Iron DeficiencyPhase 2NCT05990166
Assessing the Effect of a Mineral-enriched Powder on Iron Deficiency in Women of Reproductive Age
A Phase 2 study testing Mineral-enriched powder in people with Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anaemia, run by Carleton University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if taking a mineral-enriched powder can raise blood iron levels compared to a placebo powder in reproductive-aged women with iron deficiency. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Iron Deficiency, Iron Deficiency Anaemia
- What is being tested?
- Mineral-enriched powder
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 27 Apr 2023to 25 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-pregnant and non-lactating
- English speaking with the ability to give informed consent
- 18-35 years of age (inclusive)
- Women who are biologically female
- Iron deficient (SF >/=12μg/L and </=30 μg/L). Note: there is currently poor consensus on diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency based on SF concentrations. Current recommendations range from 15 μg/L to 100 μg/L.
- Hb >/=110 g/L
Show all 9Show fewer
- Willing and able to agree to the requirements and lifestyle restrictions of this study
- Able to understand and read the questionnaires in English and carry out all study-related procedures
- Located in the greater Ottawa area and a resident of Ontario
Who cannot join
- Individuals who are lactating, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study
- Individuals who are not maintaining adequate birth control measures
- Adequate birth control measures include any option that will adequately prevent pregnancy including: contraceptives, lifestyle choices, complete abstinence, or as a result of other medical methods, procedures, or conditions
- Have a known sensitivity, intolerability, or allergy to any of the study products or their excipients
- Are using vitamin and mineral supplements containing iron and/or zinc
- SF concentrations <12 μg/L or >30 μg/L
Show all 39Show fewer
- Having moderate or severe anaemia (Hb <109 g/L)
- Expecting to change diet and exercise regimen in the next 6 months
- Are frequent blood donors
- Have donated blood in the last four months
- Donate blood more than two to three times per year
- Had major surgery in the past three months
- Have planned surgery during the course of the study
- History of problematic alcohol or substance use in the 12 months prior to screening (including having been hospitalized for such in an in-patient or out-patient intervention program)
- Use of investigational product(s) in another research study within 30 days prior to the baseline visit or during the study duration
- Using any of the following drugs:
- Antacids or proton pump inhibitors, H2 blockers
- Salicylates, aspirin, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- Anticoagulants, antiplatelet compounds
- Drugs with known contraindication with iron supplementation or fortification
- Antiviral medications
- Levothyroxine (Synthroid)
- Known medical history of specific conditions including:
- Gastrointestinal disorders: celiac disease, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease
- Gastric cancer and gastric polyps
- Colon cancer
- Diverticular bleeding
- Inflammatory bowel diseases
- Angiodysplasia
- Helicobacter pylori infection
- Hookworm (Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus)
- Defects of hemostasis (hereditary hemorrhagic telangectasia, von Willebrand disease)
- Gastrectomy, duodenal bypass, bariatric surgery
- Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy
- Chronic kidney disease
- Hemochromatosis
- Hemoglobinopathies
- Blood clotting disorder
- Have any other active or unstable medical conditions or use of medications/supplements/ therapies that according to the scientific literature, may adversely affect the participant's ability to complete the study or its measures or pose a significant risk to the participant or the quality of the study data.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Effect of a Mineral-enriched Powder on Iron Deficiency in Women of Reproductive Age
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if taking a mineral-enriched powder can raise blood iron levels compared to a placebo powder in reproductive-aged women with iron deficiency. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the mineral-enriched powder raise blood iron levels compared to a placebo powder in women when it is taken every day for six months?
- How many participants still have iron deficiency after six months of taking the mineral-enriched powder compared to a placebo powder?
Read more
Participants in this clinical trial will drink the mineral-enriched powder containing ferrous iron and zinc sulphate monohydrate or a placebo powder mixed with 1 litre of water daily for six months. The placebo is a look-alike substance that does not contain active ingredients (iron and zinc). Participants will also have to:
- Complete an online "study diary" every two weeks for six months
- Provide a blood sample once a month for six months
- Attend three in-person visits with a researcher, at enrolment (baseline), midline (three months), and endline (six months)
- Complete three sets of online questionnaires (following each in-person visit)
- Complete three sets of dietary assessments (following each in-person visit)
- Provide three stool samples (following each in-person visit)
- Conditions
- Iron Deficiency, Iron Deficiency Anaemia
- Being tested
- Mineral-enriched powder, Placebo powder
- Keywords
- Iron deficiency, Iron deficiency anaemia, Iron fortification, Reproductive-aged women
- Medical subject headings
- Iron Deficiencies, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mineral-enriched powderOther
Mineral-enriched powder Mineral-enriched powder to allow for at-home fortification of beverages with 5 mg of ferrous iron and 10 mg of zinc sulfate monohydrate
Placebo powderOther
Placebo powder which is identical to the mineral- enriched powder, but does not contain the active ingredients (ferrous iron and zinc sulfate monohydrate)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active intervention | Experimental | Mineral-enriched powder Receives: Other: Mineral-enriched powder |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo powder Receives: Other: Placebo powder |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Serum ferritin (SF) concentrations between active intervention and placebo groups at endline (six months). Proportion of participants remaining iron deficient between active intervention and placebo groups at six months.
