AzTrials
AzTrials

Labor AnalgesiaDPENCT05990504

The Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Block Technique on the Effectiveness and Safety of Labor Analgesia

A study testing ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Dural Puncture Epidural Labor Anagesia and ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Epidural Labor Anagesia in people with Labor Analgesia, run by Zongxun Lin at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dural Puncture Epidural is a clinical improvement of Combined Spinal-Epidural and is widely used in Maternal.Dural Puncture Epidural Technique improves Labor Analgesia Quality And Safety By Increasing Drug Permeation.This study combines ultrasound real-time guidance technology. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Labor Analgesia
What is being tested?
ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Dural Puncture Epidural Labor Anagesia and ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Epidural Labor Anagesia
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Sep 2023to 31 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I or II;
  • Single healthy pregnancy;
  • Head showing first;
  • 37 to 41 weeks;
  • The labor process is active, and the cervix dilates<5cm;
  • Require epidural labor analgesia;
  • Volunteer to participate in this study and sign an informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of pregnancy diseases, such as pregnancy hypertension, pre eclampsia, pregnancy diabetes;
  • Contraindications to intraspinal analgesia: 1) Central nervous system diseases. 2) Infection or septicemia at the puncture site. 3) Coagulation dysfunction;
  • Known cases of fetal malformation or increased risk of cesarean section, such as a history of uterine rupture;
  • Persons with a history of mental illness, hysteria, epilepsy, etc. who cannot cooperate.
  • Patients with long-term use of opioids, steroids, and chronic pain.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Fujian Provincial Hospital

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001

Other trials in China

About this study

Dural Puncture Epidural is a clinical improvement of Combined Spinal-Epidural and is widely used in Maternal.Dural Puncture Epidural Technique improves Labor Analgesia Quality And Safety By Increasing Drug Permeation.This study combines ultrasound real-time guidance technology. This technology ensures the accuracy of intervertebral space positioning and puncture success rate through operational visualization, and reduces the impact of operator proficiency on research results.

Read the detailed description

Dural Puncture Epidural is a clinical improvement of Combined Spinal-Epidural and is widely used in Maternal. The implementation step is to complete the epidural puncture, temporarily do not place a tube, puncture the dura mater with a subarachnoid anesthesia needle, but do not directly inject drugs into the subarachnoid space, and then leave an epidural catheter for administration according to epidural block. The theoretical basis is that anesthetic drugs can originally penetrate into the subarachnoid space from the epidural space through a complete spinal dura, and the puncture hole formed by spinal dura puncture facilitates this process.After injecting high volume anesthetic drugs into the epidural space, the pressure increases, and the drug penetrates from the epidural space through the puncture hole along a pressure gradient to the subarachnoid space, thereby enhancing the effect of labor analgesia.Dural Puncture Epidural also has the advantage of verifying that the epidural needle is in the middle of the epidural space again, thereby reducing the incidence of epidural catheter insertion failure or deviation to one side.This study combines ultrasound real-time guidance technology. This technology ensures the accuracy of intervertebral space positioning and puncture success rate through operational visualization, and reduces the impact of operator proficiency on research results.

Conditions
Labor Analgesia
Being tested
ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Dural Puncture Epidural Labor Anagesia, ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Epidural Labor Anagesia
Keywords
labor analgesia, delivery woman, neonate, Effectiveness, Safety

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Dural Puncture Epidural Labor AnagesiaDevice

    Dural Puncture Epidural is a clinical improvement of Combined Spinal-Epidural and is widely used in Maternal. The implementation step is to complete the epidural puncture, temporarily do not place a tube, puncture the dura mater with a subarachnoid anesthesia needle, but do not directly inject drugs into the subarachnoid space, and then leave an epidural catheter for administration according to epidural block.

  • ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Epidural Labor AnagesiaDevice

    Epidural is a traditional labor analgesia technique.

Study groups in NCT05990504
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dural Puncture Epidural GroupExperimentalDural Puncture Epidural is a new type of labor analgesia technology.
Receives: Device: ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Dural Puncture Epidural Labor Anagesia
Epidural GroupActive comparatorEpidural is a traditional labor analgesia technique.
Receives: Device: ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Epidural Labor Anagesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The incidence of NICHD category elevation from baseline

    NICHD (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) Fetal Heart Tracing Classification: Category I (normal), Category II (indeterminate), Category III (abnormal). A higher category (e.g., III vs. I) indicates a less reassuring fetal status.

    Measured: From the baseline assessment (pre-analgesia) through delivery(assessed up to 24 hours).

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Distribution of NICHD categories (I, II, III)

    NICHD (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) Fetal Heart Tracing Classification: Category I (normal), Category II (indeterminate), Category III (abnormal). A higher category (e.g., III vs. I) indicates a less reassuring fetal status.

    Measured: From the baseline assessment (pre-analgesia) through delivery(assessed up to 24 hours).

  2. Fetal heart rate

    Assess fetal heart rate(time-weighted mean derived from area under the curve calculation).

    Measured: From the baseline assessment (pre-analgesia) through delivery(assessed up to 24 hours).

  3. Duration of individual uterine contractions

    Time-weighted mean duration of individual uterine contractions, derived from area under the curve (AUC) calculation

    Measured: From the baseline assessment (pre-analgesia) through delivery(assessed up to 24 hours).

  4. Incidence of hypertonus

    defined as a single contraction lasting >2 minutes

    Measured: From the baseline assessment (pre-analgesia) through delivery(assessed up to 24 hours).

