Pelvic Organ ProlapseNCT06004089
Vaginal Transluminal Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
A study testing V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy following vaginal hysterectomy, focusing on perioperative and early postoperative results. The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life is investigated using validated assessment tools. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 79 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- What is being tested?
- V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2021to 1 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 79 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who presented to the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic with complaints related to pelvic organ prolapse, had stage III or IV prolapse according to POP-Q classification, were between 45 and 79 years old, had no contraindications for pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, and were eligible to perform transvaginal NOTES were included in the study.
Who cannot join
- Patients with previous pelvic inflammatory disease, deep endometriosis, severe pelvic adhesions, and patients who are at risk of gynecological malignancy and are not suitable for transvaginal surgery were not included in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital
Istanbul, Kartal
About this study
Official title: Vaginal Transluminal Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Minimal Invasive Approach for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy following vaginal hysterectomy, focusing on perioperative and early postoperative results. The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life is investigated using validated assessment tools. Additionally, operative time, complications, pain scores were assessed.
Read the detailed description
Patients who presented to the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic with complaints related to pelvic organ prolapse, had stage III or IV prolapse according to POP-Q classification, were between 45 and 79 years old, had no contraindications for pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, and were eligible to perform transvaginal NOTES and gave written informed consent were included in the study. Demographic data, age, medical and surgical history, body mass index (BMI), operation time, preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin levels, perioperative complications and length of hospital stay were collected. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores were evaluated before and 1 month after surgery. Quality of life was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20).
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Being tested
- V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy
- Medical subject headings
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
V NOTES SacrocolpopexyProcedure or surgery
The procedure involved a single-port laparoscopic surgery through the vaginal route, aiming to restore pelvic floor function by suspending the vagina to the anterior longitudinal ligament. The surgical approach differs from conventional methods, as these procedures are conducted through abdominal or vaginal routes without the aid of laparoscopic cameras, However, in our approach, we uniquely combine the widely acknowledged gold standard sacrocolpopexy procedure using vaginal route with laparoscopic camera assistance. No experimental drugs or devices were employed; only the surgical approach was modified.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy arm | Experimental | V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy was performed who met the eligibility criteria and gave written informed consent. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores were evaluated before and 1 month after surgery. Quality of life was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Receives: Procedure: V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life regarding daily activities and emotional health
The impact of pelvic floor function on daily activities and emotional health of life was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy following vaginal hysterectomy, focusing on perioperative and early postoperative results.
Measured: 1 month
The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life regarding level of discomfort
The level of discomfort associated with symptoms was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy following vaginal hysterectomy, focusing on perioperative and early postoperative results.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2023
- Study start1 Oct 2021
- Primary completion1 Apr 2022
- Study completion1 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pelvic Organ ProlapseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elif Cansu Gundogdu, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
- Investigators
- Elif Gundogdu, M.D.Dr, Principal investigator, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06004089
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022/514/222/30
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vaginal Transluminal Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Minimal Invasive Approach for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06004089
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022/514/222/30
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy following vaginal hysterectomy, focusing on perioperative and early postoperative results. The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life is investigated using validated assessment tools. Additionally, operative time, complications, pain scores were assessed.
Detailed description
Patients who presented to the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic with complaints related to pelvic organ prolapse, had stage III or IV prolapse according to POP-Q classification, were between 45 and 79 years old, had no contraindications for pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, and were eligible to perform transvaginal NOTES and gave written informed consent were included in the study. Demographic data, age, medical and surgical history, body mass index (BMI), operation time, preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin levels, perioperative complications and length of hospital stay were collected. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores were evaluated before and 1 month after surgery. Quality of life was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy arm | Experimental | Procedure: V NOTES SacrocolpopexyV-NOTES sacrocolpopexy was performed who met the eligibility criteria and gave written informed consent. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores were evaluated before and 1 month after surgery. Quality of life was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 79 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who presented to the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic with complaints related to pelvic organ prolapse, had stage III or IV prolapse according to POP-Q classification, were between 45 and 79 years old, had no contraindications for pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, and were eligible to perform transvaginal NOTES were included in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with previous pelvic inflammatory disease, deep endometriosis, severe pelvic adhesions, and patients who are at risk of gynecological malignancy and are not suitable for transvaginal surgery were not included in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| V NOTES SacrocolpopexyThe procedure involved a single-port laparoscopic surgery through the vaginal route, aiming to restore pelvic floor function by suspending the vagina to the anterior longitudinal ligament. The surgical approach differs from conventional methods, as these procedures are conducted through abdominal or vaginal routes without the aid of laparoscopic cameras, However, in our approach, we uniquely combine the widely acknowledged gold standard sacrocolpopexy procedure using vaginal route with laparoscopic camera assistance. No experimental drugs or devices were employed; only the surgical approach was modified. | Procedure or surgery | V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy arm |
Primary outcome
The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life regarding daily activities and emotional health
Time frame: 1 month
The impact of pelvic floor function on daily activities and emotional health of life was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy following vaginal hysterectomy, focusing on perioperative and early postoperative results.
The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life regarding level of discomfort
Time frame: 1 month
The level of discomfort associated with symptoms was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy following vaginal hysterectomy, focusing on perioperative and early postoperative results.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Return to Physical Activity After Retropublic Transvaginal Sling and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Active, not recruitingObservational study
i-Stitch for Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation (SSLF)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Genital Prolapse
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of a Pelvic Floor Mesh Implant for Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy (ProGYNious)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), Synthetic Mesh
Recruiting
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training During Pregnancy
Urinary Incontinence, Anal Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
Perineal Protection Device for Reducing Perineal Trauma During Vaginal Delivery in First-time Mothers: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Perineal Laceration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elif Gundogdu, M.D.Dr principal investigator
Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life regarding daily activities and emotional health (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2023.