Major TraumaALTRNCT05996068
Arterial Line in Trauma Resuscitation
A study testing arterial line in people with Major Trauma, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Accident-related deaths is the 7th leading cause of death in Taiwan, and most of them is due to trauma from falls and traffic accident. Among trauma patients, the common cause of death is from hemorrhagic shock. Thus, real-time and accurate blood pressure monitoring is important for trauma patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Trauma
- What is being tested?
- arterial line
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13 or less
- SBP < 90 mmHg
- Respiratory rate < 10 or > 29 breaths/min
- Fall from height > 6 meters
- High-Risk Auto Crash: Partial or complete ejection, intrusion > 30 cm any site, Need for extrication for entrapped patient, Death in passenger compartment
- Rider separated from transport vehicle with significant impact
Show all 14Show fewer
- Penetrating injuries to head, neck, torso, and proximal extremities
- Skull deformity, suspected skull fracture
- Chest wall instability, deformity, or suspected flail chest
- Suspected pelvic fracture
- Suspected fracture of two or more proximal long bones
- Amputation proximal to wrist or ankle
- Active bleeding requiring a tourniquet or wound packing with continuous pressure
- Burns in conjunction with trauma
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Patient or family who are unable to obtain informed consent
- Known coagulopathy that is inappropriate for arterial line insertion
- Known peripheral arterial occlusion disease that is inappropriate for arterial line insertion
- traumatic cardiac arrest
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Enhancing Trauma Resuscitation Through Arterial Line Integration: A Before-After Study
Accident-related deaths is the 7th leading cause of death in Taiwan, and most of them is due to trauma from falls and traffic accident. Among trauma patients, the common cause of death is from hemorrhagic shock. Thus, real-time and accurate blood pressure monitoring is important for trauma patients. Incorrect blood pressure monitoring can lead to adverse events like traumatic cardiac arrest and shock and can also delay the time for intervention (fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion and operation). The current practice of blood pressure monitoring in trauma patient is by non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, which may be incorrect and not timely. Patient's body type and peripheral perfusion can both influence the result of non-invasive blood pressure monitoring.
With continuous and correct blood pressure monitoring, the resuscitation team can give adequate and timely treatment. In some trauma centers, arterial line insertion in trauma patients is a daily practice, while the evidence is inadequate and the potential benefit in unknown.
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the application of arterial line insertion in trauma patients. The study design is a prospective before-after study to exam whether arterial line insertion in trauma patients can reduce adverse event rate like hypovolemic shock and improve patient's outcomes.
- Conditions
- Major Trauma
- Being tested
- arterial line
- Keywords
- major trauma, arterial line, resuscitation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
arterial lineDevice
insert arterial line for patients who meet major trauma criteria
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| trauma patients with arterial line insertion | Active comparator | the after phase, actively recruited patients who are eligible for arterial line insertion Receives: Device: arterial line |
| trauma patients without arterial line insertion | No intervention | the before phase, retrospectively data collection from the past |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
composite primary endpoint (including any hypotension, vasopressors usage, any cardiac arrest in ER, Shock index )
including any hypotension, vasopressors usage, any cardiac arrest in ER, Shock index (HR/SBP)>1
Measured: during ER stay, up to 6 hours
Secondary outcomes (6)
prolong ICU admission
define as > 6 days of admission
Measured: up to 7 days
30 days mortality rate
mortality within 30 days of trauma event
Measured: mortality within 30 days of trauma event
volume of fluid administration
any type of fluid administration
Measured: during ER stay, up to 6 hours
Area under curve (AUC) difference under different time measuring frequency
We will use continuous blood pressure data and apply different intervals (1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes) to create a plot, then smooth it to calculate the area under the curve (AUC).
Measured: 1/3/5/10 minutes
units of red blood cell transfusion
units of red blood cell transfusion
Measured: during ER stay, up to 6 hours
arterial blood pressure trajectory
We will depict the arterial blood pressure trajectory for each patient.
Measured: during ER stay, up to 6 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Major TraumaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- We use se before-after study type and only the after phase receive intervention. Before phase will retrospectively collect data from patient without arterial line intervention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05996068
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202210095DINC
- Acronym
- ALTR
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 3 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Hadjizacharia P, Brown C, Salim A, Rhee P, Browder T, Noguchi TT, Demetriades D. Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center. J Trauma. 2007 Dec;63(6):1338-46; discussion 1346-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815078ae.
PubMed 18212658Klauber MR, Marshall LF, Luerssen TG, Frankowski R, Tabaddor K, Eisenberg HM. Determinants of head injury mortality: importance of the low risk patient. Neurosurgery. 1989 Jan;24(1):31-6. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198901000-00005.
PubMed 2927596Eisenberg HM, Gary HE Jr, Aldrich EF, Saydjari C, Turner B, Foulkes MA, Jane JA, Marmarou A, Marshall LF, Young HF. Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe head injury. A report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg. 1990 Nov;73(5):688-98. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.5.0688.
PubMed 2213158Tieu BH, Holcomb JB, Schreiber MA. Coagulopathy: its pathophysiology and treatment in the injured patient. World J Surg. 2007 May;31(5):1055-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0653-9.
PubMed 17426904Schreiber MA, Meier EN, Tisherman SA, Kerby JD, Newgard CD, Brasel K, Egan D, Witham W, Williams C, Daya M, Beeson J, McCully BH, Wheeler S, Kannas D, May S, McKnight B, Hoyt DB; ROC Investigators. A controlled resuscitation strategy is feasible and safe in hypotensive trauma patients: results of a prospective randomized pilot trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Apr;78(4):687-95; discussion 695-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000600.
