Ulcerative ColitisPhase 2TURN2NCT05998213
Transfer of Feces in Ulcerative Colitis 2
A Phase 2 study testing Fecal microbiota transplant in people with Ulcerative Colitis and Ulcerative Colitis Flare, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The goal of this placebo-controlled randomised multicenter trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anaerobic prepared donor fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) compared to autologous FMT in patient with ulcerative colitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis, Ulcerative Colitis Flare, Ulcerative Colitis Acute
- What is being tested?
- Fecal microbiota transplant
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 12 Jun 2020to 18 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 and <70
- Ability to give informed consent
- Established ulcerative colitis with known involvement of the left colon according to the Lennard-Jones criteria
- Partial mayo score of ≥ 3 and calprotectin > 250
- Full Mayo score 5-9
- Endoscopic Mayo score of ≥2 in either the rectum or sigmoid upon screening sigmoidoscopy
Show all 11Show fewer
- Stable dose of thiopurines or , 5-ASA, or budesonide in preceding 8 weeks.
- Stable dose of budesonide in preceding 2 weeks.
- Prednisone use ≤15mg/day in preceding 2 weeks with a mandatory taper of 5 mg per week starting from week 4.
- Women need to use reliable contraceptives during participation in the study
- Alkaline phosphatase > 1.5 x ULN in the subgroup of PSC/UC patients.
Who cannot join
- Condition leading to profound immunosuppression
- For example: HIV, infectious diseases leading to immunosuppression, bone marrow malignancies
- Use of systemic chemotherapy
- Child-Pugh B liver cirrhosis
- Anti-TNFα treatment in preceding 2 months
- Vedolizumab treatment in preceding 2 months
Show all 31Show fewer
- Tofacitinib treatment in preceding 2 months
- Ustekinumab treatment in preceding 2 months
- Cyclosporine treatment in preceding 4 weeks
- Use of Methotrexate in preceding 2 months
- Prednisolone dose > 15 mg/day in preceding 2 weeks
- Use of topical therapy in preceding 2 weeks
- Life expectancy < 12 months
- Difficulty with swallowing
- Use of systemic antibiotics in preceding 4 weeks
- Use of probiotic treatment in preceding 4 weeks
- Positive stool cultures for common enteric pathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter, enteropathogenic e coli)
- Positive C. Difficile stool test
- Positive dual faeces test for pathogenic parasites e.g. Dientamoeba histolytica, Giardia Lamblia, Dientamoeba fragilis, Blastocystis hominis only if microscopically many or very many blastocysts are seen.
- Positive serological test for HIV
- History of surgery:
- presence of a pouch
- presence of stoma
- Known intra-abdominal fistula
- Pregnancy or women who give breastfeeding
- Vasopressive medication, icu stay
- Signs of ileus, diminished passage
- Allergy to macrogol or substituents, eg peanuts, shellfish
- Known allergy to iv gadolinium in the subgroup of patients who would be scheduled for MRI liver
- Crohn's disease
- Subject who has any conditions that in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the safety of the subject or the quality of the data and is an unsuitable candidate for the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1061BK
About this study
Official title: Transfer of Feces in Ulcerative Colitis 2; Improving Efficacy
The goal of this placebo-controlled randomised multicenter trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anaerobic prepared donor fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) compared to autologous FMT in patient with ulcerative colitis.
Participants will receive 4 treatments with frozen FMT via both upper and lower gastro-intestinal route (infusion via duodenal tube and enemas).
Donors are selected based on microbiota profile.
- Being tested
- Fecal microbiota transplant
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fecal microbiota transplantOther
Also called FMT
Frozen FMT via duodenal tube (2 times) and enemas (4 times)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Donor fecal microbiota transplant | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Fecal microbiota transplant |
| Autologous fecal microbiota transplant | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Fecal microbiota transplant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical and endoscopic remission
per adapted Mayo: stool frequency subscores (SFS) ≤ 1, rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) =0 and endoscopic subscore ≤ 1.
The adapted Mayo score has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 9. The 3 subscores (SFS, RBS, and endoscopic subscore) have a minimum of 0 and a maximum score of 3. The adapted Mayo score does not include PGA (physician global assessment), in contrary to the full Mayo score. A higher score reflects worse outcome.
Measured: week 8
Secondary outcomes (13)
Clinical response
Adapted Mayo: decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% plus a decrease in RBS ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1.
The adapted Mayo score has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 9. The 3 subscores (SFS, RBS, and endoscopic subscore) have a minimum of 0 and a maximum score of 3. The adapted Mayo score does not include PGA (physician global assessment), in contrary to the full Mayo score.
Measured: week 8
Clinical improvement
Partial adapted Mayo: a decrease from baseline ≥1 points and ≥30%, plus a decrease in RBS ≥1 or an absolute RBS ≤1.
The partial adapted Mayo score has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 6. The 2 subscores (SFS, RBS) have a minimum of 0 and a maximum score of 3. The partial adapted Mayo score does not include PGA (physician global assessment) and endoscopic subscore, in contrary to the full Mayo score.
Measured: week 8
Clinical remission
Full mayo score: a decrease from baseline of ≤2 points with no subscore >1
Measured: week 8
Complete remission
Full Mayo score: ≤2 points reduction from baseline with no subscore >1, and an rectal bleeding score and endoscopic subscore of 0
Measured: week 8
Sustained steroid-free remission
Adapted Mayo: SFS ≤1, RBS =0, endoscopic subscore ≤1, and no need for rescue therapy until week 52.
