PreventionCECC-OMSNCT05992792
Evaluation of the International Diffusion of the European Code Against Cancer Through Mobile Telephony
A study testing App message, SMS message and Internet in people with Prevention and Health Behavior, run by Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
We conducted an implementation research pilot study to assess the adoption, fidelity, appropriateness and acceptability on an intervention to effectively disseminate cancer prevention messages to the public throught a mHealth implementation strategy Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Prevention, Health Behavior
- What is being tested?
- App message, SMS message and Internet
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,990 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2018to 10 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- -18 years or over, being entitled to health care benefits in Public Andaluz Sanitary System (SSPA in Spanish), user from the User Database (BDU in Spanish) having a mobile phone, and being able to read messages on them.
Who cannot join
- -Failing to give informed consent to participate in the trial.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the International Diffusion of the European Code Against Cancer (ECAC) Through Mobile Telephony. CECC-WHO Study
We conducted an implementation research pilot study to assess the adoption, fidelity, appropriateness and acceptability on an intervention to effectively disseminate cancer prevention messages to the public throught a mHealth implementation strategy
Read the detailed description
A type-2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study was designed to primarily test the impact of a mHealth implementation strategy on implementation outcomes (e.g., adoption, fidelity of intervention delivery) while simultaneously gathering information on the effectiveness of the intervention. The feasibility single-blind randomised controlled trial has been carried out on a sample of the general population in the Autonomous Community of Andalusia, the most populated region of Spain, with more than 8.5 million residents (17.9%). The Andalusian Health Service (SAS, acronym in Spanish) is the main healthcare provider of the Andalusian Public Health System (SSPA, acronym in Spanish), part of the decentralised Spanish National Health System, which provides free universal health insurance. The SAS oversees "Salud Responde" (SR, acronym in Spanish), a multi-channel platform that provides a broad online portfolio of services to respond to health-related issues and administrative management needs of citizens and health professionals, complementing the care provided by the health care units. It allows 24 hours a day access to the services and benefits of the SSPA, from any point in Andalusia, through telephone, e-mail, short message system (SMS) and a mobile application (app) to manage appointments and reminders, and to disseminate personalized health information. The app has a high coverage with more than 5.7 million users (67% of the Andalusian's population) registered in its system in 2023; yet the SR platform maintains the information system service via SMS for specific campaigns to those users who do not have or want the app installed on their mobile phone (around 9700 registered users).
The inclusion criteria were being 18 years or over, being entitled to health care benefits in SSPA, having a mobile phone, and being able to read messages on them. A sample of 1991 users from the User Database (BDU, in Spanish) of the SSPA, that in 2019 included more than 8.5 million users (REF), was used to randomly assign subjects to the different groups. The first randomization was performed according to the recruitment procedure (users registered or not in the SR platform) and the technology used to disseminate the messages (app or SMS). Group 1 (G1), subjects registered in the SR app service platform, and Group 2 (G2) subjects registered in the SR SMS service platform, were recruited through phone call. The rest of subjects needed to reach the target sample size were recruited from those included in the BDU database through a phone call. A maximum of eight attempts were done before considering no response. To be able to calculate participation rate (positive response rate + acceptance to participate), no replacement was performed.
For those not registered in the SR platform who accepted to participate in the study, a further distribution was done based on a discriminatory question: those users with internet connection in their mobile phone both through 3G/4G and Wi-Fi were allocated in Group 3 (G3) and encouraged to download the app to receive messages, and those without internet were allocated in Group 4 (G4) to receive messages by SMS. Informed consent to participate was requested for tehe investigators and the voluntary and anonymous nature of the participation was ensured. The simple randomisation to the different study groups was performed using the EPIDAT 4.0 programme. The second randomization was performed based on the messages' delivery frequency: frequency of 2 SMS or 2 app notifications ("push") per week, or frequency of 7 SMS or 7 app notifications per week.
