AzTrials
AzTrials

NIRS and AnesthesiologyNCT05978310

NIRS and Anesthesiology

An observational study of NIRS and Anesthesiology, run by Trakya University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Our aim in this study is to investigate the effects of the positions applied in Intracranial Surgery on Cerebral Oxygenation(with NIRS device) and to evaluate the superiority of the patient positions used to each other. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
NIRS and Anesthesiology
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Oct 2022to 1 Feb 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 150 patients in the ASA I-II-III risk group between the ages of 25-75 who will undergo intracranial surgery at Trakya University Medical Faculty Hospital will be included in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who will undergo intracranial surgery
  • Patients aged 25-75 years
  • Patients in the ASA I-II-III risk group

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a GCS below 15
  • patients with heart failure, renal failure, liver failure
  • patients with congenital neurological deficits
  • patients who cannot be contacted

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Trakya university

    Edirne

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Patient Position on Cerebral Regional Oxygen Saturation in Intracranial Surgeries

Our aim in this study is to investigate the effects of the positions applied in Intracranial Surgery on Cerebral Oxygenation(with NIRS device) and to evaluate the superiority of the patient positions used to each other.

Read the detailed description

One of the main goals during anesthesia practice is to provide adequate tissue oxygenation. For this purpose, many parameters such as ECG, blood pressure, blood gas, and urine monitoring are monitored. However, it is a serious deficiency that the brain, which is the most sensitive organ to ischemia, is not monitored in intracranial surgeries . Trying to keep the intraoperative blood gas parameters and cerebral blood flow at normal values in order to overcome this deficiency brings along serious problems in proportion to the frequency of the measurement interval. For this reason, evaluation of tissue oxygenation with the Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) method has come to the fore in recent years, and especially cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSo2) follow-ups have begun to be performed more frequently. The values obtained by this method represent 75% venous, 20% arterial and 5% capillary compartment of the measurement area .

While deciding on the positions applied in intracranial surgery, it may be necessary to apply modifications by keeping the surgical application site in the foreground. The preferred patient position in the operation can help prevent complications and serious side effects. Although each position applied in intracranial operations has advantages and disadvantages, the surgeon should choose the most suitable position for the patient and pathology. The "park bench" position is widely used in posterior fossa operations and has replaced the sitting position for most neurosurgical procedures . However, since the advantages of the sitting position could not be obtained, this position was also changed and the modified Park bench position with 30 degrees upside tilt was used. This position can provide similar advantages with the sitting position and also reduces the risk of venous air embolism and hypotension . The modified sitting position for posterior fossa surgery versus the semi-sitting or "beach chair" position retains many of the advantages and provides a rapid trendelenburg in case of air embolism. The classical sitting position causes postural hypotension in approximately 1/3 of the patients and severe hypotension is seen in 2-5% of the patients. Excellent surgical intervention, drier area and less blood loss, reduced facial swelling are the advantages of the sitting position. However, the risk of venous air embolism and increased pneumocephalus should not be ignored.

In addition to the hemodynamic changes due to all these known positions, there is no follow-up of cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSo2) monitoring depending on the position, which we could not detect in the literature. This monitoring can contribute to the optimal continuation of cerebral blood flow while deciding on the appropriate position of the patients. In this case, the postoperative mortality and morbidity of the patients can be reduced. In addition, intraoperative cerebral oxygenation monitoring is critical for predicting delirium in the postoperative period.

Our aim in this study is to investigate the effects of the positions applied in Intracranial Surgery on Cerebral Oxygenation and to evaluate the superiority of the patient positions used to each other.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05978310
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group PPatients operated in the prone position
Group SPatients operated in the supine position
Group LPatients operated in the lateral position

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. NIRS values

    Measured: October 1, 2022 /February 1, 2025

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2023
  2. Study start1 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05978310
Sponsor's protocol ID
Trakya U/Anesthesiology
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
28 Jul 2023
Last updated
7 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of NIRS and Anesthesiology, run by Trakya University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

NIRS values (time frame: October 1, 2022 /February 1, 2025). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in