AzTrials
AzTrials

PneumoniaNCT05979350

Metagenomic NGS for Diagnosis of Pneumonia

A study testing Metagenomic next-generation sequencing and Standard work-up for pneumonia in people with Pneumonia and Diagnosis, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this randomized controlled trial, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of incorporating mNGS in the management of pneumonia on efficiency and accuracy of causative pathogen identification, proportion of participants with effective antimicrobial therapy, length of hospitalization, and mortality. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pneumonia, Diagnosis
What is being tested?
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing and Standard work-up for pneumonia
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
114 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
7 Aug 2023to 30 Nov 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Presenting to the ICU with a diagnosis of pneumonia (fulfilled with both radiographic and clinical criteria)
  • Adults aged ≥18 years
  • Orotracheally intubated
  • ICU admission for <24 hours
  • APACHE II score <35 on ICU admission

Who cannot join

  • Life expectancy below 4 weeks
  • With an existing directive to withhold life-sustaining treatment
  • Patients not willing or able to provide a lower respiratory tract sample at ICU admission
  • Previous work-up has identified specific pathogens which can account for the index event of pneumonia
  • Multiplex PCR or NGS testing has been done for pathogen detection before screening

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Impact of Incorporating Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing in the Management of Pneumonia on Diagnostic Efficiency and Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

In this randomized controlled trial, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of incorporating mNGS in the management of pneumonia on efficiency and accuracy of causative pathogen identification, proportion of participants with effective antimicrobial therapy, length of hospitalization, and mortality.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, phase 2 study that will evaluate the efficacy of incorporating mNGS in the management of severe pneumonia on accuracy and efficiency of achieving definite diagnosis of identifying causative pathogens of pneumonia, appropriate antimicrobial therapy and patient outcomes. The diagnosis of pneumonia requires radiological evidence of pneumonia and at least two of the following clinical criteria: new, or worsening cough, new or worsening expectoration of sputum, new or worsening dyspnea, hemoptysis, pleuritic chest pain, and fever (≥38.0°C). Severe pneumonia is defined as pneumonia with hypoxemia requiring orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation support.

Written informed consent is needed from the eligible subjects or from their legal guardian at the time of recruitment. After completing informed consent, subjects will be randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio via a web-based randomization system to receive standard of care (SOC) using culture and serology based work-up for pathogen detection or SOC with additional mNGS method using APGseq ® (Asia Pathogenomics, New Taipei City, Taiwan) for pathogen detection. The treatment for pneumonia is suggested following the Taiwan Guidelines for the Management of Pneumonia published in 2018. After randomization, the subjects will be followed until death, discharged from the hospital or 28 days after randomization whichever comes first. The total study duration is expected to be two years from the first subject enrolled to the final analysis.

Conditions
Pneumonia, Diagnosis
Being tested
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing, Standard work-up for pneumonia
Keywords
diagnosis, next-generation sequencing, outcome, pneumonia
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Metagenomic next-generation sequencingDiagnostic test

    Metagenomic NGS testing for pathogen identification will be done for airway and blood specimens using APGseq ® (Asia Pathogenomics, New Taipei City, Taiwan). The sample preparation for mNGS testing was as follows: 5-10 mL of whole blood were centrifuged at 1,600g for 10 min at 4°C to separate the plasma. Plasma samples were transferred to 2 mL sterile tubes for the following DNA or RNA extraction. In general, 300ul of plasma sample was used for DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA from samples were extracted using the column-based method (e.g. QIAamp DNA Microbiome Kit, Qiagen for DNA extraction; or QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit, Qiagen for RNA extraction, respectively), following the manufacturer's operational manual. The RNA was reverse transcribed and synthesized to double-stranded complementary DNA (ds cDNA) with SuperScript II Reverse Transcription Kit (Invitrogen).

  • Standard work-up for pneumoniaDiagnostic test

    Endotracheal aspirates, blood samples, urine samples, and nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from the patients as soon as possible after ICU admission. Bacterial culture was performed, with the use of standard techniques, on blood samples and endotracheal aspirates. Urine antigen detection was performed for detection of L. pneumophila and S. pneumoniae. A PCR assay was performed on nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of influenza A and B viruses and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Fungal or mycobacterial detections, and whether to use multiplex PCR for pathogen detection, such as the FilmArray system, were determined at the discretion of the physicians.

Study groups in NCT05979350
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard care groupActive comparatorEndotracheal aspirates, blood samples, urine samples, and nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from the patients as soon as possible after ICU admission. Bacterial culture was performed, with the use of standard techniques, on blood samples and endotracheal aspirates. Urine antigen detection was performed for detection of L. pneumophila and S. pneumoniae. A PCR assay was performed on nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of influenza A and B viruses and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Fungal or mycobacterial detections, and whether to use multiplex PCR for pathogen detection, such as the FilmArray system, were determined at the discretion of the physicians.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Standard work-up for pneumonia
mNGS groupExperimentalSubjects assigned to the mNGS group will receive etiology work-up followed the protocol used in the standard care group and additional mNGS testing for two specimen of mini-bronchoalveolar lavage and one specimen of blood samples retrieved at the same time of standard work-up.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to achieving definite diagnosis in modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis.

    Cumulative probability of achieving definite diagnosis in terms of accurately identifying causative pathogens of pneumonia, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method in a time frame of 7 days in modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis.

    Measured: 7 days

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Time to achieving definite diagnosis in intention-to-treat analysis.

    To test the robustness of mITT analysis for the primary study endpoint as compared with standard ITT analysis. (Sensitivity analysis)

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Pathogen detection rate between two groups by the 72th hour.

    Proportion of participants with accurate diagnosis for the causative pathogens of pneumonia by the 72th hour after randomization in mITT analysis.

    Measured: 72 hours

  3. Pathogen detection rate between two groups by the end of study.

    Proportion of participants with accurate diagnosis for the causative pathogens of pneumonia by the day 28 after randomization in mITT analysis.

    Measured: 28 days

  4. Impact of mNGS on appropriate antibiotic prescription.

    Proportion of participants on effective antimicrobial therapy by the 72th hour after randomization in mITT analysis.

    Measured: 72 hours

  5. 28-day mortality in mITT analysis.

    Kaplan-Meier curves of 28-day survival using mITT cohort. Log-rank tests are used to test statistical significance.

    Measured: 28 days

  6. 28-day mortality in ITT analysis (total cohort).

    Kaplan-Meier curves of 28-day survival using total cohort. Log-rank tests are used to test statistical significance.

    Measured: 28 days

  7. Impact of mNGS on respiratory and mortality outcome.

    Ventilator-free days in 28 days using the mITT cohort. Wilcoxon rank-sum test is used to test statistical significance.

    Measured: 28 days

  8. Impact of mNGS on the length of ICU stay

    Curves of alive ICU discharge in 28 days after randomization using the Fine-Gray model. Death will treated as a competing risk.

    Measured: ICU discharge or 28 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2023
  2. Study start7 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion20 May 2025
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Paralleled 1:1 randomized trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05979350
Sponsor's protocol ID
202305104RINB
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
30 Jul 2023
Last updated
19 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Metagenomic next-generation sequencing and Standard work-up for pneumonia in people with Pneumonia and Diagnosis, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to achieving definite diagnosis in modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in