Intervention After the second randomisation, an intervention was conducted for 4 weeks where participants were sent app push notifications or SMS messages via the SR platform. Each push notification or SMS message included a cancer prevention recommendation from the ECAC 4th edition (in Spanish) from the following list: "Don't smoke. Do not use any type of tobacco"; "Maintain a healthy weight"; "Exercise daily. Limit time spent sitting"; "Eat lots of whole grains, legumes, fruits and vegetables"; "Limit high-calorie foods (foods rich in sugar or fat) and avoid sugary drinks"; "Avoid processed meat; limit consumption of red meat and salt-rich foods"; "Limit alcohol consumption, although it is best for cancer prevention to avoid alcoholic beverages"; and the URL link to visit the Spanish version of the ECAC's website to consult additional information, through the mobile phone or other digital device. All messages were endorsed and signed by the Head of the Andalusian Regional Ministry of Health.
Data collection was conducted for the investigators at two time points: at baseline during the recruitment call, a pre-intervention survey was performed to gather basic socio-demographic and patterns of use of new technologies (e.g., type of mobile device, internet access from phone or computer, etc.); at the end of the intervention, from one week to one month after receiving the last message, a post-intervention survey was carried out by telephone to all participants.
Variables and categorization The sample was described for the investigators according to the following socio-demographic variables of the participants: sex, age, employment status, level of education, living alone or not, and province of residence. The mHealth-related variables included were the type of mobile phone, access to the Internet through the mobile phone or other digital device, permanent access to Internet data or only through Wi-Fi, ability to browse on the Internet and from which type of device, and willingness to receive messages in the future (acceptability of a future intervention). The survey questions were structured for the investigators to estimate intervention-related variables: the adoption of the innovation (number of messages read) for the participants, the fidelity to the mHealth implementation strategy (receiving and reading the number of messages expected), the preferred frequency and time to receive messages, willingness to seek further information (number of visits to the ECAC website), and perceived utility and understandability of the messages.
Statistical analysis The sample size was calculated for the investigators considering a confidence level of 95% (5% alpha error), a precision of 5% (width of the confidence interval), an expected proportion of 50% (maximum indeterminacy) in the main variables from the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Outcomes (adoption, fidelity, appropriateness, and acceptability), and a non-response rate of 5%.
Participation rate was considered for the investigators an outcome and therefore calculated as the rate of those who accepted participate in the study among all those who responded to the recruitment call. A descriptive analysis was performed for the investigators to assess homogeneity across groups by sociodemographic data by means of relative frequencies, using Chi-square test for categorical covariates and t-tests for continuous covariates, in the univariate analysis. The sample was also described at follow-up, according to socio-demographic data and patterns of mHealth use by messaging channel. The implementation research outcomes of adoption, fidelity, appropriateness, and acceptability, and willingness to visit the ECAC's website (coded as a form of adoption) for the participants, were calculated with relative frequencies by dissemination channel and intervention group. Finally, a multivariate logistic regression was conducted to characterize the participant socio-demographic characteristics associated with having read at least one message weekly. Crude and adjusted Odds Ratios (cOR and aOR) and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Significant association was defined with p≤0.05. STATA 17.0 and SPSS V.21.0. were used in the analysis.
- Conditions
- Prevention, Health Behavior
- Being tested
- App message, SMS message, Internet, Whithout internet
- Keywords
- Cancer prevention, mHealth, European Code Against Cancer, Health Promotion
- Medical subject headings
- Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
App messageBehavioural
Participantes push App message cancer prevention from the recomendations ECAC. 2 SMS notifications (push) per week or frequency of app notifications per week.
SMS messageBehavioural
Participants push SMS message cancer prevention from the ECAC. Second randomization for received 2 notifications (push) per week or frequency of 7 SMS notifications per week.
InternetBehavioural
Also called internet connection
Internet connection in their mobile phone and WI-Fi. Participants push message cancer prevention from the recomendations ECAC. Second randomization for received 2 notifications (push) per week or frequency of 7 SMS notifications per week.