The adapted Mayo score has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 9. The 3 subscores (SFS, RBS, and endoscopic subscore) have a minimum of 0 and a maximum score of 3. The adapted Mayo score does not include PGA (physician global assessment), in contrary to the full Mayo score.
Measured: week 52
Endoscopic complete remission
Proportion of patients with Endoscopic subscore = 0
Measured: week 8
Endoscopic improvement
Proportion of patients with Endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1
Measured: week 8
Endoscopic response, evaluated by sigmoidoscopy
•Proportion of patients with ≥1 point reduction in summed endoscopic Mayo score of both the rectum and sigmoid.
Measured: week 8
Histological remission
Proportion of patients with Nancy Histological Index (NHI): NHI ≤1
Measured: week 8
SCCAI
Change in SCCAI score from baseline
Measured: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 18, 39, and 52
Partial Mayo score
Change in partial mayo score from baseline. The partial Mayo score has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 9. The 3 subscores (SFS, RBS, and PGA) have a minimum of 0 and a maximum score of 3. The partial Mayo score does not include endoscopic subscore, in contrary to the full Mayo score.
Measured: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 18, 39, and 52
IBD-Control
Change in IBD-Control score from baseline
Measured: week 2, 4, 8, 18, 39, and 52
Adverse events
Occurence of adverse events
Measured: week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2023
- Study start12 Jun 2020
- Primary completion10 Jan 2025
- Study completion18 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Medical Center Groningen, UMC Utrecht
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Cyriel Y Ponsioen, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05998213
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL65069.018.18
- Acronym
- TURN2
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Benard MV, Van Der Spek MJ, Davids M, Visser CE, Zoetendal EG, Rethans B, Zwezerijnen-Jiwa FH, Visschedijk MC, Oldenburg B, Weersma RK, Ponsioen CY. Transfer of faeces in ulcerative colitis 2: improving efficacy - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TURN2 study). BMJ Open. 2026 May 5;16(5):e107097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107097.
PubMed 42086265
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transfer of Feces in Ulcerative Colitis 2; Improving Efficacy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05998213
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TURN2 / NL65069.018.18
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Medical Center Groningen, UMC Utrecht
- Study start
- 12 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this placebo-controlled randomised multicenter trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anaerobic prepared donor fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) compared to autologous FMT in patient with ulcerative colitis.
Participants will receive 4 treatments with frozen FMT via both upper and lower gastro-intestinal route (infusion via duodenal tube and enemas).
Donors are selected based on microbiota profile.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Donor fecal microbiota transplant | Experimental | Other: Fecal microbiota transplant |
| Autologous fecal microbiota transplant | Placebo comparator | Other: Fecal microbiota transplant |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age ≥18 and <70
- Ability to give informed consent
- Established ulcerative colitis with known involvement of the left colon according to the Lennard-Jones criteria
- Partial mayo score of ≥ 3 and calprotectin > 250
- Full Mayo score 5-9
Key exclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Condition leading to profound immunosuppression
- Anti-TNFα treatment in preceding 2 months
- Vedolizumab treatment in preceding 2 months
- Tofacitinib treatment in preceding 2 months
- Ustekinumab treatment in preceding 2 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fecal microbiota transplantAlso: FMTFrozen FMT via duodenal tube (2 times) and enemas (4 times) | Other | Autologous fecal microbiota transplant, Donor fecal microbiota transplant |
Primary outcome
Clinical and endoscopic remission
Time frame: week 8
per adapted Mayo: stool frequency subscores (SFS) ≤ 1, rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) =0 and endoscopic subscore ≤ 1. The adapted Mayo score has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 9. The 3 subscores (SFS, RBS, and endoscopic subscore) have a minimum of 0 and a maximum score of 3. The adapted Mayo score does not include PGA (physician global assessment), in contrary to the full Mayo score. A higher score reflects worse outcome.
13 secondary outcomes
Clinical response
Time frame: week 8
Clinical improvement
Time frame: week 8
Clinical remission
Time frame: week 8
Complete remission
Time frame: week 8
Sustained steroid-free remission
Time frame: week 52
Endoscopic complete remission
Time frame: week 8
Endoscopic improvement
Time frame: week 8
Endoscopic response, evaluated by sigmoidoscopy
Time frame: week 8
Histological remission
Time frame: week 8
SCCAI
Time frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 18, 39, and 52
Partial Mayo score
Time frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 18, 39, and 52
IBD-Control
Time frame: week 2, 4, 8, 18, 39, and 52
Adverse events
Time frame: week 8
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42086265Benard MV, Van Der Spek MJ, Davids M, Visser CE, Zoetendal EG, Rethans B, Zwezerijnen-Jiwa FH, Visschedijk MC, Oldenburg B, Weersma RK, Ponsioen CY. Transfer of faeces in ulcerative colitis 2: improving efficacy - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TURN2 study). BMJ Open. 2026 May 5;16(5):e107097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107097.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Fecal microbiota transplant in people with Ulcerative Colitis and Ulcerative Colitis Flare, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical and endoscopic remission (time frame: week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05998213, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2026.