AzTrials
AzTrials

AnalgesiaNCT05995301

Comparative Study on Postoperative Analgesia With Transversus Abdominis Plane Block to Local Anesthetic Infiltration With Ropivacaine in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery

A study testing Ropivacaine in Transversus abdominis plane and Ropivacaine in Local infiltration at port site in people with Analgesia and Ropivacaine, run by National Academy of Medical Sciences, Nepal at 1 site in Nepal.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided TAP block with Local Anesthetic Infiltration of ropivacaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 70 years
What is being tested?
Ropivacaine in Transversus abdominis plane and Ropivacaine in Local infiltration at port site
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteNepal
Study dates
12 Mar 2022to 25 Feb 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients of either sex aged 25-70 years
  • ASA physical status I or II
  • Patient posted for elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery.

Who cannot join

  • Any absolute contraindications to peripheral nerve blockade
  • History of Hypersensitivity to Drugs
  • Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus, Renal Failure, Hepatic failure
  • History of neuromuscular or psychiatric disease
  • Patient receiving psychotropic drug, chronic analgesic therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient weight less than 50 kg

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Nepal1 site
  • National Academy of Medical Sciences

    Kathmandu, Bagmati, 977

Other trials in Nepal

About this study

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided TAP block with Local Anesthetic Infiltration of ropivacaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:

  • If Transversus Abdominis Plane block with Ropivacaine will produce long duration of analgesia than the Local Anesthetic Infiltration with ropivacaine after laparoscopic abdominal surgery .
Read the detailed description

Pain is a natural phenomenon. Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Pain is distressing and detrimental in post-operative patients. Management of post-operative pain has been a challenge to anesthetists. Pain treatment increase speed of recovery, minimum patient suffering, decrease length of stay, reduced hospital costs, increased patient satisfaction, increase productivity and quality of life.

Peripheral nerve blockade or field block with local anesthesia is helpful in managing postoperative pain effectively whilst avoiding complication associated with intravenous narcotics or neuraxial blockade. Regional block will help in reduction of dose and frequency of intravenous narcotics used in postoperative period, hence minimizing the side effects of narcotics.

Ultrasound guided abdominal nerve blocks are increasingly being used for anaesthesia and analgesia. The Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block that results in anesthesia of the abdominal wall. This plane represents an anatomical potential space with nerves leaving the plane to innervate the abdominal muscles and skin. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) is a novel procedure to provide postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery.

Ropivacaine has a greater degree of motor sensory differentiation. Ropivacaine has been safely used up to the dose of 200 mg (100 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine) as a field block for post operative analgesia. We are giving a larger volume of ropivacaine (20 ml on each side) expecting to cover the upper abdomen when TAP block is performed via posterior approach.

NULL HYPOTHESIS There is no difference in post operative analgesia with Transversus Abdominis Plane block and local anesthetic infiltration after laparoscopicabdominal surgery

General objective

  1. To compare the efficacy of Transversus Abdominal plane block and local anesthetic infiltration after laparoscopic abdominal surgery

Specific objective

  1. To compare the visual analog score (VAS) between two groups
  2. To compare time to first analgesic requirement between two groups.
  3. To compare the total dose of analgesia in 24 hours between the two groups
Being tested
Ropivacaine in Transversus abdominis plane, Ropivacaine in Local infiltration at port site
Keywords
Ropivacaine, TAP Block, Analgesia, Laparoscopic abdominal surgery
Medical subject headings
Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ropivacaine in Transversus abdominis planeDrug

    This group received 20ml of Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution in bilateral transversus abdominis plane at the end of surgery

  • Ropivacaine in Local infiltration at port siteDrug

    This group received local infiltration of 20ml of Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solutionat port sites at the end of surgery

Study groups in NCT05995301
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group IExperimentalTransversus Abdominis Plane block
Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine in Transversus abdominis plane
Group IIExperimentalLocal infiltration
Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine in Local infiltration at port site

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Duration of analgesia

    Visual analog scale at rest

    Measured: Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Duration of analgesia

    Visual analog scale on movement

    Measured: Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Aug 2023
  2. Study start12 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion12 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion25 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients were randomly assigned to two groups having 50patients in each, by using a computer-generated table of random numbers which was enclosed in a sealed envelope and was opened by an anesthesia assistant who was not involved in the study.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05995301
Sponsor's protocol ID
NAMS Bir Hospital
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
9 Aug 2023
Last updated
28 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ropivacaine in Transversus abdominis plane and Ropivacaine in Local infiltration at port site in people with Analgesia and Ropivacaine, run by National Academy of Medical Sciences, Nepal at 1 site in Nepal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Duration of analgesia (time frame: Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in