/no) and nominal (choices) for type of PrEP prescribed. If participants self-report current PrEP use at follow-up, investigators will confirm the biological presence of PrEP using dried blood spot (DBS) sampling. Samples will be transported to the Clinical Pharmacology Analytical Laboratory (CPAL) where they will be processed using FDA-validated assays analyzing drug and metabolite concentrations. Sample results will be used to compare participant self-report on the study team survey instrument (e.g., what is the concordance/discordance between PrEP presence in DBS samples and yes/no responses to the currently taking PrEP survey item).
1 secondary outcome
Change in HIV Risk Behaviors as assessed by study team instrument items
Time frame: Measured at Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30500322Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Nov;(328):1-8.
- Background: PubMed 30500323Hedegaard H, Minino AM, Warner M. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Nov;(329):1-8.
- BackgroundCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Infection Risk, Prevention, and Testing Behaviors among Persons Who Inject Drugs-National HIV Behavioral Surveillance: Injection Drug Use, 23 U.S. Cities, 2018. HIV Surveillance Special Report. 2020;24.
- Background: PubMed 26655918Des Jarlais DC, Nugent A, Solberg A, Feelemyer J, Mermin J, Holtzman D. Syringe Service Programs for Persons Who Inject Drugs in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Areas - United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Dec 11;64(48):1337-41. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6448a3.
- Background: PubMed 20650515Beyrer C, Malinowska-Sempruch K, Kamarulzaman A, Kazatchkine M, Sidibe M, Strathdee SA. Time to act: a call for comprehensive responses to HIV in people who use drugs. Lancet. 2010 Aug 14;376(9740):551-63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60928-2.
- Background: PubMed 24374889Aspinall EJ, Nambiar D, Goldberg DJ, Hickman M, Weir A, Van Velzen E, Palmateer N, Doyle JS, Hellard ME, Hutchinson SJ. Are needle and syringe programmes associated with a reduction in HIV transmission among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;43(1):235-48. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt243. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
- Background: PubMed 32333209Glick SN, Prohaska SM, LaKosky PA, Juarez AM, Corcorran MA, Des Jarlais DC. The Impact of COVID-19 on Syringe Services Programs in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep;24(9):2466-2468. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02886-2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 31725317Alpren C, Dawson EL, John B, Cranston K, Panneer N, Fukuda HD, Roosevelt K, Klevens RM, Bryant J, Peters PJ, Lyss SB, Switzer WM, Burrage A, Murray A, Agnew-Brune C, Stiles T, McClung P, Campbell EM, Breen C, Randall LM, Dasgupta S, Onofrey S, Bixler D, Hampton K, Jaeger JL, Hsu KK, Adih W, Callis B, Goldman LR, Danner SP, Jia H, Tumpney M, Board A, Brown C, DeMaria A Jr, Buchacz K. Opioid Use Fueling HIV Transmission in an Urban Setting: An Outbreak of HIV Infection Among People Who Inject Drugs-Massachusetts, 2015-2018. Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(1):37-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305366. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
- Background: PubMed 32324723Atkins A, McClung RP, Kilkenny M, Bernstein K, Willenburg K, Edwards A, Lyss S, Thomasson E, Panneer N, Kirk N, Watson M, Adkins E, DiNenno E, Hogan V, Neblett Fanfair R, Napier K, Ridpath AD, Perdue M, Chen M, Surtees T, Handanagic S, Wood H, Kennebrew D, Cohn C, Sami S, Eubank S, Furukawa NW, Rose B, Thompson A, Spadafora L, Wright C, Balleydier S, Broussard D, Reynolds P, Carnes N, Haynes N, Sapiano T, McBee S, Campbell E, Batdorf S, Scott M, Boltz M, Wills D, Oster AM. Notes from the Field: Outbreak of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Among Persons Who Inject Drugs - Cabell County, West Virginia, 2018-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 24;69(16):499-500. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6916a2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26422741Strathdee SA, Beyrer C. HIV Outbreak in Indiana. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1380-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1510396. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 29405465Geddes L, Iversen J, Memedovic S, Maher L. Intravenous fentanyl use among people who inject drugs in Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S314-S322. doi: 10.1111/dar.12668. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
- Background: PubMed 31733979Lambdin BH, Bluthenthal RN, Zibbell JE, Wenger L, Simpson K, Kral AH. Associations between perceived illicit fentanyl use and infectious disease risks among people who inject drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
- National Institutes of Health. Substance Use Disorders Linked to Covid-19 SusceptibilityLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Project de-identified IPD will made available for published analyses upon request. The investigators will also include the study protocol (IPD supporting information).
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Healthy Families PrEP Program for Women at Risk for HIV
HIV, Pregnancy
RecruitingObservational study
Leukapheresis Procedures to Obtain Plasma and Lymphocytes for Research Studies on Antiretroviral Naive HIV-1 Research Participants
HIV
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Health and Empowerment Through Contingency Management and Affect Regulation
HIV Risk
RecruitingPhase 1
HEME-25 Open-Label Feasibility Study of Elranatamab Utilized as Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed Plasmablastic Lymphoma With or Without HIV
Plasmablastic Lymphoma, HIV
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susan Sherman, PhD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CHECKIT! in people with HIV Infections, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Current PrEP status as assessed by study team instrument items (time frame: Measured at Baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05977881, which also lists 48 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.