Whithout internetBehavioural
Second randomization for received 2 notifications (push) per week or frequency of 7 SMS notifications per week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| App Salud Responde | Experimental | Subjects register in the "Salud Responde" (SR) app services de platform Receives: Behavioral: App message |
| SMS Salud Responde | Experimental | Subjects register in SR SMS services platform Receives: Behavioral: SMS message |
| Internet | Experimental | Subjects users with internet in their mobile phone Receives: Behavioral: Internet |
| Whitout internet | Experimental | Subjects whitout internet to recibe message by SMS Receives: Behavioral: Whithout internet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of preventive intervention
Rate of acceptability of a future intervention through a telephone survey (ad hoc questionnaire, created by the researchers).
Measured: 3 months
Adoption of the innovation
Number of messages expected
Measured: 3 months
Fidelity to the mHealth implementation strategy
To assess this outcome measure, the participants will be asked through a telephone survey (questionnaire, created by the researchers) how many messages they have received and if they have read them
Measured: 3 months
Willingness to seek further information
Number of visits to the ECAC website
Measured: 3 months
Perceived utility of the messages
Rate of participants who consider the received messages useful and understandable. To assess this outcome measure, the participants be asked, by means of a telephone survey (questionnaire, created by the researchers), if they have found the messages they read useful and if they were well understood.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2018
- Primary completion10 Jan 2021
- Study completion10 Jul 2022
Why it stopped: The field work was extended over time, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and due to changes in the structure of the institution in charge of it.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PreventionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Controlled Clinical Trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,990 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- International Agency for Research on Cancer
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Luis A Perula, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba
- Investigators
- Carolina Espina, Principal investigator, World Health Organization
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05992792
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AP-0176-2018
- Acronym
- CECC-OMS
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Espina C, Feliu A, Gonzalez Vingut A, Liddle T, Jimenez-Garcia C, Olaya-Caro I, Perula-De-Torres LA. Population-Based Cancer Prevention Education Intervention Through mHealth: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Syst. 2024 Jan 9;48(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-02026-y.
PubMed 38194118
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the International Diffusion of the European Code Against Cancer (ECAC) Through Mobile Telephony. CECC-WHO Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05992792
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CECC-OMS / AP-0176-2018
- Conditions
- Prevention, Health Behavior
- Keywords
- Cancer prevention, mHealth, European Code Against Cancer, Health Promotion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The field work was extended over time, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and due to changes in the structure of the institution in charge of it.
- Enrolment
- 1,990 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de CordobaOther government
- Collaborators
- International Agency for Research on Cancer
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We conducted an implementation research pilot study to assess the adoption, fidelity, appropriateness and acceptability on an intervention to effectively disseminate cancer prevention messages to the public throught a mHealth implementation strategy
Detailed description
A type-2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study was designed to primarily test the impact of a mHealth implementation strategy on implementation outcomes (e.g., adoption, fidelity of intervention delivery) while simultaneously gathering information on the effectiveness of the intervention. The feasibility single-blind randomised controlled trial has been carried out on a sample of the general population in the Autonomous Community of Andalusia, the most populated region of Spain, with more than 8.5 million residents (17.9%). The Andalusian Health Service (SAS, acronym in Spanish) is the main healthcare provider of the Andalusian Public Health System (SSPA, acronym in Spanish), part of the decentralised Spanish National Health System, which provides free universal health insurance. The SAS oversees "Salud Responde" (SR, acronym in Spanish), a multi-channel platform that provides a broad online portfolio of services to respond to health-related issues and administrative management needs of citizens and health professionals, complementing the care provided by the health care units. It allows 24 hours a day access to the services and benefits of the SSPA, from any point in Andalusia, through telephone, e-mail, short message system (SMS) and a mobile application (app) to manage appointments and reminders, and to disseminate personalized health information. The app has a high coverage with more than 5.7 million users (67% of the Andalusian's population) registered in its system in 2023; yet the SR platform maintains the information system service via SMS for specific campaigns to those users who do not have or want the app installed on their mobile phone (around 9700 registered users).
