AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerBOOSTNCT06002269

A Home-based Lifestyle Intervention for Optimizing Surgical Outcomes Among Urinary Bladder Cancer Patients

A study testing Dietary and Exercise Intervention in people with Bladder Cancer and Cystectomy, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test a randomized, controlled diet and physical activity intervention designed to be simple and address barriers to participation in lifestyle intervention among 16 urinary bladder cancer patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer, Cystectomy, Chemotherapy
What is being tested?
Dietary and Exercise Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Jun 2024to 8 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients 18 years or older.
  • Newly diagnosed urinary bladder cancer patients indicated for cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant therapy; Treated with surgery at the Huntsman Cancer Institute
  • Have reliable, consistence access to the internet for study procedures
  • Inclusion of Individuals across the Lifespan: The proposed trial will enroll 20 adults who have been diagnosed with bladder cancer. The age range of participants to be recruited is 18 years or older. Bladder cancer is generally a disease of older age and is exceedingly rare in children. According to the American Cancer Society, average age at diagnosis is 73.1 Therefore, we are unable to include children in this trial.
  • Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children: It is anticipated that 20% will be female; 80% male. Racial distribution is projected to be as follows: 97% white, 1% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander; 1% American Indian/ Alaska Native; 1% Asian; <1% Black. Approximately 96% will be Non-Hispanic.

Who cannot join

  • Special dietary requirements (i.e., allergies and intolerances, or other clinically prescribed diet).
  • Unable to provide informed consent or read, write, or fill in questionnaires in English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Home-based Lifestyle Intervention for Optimizing Surgical Outcomes Among Urinary Bladder Cancer Patients: the BOOST Study

The purpose of this study is to test a randomized, controlled diet and physical activity intervention designed to be simple and address barriers to participation in lifestyle intervention among 16 urinary bladder cancer patients.

Aim 1 is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Read more

Aim 2 is to measure the feasibility of collecting data on the intervention effects on complication rate, nutritional status, weight loss, and quality of life post-surgery among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy ± neoadjuvant therapy. Secondarily, we will determine the magnitude of association between study group and outcomes to inform power calculations in a future, well-powered trial.

Participants will:

  • attend two dietetic consultations at baseline and post-surgical recovery where nutritional status will be evaluated with patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA)
  • complete baseline questionnaires (TCC, FACT-BI-Cys, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin)
  • receive weekly BOOST boxes
  • complete pre-surgery weekly BOOST check ins
  • complete post-surgery weekly BOOST check ins
  • complete an ASA food recall pre and post-surgery
  • complete an exercise familiarization consult
  • record weekly resistance and aerobic exercise performed at home
  • complete a 6 month follow-up questionnaire
  • receive compensation

Researchers will compare to a Usual Care group to determine differences that could be attributed to the BOOST Box intervention.

Read the detailed description

Urinary bladder cancer is the fourth leading cancer in men in the US, leading to 18,000 deaths among men and women annually.1 The survival rate is 69% for localized disease, 36% for regional disease, and only 5% for metastatic disease.2 Bladder cancer patients often present with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and are treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy delivered locally in the bladder. Patients with muscle- invasive bladder cancer or intravesical therapy-refractory disease undergo cystectomy. Weight loss, frailty, sarcopenia, and malnutrition are commonplace among urinary bladder cancer patients, all being associated with treatment-related complications including susceptibility to infection, poor prognosis and quality of life.3 Medical nutrition therapy is indicated in this population that generally has poor diet quality4-7 to achieve or maintain a healthy body weight, preserve lean body mass, minimize nutrition-related side effects, and maximize quality of life.8-10 Yet, only a handful of dietary interventions have been conducted among urinary bladder cancer patients, and no studies of diet intervention coupled with exercise prescription, with the goal of improving treatment outcomes in this population. Pre- and postoperative nutrition support has been linked to reduced hospital length of stay,11 and lower postoperative complications like infection. Immunonutrition interventions, which comprise of supplements or food/drinks high in vitamin A, fish oil or omega-3 fatty acids, and specific amino acids like arginine, have also been shown to lower postoperative complications in cystectomy patients and other cancer populations.12-15 In patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation, immunonutrition also appears to reduce mucositis and weight loss.16 Furthermore, resistance exercise promotes maintenance or increase in muscle mass, particularly among individuals with sarcopenia.17