  5. Incidence of tachysystole

    defined as >5 contractions per 10 minutes

    Measured: From the baseline assessment (pre-analgesia) through delivery(assessed up to 24 hours).

  6. Uterine contraction frequency

    Time-weighted mean uterine contraction frequency, derived from area under the curve (AUC) calculation

    Measured: From the baseline assessment (pre-analgesia) through delivery(assessed up to 24 hours).

  7. Incidence of asymmetric block

    defined as a ≥2-dermatome difference between left and right sides

    Measured: During the labor analgesia period (assessed up to 24 hours)

  8. Sensory blockade level

    Sensory blockade level was assessed by loss of cold sensation using an alcohol swab. The sensory level was determined and recorded in accordance with anatomical landmarks: pubic symphysis (T12), umbilical region (T10), hypochondrium (T8), xiphoid process (T6), nipple line (T4), and subclavian region (T2).

    Measured: During the labor analgesia period (assessed up to 24 hours)

  9. Time to analgesia onset

    The time from initial drug administration to the first documented pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score ≤ 30 mm. Visual Analogue Scale(scale title=Visual Analogue Scale,Total score=0-10,0=no pain,10=worst possible pain)

    Measured: Within 30 minutes after initial drug administration

  10. Number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demands

    Number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demands(Press the PCA button when the patient feels pain)

    Measured: Through the completion of labor analgesia (assessed from initiation to delivery, up to 24 hours).

  11. Motor blockade assessed by the Modified Bromage Score

    Modified Bromage Score: 0 = full flexion of knees and ankles, 1 = partial flexion of knees, full flexion of ankles, 2 = inability to flex knees and partial flexion of ankles, and 3 = inability to flex knees and ankles.

    Measured: During the labor analgesia period (assessed up to 24 hours)

  12. Sensory blockade at the second sacral dermatome (S2)

    Sensory blockade at the second sacral dermatome (S2) (bilateral, unilateral, none)

    Measured: During the labor analgesia period (assessed up to 24 hours)

  13. Visual Analogue Scale

    Time-weighted mean pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, derived from area under the curve (AUC) calculation; Visual Analogue Scale(scale title=Visual Analogue Scale,Total score=0-10,0=no pain,10=worst possible pain)

    Measured: Through the completion of labor analgesia (assessed from initiation to delivery, up to 24 hours).

  14. Procedure-related complications of labor analgesia

    Accidental dural puncture with an epidural needle

    Measured: From the time of the analgesia procedure until the completion of the study-specific follow-up period(assessed up to 1 week)

  15. Cesarean delivery rate

    Cesarean delivery rate among parturients receiving labor analgesia

    Measured: At delivery

  16. Neonatal Apgar scores

    The Apgar score is a standardized assessment of newborn viability, ranging from 0 to 10. Scores are typically interpreted as: 0-3 indicating a need for urgent resuscitation, 4-6 indicating a need for some resuscitative measures, and 7-10 generally considered reassuring. In this study, Apgar scores are assessed at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after birth.

    Measured: At 1, 5, and 10 minutes after birth

  17. Fetal heart rate variability

    Assess fetal heart: Fetal heart rate variability (absent, minimal, moderate, marked)

    Measured: Baseline period (prior to analgesia initiation) and the analgesia period (from initiation to fetal delivery)(assessed up to 24 hours).

  18. Fetal Heart Rate decelerations

    Assess fetal heart: Fetal heart rate decelerations (early, late, variable)

    Measured: Baseline period (prior to analgesia initiation) and the analgesia period (from initiation to fetal delivery)(assessed up to 24 hours).

  19. Clinician interventions

    Clinician interventions (Analgesic Regimen Adjustments, Epidural Catheter Manipulations, Re-puncture)

    Measured: The analgesia period (from initiation to fetal delivery)(assessed up to 24 hours).

  20. Local anesthetic consumption

    Per-minute local anesthetic consumption and Total local anesthetic consumption

    Measured: The analgesia period (from initiation to fetal delivery)(assessed up to 24 hours).

  21. The duration of each stage of labor

    The duration of the first, second, third, and total stages of labor

    Measured: From labor onset to delivery of placenta(assessed up to 24 hours).

  22. Maternal body temperature

    Maternal body temperature (pre-analgesia and at delivery)

    Measured: Pre-analgesia and at delivery

  23. Side effects and complications of labor analgesia

    Incidence of lower limb numbness, Incidence of urinary retention, Incidence of nausea and vomiting, Incidence of postpartum headache

    Measured: From analgesia initiation until 72 hours after delivery (assessed up to 72 hours)

  24. Indications for cesarean delivery

    Indications for cesarean delivery (non-reassuring fetal heart rate, arrest of descent, maternal indications, other)

    Measured: At the time of cesarean delivery

  25. Anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery

    Anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery (epidural top-up, re-puncture combined spinal-epidural, general anesthesia)(Exploratory analysis added post-hoc based on reviewer feedback during the peer-review process for manuscript [Anesthesiology Research and Practice, Manuscript ID: 1197441])

    Measured: At the time of cesarean delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05990504
Sponsor's protocol ID
Dural Puncture Epidural
Acronym
DPE
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
21 Apr 2023
Last updated
17 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Dural Puncture Epidural Labor Anagesia and ultrasound real-time guidance combined with Epidural Labor Anagesia in people with Labor Analgesia, run by Zongxun Lin at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The incidence of NICHD category elevation from baseline (time frame: From the baseline assessment (pre-analgesia) through delivery(assessed up to 24 hours).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in