SF concentrations will be measured using standard clinical lab assay.
Measured: Six months
Secondary outcomes (17)
Change in SF concentrations from enrolment (baseline), to midline (three months), and endline (six months).
SF concentrations will be measured using standard clinical lab assay.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Change in haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations from enrolment (baseline), to midline (three months), and endline (six months).
Hb concentrations will be measured using standard clinical lab assay.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Levels of metabolites (circulating metabolome) at baseline, three months, and six months.
Functional metabolites in plasma will be measured by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS).
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Concentrations of key circulating pro-inflammatory biomarkers at baseline, three months, and six months.
Plasma pro-inflammatory biomarkers will be measured using standard protocols via multi-plex assay (Human Cytokine 27-plex Assay, BioRad) which includes biomarkers such as TNF-alpha, IL-6, MCP-1. The assay will be conducted, and biomarkers measured according to manufacturer's guidelines.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Dietary recall: proportion of participants meeting dietary reference intakes at baseline, three months, and six months.
Mean food and nutrient intakes will be used to determine proportion of participants meeting dietary reference intakes. Dietary recalls will be conducted using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) Canada 2018. This tool measures all food and beverages consumed over a 24-hour period. Dietary recalls will be considered complete if participants provide a minimum of two days of 24-hour recall.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Dietary recall: dietary patterns at baseline, three months, and six months.
Mean food and nutrient intakes will be used to determine dietary patterns of foods known to alter iron absorption.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Dietary recall: Healthy Eating Index (HEI) at baseline, three months, and six months.
Mean food and nutrient intakes will be used to determine HEI scores.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Dietary recall: Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) at baseline, three months, and six months.
Mean food and nutrient intakes will be used to determine DII scores.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Self-reported perceptions of health at baseline and six months.
Proportion of participants reporting overall good health status will be measured at baseline and at six months. A descriptive health profile will be generated based on health dimensions in both the active intervention and placebo groups. Number of patients, proportions of categorical responses for each health dimensions, including the severity of the health concern will be derived. The investigators will explore significance of change in health profile within each group and significance of the difference between the active intervention and placebo groups at six months. The investigators will assess associations of health profile with adherence to study regimen.
Measured: Baseline, six months
Feasibility: Adherence to the consumption regimen for the regular use of the powder.
Proportion of participants with >80% adherence (defined as preparation and consumption of the powder on at least 4 days per week or a minimum of every second day for the duration of the trial) will be measured bi-weekly for the duration of the trial. Adherence will be determined using the study diary, in which participants will report which days they consumed the study product and which days they did not. Adherence will be reported by participants bi-weekly for the duration of the study.
Measured: Bi-weekly through study completion, approximately 7 months
Feasibility: Adherence to the consumption regimen for the regular use of the powder at three months and six months.
Proportion of unused powder sachets will be measured at three and six months. Participants will be asked to return all used (opened) and unused (unopened) powder sachets at three months and six months. Proportion of unused sachets will be calculated.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months
Feasibility: Self-reported barriers to use of the powder.
Proportion of participants reporting perceived barriers to use of the study product at six months. Qualitative summary of types of perceived barriers at six months.
Measured: Six months
Palatability.
Palatability (i.e. odour, colour, and taste assessments) collected at six months. Palatability assessments of the study product will be conducted at six months using a 9-point hedonic scale to generate palatability scores (where >/=5 indicates that the solution was liked). Differences in participant palatability scores (for colour, odour, sweet, sour, bitter, salty, umami and overall liking) and proportion of participants willing to drink the sample daily will be used to assess the palatability of the powder, show whether the powder is accepted by consumers, and document relationships between palatability and adherence.
Measured: Six months
Economic: Overall health status.
Overall health status will be measured by the EuroQol-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS) at six months. The EQ-5D VAS provides a score of 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health status and 100 represents the best imaginable health status.
Measured: Six months
Economic: Health state/health state index.
Health state values will be measure by EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) at six months. Health state values will be used to generate health state index score using Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states.
Measured: Six months
Economic: Quality adjusted life years (QALYs).