Little is known about the trajectory of dietary intake after bladder cancer diagnosis, and the specific nutritional needs of this population in diverse settings where health disparities exist, such as among rural or socio- economically disadvantaged patients.18 There is also a critical need to develop and test interventions that are simple, scalable, durable, and cost-effective,4, 19 and that address food insecurity.20 Given these major research gaps, we will implement a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention rooted in Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)21, 22 that uses food/ingredient, menu and recipe provision coupled with resistance exercise recommendations and tools provided in the "Boost Box", mailed to participants over 12-weeks. The intervention builds self-efficacy and behavioral capability in preparing meals to support nutrition goals and addresses social determinants of health in underserved populations by tackling food insecurity.23 Community partnerships will build the foundation for scaling up lifestyle intervention for cancer patients in Utah. Expanding the availability of evidence-based options for nutrition and physical activity counseling for cancer patients and survivors has been identified as a major need.24 Our proposed study is multidisciplinary and community-focused by partnering with the University of Utah Center for Community Nutrition and their established partners (e.g., Waste Less Solutions, Wasatch Community Gardens, Food Recovery Network, Utah Food Bank, Dairy West, and commercial grocers like Smiths and Harmons) to roll out the intervention in the community. Indeed, community and home-based lifestyle interventions improve physical functioning and clinical outcomes among cancer survivors and are cost-effective.25, 26 Delivering diet and physical activity education using a home-based 'Blue Apron' type approach in partnership with the community is highly novel.

Urinary bladder cancer is the fourth leading cancer in men in the US and accounts for over 18,000 deaths among both men and women annually.1 About three quarters of bladder cancer patients present with non- muscle invasive bladder cancer and are treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy delivered locally in the bladder, or cystectomy alone in intravesical-refractory or extensive disease. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. Cisplatin- ineligible patients proceed with cystectomy and those who are too sick or frail for cystectomy receive chemotherapy followed by local radiation. Weight loss is a common occurrence post-radical cystectomy, and is associated with malnutrition3 and poor overall survival.34 Moreover, up to 70% of bladder cancer patients, particularly those with frailty, present with sarcopenia, a condition of reduced skeletal muscle mass and function that is an independent poor prognostic factor35 linked to medical complications and quality of life.36 In all, this population has a 60% complication rate by 90-days,37 from urinary tract infections to bowel obstruction.

Nutrition is a vital component of chemotherapy tolerability and preparation for and recovery after cystectomy38 to prevent or resolve nutrient deficiencies, achieve or maintain a healthy body weight, preserve lean body mass, minimize nutrition-related side effects, and maximize quality of life.4, 8-10, 39 Diet quality is generally poor among adult cancer survivors in the United States.4 Bladder cancer is especially prevalent in developed countries with Western style dietary patterns and high levels of obesity,2, 40 with significant socioeconomic and geographic disparities observed.18, 41 Indeed, rural compared with urban residence is associated with elevated cancer-specific and other cause mortality among bladder cancer survivors.41 In addition, improvement in diet quality among cancer survivors undergoing dietary intervention has been found to be smaller in rural than urban patients. Yet, despite the biologically plausible role of diet in the etiology of bladder cancer, and the potent effects of treatment on nutritional status and weight loss in this population, remarkably few studies have evaluated either pre- or post-diagnosis diet in association with outcomes after bladder cancer diagnosis, nor implemented dietary intervention among bladder cancer patients to optimize their treatment outcomes.42

We will address this immense research gap by testing a randomized, controlled diet and physical activity trial designed to address barriers to participation in lifestyle intervention among 16 urinary bladder cancer patients (50% rural; 50% no college education). Baseline and post-surgical recovery nutritional status will be evaluated with patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA).43, 44 Diet will be assessed with 3-day food record during the first 6-months post-diagnosis. In the intervention arm, patients will be mailed a "Boost Box" weekly for 6-weeks before and 6-weeks after surgery, prepared by our community partners, containing food ingredients. We will work with the University of Utah Center for Community Nutrition to mail curriculum boxes with a menu and recipes for a high protein, immunonutrition-tailored diet (i.e., arginine, vitamin A, and omega-3 rich foods/beverages), and resistance bands (Theraband) with strength training guidelines.3,