PubMed 25807399Wijnberge M, van der Ster B, Vlaar APJ, Hollmann MW, Geerts BF, Veelo DP. The Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring on the Detection of Intraoperative Hypotension, a Sub-Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 14;11(14):4083. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144083.
PubMed 35887844
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Enhancing Trauma Resuscitation Through Arterial Line Integration: A Before-After Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05996068
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALTR / 202210095DINC
- Conditions
- Major Trauma
- Keywords
- major trauma, arterial line, resuscitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Accident-related deaths is the 7th leading cause of death in Taiwan, and most of them is due to trauma from falls and traffic accident. Among trauma patients, the common cause of death is from hemorrhagic shock. Thus, real-time and accurate blood pressure monitoring is important for trauma patients. Incorrect blood pressure monitoring can lead to adverse events like traumatic cardiac arrest and shock and can also delay the time for intervention (fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion and operation). The current practice of blood pressure monitoring in trauma patient is by non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, which may be incorrect and not timely. Patient's body type and peripheral perfusion can both influence the result of non-invasive blood pressure monitoring.
With continuous and correct blood pressure monitoring, the resuscitation team can give adequate and timely treatment. In some trauma centers, arterial line insertion in trauma patients is a daily practice, while the evidence is inadequate and the potential benefit in unknown.
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the application of arterial line insertion in trauma patients. The study design is a prospective before-after study to exam whether arterial line insertion in trauma patients can reduce adverse event rate like hypovolemic shock and improve patient's outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- We use se before-after study type and only the after phase receive intervention. Before phase will retrospectively collect data from patient without arterial line intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| trauma patients with arterial line insertion | Active comparator | Device: arterial linethe after phase, actively recruited patients who are eligible for arterial line insertion |
| trauma patients without arterial line insertion | No intervention | –the before phase, retrospectively data collection from the past |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13 or less
- SBP < 90 mmHg
- Respiratory rate < 10 or > 29 breaths/min
- Fall from height > 6 meters
- High-Risk Auto Crash: Partial or complete ejection, intrusion > 30 cm any site, Need for extrication for entrapped patient, Death in passenger compartment
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Patient or family who are unable to obtain informed consent
- Known coagulopathy that is inappropriate for arterial line insertion
- Known peripheral arterial occlusion disease that is inappropriate for arterial line insertion
- traumatic cardiac arrest
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| arterial lineinsert arterial line for patients who meet major trauma criteria | Device | trauma patients with arterial line insertion |
Primary outcome
composite primary endpoint (including any hypotension, vasopressors usage, any cardiac arrest in ER, Shock index )
Time frame: during ER stay, up to 6 hours
including any hypotension, vasopressors usage, any cardiac arrest in ER, Shock index (HR/SBP)>1
6 secondary outcomes
prolong ICU admission
Time frame: up to 7 days
30 days mortality rate
Time frame: mortality within 30 days of trauma event
volume of fluid administration
Time frame: during ER stay, up to 6 hours
Area under curve (AUC) difference under different time measuring frequency
Time frame: 1/3/5/10 minutes
units of red blood cell transfusion
Time frame: during ER stay, up to 6 hours
arterial blood pressure trajectory
Time frame: during ER stay, up to 6 hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2024.
- Background: PubMed 18212658Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Hadjizacharia P, Brown C, Salim A, Rhee P, Browder T, Noguchi TT, Demetriades D. Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center. J Trauma. 2007 Dec;63(6):1338-46; discussion 1346-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815078ae.
- Background: PubMed 2927596Klauber MR, Marshall LF, Luerssen TG, Frankowski R, Tabaddor K, Eisenberg HM. Determinants of head injury mortality: importance of the low risk patient. Neurosurgery. 1989 Jan;24(1):31-6. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198901000-00005.
- Background: PubMed 2213158Eisenberg HM, Gary HE Jr, Aldrich EF, Saydjari C, Turner B, Foulkes MA, Jane JA, Marmarou A, Marshall LF, Young HF. Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe head injury. A report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg. 1990 Nov;73(5):688-98. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.5.0688.
- Background: PubMed 17426904Tieu BH, Holcomb JB, Schreiber MA. Coagulopathy: its pathophysiology and treatment in the injured patient. World J Surg. 2007 May;31(5):1055-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0653-9.
- Background: PubMed 25807399Schreiber MA, Meier EN, Tisherman SA, Kerby JD, Newgard CD, Brasel K, Egan D, Witham W, Williams C, Daya M, Beeson J, McCully BH, Wheeler S, Kannas D, May S, McKnight B, Hoyt DB; ROC Investigators. A controlled resuscitation strategy is feasible and safe in hypotensive trauma patients: results of a prospective randomized pilot trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Apr;78(4):687-95; discussion 695-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000600.
- Background: PubMed 35887844Wijnberge M, van der Ster B, Vlaar APJ, Hollmann MW, Geerts BF, Veelo DP. The Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring on the Detection of Intraoperative Hypotension, a Sub-Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 14;11(14):4083. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144083.
Related trials for Major Trauma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Arterial Stiffness During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Wounds
Postoperative Abdominal Wall Wound Complications, Surgical Wound Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Assessing of Behavioral Risk and Response to Electromagnetic and Psychedelic Therapies
PTSD, PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
Open-Label Psilocybin Study in Transdiagnostic Population
Transdiagnostic, Depression - Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Cortical Spreading Depolarization After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingPhase 3
Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch Versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Open tíbia Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing arterial line in people with Major Trauma, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
composite primary endpoint (including any hypotension, vasopressors usage, any cardiac arrest in ER, Shock index ) (time frame: during ER stay, up to 6 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05996068, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2024.