The inclusion criteria were being 18 years or over, being entitled to health care benefits in SSPA, having a mobile phone, and being able to read messages on them. A sample of 1991 users from the User Database (BDU, in Spanish) of the SSPA, that in 2019 included more than 8.5 million users (REF), was used to randomly assign subjects to the different groups. The first randomization was performed according to the recruitment procedure (users registered or not in the SR platform) and the technology used to disseminate the messages (app or SMS). Group 1 (G1), subjects registered in the SR app service platform, and Group 2 (G2) subjects registered in the SR SMS service platform, were recruited through phone call. The rest of subjects needed to reach the target sample size were recruited from those included in the BDU database through a phone call. A maximum of eight attempts were done before considering no response. To be able to calculate participation rate (positive response rate + acceptance to participate), no replacement was performed.
For those not registered in the SR platform who accepted to participate in the study, a further distribution was done based on a discriminatory question: those users with internet connection in their mobile phone both through 3G/4G and Wi-Fi were allocated in Group 3 (G3) and encouraged to download the app to receive messages, and those without internet were allocated in Group 4 (G4) to receive messages by SMS. Informed consent to participate was requested for tehe investigators and the voluntary and anonymous nature of the participation was ensured. The simple randomisation to the different study groups was performed using the EPIDAT 4.0 programme. The second randomization was performed based on the messages' delivery frequency: frequency of 2 SMS or 2 app notifications ("push") per week, or frequency of 7 SMS or 7 app notifications per week.
Intervention After the second randomisation, an intervention was conducted for 4 weeks where participants were sent app push notifications or SMS messages via the SR platform. Each push notification or SMS message included a cancer prevention recommendation from the ECAC 4th edition (in Spanish) from the following list: "Don't smoke. Do not use any type of tobacco"; "Maintain a healthy weight"; "Exercise daily. Limit time spent sitting"; "Eat lots of whole grains, legumes, fruits and vegetables"; "Limit high-calorie foods (foods rich in sugar or fat) and avoid sugary drinks"; "Avoid processed meat; limit consumption of red meat and salt-rich foods"; "Limit alcohol consumption, although it is best for cancer prevention to avoid alcoholic beverages"; and the URL link to visit the Spanish version of the ECAC's website to consult additional information, through the mobile phone or other digital device. All messages were endorsed and signed by the Head of the Andalusian Regional Ministry of Health.
Data collection was conducted for the investigators at two time points: at baseline during the recruitment call, a pre-intervention survey was performed to gather basic socio-demographic and patterns of use of new technologies (e.g., type of mobile device, internet access from phone or computer, etc.); at the end of the intervention, from one week to one month after receiving the last message, a post-intervention survey was carried out by telephone to all participants.
Variables and categorization The sample was described for the investigators according to the following socio-demographic variables of the participants: sex, age, employment status, level of education, living alone or not, and province of residence. The mHealth-related variables included were the type of mobile phone, access to the Internet through the mobile phone or other digital device, permanent access to Internet data or only through Wi-Fi, ability to browse on the Internet and from which type of device, and willingness to receive messages in the future (acceptability of a future intervention). The survey questions were structured for the investigators to estimate intervention-related variables: the adoption of the innovation (number of messages read) for the participants, the fidelity to the mHealth implementation strategy (receiving and reading the number of messages expected), the preferred frequency and time to receive messages, willingness to seek further information (number of visits to the ECAC website), and perceived utility and understandability of the messages.
Statistical analysis The sample size was calculated for the investigators considering a confidence level of 95% (5% alpha error), a precision of 5% (width of the confidence interval), an expected proportion of 50% (maximum indeterminacy) in the main variables from the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Outcomes (adoption, fidelity, appropriateness, and acceptability), and a non-response rate of 5%.