Being tested
Dietary and Exercise Intervention
Keywords
Surgery, Weight Loss, Urinary, Lifestyle, Cystectomy, Malnutrition, Chemotherapy, Diet, Exercise
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Weight Loss, Malnutrition, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dietary and Exercise InterventionCombination product

    Participants will receive food ingredients and recipes to be made and consumed for each meal, every day for a period of 3-6 weeks before surgery and 6-weeks after surgery. The menu is designed as a high protein, high calorie diet meeting targets for omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin A, and arginine (immunonutrition meal plan). In addition, participants will receive an individualized exercise prescription to be performed at home using theraband resistance bands.

Study groups in NCT06002269
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BOOST Box InterventionExperimentalBaseline: Questionnaires (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin, TCC), exercise prescription, compensation. Pre-Surgery: Dietitian consultation, at least 3-weeks and up to 6-weeks of Boost Box deliveries and check-ins (nutritional intervention), up to 6 weeks of exercise intervention and logs, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation Post-Surgery: post-surgery surveys once (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, FAACT, Godin), 6 weeks of Boost Box deliveries and check-ins (nutritional intervention), 6 weeks of exercise intervention and logs, weekly hunger check-in, ASA Food Record (x2), Dietitian consultation, compensation. Follow-up (estimated 6 months after baseline) : 6-month questionnaire, compensation. Compensation total: up to $100 via electronic gift card.
Receives: Combination Product: Dietary and Exercise Intervention
Usual CareNo interventionBaseline: Questionnaires (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin, TCC), compensation. Pre-Surgery: Dietitian consultation, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation. Post-Surgery: post-surgery surveys once (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, FAACT, Godin), Dietitian consultation, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation. Follow-up (estimated 6 months after baseline): 6-month questionnaire, compensation. Compensation total: up to $100 via electronic gift card.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of BOOST Box Intervention

    Feasibility of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

    Feasibility metrics include: % consented/referred; attrition as a function of time; % questionnaires completed; % meals prepared and consumed. Feasibility criteria: >70% patients consented and retained; completed all questionnaires; prepared/consumed Boost Box meals ≥5/7 days/week; and adhered to resistance band exercise ≥2 days/week. Fidelity criteria: 90% protocol checklist items delivered as intended.

    Measured: From enrollment to the 6-month follow-up survey

  2. Acceptability of BOOST Box Intervention

    Acceptability of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

    Acceptability of the intervention delivery and menus/recipes will be evaluated by administering an anonymous questionnaire incorporating both Likert scale questions and space for open-ended responses.

    Measured: From enrollment to the 6-month follow-up survey

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Malnutrition assessment

    Surveys and Questionnaires used will be the Modified Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (mPG-SGA), Functional Assessment of Anorexia and Cachexia Therapy (FAACT), U.S.Household Food Security Survey Module: Six Item Short Form (Short 2012), and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) food consumption log to calculate a Healthy Eating Index (HEI) which will define diet quality (a higher score indicates a healthier diet).

    Measured: mPG-SGA, FAACT, and Short 2012 at baseline and then mPG-SGA and FAACT again six weeks post-surgery. ASA24 during six weeks pre and post-surgery

  2. Surgical complication rate

    The following information is to be abstracted from medical charts: 30- and 90-day post-surgery complication rates including wound infections; Urinary Tract Infection (UTI); infectious complications; blood clots; readmissions; failure to thrive; dehydration; re-operations.

    Measured: 30 and 60 days post-surgery

  3. Body weight

    Participant weight measurements will be collected through participant self-reporting using a digital scale provided by the study and through medical record abstraction.

    Measured: From enrollment to the 6-month follow-up survey

  4. Quality of Life (Physical, social, emotional, functional well-being, and a bladder cancer subscale)

    Questionnaire used will be the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder - Cystectomy (FACT-Bl-Cys).