Health state index scores derived from the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) at six months will be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which will be used to perform cost effectiveness analysis.
Measured: Six months
Safety (adverse events/harms).
Proportion of adverse events (AEs) and proportion of withdrawals from the study due to harms will be measured at baseline, three months, six months, and approximately seven months (four weeks post study end). AE/harms monitoring will occur bi-weekly for the duration of the study and up to four weeks after last study visit for unresolved AEs.
Measured: Baseline, three months, six months, and seven months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2023
- Study start27 Apr 2023
- Primary completion12 Mar 2026
- Study completion25 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Iron DeficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carleton University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Ottawa, Hopital Montfort, Lucky Iron Fish Enterprise
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kristin Connor, PhD, Carleton University
- Investigators
- Kristin Connor, PhD, Principal investigator, Carleton UniversityBénédicte Fontaine-Bisson, RD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Ottawa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05990166
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LIFE2022RCT2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 26 May 2023
- Last updated
- 27 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Mittl B, Zimmerman TP, Thompson FE, Bingley C, Willis G, Islam NG, Baranowski T, McNutt S, Potischman N. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Aug;112(8):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.04.016. Epub 2012 Jun 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 22704899Bansback N, Tsuchiya A, Brazier J, Anis A. Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031115. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
PubMed 22328929Devlin N, Parkin D, Janssen B. Methods for Analysing and Reporting EQ-5D Data [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2020. No abstract available. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565678/
PubMed 33347096Gloor GB, Hummelen R, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Fernandes AD, MacPhee R, Reid G. Microbiome profiling by illumina sequencing of combinatorial sequence-tagged PCR products. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 26;5(10):e15406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015406.
PubMed 21048977Gloor GB, Wu JR, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ. It's all relative: analyzing microbiome data as compositions. Ann Epidemiol. 2016 May;26(5):322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
PubMed 27143475Fernandes AD, Reid JN, Macklaim JM, McMurrough TA, Edgell DR, Gloor GB. Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome. 2014 May 5;2:15. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-15. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24910773Zierer J, Jackson MA, Kastenmuller G, Mangino M, Long T, Telenti A, Mohney RP, Small KS, Bell JT, Steves CJ, Valdes AM, Spector TD, Menni C. The fecal metabolome as a functional readout of the gut microbiome. Nat Genet. 2018 Jun;50(6):790-795. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0135-7. Epub 2018 May 28.
PubMed 29808030Abdel Rahman AM, Pawling J, Ryczko M, Caudy AA, Dennis JW. Targeted metabolomics in cultured cells and tissues by mass spectrometry: method development and validation. Anal Chim Acta. 2014 Oct 3;845:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.06.012. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
PubMed 25201272
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Effect of a Mineral-enriched Powder on Iron Deficiency in Women of Reproductive Age
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05990166
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LIFE2022RCT2
- Conditions
- Iron Deficiency, Iron Deficiency Anaemia
- Keywords
- Iron deficiency, Iron deficiency anaemia, Iron fortification, Reproductive-aged women
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Carleton UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Ottawa, Hopital Montfort, Lucky Iron Fish Enterprise
- Study start
- 27 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if taking a mineral-enriched powder can raise blood iron levels compared to a placebo powder in reproductive-aged women with iron deficiency. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the mineral-enriched powder raise blood iron levels compared to a placebo powder in women when it is taken every day for six months?
- How many participants still have iron deficiency after six months of taking the mineral-enriched powder compared to a placebo powder?
Participants in this clinical trial will drink the mineral-enriched powder containing ferrous iron and zinc sulphate monohydrate or a placebo powder mixed with 1 litre of water daily for six months. The placebo is a look-alike substance that does not contain active ingredients (iron and zinc). Participants will also have to:
- Complete an online "study diary" every two weeks for six months
- Provide a blood sample once a month for six months
- Attend three in-person visits with a researcher, at enrolment (baseline), midline (three months), and endline (six months)
- Complete three sets of online questionnaires (following each in-person visit)
- Complete three sets of dietary assessments (following each in-person visit)
- Provide three stool samples (following each in-person visit)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active intervention | Experimental | Other: Mineral-enriched powderMineral-enriched powder |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo powderPlacebo powder |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Non-pregnant and non-lactating
- English speaking with the ability to give informed consent
- 18-35 years of age (inclusive)
- Women who are biologically female
- Iron deficient (SF >/=12μg/L and </=30 μg/L). Note: there is currently poor consensus on diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency based on SF concentrations. Current recommendations range from 15 μg/L to 100 μg/L.