Participation rate was considered for the investigators an outcome and therefore calculated as the rate of those who accepted participate in the study among all those who responded to the recruitment call. A descriptive analysis was performed for the investigators to assess homogeneity across groups by sociodemographic data by means of relative frequencies, using Chi-square test for categorical covariates and t-tests for continuous covariates, in the univariate analysis. The sample was also described at follow-up, according to socio-demographic data and patterns of mHealth use by messaging channel. The implementation research outcomes of adoption, fidelity, appropriateness, and acceptability, and willingness to visit the ECAC's website (coded as a form of adoption) for the participants, were calculated with relative frequencies by dissemination channel and intervention group. Finally, a multivariate logistic regression was conducted to characterize the participant socio-demographic characteristics associated with having read at least one message weekly. Crude and adjusted Odds Ratios (cOR and aOR) and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Significant association was defined with p≤0.05. STATA 17.0 and SPSS V.21.0. were used in the analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Controlled Clinical Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| App Salud Responde | Experimental | Behavioral: App messageSubjects register in the "Salud Responde" (SR) app services de platform |
| SMS Salud Responde | Experimental | Behavioral: SMS messageSubjects register in SR SMS services platform |
| Internet | Experimental | Behavioral: InternetSubjects users with internet in their mobile phone |
| Whitout internet | Experimental | Behavioral: Whithout internetSubjects whitout internet to recibe message by SMS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -18 years or over, being entitled to health care benefits in Public Andaluz Sanitary System (SSPA in Spanish), user from the User Database (BDU in Spanish) having a mobile phone, and being able to read messages on them.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Failing to give informed consent to participate in the trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| App messageParticipantes push App message cancer prevention from the recomendations ECAC. 2 SMS notifications (push) per week or frequency of app notifications per week. | Behavioural | App Salud Responde |
| SMS messageParticipants push SMS message cancer prevention from the ECAC. Second randomization for received 2 notifications (push) per week or frequency of 7 SMS notifications per week. | Behavioural | SMS Salud Responde |
| InternetAlso: internet connectionInternet connection in their mobile phone and WI-Fi. Participants push message cancer prevention from the recomendations ECAC. Second randomization for received 2 notifications (push) per week or frequency of 7 SMS notifications per week. | Behavioural | Internet |
| Whithout internetSecond randomization for received 2 notifications (push) per week or frequency of 7 SMS notifications per week. | Behavioural | Whitout internet |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of preventive intervention
Time frame: 3 months
Rate of acceptability of a future intervention through a telephone survey (ad hoc questionnaire, created by the researchers).
Adoption of the innovation
Time frame: 3 months
Number of messages expected
Fidelity to the mHealth implementation strategy
Time frame: 3 months
To assess this outcome measure, the participants will be asked through a telephone survey (questionnaire, created by the researchers) how many messages they have received and if they have read them
Willingness to seek further information
Time frame: 3 months
Number of visits to the ECAC website
Perceived utility of the messages
Time frame: 3 months
Rate of participants who consider the received messages useful and understandable. To assess this outcome measure, the participants be asked, by means of a telephone survey (questionnaire, created by the researchers), if they have found the messages they read useful and if they were well understood.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The field work was extended over time, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and due to changes in the structure of the institution in charge of it.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38194118Espina C, Feliu A, Gonzalez Vingut A, Liddle T, Jimenez-Garcia C, Olaya-Caro I, Perula-De-Torres LA. Population-Based Cancer Prevention Education Intervention Through mHealth: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Syst. 2024 Jan 9;48(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-02026-y.
Related trials for Prevention
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ilaprazole 10 mg in Prevention NSAIDs Associated Peptic Ulcer
Peptic Ulcer
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
De-escalated Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Ruxolitinib for Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis
Graft-versus-host Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carolina Espina principal investigator
World Health Organization
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing App message, SMS message and Internet in people with Prevention and Health Behavior, run by Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The field work was extended over time, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and due to changes in the structure of the institution in charge of it.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of preventive intervention (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05992792, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2023.