    Measured: FACT-BI-Cys used from baseline to the 6-month follow-up survey

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2023
  2. Study start4 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion8 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion8 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
BOOST Box intervention compared with usual care.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Care provider
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06002269
Sponsor's protocol ID
HCI150155
Acronym
BOOST
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
15 Aug 2023
Last updated
20 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

    PubMed 31912902
  • Tobert CM, Hamilton-Reeves JM, Norian LA, Hung C, Brooks NA, Holzbeierlein JM, Downs TM, Robertson DP, Grossman R, Nepple KG. Emerging Impact of Malnutrition on Surgical Patients: Literature Review and Potential Implications for Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer. J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):511-519. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.087. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

    PubMed 28286066
  • Gregg JR, Cookson MS, Phillips S, Salem S, Chang SS, Clark PE, Davis R, Stimson CJ Jr, Aghazadeh M, Smith JA Jr, Barocas DA. Effect of preoperative nutritional deficiency on mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2011 Jan;185(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.021. Epub 2010 Nov 12.

    PubMed 21074802
  • Hansen TTD, Omland LH, von Heymann A, Johansen C, Clausen MB, Suetta C, Pappot H, Rafn BS. Development of Sarcopenia in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021 Feb;37(1):151108. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151108. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

    PubMed 33431235
  • Grimberg DC, Shah A, Molinger J, Whittle J, Gupta RT, Wischmeyer PE, McDonald SR, Inman BA. Assessments of frailty in bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2020 Sep;38(9):698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.036. Epub 2020 May 22.

    PubMed 32451229
  • Maibom SL, Joensen UN, Poulsen AM, Kehlet H, Brasso K, Roder MA. Short-term morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e043266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043266.

    PubMed 33853799
  • Jensen BT, Lauridsen SV, Jensen JB. Optimal Delivery of Follow-Up Care After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Res Rep Urol. 2020 Oct 14;12:471-486. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S270240. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 33117747
  • Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M, Byers T, Gansler T. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;62(4):243-74. doi: 10.3322/caac.21142. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

    PubMed 22539238
  • Prado CM, Purcell SA, Laviano A. Nutrition interventions to treat low muscle mass in cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Apr;11(2):366-380. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12525. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

    PubMed 31916411
  • Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Fearon K, Hutterer E, Isenring E, Kaasa S, Krznaric Z, Laird B, Larsson M, Laviano A, Muhlebach S, Muscaritoli M, Oldervoll L, Ravasco P, Solheim T, Strasser F, de van der Schueren M, Preiser JC. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;36(1):11-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Aug 6.

    PubMed 27637832
  • Keaver L, Houlihan C, O'Callaghan N, LaVertu AE, Ding X, Zhang FF. Evidence-based nutrition guidelines for cancer survivors in Europe: a call for action. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jun;76(6):819-826. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-01036-8. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

    PubMed 34716363
  • Demark-Wahnefried W, Rogers LQ, Alfano CM, Thomson CA, Courneya KS, Meyerhardt JA, Stout NL, Kvale E, Ganzer H, Ligibel JA. Practical clinical interventions for diet, physical activity, and weight control in cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):167-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21265. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

    PubMed 25683894
  • Saginala K, Barsouk A, Aluru JS, Rawla P, Padala SA, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer. Med Sci (Basel). 2020 Mar 13;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/medsci8010015.

    PubMed 32183076
  • Jochems SHJ, Van Osch FHM, Bryan RT, Wesselius A, van Schooten FJ, Cheng KK, Zeegers MP. Impact of dietary patterns and the main food groups on mortality and recurrence in cancer survivors: a systematic review of current epidemiological literature. BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 19;8(2):e014530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014530.

    PubMed 29459359
  • Lee E, Zhu J, Velazquez J, Bernardo R, Garcia J, Rovito M, Hines RB. Evaluation of Diet Quality Among American Adult Cancer Survivors: Results From 2005-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Feb;121(2):217-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.086. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

    PubMed 33158797

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dietary and Exercise Intervention in people with Bladder Cancer and Cystectomy, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of BOOST Box Intervention (time frame: From enrollment to the 6-month follow-up survey). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06002269, which also lists 42 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in