Key exclusion criteria (39 listed)
- Individuals who are lactating, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study
- Individuals who are not maintaining adequate birth control measures
- Have a known sensitivity, intolerability, or allergy to any of the study products or their excipients
- Are using vitamin and mineral supplements containing iron and/or zinc
- SF concentrations <12 μg/L or >30 μg/L
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral-enriched powderMineral-enriched powder Mineral-enriched powder to allow for at-home fortification of beverages with 5 mg of ferrous iron and 10 mg of zinc sulfate monohydrate | Other | Active intervention |
| Placebo powderPlacebo powder which is identical to the mineral- enriched powder, but does not contain the active ingredients (ferrous iron and zinc sulfate monohydrate) | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Serum ferritin (SF) concentrations between active intervention and placebo groups at endline (six months). Proportion of participants remaining iron deficient between active intervention and placebo groups at six months.
Time frame: Six months
SF concentrations will be measured using standard clinical lab assay.
17 secondary outcomes
Change in SF concentrations from enrolment (baseline), to midline (three months), and endline (six months).
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Change in haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations from enrolment (baseline), to midline (three months), and endline (six months).
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Levels of metabolites (circulating metabolome) at baseline, three months, and six months.
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Concentrations of key circulating pro-inflammatory biomarkers at baseline, three months, and six months.
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Dietary recall: proportion of participants meeting dietary reference intakes at baseline, three months, and six months.
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Dietary recall: dietary patterns at baseline, three months, and six months.
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Dietary recall: Healthy Eating Index (HEI) at baseline, three months, and six months.
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Dietary recall: Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) at baseline, three months, and six months.
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Self-reported perceptions of health at baseline and six months.
Time frame: Baseline, six months
Feasibility: Adherence to the consumption regimen for the regular use of the powder.
Time frame: Bi-weekly through study completion, approximately 7 months
Feasibility: Adherence to the consumption regimen for the regular use of the powder at three months and six months.
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months
Feasibility: Self-reported barriers to use of the powder.
Time frame: Six months
Palatability.
Time frame: Six months
Economic: Overall health status.
Time frame: Six months
Economic: Health state/health state index.
Time frame: Six months
Economic: Quality adjusted life years (QALYs).
Time frame: Six months
Safety (adverse events/harms).
Time frame: Baseline, three months, six months, and seven months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 22704899Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Mittl B, Zimmerman TP, Thompson FE, Bingley C, Willis G, Islam NG, Baranowski T, McNutt S, Potischman N. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Aug;112(8):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.04.016. Epub 2012 Jun 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22328929Bansback N, Tsuchiya A, Brazier J, Anis A. Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031115. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
- Background: PubMed 33347096Devlin N, Parkin D, Janssen B. Methods for Analysing and Reporting EQ-5D Data [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2020. No abstract available. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565678/
- Background: PubMed 21048977Gloor GB, Hummelen R, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Fernandes AD, MacPhee R, Reid G. Microbiome profiling by illumina sequencing of combinatorial sequence-tagged PCR products. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 26;5(10):e15406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015406.
- Background: PubMed 27143475Gloor GB, Wu JR, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ. It's all relative: analyzing microbiome data as compositions. Ann Epidemiol. 2016 May;26(5):322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
- Background: PubMed 24910773Fernandes AD, Reid JN, Macklaim JM, McMurrough TA, Edgell DR, Gloor GB. Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome. 2014 May 5;2:15. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-15. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 29808030Zierer J, Jackson MA, Kastenmuller G, Mangino M, Long T, Telenti A, Mohney RP, Small KS, Bell JT, Steves CJ, Valdes AM, Spector TD, Menni C. The fecal metabolome as a functional readout of the gut microbiome. Nat Genet. 2018 Jun;50(6):790-795. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0135-7. Epub 2018 May 28.
- Background: PubMed 25201272Abdel Rahman AM, Pawling J, Ryczko M, Caudy AA, Dennis JW. Targeted metabolomics in cultured cells and tissues by mass spectrometry: method development and validation. Anal Chim Acta. 2014 Oct 3;845:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.06.012. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Iron Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiencies
Recruiting
Iron Absorption From a Nutritional Iron Supplement
Iron Absorption, Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Intravenous IRON Therapy With Ferric DerisomaltOSE in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency
Heart Failure, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kristin Connor, PhD principal investigator
Carleton University
Bénédicte Fontaine-Bisson, RD, PhD principal investigator
University of Ottawa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Mineral-enriched powder in people with Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anaemia, run by Carleton University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 39 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Serum ferritin (SF) concentrations between active intervention and placebo groups at endline (six months). Proportion of participants remaining iron deficient between active intervention and placebo groups at six months. (time frame: Six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05990166, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.